×
Status message
You are currently viewing our site as a
guest which gives you
limited access to view most discussions, videos and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will have access to
post topics,
communicate privately with other users,
upload videos and photos in your own photo album and access many other special features.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
One of the goals was the goal of perfecting human nature through re-education to achieve a communal state with nature, freed of government and organized religion.
While there are different Illuminati, it seems this structure was (and still is) benevolent
What a find Crackdown! What a hoot to see Adam Whyshop. He! He! He! Phonetic spell on Adam's last name, sorry, kinda not THOU due to the serendipity I feel here. It just occurs to me in my creative phonetic spell of Adam's last name. I spelled it WHY-SHOP. Like zero economic growth of Lucifarian, Fabianistic and Marxist/Mussilini motif (aka ideas coming from ANTHONY C. SUTTON no doubt altered a tad by myself). The word I use here being "motif" is a mythologist word that people like Joseph Campbell and Zechariah Sitchin would use in their writings. I liken the word "motif" in a campy way to large picture wall paper that is hand made by a literi-dude with shuttle changes. Like reoccurring anti-human ecocomic systems found amongst the Phoenician derived black-nobility draco-SCRIBBLERS. I am being silly with an undertow of truth. If anyone understands what I'm saying, due lack of editing, I am a lucky man. I know the very last words of the famious playwright & humorist writer OSCOR WILDE. While Oscor WILDE was on his dead bed, he said the following: "Either that wallpaper goes or I go!" (Exlamation point probably left out on the quote but need be in it my guess.)
I did not read that last line until now. I did not mean to offend you Cackdown. That is if the reader understood my previous entry despite my admissions of its editorial risks. I highly recommend Quinton's book entitled, correct me if wrong, IGNORANCE. The book somewhere in it says with great pathos how we don't intend to offend. Well I DO NOT based on my history on this site and elsewhere. I was being perhaps to quick in posting my previous post. I say this now in that I have the feeling you see the Illuminati as being a force of enlightenment for the benefit of civilization and humanity. I would hope your correct, Crackdown, if that is where your are at on the Illuminati. I certainly have high regards for the enlightenment writer VOLTAIRE who wrote many works such as Candid. I like the mathematician who said "I think therefore I am" despite myself disagreeing with that statement. I carefully read the quotes of Adam Weishaupt. I must say he reads nicely in the quotes (e.a. I read above). I have bought the BELEIF that Weishaupt co-opted the Freemasons to their original monotheistic one dimensional Sun worship roots so to speak. The masons were evolving away from this to a pluralistic way where Carl Jung shadow work would be psychologically integrated (only possible where the female is not demonized as happens with monotheism/monolithic (organizational behaviour) in my view. Joseph Campbell would agree so I know. It's not like I'm writing a review here to the New York Times Book Review. I do NOT understand how Weisaupt could write so prosocial while I have bought the idea from many sources I value that he was otherwise. That is Weishaupt a key leadership as he remains today of the Illuminati. The destroying the Freemasons maturation away from monotheistic Egyptian Aton only male deity Sun worship, I attribute to the doings of Adam Weishaupt and his elk. This is despite the populist claims the masons value all religions pior to Weishaupt and after. This is lame in that this results in contradictions of multiculturalism despite multiculturalisms symtomatic benefits.
Who is the skeleton supposed to be?
Is it a leader...or?