Israel

New Post

Articles (3)

The Modern 12 Tribes of Israel Table

The Declaration of Arbroath

Christian Identity Politics

Opinions (1)

The Bible Proves The "Mainstream" Definition of Israel As Wrong

Quotes (60)

The nations will gather to pay homage to the people of God: all the fortunes of the nations will pass to the Jewish people, they will march captive behind the Jewish people in chains and will prostrate themselves before them, their kings will bring up their sons, and their princesses will nurse their children. The Jews will command the nations, they will summon peoples whom they do not even know, and peoples who do not know them will hasten to them. The riches of the sea and the wealth of nations will come to the Jews of their own right. Any people of kingdom who will not serve Israel will be destroyed.

Isidore Loeb / <cite>Le Litterature des Pauvres dans la Bible (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Freemasonry is born out of Israel

The Jewish Guardian / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

As explained earlier, this Joseph was himself descended from Jacob. Jacob, the brother of Esau, was later re-named Israel. He was the son of Isaac. And Isaac was the son of Sarai, not by way of Abraham (as official legend has it), but by way of Tuthmosis III, the warrior pharaoh of Egypt's eighteenth dynasty. So, the sense of importance that modern politicians get from aligning themselves with the events, characters, and rhetoric of the Old Testament derives from this fact and should be understood in this context. These facts have long been guarded by the royals and masons of the world. The basic truth understood by initiates is that Tuthmosis III was the true father of the so-called "Twelve Tribes of Israel," and not Abraham. The birthright that Esau rejected and that passed onto his brother Jacob was their royal Egyptian legacy.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The preposterous nonsense of new Israelite Kingdoms in the West, as spouted and screamed from the pulpits by rabid mouthed Atonists and British-Israelites, arose because of a deliberately erroneous interpretation concerning Genesis Chapter 48. This chapter concerns the blessing of Jacob upon his grandson's Ephraim and Manasseh. These two boys were the sons of Jacob's favorite son Joseph and were, suggestively, born in Egypt while Joseph was "Governor" (or Atonist Commander) there. The boys are blessed and Joseph is informed that they will go on to found the great "Israelite" nations of the future.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

According to those scholars and thinkers who have been tracking the alleged progress of the assimilated tribes, Britain and America are the "New Israel."

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The "Israel" and "Judah" spoken of in the bible's Old Testament are fictions pure and simple. They did not exist in the way we have been conditioned to believe. This fact is known to most of the historians, biblical scholars, archaeologists, linguists, geographers, and other experts in related fields. This fact is not, however, known to the general rank and file, and many of the latest whistle-blowing experts, such as Thomas L. Thompson, have suffered suppression and academic exile.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

As a whole, we historians have not done very well in using Biblical stories to write our history with. If one feels bound to understand the history of Israel as a revision of the Bible's traditions, one must admit the near total lack of warrant that these stories have for being accepted as historical

Thomas L. Thompson / <cite>The Mythic Past: Biblical Archaeology and the Myth of Israel (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Of course, there was an Israel! The name itself is used already at the close of the Late Bronze Age on an Egyptian monument to refer to the People of Canaan that Pharaoh Merenptah's military campaign into Palestine fought against. But this is not the Israel that the Bible deals with

Thomas L. Thompson / <cite>The Mythic Past: Biblical Archaeology and the Myth of Israel (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The patriarchs of Genesis were not historical. The assertion that 'Israel' was already a people before entering Palestine whether in these stories or in those of Joshua has no historical foundation. No massive military campaign of invading nomadic 'Israelites' ever conquered Palestine. There never was an ethnically distinct 'Canaanite' population whom 'Israelites' displaced. There was no 'period of the Judges' in history. No empire ever ruled a 'united monarchy' from Jerusalem. No ethnically coherent 'Israelite' nation ever existed at all. No political, ethnic or historical bond existed between the state that was called Israel or 'the house of Omri' and the town of Jerusalem and the state of Judah. In history, neither Jerusalem nor Judah ever shared an identity with Israel before the rule of the Hasmoneans in the Hellenistic period

Thomas L. Thompson / <cite>The Mythic Past: Biblical Archaeology and the Myth of Israel (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

…we need to recognize that our understanding of Israel as a people and as a nation is unrelated to any known historical Israel...They created this 'Israel,' not as it once existed in an earlier period, but in a way that was meaningful to themselves

Thomas L. Thompson / <cite>The Mythic Past: Biblical Archaeology and the Myth of Israel (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

...Nay, not only are there no proofs of the twelve tribes of Israel having ever existed, but Herodotus, the most accurate of historians, who was in Assyria when Ezra flourished, never mentions the Israelites at all…How is this possible?

Helena Petrovna Blavatsky / <cite>The Secret Doctrine, vol 3 (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The adoption of the name “Israel” by the Zionist state which was set up in Palestine in 1948 was transparent false pretense

Douglas Reed / <cite>Controversy of Zion (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

It does not take much to see that Egypt existed. Its monuments, temples, tombs, mastabas, and vast pyramids irrefutably testify to this fact. The Pantheon, Coliseum, and Capitoline Hill, testify to the existence of Rome. The ancient ring forts, cairns, raths, tumuli, and stone circles, stand as proof for Irish civilizations. In India, Mohanjo Daro, Harappa, Jantar, and Benares clearly reveal the existence of various advanced civilizations. All over Scandinavia one can see restored Viking ships and amazing astronomically aligned structures constructed by Nordic races. In Germany intricate burial mounds and barrows clearly indicate the presence of the Teutons. Where then, we ask, are the monuments, temples, state buildings, dams, farms, wells, and houses indicating the existence of biblical Israel and Judah? They are nowhere to be found. Yes, strange as it may seem, and difficult as it is to mentally take on board, it remains an incontestable fact that no evidence whatsoever exists to support the legitimacy of a topographically placed Israelite nation during the ages conjectured by "experts." From the disciplines of archaeology, ethnology, history,and geography, there comes precious little evidence supporting the existence of an Israel or a Judah. There is no hard evidence for a United Israelite Monarchy; no evidence for a physical location in ancient times called Jerusalem, nor for a Temple of Jerusalem. There is no evidence of wars for Palestinian conquest and little hard evidence for kings Saul, David, and Solomon, as the bible describes them. Yes, we have the bible's vexatious and spurious stories of their existence, but tragically difficult as it is for most people to comprehend, stories are not proof.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

From Israel itself Judaism would never have sprung...the real Jew only developed in the course of centuries by gradual physical separation from the rest of the Israelite family...he is not the result of a normal national life, but, so to speak, an artificial product - the product of a priestly caste which, with the help of alien priests, forced upon the people against its will a priestly legislation and a priestly faith as having been given by God

Houston Stewart Chamberlain / <cite>Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, 1899 (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Obliged to give an official answer...neither Hitler nor the Vichy Government, nor even the Israeli Government have succeeded in elaborating a clear and satisfactory definition. By the Law of Return, the fundamental law of the new Jewish State, promulgated at Tel-Aviv in 1948, Israel gave the freedom of the country to all Jews of the Diaspora, whatever their origin. Once this had been done, the government had to work out a legal definition as to who was and who was not a Jew. Unable to find a legal formula which took into account the three factors of race, religion and nationality, the government of Tel-Aviv was obliged to have recourse to the religious criterion. A Jew is someone who belongs to a Jewish community of religion or religious traditions and who is not converted to another religion

Vicomte Leon de Poncins / <cite>Judaism and the Vatican (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The nonsense of the bible only seems complicated because modern Christians attempt to distinguish themselves from Jews by saying that they are descended from all twelve tribes whereas the Jews are only descended from one tribe, that of Judah (the fourth son of Jacob). Once we realize that neither Christians nor Jews can prove any such descent, the puzzles are solved.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

It is from these temples [sun colleges and temples of the lower Nile] that the term and title "Israelite" (as it has come to be used) derives. Since the earliest and greatest solar deity was the Irish Iesa, and since his worship had been brought to Egypt from the West by the Shemsu Hor (the Disciples of Horus), his adepts simply adopted titles based on his holy name. The names of many later solar personalities, such as Dionysus (Dion-esus), and Orpheus (Orph-esus) and Bacchus (Bacch-esus), Zeus, and Jesus (J-esus), etc, were just such renditions based on the prototype. When the testaments were conceived it was decided that both the word and concept of Israel should be personified. For reasons not explained Jacob -the son of Isaac (Isa, Esa) and grandson of Abraham was renamed Israel by god. This act of "renaming" (Genesis 35:9) was one of several clever ploys by the bible's mythographers to distort history and obscure the identity and existence of the Cult of Aton.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

From the moment when it first appears as an entity this tribe of Judah has a strange look. It was always cut off, and never got on well with its neighbors. Its origins are mysterious. it seems from the beginning, with its ominous name, somehow to have been set apart, rather than to have been "chosen." The Levitical Scriptures include it among the tribes of Israel...However, even this claim seems to be false, for the Jewish Encyclopedia impartially says that Judah was "in all likelihood a non-Israelitish tribe"

Douglas Reed / <cite>Controversy of Zion (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Renegade Pharaoh Akhenaton - the "Son of the Sun" (Aton). The real "King of the Jews." He was the master of the Levites and of the "12 Tribes" under his dominion. His "biography" is the Bible, his instrument of torture - Judeo-Christianity! His Cult of Aton was, and is, identical to the pre-diluvian "Brotherhood of the Snake." His minions are the Vatican, the Illuminati, Templars, Royals and British-Israelites - enemies of freedom and truth, each and all The Atonists have expertly employed their age old symbols to indicate their presence to the symbolically literate. From their bases of operation (Tanis, Alexandria, Rome, London, New York,and Washington DC) and through their lieutenants they control the world, their new Egypt.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The Hyksos kings and their people honored the astrological precession and began reverencing the traits and proclivities associated with the sign of Aries, whereas the priests of Thebes in Southern (or Upper Egypt) decided that the time was not right for new gods to be venerated.They wished to theologically remain loyal to the Taurean principles.This intriguing scenario allows us to hazard more than a guess as to why there was a schism between the tribes of "Israel." The ten tribes decided that the old paradigm was still in, whereas the two tribes of Judah decided to honor their king Akhenaton and venerate the new Astro-Theological order. Although we may not appreciate the contrariness of the Israelites, we can liken it to the more recent historical conflicts between denominations of the Christian church. Ellis gives the example of Northern Ireland where two contingents, of the same background and blood, violently differ on theological grounds.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

Another interpretation concerning this revelry states that the Children of Israel were rebelling against Moses and his Atonist Cult. They were venerating the golden calf in order to honor Pharaoh Heremheb whose name means "Powerful Bull." By paying respect to this Heremheb and the Egyptian Amunists, the Children of Israel were hoping to gain favor and perhaps be allowed to make a return to Egypt. Both the Aramaic and Hebrew bibles do make mention of the conflict at Sinai between Moses and the exiled people.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

Because of the false but very common idea that the Jews of today are all that remain of the ancient Israel people, it becomes necessary here to point out that, with the exception of a very few individuals, none of the ten-tribed house of Israel and only a very small remnant of the two-tribed House of Judah ever returned to Palestine after their deportation to Assyria and Babylon. With the fall of the empires which held them captive, the main body composed of all of the tribes, groups and clans, became a part of that great north-western migration of peoples into and across Europe which took place in the centuries just before the beginning of the Christian era

W. H.Bennett / <cite>Symbols of our Celto-Saxon Heritage (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The rivalry of the tribes alerts us to the fraudulence behind the naming of the modern "State of Israel." Israel as an entity has, according to every authentic and legitimate authority, long assimilated into the world's nations and has, as a result, long ceased to exist (if it ever did to begin with). The usage of such a term today especially to name a homeland for "Jews" is the height of historical nonsense. The vast majority of Jews living in this "Israel," like the majority of Jews anywhere in the world, are Jewish by simple religious conversion and not by ethnic or racial descent.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

According to the Old Testament, one of the reasons why the House of Israel chose to spurn the House of Judah was due to the latter's vile obsession not only with war but with human and animal sacrifice. One can split the Old Testament prophets into camps based upon whether they speak for the Judites or whether they remonstrate against them and their heinous practices. The Israelite prophets Amos, Hosea, and Jeremiah, were the staunchest opponents of the House of Judah (David) and throughout their narratives they cajole the Judites, imploring them to abandon their godless practices, particularly the sacrifice of their firstborn sons.

Michael Tsarion / <cite></cite>

The ten tribes [Northern Kingdom of Israel] have no share in the world to come

Talmud / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

Naturally, the sane among the Atonists wanted nothing to do with such monstrous scheming. They soon decided to go their own way. Biblical tradition tells us that the "chosen people" lived together in Israel for about 500 years. After 250 years they chose to divide themselves into two "Houses." Eventually, we are told that Israel was attacked and large portions of both Houses were taken into captivity by the Assyrians. The House of Judah (Aton) was particularly vulnerable since they were, unlike the Israelites, few in number. Allegedly, after their release by the Assyrians, the Judites and Israelites again suffered invasion and captivity at the hands of the Babylonians. After this period of bondage, the ten tribes of "Israel" decided not to return to their homes and Temple in Palestine but to emigrate Westward across the Caucasus Mountains and into the lands beyond. Only two tribes were still fanatical enough to allegedly make a return to Jerusalem, the "Tribe of Benjamin" and "Tribe of Levi." It is from these tribes that Levitical Judaism arose. From this tradition came the Gaonim, the Sadducees, Zadokites, Khazars, and Kabalistic colleges that were instrumental in creating the smokescreens behind which the Cult of Aton would operate.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

From this point onward the two houses - of Jews (Judah) and Israelites (Israel) - parted company. We can surmise that it was at this point that the main body of the Israelites (so called) did not agree with the Atonist plan for world domination [New World Order].

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

A reading of both versions of the Bible reveals that there were two classes of people who were involved in the Exodus. There were the Yahuds, the priestly class, and there were the Children of Israel, the commoners, the "multitudes"...the Aramaic Bible makes a clear distinction between the Hebrews (Children of Israel) and the Yahuds...When the people of the Exodus reached Canaan, the Yahuds established themselves as the Kingdom of Judah and the multitude formed the Kingdom of Israel

Messod and Roger Sabbah / <cite>Secret of the Exodus (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The word 'Ibri, "Hebrew," occurs some thirty times in the Bible, a small number compared with the 2,500 appearances of "Israel." The two terms are not synonymous

Joseph Meleze Modrzejewski / <cite>The Jews of Egypt: From Rameses II to Emperor Hadrian (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The task of identifying the historical David is complicated from the outset by the fact that the Old Testament provides us with two contrasting Davidic characters who cannot have been the same person...However, amalgamated the stories of the two Davids - one warrior king who lived in the fifteenth century BC, and the other a tribal chief who lived five centuries later - should be seen as another facet of the attempt by Old Testament editors (Jewish scribes living in Babylon between the sixth and third centuries BC) to conceal the fact that Tuthmosis III, not Abraham, was the father of Isaac, and therefore also the founding father of the 12 tribes of Israel. The first part of the Pharaoh's name, “Tuth” (or Thoth) becomes Dwd, in Hebrew, the word used for “David” in the Bible

Ahmed Osman / <cite>Christianity: An Egyptian Religion (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Like this writer, the researcher Ralph Ellis does not buy into the migration of Abraham and Sarah story. He believes that Abraham and Sarah did not come from Sumeria into Egypt in the manner commonly described. Ellis, like the great revisionist Comyns Beaumont before him, believes that Abraham (from Ab'ram meaning "of Ra the Father") was the first pharaoh of the Hyksos dynasty. Abraham may have gone with his sister and wife Sarah towards Thebes (in southern Egypt) after a famine broke out in his own Northern kingdom. According to Ellis it was during this journey that the Theban king fell in love with Sarai and took her for his wife. The Southern pharaoh in question was none other than Tuthmosis III. And so, it was he, and not Abraham, who was the true father of the so-called Twelve Tribes of Israel. They were in fact the Twelve Tribes of Aton. Since the Hyksos were rulers in the North (Lower Egypt, Delta region), they would have had dominion over the pyramids and over Heliopolis, the capital of solar worship. Hence, Akhenaton's zeal for just that kind of worship and iconography. Ellis suggests that prior to the reign of Akhenaton, the Levite Yuya (the biblical Joseph) acted as an agent for the expelled Hyksos and returned to ingratiate himself with the pharaoh Amenhotep I. Ellis believes that he was successful and became a powerful presence behind the thrones of Tuthmosis III, Tuthmosis IV, Amenhotep III,and Akhenaton. Yuya and his family were the richest personalities in the entire world at that time, after the pharaoh himself.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The term "Jews" is never in the Bible applied to the Twelve Tribes or to the Ten-tribed House of Israel

The Ensign Trust / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

Of course, there was an Israel! The name itself is used already at the close of the Late Bronze Age on an Egyptian monument to refer to the People of Canaan that Pharaoh Merenptah's military campaign into Palestine fought against. But this is not the Israel that the Bible deals with

Thomas L. Thompson / <cite>The Mythic Past (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Actually the Jewish people have little, if any, right to the name Israel at all, for many of them are descendants of religious proselytes whose ancestry is certainly not Israelitish. Even those who do have Israelite blood have no right to any national use of the name Israel for they are descendants of the House of Judah, not of the House of Israel

Douglas Reed / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

Not until Jacob in a somewhat obscure manner was told to call himself Israel was that name adopted and accorded to his twelve "sons:" but if we accept the explanation of Sanchoniathon, a Phoenician of Tyre, Cronus "whom Phoenicians called Israel" was king of Phoenicia, and it signified that these Chaldeo-Phoenician tribes were worshippers of Cronus-Saturn...for Jehovah was a far later importation. The name Israel has subsequently been misappropriated, for those Biblical Christians who term themselves Israelites in fact label themselves followers of a pagan deity

Comyns Beaumont / <cite>The Riddle of Prehistoric Britain (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

As we show in Volume One, Iesa was the third aspect of the ancient Druidic trinity. This makes him equivalent to the Christian Holy Spirit as well as to Christ. Originally, an "Israelite" was probably an Iesaite, Iesite, or Iesalite. Moreover, once the god name Iesa or Isa is combined with the Egyptian god name Ra, we get Isra. The final suffix "el" simply meant "messenger." So the name "Israelite" may simply have denoted a "messenger of Iesa and Ra," the sun gods of the ancient Arya. Iesa was the sun god of the Celts, Gaels, Scythians and Druids; and Ra (or Amen Ra) was the sun god of the Egyptians. Those who adopted the name "Israelite" have not legitimate right to the term. Originally it simply denoted an initiate or priest of the Solar Cult.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The first thing to clarify when it comes to the "Israelites" concerns the origin of the name "Israel." This name was not original to the people mentioned in the bible whose center was Jerusalem. None of the cities of the Hyksos pharaohs and their people bear the title "Israel." The term originated with the Irish and with the Phoenicians who had erected prominent and sophisticated cities all over Eastern Europe, Asia Minor, and the Levant. The Phoenicians were originally of Irish extraction and they had some of their most important bases in Ireland and Scotland. Not only were the Phoenicians expert sailors but they made good use of the land bridges that once existed between Scandinavia and England, and between England and Ireland.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

The Levites and Gaonim were of the House of Judah (Yahud) and not Israel. As we will see, the majority of those "Israelite" tribes that had left Egypt had chosen not to follow Akhenaton and his extremist Atonist priests. They went their own way after rejecting the agendas of the megalomaniacal Levites and their obsessed leader. As a result of their blasphemy they and their descendants were considered degenerate outcasts by the elite Atonists. In their minds, the Levites were true "Jews" and not the renegades who chose to disperse and assimilate into the West. The two tribes of Levites, under Akhenaton, would see to it that the "Children of Israel" would be banished in the sight of their Lord, condemned and considered "lost tribes."

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2</cite>

As our scholars have failed to see the difference between Israel and the Jews, they have completely confused the issue; and when they speak of ancient Hebrew they mean Phoenician. "The oldest Hebrew manuscript dates from AD 489, is a roll and was found in the Karaite Synagogue in the Crimea." The Targums version of the Old Testament does not date any earlier than the Babylonian captivity of the Jews, and it was written in the Aramaic Chaldee language,and even of that version there is not BC in existence. So when our scholars speak of the ancient Hebrew of the Israelites they mean Phoenician evidently, for they never have seen it written on a scroll, only on the Siloam inscription, the Moabite stone, and the Phoenician engravings of the East, the Mediterranean, Southern Russia, and Europe, particularly in Britain.

Fredrick Haberman / <cite>Tracing Our Ancestors (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

We also have to recognize that most of our Bible stories are neither whole nor original compositions. They were not put together as narrative accounts of the past, but as collections of fragmented traditions that survived the past...When we start with Israel...we need to recognize that our understanding of Israel as a people and as a nation is unrelated to any known historical Israel.

Thomas L. Thompson / <cite>The Mythic Past: Biblical Archaeology and the Myth of Israel (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

When one begins to describe historical developments within the regions of South Syria on the basis of archaeological data, one finds a very different picture of Palestine's past than in many books of biblical archaeology. The sketch of ancient Israel that comes from a harmonizing of archaeology with the biblical story is not congruent with the Bible's view.

Thomas L. Thompson / <cite>The Mythic Past: Biblical Archaeology and the Myth of Israel (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

The initiated who had passed through the inferior grades, and attained the high rank of Autops, or "eye-witnesses", were called by the whole pagan world Israelites and Hebrews. The name of Israelite, Jews, or Hebrews, did never designate a political or national body, but were the name which, from an infinitely remote antiquity, designated the Uperects, the Autops, the Rechabites...the highest order of the initiated in these holy mysteries, and to whom, and whom alone, were committed to the oracles of god

Robert Taylor / <cite>The Devil&#039;s Pulpit (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Let us pose a hypothetical question: Were the Hebrews who left Ur with Abraham in 2000 BC, and the Hebrews who entered Egypt under Joseph in 1600 BC, the same people as the Israelites who were led out of Egypt by Moses in 1200 BC? Were these Israelites who came out of Egypt the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, or were they a different people?

Max L. Dimont / <cite>Jews, God and History (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Surely even Masons would never claim the actual existence of Solomon? As Kenealy shows, he is not noticed by Herodotus, not by Plato, not by any writer of standing. It is most extraordinary he says, “that the Jewish nation, over whom but a few years before mighty Solomon had reigned in all his glory, with a magnificence scarcely equaled by the greatest monarchs, spending nearly eight thousand million of gold on a temple, was overlooked by the historian Herodotus, writing almost necessarily within a few miles of the splendid capital of the national Jerusalem?"...Nay, not only are there no proofs of the twelve tribes of Israel having ever existed, but Herodotus, the most accurate of historians, who was in Assyria when Ezra flourished, never mentions the Israelites at all…How is this possible?

Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

The early Israelites were mostly sun worshipers. And even in later times, the sun god, Baal, divided with Jehovah the worship of the Jews. Saul, Jonathan, and David named their children in honor of this god. "Saul begat Jonathan...and Esh-baal. And the son of Jonathan was Merib-baal" (1 Chron. viii, 33, 34). David named his last son, save one, Beeliada, "Baal Knows" (1 Chron. xiv, 7). Solomon's worship included not merely the worship of Jehovah, but that of Baal and other gods...Most of the Israelites certainly saw no harm in these ornaments, since they were not aware of any very great difference between the character of Yahweh (Jehovah) and that of Baal, Astarte, or Moloch. Long after the time of Solomon the horses and chariots of the Sun were kept in the temple (2 Kings xxiii, 11). Many of the stories concerning Moses, Joshua, Jonah, and other Bible characters are solar myths. Samson was a sun god. Dr. Oort says: "Sun-worship was by no means unknown to the Israelites...The myths that were circulated among these people show that they were zealous worshipers of the sun. These myths are still preserved, but, as in all other cases, they are so much altered as to be hardly recognizable. The writer who has preserved them for us lived at a time when the worship of the sun had long ago died out. He transforms the sun god into an Israelite hero Samson"

John E. Remsberg / <cite>The Christ (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

More importantly, these legends [early myths] show us that it was indeed Akhenaton's Atonists who made the journey West after their expulsion. The story of Mile and Scota is the story of Akhenaton and his descendants. It is the story of the true Israelites. In short, the Milesian conquest of Ireland, was the Atonist conquest.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1</cite>

At some point, the term Iesaite (or Esite) was transmogrified to Israelite. The term is a composite of the names of Isa and Ra. In other words, it is made from the names of two of the most important sun gods, Iesa of the Druids and Amen Ra of the Amenists. The syllable "el" at the end of Israel simply means "messenger." Therefore, an "Israelite" was a "messenger" or "agent" of the sun gods. He was a member of the Solar Cult. That is all there was to it. The word did not signify race.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1</cite>

When the ten tribes of Israel were taken into Assyrian captivity, they took their language with them, and the only inscription that they left in Palestine is the Siloam inscription in Jerusalem, and it is not in Hebrew but in Phoenician

Fredrick Haberman / <cite>quoted by Michael Tsarion</cite>

One of the main reasons why ancient Israel has disappeared from the stage of history is that Israel did not speak Hebrew but Phoenician

Fredrick Haberman / <cite>Tracing Our Ancestors (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

...the alphabet that the early Israelites used was and is demonstrably based on the Phoenician's script

Ralph Ellis / <cite>Scota: Egyptian Queen of the Scots (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

[Ralph] Ellis maintains that this mysterious sect of specially appointed guards was despised by the Hyksos people who were none other than the Israelites of the bible

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1</cite>

Not until Jacob in a somewhat obscure manner was told to call himself Israel was that name adopted and accorded to his twelve "sons:" but if we accept the explanation of Sanchoniathon, a Phoenician of Tyre, Cronus "whom Phoenicians called Israel" was king of Phoenicia, and it signified that these Chaldeo-Phoenician tribes were worshippers of Cronus-Saturn...for Jehovah was a far later importation. The name Israel has subsequently been misappropriated, for those Biblical Christians who term themselves Israelites in fact label themselves followers of a pagan deity

Comyns Beaumont / <cite>The Riddle of Prehistoric Britain (quoted by Michael Tsarion)</cite>

Importantly, recent discoveries made by Jewish and Gentile investigators alike conclusively prove that the so-called "Israelites" (those arch-enemies of would-be "Aryans") were not racially Semitic after all. Like the "Aryans," they too were racially Indo-European. Their language, Hebrew, was identical with Egyptian. Therefore, in our mind the term "Semite" can and must henceforth be dropped as a racial definition for the Bible's "chosen people." [...] the terms "Israelite" and "Judite" do not define races. The terms were religious and theological, and defined cult not race. The Israelites and Judites were conglomerated groups closely affiliated with and probably blood-related to the Hyksos pharaohs of old, a fact confirmed by top Jewish historians.

Michael Tsarion / <cite>The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1</cite>

But since you and the Israelite people will live in spiritual darkness for an extended period, understanding and wisdom of the spirit and of the consciousness will remain hidden from you for a long time.

Other peoples will advance beyond you in spirit and consciousness, evolve to a high degree and follow the laws of Creation.

Therefore, other peoples will be superior to you in spirit and gather great wisdom, so that many among them will soon be like the prophets and remember former lives.

But you and the people of Israel shall remain poor in consciousness and therefore drift in spiritual darkness;

and if someone incurs punishment, he shall have to endure it.

Talmud of Jmmanuel / <cite>23:25-29</cite>

The common notion that the twelve tribes of Israel make up the Jewish nation is quite incorrect, as Israel means all life; the tribes of Israel are all living things. Israel is a generic term for humanity as a collective whole, regardless of race or nation. When this collective humanity is signified by a single term it may be called Adam, or again Jacob. Both represent humanity. This is in the same sense that we use the word man to signify either one man or all men.

Manly P Hall / <cite>How to Understand Your Bible</cite>

The stars are the races of heaven, the population of the firmament, and they are ruled by kings greater than any kings of the earth, even the kings of Edom - the Lords of the stars. When we think of Israel, therefore, we have not only to consider a people or a tribe or nation, but of the whole life of nature, the gods of heaven whose shadows are upon earth.

Manly P Hall / <cite>How to Understand Your Bible</cite>

From Shem, Japeth, and Ham descend the races of humanity, and to this newly established human kind is given the collective term Israel. The word Israel signifies not the Jew in particular, but all humanity, and the evolution of man in the period subsequent to the Atlantean Deluge is symbolically described by the wanderings of the twelve tribes of Israel. These tribes are the twelve orders of human beings dominated by the twelve signs of the Zodiac.

Manly P Hall / <cite>How to Understand Your Bible</cite>

The first place where Jews are mentioned [2 Kings 16] they were at war against Israel. Now can you imagine that? The Jews at war against Israel. Why doesn't everybody think that the Jews are Israel? But the truth is they are not. The Jews are not Israel at all.

Herbert W. Armstrong / <cite>Where are Our Roots?</cite>

The Israelitish consciousness took origin in the hill country of Ephraim; the later Jewish consciousness originated in the southern clan of Judah. The Jews (Judahites) always sought to defame and blacken the record of the northern Israelites (Ephraimites).

Melchizedek of Nebadon / <cite>The Urantia Book</cite>

There never were twelve tribes of the Israelites—only three or four tribes settled in Palestine. The Hebrew nation came into being as the result of the union of the so-called Israelites and the Canaanites. " And the children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites. And they took their daughters to be their wives and gave their daughters to the sons of the Canaanites. " The Hebrews never drove the Canaanites out of Palestine, notwithstanding that the priests' record of these things unhesitatingly declared that they did.

Melchizedek of Nebadon / <cite>The Urantia Book</cite>

Comments (12)

HebrianDaniel: I really wonder what

I really wonder what happening now to the the other 10 lost tribes. will ever they will embrace with our Yehuda Nation and 1 day will reform again our nation back? as the Nation of Israel i hope the tribes will be back and help us form the israel nation :)

Quinton: I think a fairly convincing

I think a fairly convincing theory is that the 10 tribes went up north and become Europe. Ephraim and Manasseh went on to become England and America. So if that is the case they are a lot closer than we might think ;)

HebrianDaniel: so they spreaded all around

so they spreaded all around the globe than i bealive they are more than 1 billion population now the all tribes together. that mean we are many people now

wmarkley: right

Manasseh i hear is us in the USA. we are closer than you think.

UN.i1-PHI: sorry hd i sence influence of israeli propaganda media in you

in the way your commenting and thinking from the israeli side versus palestinian (also because you live there and are hebrew and you associate yourself with it yourself), while you try to explain/argumentate/excuse what or rather why isreal is doing what it does all the time...

look hd i do not watch that often the mainstream media and i am sceptic towards their every move as i am aware of their ways of deceiving and conditioning, but i have noticed certain arguments/things from you wich relate/reflect on certain msm propaganda being pushed atm to excuse israel for what it has been doing for a long time against palestine, however this is a conflict where the actual 'leaders' of israel and palestine are both the responsible ones (and the ones controlling&financing them) for the ongoing war where innocents have to suffer and die and most probably both sides, considering them as marionets, are controlled by strings that lead to the same higher-up puppetteer(s), so they set up terrorism here and there to have the excuse to invade and war against the local people/city/country who they directly or indirectly (falsely) label and associate along with the terrorist organizations they have in their pocket anyway, so they pretend to fight the enemy but the enemy is their secret 'friend' to create an opposite party and include the innocent people wich is their real target so they can take over and control

you say it's almost impossible to have peace with muslims who's desire is to sweep you from the land and throw you into the sea... tough this is the case from both sides, i think the palestinians rather have the fair right to say this about isreal, this is what they've been doing all along wiping palestine off the map bit by bit... and they wont accept it you know, however i think it's all according to the plan of corrupt leaders of both in isreael and palestine who are in bed with eachother to fullfill their purpouse&'prophecy'

this is not about judging israeli people or muslims, this is what the higher ups are doing to continue and excuse the conflict (using religion) but they are the one who we rather judge here at TruthControl, you say "we israelites won't easily give in peace as long as they keep firing rockets from gaza", but i think that is precisely what your zionist leaders want you to think, so what if it's all false flag attacks etc, they probably control the conflict and those rockets firing being fired from the 'muslim side' so that they can continue warring and robbing palestine till the last bit, but lets say they didnt control/caused those rockets being fired upon themselves from gaza, and there is muslim radicals who fight back, well then they're just fighting back right how would you feel like to have your home and family stolen and teared apart and the invader occupies most of the territory and you're left with a small unacceptable percentage, especially with religious conflict programming/conditioning theres no surprise why they wouldnt want to fight back against israel they can say oh now we'd want peace (we have so much anyway), you think they will settle the game over the palestinian/israel territory losing more then 80% orso, hell no even if they would want 51% why would they give them this after theyve robbed and killed them families and places, but i really think both movements are 'highjacked'/controlled to go on doing what they do all according to the plan of no peace untill they have what they want creating a new (world) order

UN.i1-PHI: yeah isreael is taking good care of palestine LOL

sure hd there is/should be some kind of support from israel to palestinians (to a certain degree) because they're the ones suffering directly from their prescense, the zionists elites robbed them from all thesethings wich are necessities in life, and its supposed to be okay/excused or seen as giving support/supply just because they('d have to) feed em a little atleast( wich relatively is really not alot/that much..) wich in turns favors israel because it conditions israelites to think that isreael isnt that bad or is kinda caring for palestine anyway...

they always do this stage up terrorism blame it on those they want to invade and then pretend to be taking care and giving support while they're establishing their things in there, just like with the Red Cross BS in ukraine and they only blame russian aid for bringing gunz in while who knows what they (EU/US etc) are bringing/smuggling(in form of aid) while doing it, there's a conditioning going on now to see things only from one side without making you considering the plain opposite, all to favor the EU, US and Israel (and England) propaganda
they want you to feel only sorry if israel is hit or if an american is decapitated or to make you suspect russia for all things going on around there while they're themselves are acting covertly all over there

people should really stop buying into all this MSM covert pro-pirate-agenda

UN.i1-PHI: VIDEO: How Israel helped to create Hamas

VIDEO: How Israel helped to create Hamas

Late last month, the Irish senator David Norris have been much discussed speech in the Irish Senate about the conflict between Israel and Gaza. The video of the speech has been viewed more than 300,000 times on YouTube, Norris makes the most successful Irish politician on the movie site.

"I'm for human rights, whether a man is Israeli, gay, female or black," said Norris. "I do not ask my opinion on. I'm not anti-Israel or anti-Semitic, but I am for human rights for everyone. "

Norris lashed out at Israel, how the country has the grind on the rest of the world and uses the Holocaust as a justification for the bombing of Gaza

In the video says Norris

Israel is afraid of the Palestinian unity, that's what it's all about. It has nothing to do with the murder of Israeli children, the Israelis knew prior to this war that Hamas had nothing to do with it. Israel created Hamas to split. Fatah They are therefore responsible for Fatah, and I did that a few years ago at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs can confirm in Jerusalem.

Senator David Norris" Israel bombs first and weeps later". Full unedited
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0ee8_dIEPo

Fatah is a Palestinian political movement that was co-founded. By Yasser Arafat The main objective is "the liberation of all of Palestine," the "termination" of Zionism and restoring the state of Palestine to the original territory of the British Mandate of Palestine. The movement, which joined the PLO is seen by Israel as a "terrorist organization."

Hamas, the Islamist movement that lately has been frequently in the news, was founded by Israel, as Senator Norris suggests. Previously proved by WikiLeaks cables that Israel wanted to use the PLO to weaken Hamas. More on this in an article in the Washington Post entitled "How Israel Helped create Hamas. In 2009 appeared in the Wall Street Journal for a hefty article showing how Israel has helped in the creation of Hamas itself.

Documents show from the eighties that Israel Hamas has strengthened to sow among the Palestinians. Divisions during the First Intifada In American government documents , we read: "There is only a small number of Hamas leaders arrested. Israel sees the activities of Hamas not only condone, but supports them even. "

Similarly, the mujahideen were (later Al Qaeda) Osama bin Laden armed and financed by the United States in the fight against the Soviet Union. Years later, these freedom fighters were suddenly seen as terrorists and fought by an international coalition force.
[ Irish Examiner , Washington Post ]
© Copyright (c) NineForNews.nl
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=nl&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=nl&ie...

UN.i1-PHI: Congress must probe ISIL creation by US, Israel and Saudi Arabia

Congress must probe ISIL creation by US, Israel and Saudi Arabia: Dankof

Congress must probe ISIL creation by US, Israel and Saudi Arabia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HGQ9Z_jdII

A former US Senate candidate calls for a congressional investigation into the creation and funding of the ISIL terrorist group by the United States, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
 
“The entire world knows that this ISIS organization, also known as ISIL, was created by the United States, Saudi Arabic and Israel for the specific purpose of enacting regime change in Syria,” said Mark Dankof in an interview with Press TV on Thursday.

“There needs to be a set of congressional hearings –honest ones which we are never going to see—that actually expose how this ISIS organization was created, who provided the funding, who provided the logistics, and why it is that this organization entered Syria and later Iraq principally to the auspices of two American allies; Turkey, a NATO member, and Jordan,” he added.

Dankof characterized ISIL as “a foreign mercenary army” that has been “deliberately introduced into Syria" by the United States and its allies for the “nefarious purpose” of “regime change in Syria” and as “a prelude to a military attack on Iran which is what Israel has wanted all along.”

US President Barack Obama is considering expanding the military air campaign against ISIL targets from Iraq into neighboring Syria.

Dankof said that Obama is using the terrorist group “to justify military actions in Syria which are as much aimed at President Assad of Syria ultimately as they are at ISIS.”

“This is a classic case of ‘creating a problem and then offering a ‘solution’,” he said.

Starting a war without congressional authorization is a violation of Article I of the US Constitution, Dankof pointed out. “The fact of the matter is Barack Obama knows that he can get away with this. He’s had a series of predecessors, who have gotten away with it.”

The White House insists it does not need explicit congressional authorization for military operations against ISIL positions in Iraq or Syria because they are intended to protect American interests.

On Tuesday, the United States began surveillance flights, conducted by manned and unmanned aircraft, over Syria which could pave the way for expanded military action against ISIL terrorists there.

AN/HRJ

UN.i1-PHI: Fidel Castro compares NATO Nazis Terror Group IS set up by US-IS

Fidel Castro compares NATO Nazis, "Terror Group IS set up by US-Israeli"

Former Cuban President Fidel Castro accused the 'cynical' United States and European Union that they use NATO to unleash wars. In a published by Cuban media text the 88-year-old 'lider maximo' compares the Atlantic Alliance with the SS units (Schutzstaffel) of the German Nazi regime. "On some occasions they hoist themselves during the summer in dark suits."

"The European economic community with an iron hand and unconditionally led by the United States," Castro wrote. "They feel that the time has come to settle with what remains of two great nations (Russia and China) the bill. Both countries have been so bold to break. Imposed by the Europe and the United States to the world, colonial and imperial order The aggressive governments of the NATO countries by their cynicism and their attempts to preserve become the laughing stock of Europe and the world. "Their shameful privileges

[check out: policy blunders pushing europe into a depression]
The "destructive economic policies of the West," according to Castro will lead the euro and dollar soon to be dependent on the Russian ruble and the Chinese yuan. He writes that the political bruising Washington and its European allies will be run on an "economic collapse" that dollars and euros to 'worthless paper' will reduce.

The communist former president accused the Republican senator John McCain it together with the Israeli secret service Mossad have created. The terrorist Islamic State (IS) "McCain unconditionally support Israel and have contributed to the creation of IS, who has the power conquered large parts of Iraq and part of Syria."

Instead of unleashing wars, governments must invest in hospitals and schools for the billions of people who desperately need, says Castro.

Fidel Castro was between 1959 and 2008, the leader of the island of Cuba. In 2006 he carried his duties for health reasons, to his brother Raul. Since then he has numerous articles and books on foreign policy.
[ RT , HLN ]
© Copyright (c) NineForNews.nl
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=nl&sl=nl&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2F...

HamiticNegus: HAM

The Hamitic
The French scholars came to the conclusion that the Egyptians were NEGUS. Denon, one of Napoleon's original expedition, describes them as such:
...a broad and flat nose, very short, a large flattened mouth... thick lips, etc.'.
The view that the Egyptians were 'NEGUS and highly civilized apparently existed before the French expedition to Egypt. Count Volney, a French traveller to the Middle East, spent four years in Egypt and Syria and wrote in a well-known book: How are we astonished... when we reflect that to the race of NEGUS’, at present our slaves/prisoners/free Labor for the vicious, and the objects of our contempt, we owe our arts, sciences, and... when we recollect that, in the midst of these nations, who call themselves the friends of liberty and humanity, the most barbarous of slaveries is justified; and that
it is even a problem whether the understandings of NEGUS be of the same species with that of Shem Japhet men

http://courses.washington.edu/relvip/Religion_%26_Violence/Study_Guides/...

Jewryism:
The Babylonian Talmud, a collection of oral traditions of the Jews, appeared in the sixth century A.D.; it states that the descendants of Ham are cursed by being black, and depicts Ham as a sinful man and his progeny as degenerates. Thus, early tradition identified the Hamites with Negus and endowed them with both certain physiognomical attributes and an undesirable character. This notion persisted in the Middle Ages, when fanciful rabbinical expansions of the Genesis stories were still being made. Ham, some of them said, was supposed to have emasculated Noah, who cursed him thus: 'Now I cannot beget the fourth son whose children I would have ordered to serve you and your brothers! Therefore it must be Canaan, your firstborn, whom they enslave. And since you have disabled me... doing ugly things in blackness of night, Canaan's children shall be borne ugly and black! Moreover, because you twisted your head around to see my nakedness, your grandchildren's hair shall be twisted into kinks, and their eyes red; again because your lips jested at my misfortune, theirs shall swell; and because you neglected my nakedness, they shall go naked, and their male members shall be shamefully elongated! Men of this race are called Negroes, their forefather Canaan commanded them to love theft and fornication, to be banded together in hatred of their masters and never to tell the truth.'

Scholars who study the Hebrew myths of the #Genesis claim that these oral traditions grew out of a need of the #Israelites (ADL), to rationalize their subjugation of #Canaan, grandson to #Ham, a historical fact validated by the myth of Noah's curse. Talmudic or Midrashic explanations of the myth of Ham were well known to #Jewish writers in the Middle Ages, as seen in this description by Benjamin of Tudela, a twelfth-century merchant and traveller south of Aswan:

Site Statistics

Posts
48,602
Comments
31,951
Members
26,150