Judah

New Post

Articles (1)

Germanic Saxons Being The Tribe of Judah

Quotes (33)

The term Sion (or Zion) can be found in the Book of Samuel. It was the city adopted as a capital city by King David, of the "House of Judah."

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

Piazzi Smyth, a Scot astronomer, evolved the British Israel theory by complicated mathematical calculations in some remote connection with the Great Pyramids upon which he based the claim that the throne of England is the throne of David, and the kings and queens of England Queen...are of the royal lineage of David, and the British people, therefore, the real Israel today, which they claim descends not through Judah or the Jews but from the ten tribes.The true Israel, they claim, does not include Jews but are the Anglo Saxons...Their theoretical views are completely contrary to ethnological history bearing on the origin of the British people and the Anglo-Saxon race, the facts of which the Anglo-Israel authors have the bold audacity to dispute and deny. But their unhistorical claims are no more pretentious than their unscriptural interpretations are presumptuous

Foy E. Wallace Jr. / <cite>God&#039;s Prophetic Word (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The "Israel" and "Judah" spoken of in the bible's Old Testament are fictions pure and simple. They did not exist in the way we have been conditioned to believe. This fact is known to most of the historians, biblical scholars, archaeologists, linguists, geographers, and other experts in related fields. This fact is not, however, known to the general rank and file, and many of the latest whistle-blowing experts, such as Thomas L. Thompson, have suffered suppression and academic exile.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

It does not take much to see that Egypt existed. Its monuments, temples, tombs, mastabas, and vast pyramids irrefutably testify to this fact. The Pantheon, Coliseum, and Capitoline Hill, testify to the existence of Rome. The ancient ring forts, cairns, raths, tumuli, and stone circles, stand as proof for Irish civilizations. In India, Mohanjo Daro, Harappa, Jantar, and Benares clearly reveal the existence of various advanced civilizations. All over Scandinavia one can see restored Viking ships and amazing astronomically aligned structures constructed by Nordic races. In Germany intricate burial mounds and barrows clearly indicate the presence of the Teutons. Where then, we ask, are the monuments, temples, state buildings, dams, farms, wells, and houses indicating the existence of biblical Israel and Judah? They are nowhere to be found. Yes, strange as it may seem, and difficult as it is to mentally take on board, it remains an incontestable fact that no evidence whatsoever exists to support the legitimacy of a topographically placed Israelite nation during the ages conjectured by "experts." From the disciplines of archaeology, ethnology, history,and geography, there comes precious little evidence supporting the existence of an Israel or a Judah. There is no hard evidence for a United Israelite Monarchy; no evidence for a physical location in ancient times called Jerusalem, nor for a Temple of Jerusalem. There is no evidence of wars for Palestinian conquest and little hard evidence for kings Saul, David, and Solomon, as the bible describes them. Yes, we have the bible's vexatious and spurious stories of their existence, but tragically difficult as it is for most people to comprehend, stories are not proof.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The nonsense of the bible only seems complicated because modern Christians attempt to distinguish themselves from Jews by saying that they are descended from all twelve tribes whereas the Jews are only descended from one tribe, that of Judah (the fourth son of Jacob). Once we realize that neither Christians nor Jews can prove any such descent, the puzzles are solved.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The word [Judah] originally meant the same thing as the word Judge does today. It did not refer to a particular race but to an elect of educators or adepts initiated into the mysteries and dignifiedin science and magic. The words Jew, Judite, and Judge are to be rightly regarded as the titles of those proficient in astronomy, astrology, and esoteric science. Change the "J" to the phonetically similar "D" and we get Dews, or Deus, meaning "god," or "of god."

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The term Juda means the "shining" or "illustrious ones." It refers to the members of the Gaonim, or the Cult of Aton, and not to some black-robe-wearing priestarchy. It refers to the eighteenth dynasty Sun Cult pharaohs of Egypt whose descendants hide under the names "Israelite" and"Judite." So when we hear that “David” and “Solomon” (whom we now know as Tuthmosis III and Amenhotep III) were of the "House of Judah" we understand that it was a reference not to the Semites, or the Levites and their ethnicity and theology, but to Egypt's Solar Cult and their theology.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

From the moment when it first appears as an entity this tribe of Judah has a strange look. It was always cut off, and never got on well with its neighbors. Its origins are mysterious. it seems from the beginning, with its ominous name, somehow to have been set apart, rather than to have been "chosen." The Levitical Scriptures include it among the tribes of Israel...However, even this claim seems to be false, for the Jewish Encyclopedia impartially says that Judah was "in all likelihood a non-Israelitish tribe"

Douglas Reed / <cite>Controversy of Zion (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The Lion of the Tribe of Judah, the lieutenants of the Cult of Aton.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

Moreover, the symbol for the Tribe of Judah is the lion. This symbol is used by the royal families of Britain and is found on British heraldry, incorporated into the architecture of state buildings, and emblazoned on so many corporate logos. The Lion is the symbol for the sign of Leo that, as any competent astrology buff knows, has long been connected to royalty, especially that of Egypt. The pharaoh's costume included a ritually worn lion's tail and the throne of pharaoh, like those of the kings and queens of England, was styled with lion motifs. Many images show the pharaoh's hunting lions from their royal chariots. The cheetah and the panther were associated with the priests, but the lion was always reserved for the pharaoh. The lion of Africa is used as a seminal symbol by the royal houses because of their descent from the House of David, or more correctly,from the House of Aton.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The little tribe in the south, Judah, became identified with the landless tribe, that of the Levites. These hereditary priests who claimed that their office had been bestowed upon them by Jehovah on Mount Sinai were the true fathers of Judaism

Douglas Reed / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

Because of the false but very common idea that the Jews of today are all that remain of the ancient Israel people, it becomes necessary here to point out that, with the exception of a very few individuals, none of the ten-tribed house of Israel and only a very small remnant of the two-tribed House of Judah ever returned to Palestine after their deportation to Assyria and Babylon. With the fall of the empires which held them captive, the main body composed of all of the tribes, groups and clans, became a part of that great north-western migration of peoples into and across Europe which took place in the centuries just before the beginning of the Christian era

W. H.Bennett / <cite>Symbols of our Celto-Saxon Heritage (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

...it was impossible for any Jew at this time to describe himself truthfully as of the tribe of Benjamin...the Benjaminites later intermarried with the tribe of Judah to such an extent that they lost their separate identity and all became Judites or Jews. Only the Levites, the priestly tribe, and that section of the Levites called the Kohanim (Cohens) or priests (the descendants of Aaron) retained their identity because they needed to do so for cultic reasons. All other Jews were simply known as Israelites for cultic purposes...and no distinction was made for any religious purpose between Judites or Benjaminites, so that there was no motive for preserving the distinction. Consequently, when Paul described himself as "of the Tribe of Benjamin," this was sheer bluff, though the recipients of his letters, the Gentile converts to Christianity, were in no position to know this

Hyam Maccoby / <cite>The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

According to the Old Testament, one of the reasons why the House of Israel chose to spurn the House of Judah was due to the latter's vile obsession not only with war but with human and animal sacrifice. One can split the Old Testament prophets into camps based upon whether they speak for the Judites or whether they remonstrate against them and their heinous practices. The Israelite prophets Amos, Hosea, and Jeremiah, were the staunchest opponents of the House of Judah (David) and throughout their narratives they cajole the Judites, imploring them to abandon their godless practices, particularly the sacrifice of their firstborn sons.

Michael Tsarion / <cite></cite>

Naturally, the sane among the Atonists wanted nothing to do with such monstrous scheming. They soon decided to go their own way. Biblical tradition tells us that the "chosen people" lived together in Israel for about 500 years. After 250 years they chose to divide themselves into two "Houses." Eventually, we are told that Israel was attacked and large portions of both Houses were taken into captivity by the Assyrians. The House of Judah (Aton) was particularly vulnerable since they were, unlike the Israelites, few in number. Allegedly, after their release by the Assyrians, the Judites and Israelites again suffered invasion and captivity at the hands of the Babylonians. After this period of bondage, the ten tribes of "Israel" decided not to return to their homes and Temple in Palestine but to emigrate Westward across the Caucasus Mountains and into the lands beyond. Only two tribes were still fanatical enough to allegedly make a return to Jerusalem, the "Tribe of Benjamin" and "Tribe of Levi." It is from these tribes that Levitical Judaism arose. From this tradition came the Gaonim, the Sadducees, Zadokites, Khazars, and Kabalistic colleges that were instrumental in creating the smokescreens behind which the Cult of Aton would operate.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

From this point onward the two houses - of Jews (Judah) and Israelites (Israel) - parted company. We can surmise that it was at this point that the main body of the Israelites (so called) did not agree with the Atonist plan for world domination [New World Order].

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The people known at present as the Jews are descendants of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin with a certain number of the tribe of Levi

Rabbi J. H. Hertz / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

A reading of both versions of the Bible reveals that there were two classes of people who were involved in the Exodus. There were the Yahuds, the priestly class, and there were the Children of Israel, the commoners, the "multitudes"...the Aramaic Bible makes a clear distinction between the Hebrews (Children of Israel) and the Yahuds...When the people of the Exodus reached Canaan, the Yahuds established themselves as the Kingdom of Judah and the multitude formed the Kingdom of Israel

Messod and Roger Sabbah / <cite>Secret of the Exodus (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

It is this Tribe of Judah that was, in our estimation, Atonist.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

Actually the Jewish people have little, if any, right to the name Israel at all, for many of them are descendants of religious proselytes whose ancestry is certainly not Israelitish. Even those who do have Israelite blood have no right to any national use of the name Israel for they are descendants of the House of Judah, not of the House of Israel

Douglas Reed / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

If Akhenaton (and his family before him) was of the Hyksos bloodline, then his bizarre and sacrilegious actions would make a great deal of sense. But it should be realized, in any case, that Akhenaton was not the legitimate heir to the throne of Egypt. His mother Tiye was not of Egyptian blood and was not acknowledged as being a spiritual "daughter" of the god Amen-Ra, that a female had to be in order to have legal rights to the throne. Since Tiye did not possess this right,her son Akhenaton did not either. It can be argued that almost every pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty (as well as those infidel "Hyksos" kings from the 13th dynasty to the 18th) were not, in the true spiritual sense, legitimate pharaohs. Nevertheless, Akhenaton certainly was not. Ergo, when he and his cult of Levite followers were deposed they naturally found it expedient to obscure their identity ("Israelites," "Judites," "Levites") and not openly proclaim or emphasize their relationship to Egypt. Historians have followed suit so it is only now, in relatively recent times, that the truth about the origins of the Judites and Levites has surfaced.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The Levites and Gaonim were of the House of Judah (Yahud) and not Israel. As we will see, the majority of those "Israelite" tribes that had left Egypt had chosen not to follow Akhenaton and his extremist Atonist priests. They went their own way after rejecting the agendas of the megalomaniacal Levites and their obsessed leader. As a result of their blasphemy they and their descendants were considered degenerate outcasts by the elite Atonists. In their minds, the Levites were true "Jews" and not the renegades who chose to disperse and assimilate into the West. The two tribes of Levites, under Akhenaton, would see to it that the "Children of Israel" would be banished in the sight of their Lord, condemned and considered "lost tribes."

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

Interestingly, for our thesis, the ancestors of Mary were Benjaminite priest kings of the House of Judah (Aton).

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

Possibly the tribe of Judah is mentioned in the El-Amarna tablets (comp. Jastrow in "Jour. Bib. Lit." xii. 61 et seq.); but, if so, the reference is too obscure to increase present knowledge. In the judgment of critics the stories of the patriarch Judah are not real biography, but are narratives of an eponymous hero, or portions of the history of the tribe. These being taken in this way, it is gathered that the clan of Judah was at first weaker than the clans of Reuben, Simeon, and Levi; that when Judah entered Palestine it first gained a foothold at Adullam and Timnah (Gen. xxxviii. 1, 12), places which were probably on the eastern side of the Judean ridge. This Timnah is not to be confused with the Timnah of the Shephelah (Judges xiv. 1). An alliance was soon made with the clans of the Perizzites and Zerahites, who had the palm-tree for their totem, and were therefore said to be children of Tamar (Gen. xxxviii. 13-30). Later the Kenizzite clans of Caleb and Othniel were amalgamated with the tribe. These clans were, perhaps, of Edomitish origin, since Kenaz is counted among the descendants of Esau (Gen. xxxvi. 11). These two clans occupied the region around Hebron, Carmel, and Kirjath-sepher, or Debir. Gradually the Jerahmeelites were also incorporated in the tribe of Judah. Their habitat appears to have been in the Negeb (I Sam. xxvii. 10), and as Jerahmeel is said to be Caleb's brother, perhaps they also were of Edomitish origin. A branch of the Kenites from the Sinaitic peninsula added another element to Judah's complex character (see Kenites). This large admixture of foreign blood in the tribe of Judah is probably the reason why the Judahites were so loosely connected with the other tribes of Israel. A consciousness existed on both sides that Judah stood apart in origin and in sentiment.

The prophets of Judah framed the Deuteronomic law which led to Josiah's reform. This reform accentuated the uniqueness of Israel's religion; and it was this that held the inhabitants of the Judean kingdom together in exile, that revived their state, and that made them the world's teachers of monotheism. But the inhabitants of the Northern Kingdom were absorbed by the people among whom they were scattered, because their religion lacked this uniqueness. It was this uniqueness, furthermore, which caused the name of the tribe of Judah to be perpetuated in one of the great religions of the world.

Jewish Encyclopedia / <cite>http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=594&amp;letter=J</cite>

Anyway, those Scriptures and today's authorities agree about the separateness of "Israel" and "Judah". In the Old Testament Israel is often called "the house of Joseph", in pointed distinction from "the house of Judah". The Jewish Encyclopaedia says, ''Joseph and Judah typify two distinct lines of descent" and adds (as already cited) that Judah was "in all likelihood a non-Israelitish tribe". The Encyclopaedia Britannica says that Judaism developed long after the Israelites had merged themselves with mankind, and that the true relationship of the two peoples is best expressed in the phrase, "The Israelites were not Jews". Historically, Judah was to survive for a little while and to bring forth Judaism, which begat Zionism.

Douglas Reed / <cite>The Controversy of Zion</cite>

Judea made no discoveries in mathematics or astronomy; its artisans produced no great sculptures, monuments, temples, public buildings, or feats of engineering comparable to those of Egypt, Greece or Babylon

Ernest Busenbark / <cite>Symbols, Sex and the Stars (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The term Judah in the bible (the fourth son of Jacob whose name was adapted as Jew) was not a name at all, but a title. It has been the clever ploy of duplicitous historians to have us erroneously believe that titles (for an initiate, king, or vizier, etc,) were personal names. This is the case with "Moses," "Joshua," "Jesus," "Aaron," and "John." Judah was the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, son of Abraham. Abraham's original name was Abram until, as chapter 17 of the Book of Genesis tells us, he was given his new title by the Lord. Sarah's original name was Sarai, and Jacob was renamed (re-titled) Israel. He probably received this title because, like his Levite family, he was very closely allied with the Cult of Aton. Being an initiate of the solar colleges he was eventually given a Druidic title to distinguish him as a "shining one."

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1</cite>

1The word that came to Jeremiah concerning all the Jews which dwell in the land of Egypt, which dwell at Migdol, and at Tahpanhes, and at Noph, and in the country of Pathros, saying,

2Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Ye have seen all the evil that I have brought upon Jerusalem, and upon all the cities of Judah; and, behold, this day they are a desolation, and no man dwelleth therein,

3Because of their wickedness which they have committed to provoke me to anger, in that they went to burn incense, and to serve other gods, whom they knew not, neither they, ye, nor your fathers.

4Howbeit I sent unto you all my servants the prophets, rising early and sending them, saying, Oh, do not this abominable thing that I hate.

5But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear to turn from their wickedness, to burn no incense unto other gods.

6Wherefore my fury and mine anger was poured forth, and was kindled in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem; and they are wasted and desolate, as at this day.

7Therefore now thus saith the LORD, the God of hosts, the God of Israel; Wherefore commit ye this great evil against your souls, to cut off from you man and woman, child and suckling, out of Judah, to leave you none to remain;

8In that ye provoke me unto wrath with the works of your hands, burning incense unto other gods in the land of Egypt, whither ye be gone to dwell, that ye might cut yourselves off, and that ye might be a curse and a reproach among all the nations of the earth?

9Have ye forgotten the wickedness of your fathers, and the wickedness of the kings of Judah, and the wickedness of their wives, and your own wickedness, and the wickedness of your wives, which they have committed in the land of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem?

10They are not humbled even unto this day, neither have they feared, nor walked in my law, nor in my statutes, that I set before you and before your fathers.

11Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will set my face against you for evil, and to cut off all Judah.

Jeremiah 44:1-11 / <cite>The Bible</cite>

And Judah saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite, whose name was Shuah; and he took her, and went in unto her.

Genesis 38:2

There are many people who can agree that the kings and leaders of the Western nations are descended from the tribe of Judah, but they fail to recognize an important fact, which is entirely omitted in the King James version of the Bible, that there were three branches of the tribe of Judah. Those who lump all the descendants of the tribe of Judah together do not realize that there was a tainted branch. There were the families of Pharez and Zarah, Judah's pure bred sons out of Tamar, and there was a third branch, Judah's descendants from a Canaanite mother, Shuah, who were known even afterwards as "the cursed Shelanites."

Eustace Mullins / <cite>The Curse of Canaan</cite>

Summer begins in Leo, the constellation of Leo, the lion of the tribe of Judah - the lion king. He is king over the Northern Hemisphere and over the earth and over Europe and the first day of summer, which is in the constellation of Leo, he's the lion king. They still make movies about it.

Jordan Maxwell / <cite>Chief Cornerstone Lecture</cite>

And so does the truth about the Jewish people disclose that much which has been regarded as sacred history turns out to be little more than the chronicle of ordinary profane history. Judaism was the soil out of which Christianity grew, but the Jews were not a miraculous people.

Melchizedek of Nebadon / <cite>The Urantia Book</cite>

The jews are not the tribe of Judah though, but of Esau and Cain. Germany mainly comprises the tribe of Judah. Most Kings and Queens of Europe have German ancestry. Judah is the sceptre, the Royal line of our People.

Anonymous

Site Statistics

Posts
48,763
Comments
31,845
Members
25,891