Michael Tsarion - News, Updates, Images & Quotes

Vatican City was perfectly aligned with the Druidic sites of Newgrange and Knowth, in Ireland. From the air, St. Peter's square looks like a keyhole, and also suggestively like a Scottish thistle. Does this indicate ties between the popes and Scottish Templars?

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

As the Dead Sea Scrolls have revealed, the Old Testament and the Gospels are travesties that have served to obscure the truth about the true origins of religion.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

By the time of the wealthy Christian extremist Bishop Marcion (an ardent second century supporter of Paul's message) Christianity was lauded and the new Christ accepted as the king sent from heaven to save souls. Marcion, who was possibly an Atonist, virulently condemned the Jews and their Torah, accusing them of being devilish "Anti-Christs." He asserted that only Paul's message should be trusted. Any other church or interpretation was to be considered false and heretical. He worked to have the Old Testament removed from the bible and to re-collate and re-interpret the Gospels. The Marcionite sect remained prominent in Europe for over three hundred years.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

We would do well to meditate on the meaning of well used terms such as "the sacking of Jerusalem" and "destruction of the temple." They mean that "Judaism" was over and done with as far as the world was concerned. It was officially a dead religion. If anything of it remained it was literally owned by the masters of Rome. Judaism was, in effect, their property

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Dead Sea Scrolls may not have been written by the Essenes at all. That was merely the first conjecture made by experts shortly after their discovery. The Scrolls do not mention any such group as the Essenes. It is not even agreed that the Essenes were Jewish.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Due to their antipathy toward the complicit Jerusalem Church, many Jews decided to join breakaway sects and remove themselves to remote regions in order to preserve the ways of the Torah and to facilitate an unadulterated lifestyle. Among the most important of these sects were the Essenes, presumably the composers of the Dead Sea Scrolls. When these texts were re-discovered in the twentieth century the Vatican's hierarchy were deeply threatened. The Vatican officialdom knew that these documents would contain information on Paul and on the false brand of Christianity concocted for Western audiences. The campaign to suppress the texts and to prevent their worldwide publication is rooted in this fear.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

All the while Paul knew exactly who the real "Christs" were - his own Roman backers - the Flavians, Pisos, and other Atonist families of Rome and the Orient. It was for them that a new religion had to be fashioned and imposed upon the world. It was from their capital city that it would eventually be established and to a Western audience that it would matter most in the end. If it pacified Jewish revolt that was good. But this is not the reason for which Christianity was created, as so many authors and historians conjecture.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Paul's Christ recommended giving unto Caesar his due and not fighting against him. Christ's message compelled one to turn the other cheek and to forgive enemies. Paul's "Christ" did not advocate, as did the Torah, the living of a spotless moral life. It stressed being forgiven for all sins and moral infractions by Christ. It stressed belief and acceptance by faith. It let one off the hook and this doctrine was most attractive to the kings, emperors, and nobles of the West. The Christian doctrine was infinitely more acceptable than the hardcore Jewish brand. Paul drew heavily on paganism in order to make his Christ figure familiar to a pagan audience. For this offense he was naturally spurned by the orthodox Jews who were still committed to the old calcified and convoluted paradigm.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Exilarchs of the Gaonim compiled the Talmud and Torah knowing full well what ordinary Jews and Christians were never meant to know, namely, that the roots of Judaism and Christianity had been inherited from the great solar colleges and temples of the Nile, from the three-hundred year reign of the Hyksos kings, and from the Atonist Pharaoh Akhenaton and his skewed version of sun worship. Once the Gaonim set to work expunging obviously pagan elements they could lay claim to that which was not theirs to begin with. They could maintain that Yahweh had communicated the Law to their ancestors at Mount Sinai. They could downplay Egypt and form themselves into what appeared to be a distinctly unique religious sect. Paul and his Christians could do likewise and all would be well. And so we have it - Judaism and Christianity - two hands serving the same brain. The Gaonim (or at least their occult ways) would later be an active part of the Freemasonic Order. The cryptic masonic insignia "G" refers to and belongs to them.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The average Jew has yet to realize that although they have been expertly taught to regard themselves to be "People of the Book" the book in question is not the Torah but the Talmud (and also Mishnah). The descendants of the ancient Talmudists from Sinai, the followers of "Moses" who have expertly duped the world, are alive and well. They operate from behind the veils of Judaism and Christianity, the religions of their own making. It is the ancient oral tradition that is of value and importance to them and it was a tradition not meant for the laity. It was reserved for the elite, the Naassians, Kohanim, Levites, Gaonim, and Pharisees. This tradition was finally codified as the Palestinian Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The pope who ostensibly heads Catholicism from the Vatican ("Place of Sorcery") wears the Judaic regalia for a reason. The Lutheran priests and court magistrates and school teachers who adorn themselves in the long black robe of the rabbis also do so for a reason. Whether it is the tassel on the square "mortar board" headgear of graduates, or the many Christian festival holidays, or the symbols employed by Western royal families and their governments, the "Judaic" (Atonist) elements are evident.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

What we see with Paul's work is an ingenious revamping of the old Egyptian solar religion that had been grinding to a halt with rabbinical Pharisaism.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In time, after a few decades had elapsed, and after its establishment, Christianity's Judaic origins could be acknowledged. But in its inception the emphasis was to be placed on its novelty. Conversely, the rank and file of Jewry would be coerced by their Pharisaic rabbis and teachers to ostensibly reject this Christ and his conformist teachings. And this rejection of the new religion by old world, old school Jews further served to convey the impression that there were few points of similarity between the two religions.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Sadducees of the Temple of Jerusalem knew how detrimental belief in a raging Messiah would be to their interests. They knew only too well that there was no way for a Pharisaic Messiah to be accepted or welcomed in Rome by Gentiles. They also knew that the Jewish people were not going to jubilantly accept Rome as the capital city of the new church. So, we insist that it was a coterie of Sadducees who, during the Roman occupation, commissioned "historians" in Egypt, Judea, and Rome, to concoct the Messiah story. We do not accept the theories of those scholars (Joseph Atwill and others) who strive to prove that the situation was the reverse, i.e., that Romans, for their own purposes, invented the Christ story. We do not feel that the Jesus story was created merely to dampen or offset the revolutionary spirit among lower class Jews in Judea. We do not believe that those who had smashed the Temple and removed the Jewish Torah to Rome, were particularly worried about Jewish uprising. The Roman Empire was large. If they were inclined to concoct new religions and new divine heroes to dupe the people of the lands they occupied they would have done so for every one of the places they overran and conquered. And this is not the case. Massacre, persecution, and oppressive legal prohibition, were the manner in which Rome dealt with open hostility and rivalry. Taking out the head men and dispensing fear were the methods used to maintain order in foreign parts. Making friends of the intellectual classes and employing "Quislings" from the conquered peoples also paid dividends. Demonstrating a relatively tolerant attitude toward the religious beliefs of compliant nations was also a clever ploy to win acceptance. It appears that the Romans permitted their conquered peoples to continue worshiping as they saw fit, as long as they also accepted the divinity of Caesar.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The elites within Judaism (in particular the Sadducees), who had their minds set on assimilation into Western elite circles, were not eager for it to be known abroad that their Moses was none other than Akhenaton and that their own origins were to be found in the despised land of Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

"Solomon" who established the "Zadokite" order was none other than the eighteenth dynasty Pharaoh Amenhotep III, the father of Akhenaton. Amenhotep III was a descendant of the Hyksos pharaohs of Upper Egypt and was a worshipper of the sun god Aton. The name Solomon was merely his solar title - sol meaning sun. The Zadokites, originally sun priests of Egypt, were serpent worshippers.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Sadducees were also known as Zadokites (from tsedduqim) after the high priest Zadok who had anointed King Solomon (Sol, Sun).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Sadducees were aristocrats. They were a conservative upper class while the Pharisees were distinguished by their intellectual expertise and great learning. The word Pharisee meant "those set apart" or "those standing alone."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Sadducees were the elite, wealthy Jews who worked closely with certain Roman nobels. Hated even by their own kind, whom did they really serve?

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Official Jewish history indicates that the Sadducees and Pharisees were rivals but the division between these kindred sects occurred relatively late in their history. It occurred during a Jewish civil war that broke out during the so-called "Hasmonean Period" under the rule of Maccabean King John Hyrcanus II. The conflict finally abated and history books tell us that the Sadducees finally ceased to exist after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. We are not, however, convinced that the Sadducees just vanished into thin air at this time. They were on excellent terms with the Roman nobility and would have been protected and forewarned of Rome's retaliation against Jerusalem.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

For these reasons we do not agree with the writers and investigators who believe the Gospels to have been written at the behest of Rome for political reasons. The intellectual elite within the Sadducees and Romans were not in the least bit perturbed by the zealots of Judea. They considered the Messianic idea of ordinary Jews totally redundant. If pacifying Jews was their desire they could have groomed a real, living savant and let him loose, professing himself to be the Messiah. They could have promoted a man to impersonate the Messiah and no one would have been the wiser. This would have made better sense than to simply create the history of one in writing and hope that people would read it and react. No! The idea was to create a new religion based on the old Atonist model to appeal to a Western audience. Whether this religion and its Christ was accepted by the Jews or not was barely a concern. They could accept Christ or they could deny him. What did it matter to Rome and the Caesars? This is why Josephus barely mentions the Messiah in his vast works and why Christianity was established in Rome and not Judea. Christianity was the brain-child of one small elite group of Atonists resident in Rome, and of their intellectual colleagues, the Sadducees. Its central hero was a hybrid of several pagan deities and heroes, and partly based on the old Jewish Messiah. But the creators of the new religion, and of Christ, knew that the real Messiah was an Egyptian concept and not a Jewish one. The real Messiah was a descendant of the House of David, and that meant them. The claims made by the Jews meant nothing and would never come to pass - as they have not.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The strange predictions of a coming savior that misinformed Christians believe exist in the books of Daniel and Isaiah do not refer to Jesus. They refer to the one for whom the Gospel Jesus spoke, for whom the inventors of Jesus spoke. Whether these inventors were Roman emperors or Egyptian sun priests, their agenda was the re-creation and re-establishment of a solar religion that had failed to galvanize the world at the first attempt. The second attempt was to succeed. All human beings would leave aside their petty allegiances and would remove their blindfolds. They would bow before the new lords of light and their bright stainless king.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Atonists had left Egypt in the company of their Israelite brethren. After their exile, and after falling out amongst themselves, the Atonists found themselves vulnerable and few in number. These Atonist-Levites carried with them the gnosis imparted to them by Akhenaton and his descendants. They were a privileged priesthood and had little time for the mass of Israelites that had accompanied them and eventually fallen back to old pagan beliefs. A close reading of the factional conflict at Mount Sinai reveals as much. We read that Moses (Akhenaton) became furious after discovering his disgruntled followers were backsliding into the worship of the golden calf (symbol for the god Amen-Ra and the previous Age of Taurus). As the centuries passed the elite Atonist Levites had less and less to do with their erstwhile lower class brethren, the Israelites. Ten tribes had assimilated into the Western lands and only the so-called Tribes of Benjamin and Levi (The Levites) had stayed true to the oral tradition handed down to them at Sinai. These hardliners knew themselves to be heirs of the pharaohs and they did not relish their fate, nor plan to continue scrounging around the wastelands in exile. They had their minds set on ingratiation with their many allies in Assyria, Babylonia, Crete, Greece, and Italy. It is our belief that they were more than successful in their intent and that they did indeed enjoy the confidence of foreign powers. When the Grecian Empire gave way to that of the Roman, the Atonist families continued to prosper and liaise. They concerned themselves solely with making inroads into civilized nations and winning power-allies and not with the goings on in Judea of people they considered arch-betrayers. If their old pals were being conquered and harassed, that was just hard luck on them. They were merely receiving their just desserts for past iniquity. They did not want Aton so they could have the Roman Jupiter instead. They could wait for their promised Messiah for as long as they wished. He was not coming, because he was already there.The Atonists who insinuated themselves into the upper class of Roman society considered themselves direct descendants of Akhenaton. They were the "Messiah" that Jews were foolishly expecting. Paul and his Christ character of the New Testament were merely loudspeakers, messengers, proclaimers crying in the wilderness "make straight the way of the Lord Aton."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The priests and governors of Judea were personally appointed to their stations by the Flavian Caesars of Rome. It is coming to light that the Flavians were, through their agent Paul, one of the main conceivers of the Jesus story as it appears in the New Testament.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Before they arrived in Rome, the Herodian dynasty were allegedly known as Edomites, and we strongly suspect they were connected to the descendants of the Atonists and to the Hyksos "Shepherd Kings," of Egypt. The word Edom is believed to have meant "red men," or "men from the red land," and the color red is associated with the Hyksos bloodline. The Herod family was both Jewish and Roman, and we believe them to have been puppets of the Atonists ensconced in France and Britain.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Herodians, known as "Kings of the Jews" were a Jewish-Roman elite of great power and prestige. They were Edomites (Idumeans) or Hyksos, that is - Atonists. A few experts believe that the letter "I," at the beginning of Idumean, should be a "J." They believe the word is a rough and deliberate corruption of Judean. This makes sense. This is merely one example of how words and terms have been tampered with so that the truth about mankind's past remains distorted.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The relationship between the Sadducee Party and Roman authorities requires further exploration and is, in our opinion, a key factor behind the re-casting of the Jewish Messianic figure into the Jesus Christ figure so beloved of the Christians and so soft on the Romans. It is our personal belief that a relationship existed between Roman and Sadducee elites and that these two forces conspired together, for reasons of financial gain and territorial power, to invent the Christ myth.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Before his remarkable and suitably dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus, Paul was suggestively named Saul (Sol). Before he worked for "the Lord" saving souls he worked for the High Priest of the Temple of Jerusalem. He was a police agent hunting and persecuting Christians. The High Priest was a member of the powerful Sadducee Party.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

After the death of the physical Jesus Christ the Church Fathers decided to combine the Old and New Testaments. The reasons for this have been downplayed and are very important. The joining of the two treatises was a signal that there was, after all, little difference between Mosaic (Atonist) Judaism and Pauline Christianity. And we agree that there is little essential difference. In the end, despite implied superficial differences, Judaism and Christianity are merely two words for Egyptian Atonism.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

To hardcore Jews these Romans and their Sadducee (and Herodian) lieutenants were emissaries of Satan.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The two crossed keys and golden eagle of Vatican City. Like the double-headed eagle of Freemasonry, or the royal lion and unicorn insignia, these emblems symbolize the dialectic of Judaism and Christianity - two arms serving the same brain.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Like the pyramid, the beehive suggests the organized, hierarchical society so desired by the Atonist world controllers. This symbolism makes us aware of the intimate connections between the Church of Rome and the secret cabals they pretend to oppose.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The [two crossed] keys also represent the enigma of zodiacal precession. The words pontifex (a title of the pope), and cardinal connote doorways, and the reference is to the various zodiacal doorways which are opened and closed as the sun passes from one age, or sign, to another.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In the Dead Sea Scrolls, although the connection is never lucidly made, Paul is certainly the one being described as the "Wicked Priest" who threatens the life of John the Baptist, the "Teacher of Righteousness."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

But he [Paul] knew that the Christians who felt repulsed by hardline Pharisaic Judaism were unconsciously identifying with Levitical Atonist Judaism. The fact that most Christians were unaware of how their allegiances were being manipulated, and of the deep connections between their religion and the secret Judaic tradition, has little bearing on the facts. This is the very reason why so many American evangelist pastors appear to be so pro-Israel, and why they continue spouting Zionist rhetoric about the holiness of Israel and the fact that America is the "New Israel." They do not care about ordinary Jews and their beliefs. Their Zionism is not Jewish but Egyptian. It is Atonism plain and simple.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Levites and Gaonim were of the House of Judah (Yahud) and not Israel. As we will see, the majority of those "Israelite" tribes that had left Egypt had chosen not to follow Akhenaton and his extremist Atonist priests. They went their own way after rejecting the agendas of the megalomaniacal Levites and their obsessed leader. As a result of their blasphemy they and their descendants were considered degenerate outcasts by the elite Atonists. In their minds, the Levites were true "Jews" and not the renegades who chose to disperse and assimilate into the West. The two tribes of Levites, under Akhenaton, would see to it that the "Children of Israel" would be banished in the sight of their Lord, condemned and considered "lost tribes."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The story of the Baptist and his Gnostic Church was modified and skewed into the shape found in the New Testament that presents John as a rather eccentric skin-wearing old world prophet content to baptize and laud Jesus and tell his own disciples and the rest of the world to follow him alone. In truth, the successor of John the Baptist, the Mandean "King of Light," was the Gentile prophet Simon Magus who cryptically turns up in the Christian New Testament as Simon the Zealot, Simon Cananaios, and Lazarus of Bethany. The cults of John and Simon are believed to have carried on in secret through many Gnostic sects and orders, particularly the Knights Templar, Knights of St. John, and powerful Order of Sion (whose chiefs are entitled "John" or "Jean"). The Church of Rome considers the John cults heretical and even satanic since they condemn the Pauline Jesus as an imposter and opportunist.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

According to Judaic and Christian sources, the original followers of Jesus were not called "Christians." They were referred to as "Nasoreans," or "Nazarenes" (from Notzrim). This is confirmed by Clement, Origen, St. Jerome, and other historians. If Roman or other historians had then been writing true and accurate accounts of Jesus they would have been chronicling and recording this term and not that of "Christian," that is used but four times in the New Testament. The reason why this proper name was not used probably has to do with the fact that the Nazarenes were known to have existed over 150 years prior to the birth of the New Testament Jesus. This predicament was not a problem to the Essences and Gnostics who accepted that Jesus, the "Nasorean," had lived years before the bible's nativity. For Christians, however, the predicament was seriously threatening since it hearkened back to a time when their Jesus was considered a heretical self-serving corruptor of truth rather than a champion of it. For this reason the term "Nazarene" was misapplied to mean the place of Jesus' birth and the term "Christian" was adopted to distinguish his followers. Factually, the term Nasorean, that means "to be separate," was used to describe the priests and members of the Gnostic Mandeans who repudiated the teachings of Jesus in favor of those of John the Baptist. Jesus had, they believed, been a disciple of John but had corrupted his teachings. The term Nasorean had to be mistranslated since the Church knew that it originally referred to cults with connections to Egypt whose teachings contradicted the Christian Gospels and whose leaders came from a spiritual lineage going back to distant ages. Most importantly, the Mandean church and its teachings clearly evidenced the direct connections between proto-Christianity and Egyptian stellar and solar theology. And it was this relationship that threatened Paul and his masters.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

It was by the ingenuity of Paul that this improbable Judaic "Messiah" was re-scripted and upgraded into an attractive and dynamic figure with a unique spiritual message openly contradicting the rabbinical tradition and offering a revolutionary path to salvation. A weak renegade who was an anathema to Jewish hardliners could quite easily be transmogrified into something suitable for a different audience. He could have traits of every god-man, sun king, and solar hero that had ever edified the human imagination. And he could be a representative of someone very special, someone who was not meant to be openly known, whose bloodline had continued to influence the world from the Mosaic age and who had ingratiated the highest echelons of imperial Rome, whose empire stretched across the known world. As an agent of this secret dynastic power, Paul was to artificially create a rift between the old tradition and his new one so that one could be played against the other for as long as need be. Through his artifice the divide would be drastic and long lasting. It was important, therefore, that his Messiah's message was seen to be rejected by recalcitrant and quarrelsome Jews. It was important that his savior of all mankind be put to death by the Jewish Sanhedrin of Pharisees and Sadducees and not by Rome. His tradition would acknowledge no direct connection to the Rabbinical tradition of ancient times. Ultimately, Paul's treatment would denigrate the Jews and cause men to accuse them of deicide. Moreover, such egregious tactics would compel the vast majority of Jews to reject the "Rome-friendly" solar hero of the New Testament. This rejection of the Pauline Christ was the perfect smokescreen obscuring the dark and remote origins of both religions.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Yes, this [Messiah] is clearly an entity in line with the Mosaic (Atonist) Jehovah. He's a far cry from the gentle forgiving Jesus presented by Paul. Paul was basing his Christ only slightly on such a rapacious character and much more on pagan deities familiar to Western Gentiles. His Christ was compassionate, tolerant, and loving of all men, someone who gave up his own life for the good of all. The Messiah of the hardliners was the "Lion King" of Judah returned to cast off oppression and bring retribution. It is our belief that this Jewish personage - part king, part adjudicator, part destroyer - is a composite figure based on the Akhenaton, his god Aton, and the volcano god Yahweh. He is a concoction of the Levites and Gaonim, a being who would have faded into oblivion if the Jews of later ages had not suffered invasion and oppression, and if their political aspirations had not been thwarted. Those who have happy homes in this world do not devote themselves to the veneration of aggressive Messianic kings. A part of Paul's job was to take this time hardened tradition and soften it up. It was vital the Messianic figure was seen to have spiritual powers only, and not be considered a political threat.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Behind the official form of Judaism lay the secret Mosaic (Atonist) doctrine transmitted to an elect group of mysterious Levites who had followed Moses out of Egypt across the desert to Mount Sinai.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

For all his conniving and ingenuity, Paul's attempt to divide Christianity from its Judaic roots failed. The Church employed too much old world symbolism for the ploy to be one hundred percent successful.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Israelites were a powerful nobility of Egypt and not vagabonds wandering around seeking for a home. Their religion was not fringe or obscure. It was conceived in the sun temples of the Nile. It was fine that the world remained ignorant of this. The elites with intelligence knew it, and that was enough. Judaism had arisen from Atonism and another branch would develop from the same trunk. That branch was Christianity.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The British and Roman quorums for the rise of "Judaism" are also responsible for the rise of Christianity. The supposed differences between the two religions, and the schisms between them (like those between Catholicism and Protestantism), have been craftily concocted to conceal this fact. Their differences and supposed enmity are, for the most part, merely camouflage concealing their closeness and true histories. When "Judaism" ceased to fully serve the secret purposes of its creators, living it up in affluent Rome, a new religion was commissioned to better serve their temperaments and private agendas. Judaism was not to fade. It was to be renovated and transformed. As Ralph Ellis puts it in King Jesus, Pauline Christianity was in reality Judaism made simple. The Pharisaic interpretation was to be scaled back and Paul, friend of the Sadducees and Romans, would rescript the archaic traditions into something modern that served to mollify their pagan hosts while empowering the Levitical elites seeking new empires in the Western lands. Paul would be the man to tear the tapestry of Judaism into two parts. The separation of the tapestry, so to speak, allowed Paul to stich into his Christian half the Atonist threads that had faded and broken in the Judaic half. Atonism was to be the world's new religion. It had been the father of all religions and it was to rule again albeit under a cloak.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The bizarrity is increased when we discover how many "career" clerics, bishops, and priests have dismissed the historicity of Jesus, the man they are meant to be administering for.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The expelled Atonists of Egypt had quickly managed to find new homes in Greece, Syria, Crete, and other countries, so it is not unlikely that they also had many friends in Italy, especially among the patrician families who admired Egypt and who would one day conquer it for themselves. Yes, the Atonists would have coveted the hospitality of the Roman elite. In Rome they would have had access to the men whose empires controlled the world. From there they could commission agents to concoct historical and religious motifs to suit their vision of themselves. We believe Rome was chosen as a new headquarters by Akhenaton's Atonists.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Bushby rightly draws our attention to the significance of the term Panthera. It specifically refers to the panther, and to the garb worn by priests of the sun temple of Egypt. The panther was, like the lion, a symbol of initiation into the Hermetic mysteries. And most significantly, the term appears to derive directly from the Egyptian Pan Neter Ra, a title meaning “Son of Ra” (Son of the Sun). So,if we are to believe the latest evidence, the physical Jesus was not the son of god, as Christians and Jews may or may not accept, but the descendant of Roman emperors and heir to their throne.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Interestingly, for our thesis, the ancestors of Mary were Benjaminite priest kings of the House of Judah (Aton).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Author Tony Bushby, primarily working from rather spurious and convoluted Jewish sources such as the Talmud and Toldoth Jeshu or "Life of Jesus," is convinced that Paul’s hero is based on a legitimate historical rebel leader known as Judas Khrestus and on his twin Yeshua Ben Panthera.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Author Tony Bushby discovered that many of the stories pertaining to Jesus were rescripted excerpts from the biography of Apollonius. Apparently, it was Church Father John Chrysostom who set about plagiarizing the story of the life and times of Apollonius, presenting them anew as the story of Jesus. Bushby believes that the name "Paul" was the nome de plume of Chrysostom or some other ghost writer. In his mind there was no Paul of Tarsus. He explains that the name Paul, or Paulus, is merely the Latinized version of the Greek name Apollonius.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Through the exemplary revelations of many researchers we now know Paul modeled his "Christ" on several mythical and historical personages who had already risen to prominence and notoriety in the world. A partial list of potential candidates for Paul's elusive Jesus includes:

King Hezekiah of Judah
John the Baptist
Simon Magus
Apollonius of Tyana
Simon Maccabeus
Joshua the Son of Nun
Menahem the Essene
Judas Khrestus
Joshua ben Panthera
Jesus Gamala
Caesar Augustus (Octavian)
Akhenaton
Tutankhamun
Zoroaster
Nebo
Serapis
Mithras
Esus, or Iesa
Dionysus (Zagreus, Bacchus)
Siddhartha Gautama Buddha

Basing his Jesus on well known mythical icons and spiritual adepts was a clever device to ensure that his creation would be accepted throughout the world by men of culture and learning.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Apollonius of Tyana (97 AD) was known as the "Nazarene." The neo-Pythagorean sage lived and taught in Tarsus, the city where Paul was born. Supposedly a contemporary of Jesus, he was known to have traveled to the East to meet the Brahmins of India.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

There was only one major difference between Paul's Christianity and the pagan corpus, and that it involved the sanctity of the self. Apparently, the cabals in Britain, Rome, and Jerusalem, that commissioned Paul were determined to decimate the pagan philosophy that considered man as his own savior.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Paul of Tarsus (10BC-67AD) - Agent of the Atonists. Author Ralph Ellis believes Paul and the historian Josephus Piso to have been one and the same person. Ellis maintains that Saul-Paul-Josephus wielded enormous power in Judea. He was probably not only the creator of Christianity, as we know it today, but, according to Ellis, he was also the compiler of the Talmud. He was, therefore, responsible for the type of Judaism known today. Paul also had the power to sequester or destroy any historical works and accounts that contradicted his own literary concoctions. He had the power and ability to invent historians and historical accounts out of thin air. Author Tony Bushby believes Paul was the pen-name of an unknown author. Bushby emphasizes that the name Paul, or Paulus, is the Latinized version of Apollonius, and that the biography of Apollonius of Tyana was plagiarized by the scribe known as Paul.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

We are now sixty-seven years on from the death of Sigmund Freud and we feel that the time has finally come when scholars and researchers can declare, with confidence and authority, that the Jesus depicted in the New Testament did not exist as a physical presence in the world. Search as they might the biblicists have not found the appropriate evidence to support a real man, a carpenter's son, who was also savior of the world. Every major find further decimates the theory of a Jesus of Nazareth put before us in the New Testament.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

A controversial postscript to the case of Sigmund Freud concerns his murder. Author and investigator into the so-called "curse" of the tomb of Tutankhamun, Gerald O'Farrell, believes Freud was poisoned to death in retaliation for his audacious revelations. The heinous act served to keep him from revealing more to the world. O'Farrell has discovered that Freud's writings and notes on the connections between Moses and Akhenaton are being deliberately sequestered by the keepers of his archives in New York. Freud's assassination was, according to O'Farrell, one of many killings surrounding the excavation of the tombs of Tutankhamun and Queen Tiye (Akhenaton's mother).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The origins of Judeo-Christianity are to be found in Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Despite deliberate doctoring, passages such as the following from Exodus, Isaiah, Hosea,Joshua, and Micah (typical of many in the texts) are not to be erroneously regarded as recordings of the words of an affronted or disgruntled Yahweh, a disembodied supernatural god. On the contrary they are those of a physical being. The "I" speaking is not god but Moses or - more correctly - Akhenaton.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

There are many passages in the Old Testament that speak of semi-enlightened god-men, or god-kings, the leaders of the Israelites. Many of these passages, particularly those in Daniel and Isaiah, have been cunningly misinterpreted as predictions concerning Jesus who was to appear seven centuries later in history. This nonsense has been widely accepted on faith by the majority of churchmen and evangelists. However, these mysterious passages relate not to future prophets and leaders but to contemporary ones who descended from royal Atonist houses. The character known as Moses was one such super-human entity. Even though it is now known that this Moses did not write the books attributed to him he is still considered a legitimate historical character. We submit, however, that he was none other than Akhenaton himself or, at least, one of his royal pharaonic Atonist successors.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Once we realize that Aton and Adon are the same deity and that they are Egyptian and not Arabian or Syrian, and that their priest was none other than Akhenaton, the expelled eighteenth dynasty renegade pharaoh, the clouds of mystery evaporate and the truth stands illuminated. The realization assists us to understand the secret meaning of many biblical passages that have not been successfully explained even by the greatest scholars.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In any case, Freud's words lead us to the heart of the Moses-Akhenaton problem. We know that the god of the latter figure was Aton, god of light. This is the same god worshipped by the Israelites under the name Adon. But Adon was a name used in place of the word Jehovah. So Aton and Adon (or Aton and Jehovah) are one and the same being. Since this fact had to be concealed, the story of the volcano-god was concocted. Jehovah was to be met in lands distant from Egypt. He was to be encountered after the exodus and not before. Prior to the exodus only Moses himself would have been granted an audience and that, again, would have been during the time when he was an outcast in remote lands.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Freud expressed amazement that so much detail on the reprehensible nature of this god [Yahweh] should have been preserved. Perhaps he would have agreed with us that it was included and preserved, even after centuries of editing, because it served to obscure the god being worshipped by the Egyptian-born exiles, the entourage of Akhenaton - the real "Moses."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

[Sigmund] Freud rightly sensed this and knew full well that Jehovah was but a minor god of mountains and volcanoes, worshipped by small numbers far outside the land of pyramids, sun temples, and complex pantheons.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Ankh is a symbol of the Nephilim, or Annunaki, and their primordial knowledge and royal status. It served the same symbolic purpose as the modern crown, scepter, and mace. Indeed, the very word ankh is a loose rendering of the word Anakim (meaning “great kings” or “giants”) and perhaps of Annunaki, meaning "heavenly serpents" or "those who came down from heaven to earth.” That Judeo-Christianity was not originally monotheistic is demonstrated by the fact that the Elohim are commonly considered identical to Jehovah.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Freud did not realize, as most still do not, that the term Elohim (from Eloah, and Aleim), that implies a plurality of "gods," simply referred to the Egyptian (and Phoenician-Sumerian) kings and pharaohs who were considered nothing less than living gods. These kings of the Euphrates and the Nile not only styled themselves on the gods of ancient pantheons, but were regarded as actual embodiments of and channels for the will of those gods and goddesses. They were the"Keepers," the "Watchers," the "Elders," the "Kadosh." Secondary permutations of the words,Elohim, Nephilim, and Annunaki, refer to these living incarnate gods, the pharaohs of Egypt, and the various stellar, solar, and lunar priestarchies they headed.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

That there are two gods and two schools of thought, in the first books of the bible, is of major importance. It shows us that "history" was being deliberately, if not methodically, concocted.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In Moses and Monotheism, Freud discloses a theory for the belief in a Messiah, and in the second coming of such a being. He emphasized that it was a consequence of the violent demise of the Jewish Moses after the time of the exile. Most biblical researchers and commentators agree that Moses died soon after reaching Sinai and that the leadership of the exiled peoples fell to his brother Aaron.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

On the surface this Atonist denial of the underworld, of shadow, death, and mortality, can seem admirable and commendable. But total denial can lead to its own kind of pathology. And we assert that it has indeed done so. Apollonian religions, such as Judeo-Christianity, have forced the consciousness of human beings into a polarized and unhealthy state. The Atonists believed shadows disperse once bright light is thrown at them. They were wrong. The shadows merely darken. Dare we speculate then on the peculiar psychological profile of priests and worshippers of the sun who avoid noticing the existence and significance of shadows cast by the light they revere?

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

We insist that this Atonist doctrine was a key pylon in the foundation of both Judaism and Christianity. Although the earliest "Christian" sects sought to live humble spirit-focused lives as taught by their savior, and although they honored the apostolic tradition of poverty, the leviathan of the later Roman Church took a suggestively different course. The shameless decadence and arch-materialism of the Vatican stands out as further proof for their Atonist origins. The abandonment of all gods but one, the adoption of a theology of light, the denial of Underworld rituals and tradition, the lionization of an exceptional but short-lived leader, the heinous cruelty against adversaries, and chronic unbounded materialism, are the commonalities between Judaism, Catholicism, and Atonism. They are the hallmarks of all three.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Freud also speculated about the psychic disposition of Moses (Akhenaton) and wondered not only why he was so ardently fixated on the sun and its properties, but why he feared and loathed darkness. He noted how Akhenaton had forbidden the people of Egypt to venerate Osiris or to participate in the rites of the Underworld that had been customarily undertaken for thousands of years. The Atonist pharaoh might perhaps have begrudgingly tolerated mention and veneration of Atum Ra (an important sun god of Heliopolis in Lower Egypt) or of Shu and Isis perhaps, but never of Amun Ra (Amen or Amon) of Thebes, or of the primordial Osiris. These gods played no part in the Cult of Atonism. There was no Underworld for Akhenaton. There was no traversal of the twelve stages of the shadow realm, no guides of the dead, and no need to think of anything beyond this life. These theological and cultural changes came as a shock to the understanding of most Egyptians who believed that Osiris was the god who would lead the soul safely through the tests that awaited after death. The man who did not reverence Osiris could not possibly enter the afterlife safely and could not hope for salvation. To not believe in Osiris was tantamount to not believing in the soul.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

We emphasize at this point that spurious and preposterous stories, such as this one mentioned by Freud, are just part of the great tapestry of deception covering up the connections between Moses and Akhenaton. It was essential to the authors of the "holy books" that Moses, their concocted character, appear to have a separate life of his own. In light of this, any kind of embellishment was satisfactory as long as it served to make Moses appear to be a different character from Pharaoh Akhenaton. And so we have the outlandish stories of his birth, abandonment, adoption, and criminal history, etc. Most of these stories were simple plagiarization of earlier world myths. The tale of the abandonment on the river was adopted from the life of King Sargon. The scene upon the mountain was gleaned from tales of the lives of King Menes and King Nebo. His "biographers" who detailed his time as an exile, shepherd, and adopted son of a strange priest Jethro, knew that there was nothing original about their stories. Every culture and nation had similar if not identical heroes and myths. Their concoction would be skillful enough to subtly paraphrase the life of Akhenaton without giving the game away. It was designed to magnify areas of insignificance and minimize anecdotes of greater significance.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

One of the problems that intrigued Freud was why Moses, an Egyptian prince raised in the houses of the pharaoh, would go on to reinvent himself as the autocratic leader of a ragbag bunch of slaves and foreigners. Why would he wish to know, convert, and lead such a motley bunch? Why would he be in a position to not only tell them what to do but to bestow upon them an apparently brand new religion? Why would he be in a position to introduce them to Jehovah, their new god? Did they not have a god of their own before Jehovah? And if they did have a previous religion why do we hear so little about it in the bible? Additionally, why would the Israelites be motivated to change their beliefs in such a radical way to please a single man? Naturally, our answer to questions of this kind builds upon the Freudian foundation and continues to undermine the traditional historical version of the life of Moses as well as the identity of his followers. Our theory is that the chosen people themselves were not lower class foreign contingents living miserable lives within the country. They were not slaves or underlings but powerful and wealthy conquerors of Egypt. The people that "Moses" led out of Egypt were, as Freud and others have speculated, nothing less than a powerful pharaonic dynasty. And more controversially, their leader Moses was none other than Akhenaton, pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty and true originator of their brand of monotheism.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

He [Sigmund Freud] understood that, mythologically speaking, a man becomes a hero after he combats and defeats his first major rival, his own father. After his fell deed, the victorious son gains the supremacy and ends his secondary status tribally. He also gains spiritual status. He is no longer the prince but the king, and he acquires the privileges of his rank. He gains respect and has the pick of the women of the tribe. Despite his physical acquisitions, however, the son must live with the guilt of patricide. He has a guilty conscience for his murderous act and for giving vent to his aggressive and acquisitive instincts.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The eclectic and brilliant man [Sigmund Freud] fully understood that the Jewish people would be extremely loath to accept his controversial theories concerning their origins.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Sigmund Freud was the Viennese founder of the School of Psychoanalysis. He was cold-bloodily murdered for what he knew and wrote about Judaism, Egypt, and the secrets of the Bible.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Tutankhamen's title was "The Living Face of the Sun." He was an Atonist pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty. Lord Carnarvon, in charge of his tomb's excavation, was funded by the Rothschild dynasty to which he was personally related.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

And so, if it be true that Jesus lived at the time of Moses and if, in post-exilic times, he ruled as a king over the Levites and Houses of Israel and Judah, then perhaps we should spend some time examining this era. After all, the "Messiah" of the Jews was considered to be of the Davidic line, a descendant of the House of Judah (Yahud). He was supposed to be the "Lion King," the savior to free his people from oppression.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Jews have allowed their denial of the Christ to stand but have concealed their reasoning from Christians. They also know that Jesus was not a name per se but a title, one used by many leaders of the Egyptian solar church. Allowing readers to believe that it was a personal name compounded the obscuration of the truth. It is even likely that Paul, the employee of the elusive descendants of the Egyptian Levites operating out of Rome, also knew about the story of Joshua. He may have based his Jesus upon Joshua, Moses, Aaron, and other earlier leaders of the Levites. To the hardliner Essene, Joshua was the solar Messiah about to make a physical return. He was to save his devotees not only from the Romans but also from the colluding elitist Sadducees of the evil “Jerusalem Church.” The fact that these Essenes would have had no time for the New Testament Jesus did not prevent Paul from adapting Essenic lore.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Clearly, this earlier existence of a Jesus character was known to the Palestinian Jews since there was not a writer amongst them, nor amongst the Roman historians for that matter, who mentioned a single word about the Jesus who was eventually accepted by Christians. This can explain why Jews problematically deny that the Christian Jesus was the Christ, and why they do not accept him as being of the House of David. The reason for their denial is because they know what Christians are not supposed to ever know. The Jewish elite know that Jesus lived one hundred centuries earlier.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

With a similar mindset as Dr. Karl Abraham and Dr. Sigmund Freud, the authors Ahmed Osman and Moustafa Gadalla both insist that the biblical Moses was the Pharaoh Akhenaton and that the expulsion of Moses from Egypt during the later eighteenth dynasty was, in fact, the expulsion of the "broken king" Akhenaton. The scene at Sinai, the subsequent move to Jerusalem, and the eventual splitting of the twelve tribes, were events that occurred not to humble oppressed captives but to an arrogant and wealthy royal clan, followers of a pharaoh considered the father of monotheism. Soon after arrival at Sinai legend has it that Moses died. His place as leader of the Levites (Atonists) was taken by a mysterious man called Joshua. Osman believes this character to have been the true Jesus. If Osman is correct it means that Jesus lived over 1000 years before the official dates given by Paul and by the four spurious gospels. It also means that Jesus was an Egyptian.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Official history tells us that the oppressive Hyksos were eventually expelled from the country by the Pharaoh Ahmose I (1575-1550 BC) who led the Egyptian people in rebellion against the tyrannical invader dynasty. However, we believe the upper classes of the Hyksos invaders were not expelled. We believe they maintained senior positions at the pharaoh's court and great temples of the sun at Gizeh, Tanis, Heliopolis, Amarna, Avaris, and Alexandria. The upper strata of the Hyksos people had clearly married in with the native Egyptian line, since even Tuthmosis IV and his son Amenhotep III were of mixed blood. Some Egyptologists believe that Amenhotep III was the father of both Smenkhare and Tutankhamun, and given that this is true, it would mean that these two Atonist pharaohs were also of mixed blood.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

All is made clear,regarding Abraham and Sarah's traversal into Egypt, when we realize what biblicists meant by the term "Egypt." As Ralph Ellis so brilliantly points out, the name Egypt was employed by the composers of the Old Testament to denote Thebes in Lower Egypt. This was the city and region controlled by the adversaries of the Hyksos. It was considered a separate region, with different rulers, gods, customs, and politics. So, it was not the country of Egypt that Abraham visited, but Thebes within Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

They [Moustafa Gadalla and Ahmed Osman] contend that Abraham, Jacob, Isaac, and Joseph were themselves members of a powerful dynasty of Egyptian pharaohs known as the Hyksos. Osman declares these Hyksos to be the same people as the Israelites. He argues that the Hyksos Kings of the Egyptian 13th dynasty, who ruled for approximately 300 years, are the ancestors of those referred to as Israelites and Levites. During the eighteenth dynasty, their leader was Pharaoh Akhenaton, who was himself either a physical or ideological descendant of the Hyksos. Author Ralph Ellis insists that Abraham did not come into Egypt from elsewhere. He claims that Abraham was always resident in Egypt and that he was a powerful Hyksos king and rival to the pharaoh of Upper Egypt resident at Thebes. The city of Ur was not in Mesopotamia at all. It was not near the Euphrates and Tigris, as most believe, but on the Nile.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

What most Christians and Jews may not be aware of is that there are many candidates for the real Jesus and some lived centuries before the time asserted in the Gospels. Naturally, there is little consensus among modern investigators as to the identity of Jesus. Each declare that he was this or that person, from this or that period in history, either from the accepted periods or from times more remote. It depends upon the individual scholar. Given that such a man existed (and that is neither impossible nor improbable) we find that one of the most logical candidates for the man Jesus is none other than the famed boy-king, Tutankhamen, of the eighteenth dynasty of Egypt. Regardless of the controversiality of this declaration, it stands to reason once the evidence is reviewed.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

As we have outlined in Volume One, Christianity was created in Britain and eventually transplanted to the Middle East. The story of Jesus did not originate in Galilee or Judea as the Gospels state. The men who invented the story of Jesus had their origins in Egypt of the eighteenth dynasty. They were the Atonists.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

As for the symbol of the cross, it too was known the world over. Although Christians consider it one of their cardinal symbols, it is hardly unique to their religion.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Chaldean-Babylonian god Tammuz was referred to as "the only son" or "only begotten one."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

If writers such as Doherty are that eager to find evidence for a physical personality, perhaps they should examine the character of the Irish sun-king Esus. If not, they may find time profitably spent tracking their "Jewish" sagas back to the life and times of the Buddha. Failing that, they may wish to look to the lives of Lugh, Orpheus, Dionysus, Prometheus, Attis, Mithras, Serapis, Osiris, Horus, Balder, Odin, Rama, Krishna, Quetzalcoatl, or any one of the sixteen or more crucified saviors of old:

Adad (of Assyria)
Adonis
Apollo
Heracles
Zeus (of Greece)
Alcides (of Thebes)
Attis of (Phrygia)
Baal of (Phoenicia)
Bali of (Afghanistan)
Beddru (of Japan)
Buddha (of India)
Crite of (Chaldea)
Deva Tat (of Siam)
Hesus (of the Druids)
Horus
Osiris
Serapis
Indra of (Tibet/India)
Jao of (Nepal)
Krishna (of India)
Mikado (of the Sintoos)
Mithra (of Persia)
Odin (of the Scandinavians)
Prometheus (of Greece)
Quetzalcoatl (of Mexico)
Salivahana (of Bermuda)
Tammuz (of Babylon and Chaldea)
Thor (of the Gauls)
Universal Monarch of the Sibyls
Wittoba (of the Bilingonese)
Xamolxis (of Thrace)
Zarathustra/Zoroaster (of Persia)
Zoar (of the Bonzes)

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Jesus story is, like most of the bible, an Astro-Theological story first composed by astrologers who noticed the passage of the sun through the heavens. This knowledge is what led the scribe John to alter the dates of Jesus' crucifixion. He contradicts Mark, Luke, and Matthew, and places the crucifixion of Jesus on the eve of the Passover and not one day after it. This mythmaker at least knew the sun's astrological birthday and wanted his character's death and resurrection to correspond to the sun's transition and renewal. Astrology is where we are to look for origins concerning the life and death and rebirth of this character Jesus and not the history of men.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Jesus, the sun king, was a concept known long before the rise of orthodox Christianity. The early religious groups that were aware fo this were eventually annihilated by emissaries of the Vatican.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Josephus' writings, in this regard, cannot be considered a true and accurate account of Christianity's history. Moreover, this Josephus was in the employ of the Flavian Caesars and was devoted to maintaining their power in Judea. The Flavians, and other Roman patricians (such as the Pisos, Aemili, Claudia, Julia, Manlia, Cornelii, Fabii, Scipiones, Gracchi, etc), despised the religion of the Jews but were clever enough to indulge it for the sake of order. They installed a non-Jewish dynasty to rule the region - the Herodian - and cultivated profitable political affiliations with the powerful and wealthy Sadducees. Their main opposition came from lower class Jews and from the families considered those from whom the famous "Messiah" would arise. The most illustrious of these rebel families was the Maccabees. They were annihilated and basically disappeared from the world stage after the time of Emperor Vespasian.

— Michael Tsarion view

To the horror and consternation of Christians all over the world, this passage [Book Eighteen, Chapter Four, of Josephus] was, during the sixteenth century, proven to be a blatant forgery. It was worthy of doubt since no contemporary historian, or any coming after who knew Josephus' works, mentioned this passage. This omission was especially startling in the case of the Church Father Origen who wrote many hundred books and covered every aspect of Christian history. In Origen's voluminous work there is no mention of Jesus as a man and no quote from, or reference to, Book Eighteen, Chapter Four, of Josephus.The spurious passage (like another in Book Twenty) was an interpolation and had been inserted into the works of Josephus by a later unnamed "editor" or compiler, no doubt some monk who decided to edit history in order to give Christians "proof" for their Jesus. The passage also mentions that Jesus was accepted as the so-called "Christ." This is also patently spurious since most Jews did not accept Paul's version of Jesus as the "Christ." This concept meant something only to pagans. Additionally, the Romans (like the Egyptians) were already familiar with the term "Chrestus" (meaning "anointed") used for their own gods and emperors. Thus the term "Christ" would not have denoted anything particularly unusual and would actually have offended both the orthodox Jews of Jerusalem and the Nazarene Church (those said to have known the physical rabbi Jesus).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Flavius Josephus Piso (whom author Ralph Ellis believes to have been St. Paul of Tarsus).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Outside of the bible, the name of Jesus appears in brief, fragmentary comments and passages from the works of several Roman authors, historians, and chroniclers. The list is as follows:

Suetonius - Lives of the Caesars (120 AD)
Suetonius - Life of Nero (120 AD)
Tacitus - Annals (112 AD)
Pliny the Younger (93 AD)
Lucian of Samosata (165 AD)
Flavius Josephus - Antiquities of the Jews (Bk XX. 94 AD)
Justin Martyr - Dialogue with the Jew Trypho (cf. Eusebius, Church History IV, 187)
Rabbi Abbahu of Caesarea - (270 CE)

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

A historical event takes place once at a particular time and at a particular place. A mythological event is not so constrained. It can take place in the same manner anywhere at any time. A myth is beyond time and space.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Abraham about to sacrifice his son Isaac. The mountain is a symbol for the sign of Aries, as is the sword and ram seen in this artist's rendition of the Old Testament account. New found evidence suggests that, like several other Biblical characters, this patriarch was himself a noble of Egypt, or even a pharaoh. He has been tentatively identified with Sensuret I of the 12th dynasty and with Amenemhet I.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Amenemhet III. Could he have been the Biblical Joesph, the so-called dream interpreter of the unnamed pharaoh, and the man with the coat of many colors?

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Amenemhet I (1991-1962 BC) was titled "Amen is the Head." He was the first king of the twelfth dynasty, and his ancestry is unknown. Some scholars suspect he was the prototype for the Biblical patriarch known as Abraham. However, this would place Abraham in Egypt before the official dates for the invasion of the Hyksos. The problem is less complicated once we understand that the Hyksos were not invaders from outside Egypt. They were foreign to Upper Egypt but not to Egypt itself. The groups that invaded during the thirteenth dynasty may have been related to the noble families of Lower Egypt, that is, of the Hyksos Kings. They may have entered the land by invitation. Later, as the dynasties changed, these visitors appear to have been considered unwelcome guests or invaders.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

We are to understand that there is not a lot of authenticity to the characters who appear in the bible. Although newly discovered evidence shows that a few were based upon actual historical personages, many more were pure concoctions. Some were analogues of powerful men who desired to keep their identities hidden from mankind, and some were flagrantly outlandish fictions. Scholars tend to classify them under the term "biblical embroidery". Some were based upon historical savants, while others were the brainchildren of clever duplicitous propagandists. Some were composites of several figures, and some are representatives of psychological "types." More contentiously, others were personifications and analogues of zodiacal phenomena; in other words they were created as fictive renditions of Astrological Archetypes first studied and codified by Druids of ancient Ireland. It is certainly this last thesis that most concerns this writer. However, the other concepts are of great interest and cannot be underestimated. All in all, the way is open for a total overhaul of what we know about the Christian religion and the characters we have accepted as historically legitimate. We can only benefit from such exploration.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Nevertheless, when researcher Ahmed Osman declares he has proven the Old Testament character known as "King David" to be none other than the eighteenth dynasty Pharaoh Tuthmosis III; and a succeeding pharaoh, Amenhotep III, to be the “Jewish” King Solomon, one would think the revelations should not only raise the proverbial eye-brow but should cause worldwide discussion. When author Laurence Gardner states that the prophet Enoch was a character based on the Sumerian Enki; and when Tony Bushby declares Roman Emperor Tiberius to be the true father of Jesus, we should take notice. And when revisionist author Moustafa Gadalla labors to prove that Jesus Christ was a character based on Pharaoh Tutankhamen, the world should surely grind to a halt to listen.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Hypatia of Alexandria (370 AD - 415 AD) was a teacher, philosopher and polymath. A Christian mob attacked her as she drove through the streets of the city. They dragged her from her chariot and proceeded to beat her to death. After she was dead the mob took sharp shells and used them to tear every piece of flesh from her bones. Her remains were then cast into a bonfire and burned so that not a trace of the seer remained.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

He [Jesus] was the character scripted by adroit myth makers who knew that the world would accept their literary hero. Man's imagination would be their ally and the promises spoken of by their savior would be perfect incentives. If the world was made a hellish place, and if ordinary men and women were stripped of dignity and rights, the promise of eternal life by way of a glorious, forgiving, miracle-working savior would surely prove attractive. Entire civilizations bowed before Earthly kings and pharaohs and they would likewise bow to a god made flesh who held keys to the kingdom of heaven. Once the idea of such a being and his life were installed in the human mind the fertile imagination would take over and do its work. As time passed, people would not bother to question whether their ideas were based upon facts. And this is what the priests have counted on. A civilization that has not learned to distinguish between an idea of reality and reality itself can be slowly manipulated into believing anything.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

So, again, why was there not an Egyptian revival? Why was Jesus accepted and not Horus, or Osiris, or Serapis? One answer could be that the vast majority of intelligent converts already knew that Christianity was close to Egyptian religion. Unlike people today they would have understood Christianity's doctrine to be nothing more than a rescripting of solar theology from Egypt's many esoteric colleges. We do not see any other reason as to why such conversion would have taken place given that the world's wealthiest and most erudite scholars and dignitaries were reverers of Egyptian occult traditions.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Charlemagne (742-814 AD) was the Merovingian and Carolingina Emperor and close friend of popes. The "hammer" of the Saxons, he butchered those who would not convert to Christianity.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

"Make them to astonish," demanded Constantine, speaking of the compilation that finally became the New Testament. His wish was amply fulfilled.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

After Horus was born, he and his mother Isis had to hide from his evil uncle Set who had vowed to kill him. Set was afraid that Horus would grow up and avenge his father's murder. Isis and her son hid in the marshes and swamps of the Nile. Her symbol, the lily, which signified divine protection, was later adapted as a symbol for the Virgin Mary. One day, Horus was badly bitten by a scorpion. His body went limp and he fell into a comatose state. Isis grieved, thinking her son would not recover. This incident in the life of the Egyptian sun god was later adapted by Christian mythmongers.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

If this Jesus was really the son of god - the Christ - how come he made such a insignificant impact on the prominent intellectuals and historians of his time? Why do the major historians and intellectuals of his time not mention Jesus or any of the events that occurred because of him, in their works? Why do recently discovered scriptures (the Gnostic Gospels and Dead Sea Scrolls, etc), as well as various Apocryphal works, not corroborate the bible's key accounts? Why were such texts considered uncanonical?

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Our statement becomes even more pertinent when it is realized just how little attention was originally given to the existence of Jesus by historians and philosophers who lived during the period in which he is believed to have lived and preached.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Book after book is composed by perplexed scholars who are forced to accept, by the dearth of references on Jesus from early Christian sects and by the contradictions between the official accounts, that the story of Jesus just could not be based on actual events. It is anything but a biography, lacking the essential minutiae and nuance that are customary when descriptions are made of a living person's life. It is certainly not a valid recollection of his colleagues since their accounts are contradictory over essentials that should merit neither doubt nor discrepancy.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

We can surmise,however, that those same forces insisting the Jesus story be accepted as it was written in the gospels would sooner admit to it being a concoction than they would admit it to be Egyptian or Irish in origin.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

For centuries, prominent biblical scholars have demonstrated that the four gospel accounts do not reference events that occurred historically.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

As we mentioned in Volume One, the Gnostics, like the Stoics, were most likely a pan-Druidic order. Gnostic groups were very likely making a return to the highest principles of the Egyptian Amenists and the Irish Druids. This is the reason why Gnostic groups were so ruthlessly persecuted. Given that this is the truth, we are not surprised that modern academics are, on the whole, loath to get to the bottom of what Gnosticism was about. They know, all too well, what it would mean for the orthodox hegemony, should the truth about the Gnostics and their inclination toward Druidry be brought to light.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Gnostics, whose only "crime" involved anon-literal interpretation of scripture, suffered unbearable tortures. They were barbarically massacred because they chose to interpret bible's passages allegorically, because they incorporated the feminine principle, and because they had a different take on the ancestry and identity of Jesus.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

One of the most interesting and puzzling Gnostic sects with a deep connection to Egypt were the Mandeans. Their existence was brought to light when Jesuit missionaries discovered remnants of their cult still existing in modern day Iraq. The Mandeans said that they were descendants of the church of John the Baptist and that they did not accept the Jesus of the official Church. They considered Jesus a "lying Messiah." This attitude was also found among the Essenes of Qumran who referred, in their texts, to John as the "Teacher of Righteousness" and Jesus as the "Wicked Priest." The Mandeans referred to themselves as "St. John's Christians." Their chiefs or priests were known as "Nasoreans." The Moslems knew them as the "Sabeans," a word that means "of the stars" or "heavens." The Mandeans declared themselves descendants of the Egyptians and their master to have come from Alexandria in Egypt. Naturally, the existence and teachings of these Gnostic Mandeans has been obscured by the hegemonic forces from Rome and London.The Iraqi Mandeans are now practically extinct.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Church did not want the teachings of the Gnostics to be studied. They knew only too well that Gnosticism was nothing more or less than Egyptian religion. It was the faint echo of the theologies of Egypt mixed with many other religious and spiritual traditions commonly found in Hellenistic Alexandria long after the great dynasties had passed into oblivion. They do not want it known that the Gnostics themselves were a later offshoot of the more ancient Solar and Lunar Cults that had their roots in the Stellar Cults of Egypt and Ireland. And they did not want it known how the Gnosticism of the Egyptians had influenced their religion and bible.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Gnostics did not attribute much meaning to a physical Jesus even though they did believe in one. For the majority of the Gnostics it was Jesus' divine presence that was important. And this is most significant since this was also the mindset of the Solar Cult members of ancient Egypt. The interest of the Gnostics was on the archetypal rather than stereotypical level. Jesus was a symbol of what all men can and must become. Their Jesus was a spiritual model and not a physical being whose earthly lifestyle mattered.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The mysterious Melchizedek and Pharaoh Akhenaton. Were they the same person? Or was Melchizedek a fictive stand-in for Akhenaton's god Aton? Is it Aton (code name "Melchizedek"), and not Jesus, who has been secretly venerated for centuries by the hierarchs of Vatican City?

— Michael Tsarion view

The [Dead Sea] Scrolls reveal the dementia of men who believed in the coming of a blood-crazed Messiah. They also help us to understand the dementia of men who believe in the intervention of the divine savior. After all, what if the concept of divine salvation by proxy was spawned by men too spiritually malignant and toxic to make moral and spiritual changes of their own bat? The man who requires a divine mediator to "save" him from his own sins, is the man incapable of moral change for its own sake. Weak, demon-haunted, men of this kind are plentiful today and were plentiful in ages past. The first Christian emperors and bishops (such as Augustine of Hippo) were such men. St. Paul - the great Christologist himself - was definitely such a man. His own words show that he was troubled of heart and filled with animosity towards himself and his grievous sins. Masochism and extreme guilt are common dilemmas among "good" Christians.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Ultimately, the data in the Dead Sea Scrolls revealed that the irrational ideas of the fanatical Zadokites had been plagiarized by Paul and Christian churchmen. They supplied evidence to show that Paul was certainly an agent of the Romans and probably of the elite Sadducees.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The suppression of Dead Sea Scrolls is entirely understandable. Their publication was resisted by the Vatican's appointed overseers for the reasons stated above, and also because the secret cadre operating behind Judaism and Catholicism would have been compromised once the world came to know facts about Palestine. It would not have served the interests of the Vatican hierarchy if the world came to know how tolerant early Jews from Judea and Galilee had been toward local pagan ideas and gods. And, furthermore, it would not have been good for business if the world discovered that the Jewish god had morphed out of pagan deities well known in the region. It would be difficult if bible readers were to find out that the Jews of the Near East had the Messianic doctrine forced down their throats, or that those possessed by Messianic zeal were merely one small extremist cell with political rather than spiritual objectives. Early Jews were supposed to look like the perfect followers of Moses and Jehovah, while early Christians were meant to look as if they were obedient and devout followers of a merciful and forgiving Jesus Christ. And evidence that might inspire deviance from these made to order images was marked for seizure and destruction. Stories of the secret oral tradition handed down at Sinai to the Levites were downplayed; data on the identity of the mysterious Melchizedek was obscured; the tolerance of the vast majority of Jews toward pagan traditions was both ignored and under-emphasized; and information about extremist cults whose ideas, in skewed form, became the basis for Christian doctrines, was prevented from reaching the world.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Melchizedek's lineage is obscure in the Bible because he is merely a fictive device, a stand-in for someone else whose name was not to be mentioned.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In the same book [Hebrews 5] Melchizedek is described as being: "Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made life unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually." This reference emphasizes that Melchizedek can not be considered a normal human being. He is a king of special lineage. Suggestively, this was how pharaohs were regarded. Their mothers and fathers were gods.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The name Melchizedek apparently means "King of Zedek," "King of Salem (Peace)," or "King of righteousness." The term zedek means "justice."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

This Sadducee-Roman connection has rarely been investigated by modern authors. In fact, it has been downplayed. Significantly, it was the Sadducees who taught that Moses had received two laws from Jehovah, one written and one oral, that is, one open and one secret. It is likely that the wealthy Sadducees encouraged their Roman allies to finally eradicate the extremist Zadokites who were making so much trouble for them. This assault did take place, and the Vatican was disturbed should modern-day readers find out about it. The facts concerning the ruthless purge of Zealots and Zadokites, by the Romans and Sadducees, was to be obscured at all costs.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

A major area of controversy, when it comes to understanding the Dead Sea Scrolls, concerns the true identity of the group responsible for their composition. Some believe the Essenes were the authors of the Scrolls, while others believe the Zealots were responsible. The difference is important because the Zealots were part of the fanatical Zadokite Order that dated back to the time of King Solomon and to the even more ancient Melchizedek. The powerful religious sect, the Sadducees, were also thought to be descended from the Zadokites or "Sons of Zadok." In any case, the Zealots, or hardline Zadokites, had broken away from the Temple of Jerusalem and the elite Sadducees who supported the Roman presence in Palestine. The extremist Zealots awaited the coming of a Messiah-King who would free them from Roman domination and strike down the Jews who had been their confederates. Their radical stance put the Zadokites at odds with the Sadducees and with most Jews in Palestine.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The main controversy, regarding the [Dead Sea] Scrolls, centered on the fact that they did not present a loving and merciful Son of God consistent with the image found in the Gospels and presented by Paul. Furthermore, the "Teacher of Righteousness," mentioned in the Scrolls, and often taken for Jesus, might have lived centuries before the time stated in the officially compiled scriptures. And so, because the content of the Scrolls was largely inconsistent with Christian accounts, the Vatican elites prevented their publication for over forty years. Another reason for the reticence could have been due to the fact that the breakaway sect of Qumran had clearly desired the overthrow and destruction of Rome. They considered Roman rule to be evil and, although they did not speak for the majority of Jews, they condemned any Jew who supported or profited from Rome's presence in their land. Ultimately the Vatican could not benefit from the information contained in the Scrolls. There was too much dissimilarity between their Jesus Christ and Qumran's Teacher of Righteousness, and too much criticism of Rome.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Jesus of the New Testament would not have been accepted by such a sect [sect that allegedly lived at Qumran, and was responsible for the Dead Sea Scrolls]. Paul, his inventor, would also not have been accepted. Paul, who, after his alleged conversion on the road to Damascus (and who was for a short time a member of their order), was regarded as a renegade, betrayer, and scurrilous counterfeiter worthy of death. He was regarded as a Roman agent who had infiltrated their order to find out coveted secrets that he afterwards broadcast to the world at large. His Christianity, and his Jesus, were not acceptable to the hardline Jewish militants. His murder was only prevented by the Romans whose agents closely watched over him.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Whatever the truth, and whatever the motives of the Church's executive, the physical Jesus can have existed but once and meeting him would have been a historical event, pure and simple. A spiritual Christ, on the other hand, as revered by St. Paul and the New Testament's authors can be encountered and experienced at any time by any person (believer and non-believer) at any location of the world. If we are led to confuse the two we are condemned to position our physical Jesus (or at least his attributes) wherever and whenever the spiritual Christ is said to have appeared. The truth falls by the wayside while the spiritual gets confused with the physical and the theological with the historical.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The search for proofs concerning the historical existence of an all too physical Jesus has been the monomania of several modern scholars, of both the orthodox and revisionist persuasion. British-Israelites, such as Fredrick Haberman and E. Raymond Capt, have assured the world that Jesus and his coterie arrived in England with the Roman trader Joseph of Arimathea in the years following the supposed crucifixion. Those who have deciphered Templar and Gnostic documents believe that Jesus survived his crucifixion and that he and his wife Mary Magdalene traveled to England by way of France. Author Tony Bushby trails his "Yeshua ben Panthera" to Wales by way of Rome, while author Ralph Ellis believes him to have been Jesus Gamala, a descendant of Cleopatra and Julius Caesar. We are quite bemused with the efforts of writers such as these to prove the existence of the world's most elusive man. Perhaps, such authors have an agenda that transcends mere maverick investigation or academic inquiry. After all, the Machiavellian intelligentsia behind Judeo-Christianity have always been most aggravated by the exposure of their fraudulence and connivance and by the dearth of biographical information confirming the existence of their iconic savior. Since the most erudite scholars in the world, down through the ages, have demolished all possible arguments for the physical existence of Jesus, as the bible has portrayed him, it would be most gratifying if apparently "independent" and "objective" researchers from the secular world were to come up trumps.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Moreover, a great deal of trouble has been caused within theological circles, as well as in the secular domain, simply due to confusion over the difference between the physical Jesus (a supposed historical personality) and the preternatural Christ figure. In most minds the two are fused as one and this presumptuous blending, together with the plethora of other factual inconsistencies between the two entities, has lead the Christian and non-Christian masses to see one where the other should be, and to think of one in terms of the other. The attributes of the spiritual Christ have been transferred and transposed to the physical personality while the attributes of the supposed physical Jesus have been carried over to the phantasmagoria of the Christ. We have been conditioned to treat these two very different entities as one and the same. Nevertheless, they are not the same. In short, the story of the man Jesus is quite a different story than that of the Christ. This fact cannot be overstressed.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The greatest of Jewish scholars, those who have thoroughly analyzed the ancient Jewish scriptures and who have expert knowledge concerning the origins of Christianity, understand Christianity to be akin to the mystery religions of the ancient pagan world and to the Gnostic traditions that orthodox Judaism ostensibly frowns upon. It was these pagan mystery traditions that advocated sun-gods, dying saviors, and divine salvation, and not Judaism. These facts have been guilefully obscured by latter-day elites within the Roman Catholic (and Protestant) churches who have a great deal to lose should the pagan roots of their "heavenly" Jesus be revealed.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The "Christ" is a rendition of the sun king, a sacred archetypal principle revered by the priests of the Solar Cult in Egypt. The stereotypical “Christ” was a figure who personified the physical sun, and his "biography" was simply a re-scripting in anthropomorphic terms of the annual behavior of the physical sun as it passes through the twelve signs of the zodiac. On its journey, the sun encounters other luminaries and stars and must pass through constellations and houses. This personification of heavenly bodies began in Ireland with the Druids. It was a subject taught throughout the world by masters in the many Druidic colleges that were destroyed by the Romans and founders of Christianity. To the Druids there was nothing secretive about the sun king and his message of light and love. The son of god - the metaphorical "Light of the World" - is the sun of god, the actual light of the world. This is not as heretical as it may first sound for when we do our homework and open our eyes we will discover that the elites within Judeo-Christianity know this fact all too well. Their predecessors are the ones who decided, as many other pagan peoples had already done, to personify the sun as a man born at the winter solstice.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In our estimation the term "Jesus" was, in fact, not a name but a title. It was a title given to the highest initiate of the Solar Cult in Egypt, although its actual origins lie in Ireland. A "Jesus Christ" was a high ranking priest of the temples of the sun. He was a priest of Aton, the sun god worshipped at cities of Heliopolis, Avaris, Tanis, Amarna, and Alexandria. The title was transferable and did not specify a single unique god-inspired savior. It was similar to the titles "pharaoh," "sera," "king" and "pope," adopted by any number of incarnate individuals.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The point that requires stressing concerns the connection between the Jewish "House of David" (or Judah, or Yahud) and the Egyptian House of the Pharaohs.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Jewish author and historian Hyam Maccoby states that the term Messiah referred to the seed and house of David.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The important matter, however, is not that she [Mary Magdalene] was a physical wife to the man Jesus but that she was a symbolic representation of the Christed man’s feminine aspect. The biblical Mary is an analog to Danu, Brigit, Isis, Nuith, and Ma'at, to Demeter, Hera, Persephone, and Eve. Like the moon in the heavens and the night sky around the Earth, the feminine Anima both mirrors and embraces the masculine Animus.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Sobek (or Sobek Ra), was a crocodile god worshipped at Thebes. Like Christ and the pharaoh, he represented the merging of the four elements.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The very word Messiah comes from the Hebrew Mashiach (Egyptians Messeh) which means "anointed." It specifically referred to the oil that was processed from the fat of the Nile crocodiles that were sacred to the Egyptian god Sobek.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In the Egyptian language the word “Christ” denoted one who was "anointed." In ancient times there was a process or ritual known as Horasis. During this rite the male's entire body was regarded as a phallus and anointed accordingly. This practice originated from the Druids who would anoint the trunk of a specially prepared oak tree with oil. We note a similar practice among the Egyptians, whose ithyphallic obelisk symbolized the ancient earth god Geb. And we find the practice among the Hindus, whose erect "lingam" stone symbolized the ancient god Shiva, or Pashupati.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Evidently, the star that was of concern to the Essenes and to the descendants of the Cult of Aton, was the sun itself and not just any old star in the over-crowded heavens. The Commander, the David, the Krist, the Lucifer, or Messiah, was not only the "Star," he was the Sun - the Prince of Light.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The title "Star" is significant given how many starry symbols we see today on state regalia. We see stars on flags, medals, and corporate logos. They are frequently used as symbols for political organizations and churches. We even find stars as emblems on hellish machines of war. They appear on the American one-dollar bill and above the head of the dollar's apparently “Judaic” eagle. Newspapers and businesses utilize the title, and media celebrities have even been given the term to emphasize their iconic status and claim to fame.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The term Krist (or Karast) was a title commonly bestowed by the Essenes to denote one of their excellent or special initiates who had passed through extraordinary trials and who held high status and rank. It was not a personal name. The Essenes are known to have referred to themselves as "the Elect" or as "Sons of Light." Masters of high caliber were known as the "Star." This is clearly an astrological title. Paintings have been discovered of priests with star-shaped diadems upon their foreheads. The very word minister contains the syllables for moon (min) and star (ster). We can perhaps understand now why the Vatican did not want the Dead Sea Scrolls, and other presumably Essenic scriptures, to be found, translated, published, and commonly read. The Vatican did not want any record or mention of lineages of "Christed" men. They wished the world to believe their Jesus to be unique in every way. The literature and traditions that contradicted this policy were to be sequestered or destroyed. Cults or sects that preached the contrary were to be condemned and persecuted as heretics. Interestingly, this word simply meant "those who choose."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The term "Christian" appears only three times in the New Testament's convoluted scriptures. It appears twice in Acts and once in I Peter, although the entries in Acts may not be original. They may have been added by editors at a later date. Worse than this, the word "Christian" can not be found in Christian literature composed in the first one hundred years after the supposed crucifixion of Jesus. The term is found only in literature of pagan authorship. On almost every occasion the term is used to describe degenerate sects who have disturbed society by violent and illegal acts. The first pagan author to mention the term was Suetonius. After him it appeared in a letter of an Adrian around the year 117 AD. Spelled "Chrestian" it again turned up in the work of Justin Martyr between 147 and 161 AD. As we can see these brief entries do not provide enough information to verify that the term signified the followers of the biblical Jesus.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The world's Luciferian enclaves, the meritocratic masonic secret societies, also make frequent use of the symbol of the sun and the metaphor of light as knowledge. They honor and observe the days of ritual importance on the solar calendar, hold secret meetings on specific dates, and pass on their arcane teachings in private convocations. Illustrious masonic initiates refer to themselves as "Princes of the Light." Both they and their lodges are, in our estimation, corrupt replications of the sun temples of the ancient world. Their choice of symbolism (both Druidic and Egyptian) leaves us with no doubt of this. As a result of their peculiar theological disposition masons generally allow all the world religions to play a part within their lodges. The three main religions are revered and regarded as equals. We say, naturally this is the case. It occurs because these masonic insiders know what laymen are not supposed to know, namely that religion is a solar theology and that the Sun Cult's chief hierophant and tutelary icon was not Moses, David, or Solomon, but Akhenaton - the Aton worshipping Pharaoh of Light (or "Lucifer").

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

After the eighteenth dynasty, princes and priests of Aton became the most powerful monarchs and theocrats in the world. The Atonists operated from behind serveral fronts. One of these was the Sol Invictus Cult to which Emperor Constantine belonged. He was an initiate of this order during the time he established Christianity. Therefore, as far as we are concerned, Constantine and his royal descendents were Atonists. They were guided and financed by the biological or ideological descendents of Akhenaton, who established the worship of Aton.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The chiefs of the world's most powerful Solar Cults use the title "Lucifer." This is because, esoterically speaking, they are sons of the morning or dawning. They are "Sons of the Sun" - the Princes of Light. (The very term Freemason means "Brother of the Sun.")

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Throughout his life Constantine had been the chief of the Sol Invicta Cult. Like the Atonists of Egypt, the members of this order believed that the emperor was a living incarnation of the sun.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

It was on June 21 - the day of the summer solstice - that a total of 2,048 presbyters, deacons, sub-deacons, acolytes, and exorcists gathered at Nicea to decide what Christianity really was, what it would be, and what writings were to be used and who was to be its god. The tyrant Constantine commissioned this council and he imperiously presided over it throughout its duration.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

One of the most repetitive refrains concerns the building of a new world over the ashes of the old.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

He [Constantine] made Christianity the official religion of Rome after allegedly receiving a mystical vision. He murdered his wife and eldest son the same year he convened the Council of Nicea. Throughout his life he was head of the Sol Invicta Cult that, like Atonism, held the Emperor to be an incarnation of the sun.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Many people have chosen to believe the incomprehensible gobbledygook of the bible simply indicates its scribes and editors were not, in fact, guilty of any conscious manipulation of history or theology. If they had wanted to create a religion to manipulate the entire world then surely they would have compiled a more consistent and realistic tome. In other words, they would have done a better job. We submit, however, that it is foolhardy to believe that the bible's utter incoherence and fantastic collection of scientific, philosophical, and theological errors, is proof of innocence on behalf of its composers and compilers. The various biblical councils could certainly have fashioned for themselves and their flock a book of sublime rationality such as would have impressed the Grecian philosophers. But this was not their aim and the inconsistencies and absurdities were purposely left in for a very important reason. A rational book, understood by all, would need no interpreters whereas a mythical compendium would require it. The clerics, bishops, cardinals, priests, and curates of the past, and the hysterical, verbose, and ludicrous evangelists and pastors who preach today, would hardly be required if the chapters, verses, and words of the bible made sense. They were not intended to make rational sense. They were chosen, entered, and espoused because they stimulate the mythic sensibility and ancestral consciousness. They stir the imagination and limbic centers of the brain, and mollify the needs and cravings of the many rather than sharpen the logic of the independent thinker. The world's masses require myths, and subconsciously rely upon them in order to feel secure. Believing these myths allows a man to feel part, rather than apart, of the collective. Men require things to believe in, and to have faith in. They are largely unaware of how these needs make them victims of manipulation. Where belief is operating, sanity and reason are often in abeyance, and the masters of the game, the "Scribes and Pharisees" so to speak, know this only too well. The early potentates never expected an independent and critical class to rise during their own time, or at any other time. They were concerned with duping the mass, the rank and file, and those illiterate hordes who could not work out the bible's meaning for themselves and who would not be permitted to do so. Humanity inherited the Cult of the Priest and has been under the power of these blackguards for thousands of years. For their special self-appointed duty of pontificating upon the "mysteries" of the bible they live in luxury and are awarded all sorts of titles and social privileges. Indeed, it is this special overclass that molds and controls the societies of the world. The god of these duplicitous and profoundly sadistic men did not write his own biography or record his own activities. He had secretaries, public relations officers, image consultants, and make-over artists to do it for him. He was made in the image of those with cruelty in their hearts and world dominion on their minds. The world's cultures were filled with gods and goddesses some of which were of a very pure and lofty nature. Some are immensely ancient and deeply revered. The god of Judeo-Christianity had to stand out. He had to be properly shaped to suit a practical and political end. If Jehovah could be made to thunder and flash, and if his countenance was stern, angry, and vengeful, as opposed to gentle, loving, and forgiving, then men would fear him. Even very rebellious and iconoclastic men would harbor fear in his presence. And if men could be trained to fear and obey their brooding heavenly "Lord" and "Master" they could soon be trained to fear and obey their earthly lords. It seemed a feasible and relatively simple ploy. It was an attractive notion to the emperors and princes who commanded their myth mongers to script "Lord God" as a most intolerant, hot-tempered sort ready to damn to perdition those who showed the least sign of contempt or self will. The scribes did their work well. Their travesty of theology sent men into a maze of conflicts and confusion. In their hellish vats fear was mixed with love and forgiveness with vengeance. On their canvases heaven was contrasted with hell, and beauty with corruption. The human reason was gradually but expertly subverted.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Many historians have been puzzled as to why Western "European" man has had such an obsessive fascination with the convoluted nonsense of the bible. Why was this tome taken to heart by Westerners who had their own rich ancestral traditions? Certainly, force was involved, but the main reason for its acceptance is a carefully guarded secret. The bible stories were accepted throughout the occident because they were born there. Travesties they may be, but the ancestral brain remembers and is subconsciously familiar with the underlying truths contained in the bible's lamentably fragmented and convoluted texts. Behind the apparent nonsense and contradictions, the protestations and dubious morality tales, lies the great tale - that of the stars, the heavens, and the wisdom therein.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

It is not very difficult for a rational person to see that there is something distasteful and wholly suspect about the majority of the sordid stories in the bible. If it were not for the indoctrination which begins during our earliest years we would regard the bible as a book to be avoided rather than lauded. If it were not because of the existential ennui that leaves a man open to manipulation we would regard the god of the Testaments as a most deplorable creature. We would regard the bible in the same way we do the Maya Popul Vuh, the Norse Eddas, or the Aryan Shastras and Vedas, as a book with interesting aspects not to be wholly believed or used to condemn other human beings to eternal damnation. Without brainwashing the bible would be avoided by literate men and hardly considered a manual for right living. No, the bible would be seen for what it is - the bizarre creation of the deranged. It might even be given an "X" rating and kept well out of the way of youngsters who would find all they require for right living in Plato, Aristotle, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Rand, or in the myths and legends of their ancestors. In our opinion, this mythic archive contains all that a man or woman needs for moral rectitude and spiritual maturation. If there is value in the bible it exists only in the proof that its text offers us concerning the depth of human idiocy and depravity. As a catalog of man's inhumanity and perversity the bible serves the student well. As William Blake affirmed, its proverbs are not of heaven but of hell.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Additionally, most of the people of the world, being illiterate,could not care less whether the bible was based on fact or not, and the very few literate readers knew full well what the consequences were if they offered refutations or contradicted the almighty emperor and his appointed bishops. The memory of the fate of the great Giordano Bruno would be enough to quell most dissent. The situation was no different during the time of the despot King James Stuart. People accepted his "Authorized" version simply because he had authorized it.That version of the bible, and only that version, would be considered right. There was no debate about the matter.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Thankfully, there have been those down through time, as well as at the time, who knew that the bible was a concoction of ancient solar theocracy and that it did not depict actual events.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

And more; it was the sacred principles of Druidry that were to be studied by the senior Templars, Masons, Cardinals, Priests, and Kabalists of old.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The most fantastic and yet psychically tranquilizing of these promises concerns a man's fate in the afterlife. If he performs his duties well in this life he may inherit good things after he dies. His sins will be forgiven and his soul will be at rest for eternity. If he rebels and does not perform his assigned tasks he will perish and be eternally damned. Promises were the business of the Church, and they still are. In this regard nothing has changed. They were in fashion then and they are in fashion now. It is by way of this reward contract that the church has slowly but effectively molded men into obedient slaves. This crafty tactic has even served to quell the Spirit of Rebellion in many men. Yes, one cannot think of a more successful stratagem than the promise.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The bible is a compilation of numerous occidental and oriental pagan doctrines. Its compilation was commissioned by the chiefs of the Solar Cult (Atonists) situated in Tanis, Alexandria, Jerusalem, and Rome, in order to galvanize their empire and maintain control over the minds of the mass of illiterate and superstition-ridden human beings under their dominion. Dominion over men and the world was what it was all about, and little has changed when it comes to this agenda.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

At least, we may inquire why is it that this touted but misnamed "Judeo-Christian" religion, that all men are expected to respect and trust if not follow, does not speak in detail concerning the dynamics of man's psyche as do the writings of Plato, Aristotle, and Lucretius? And why do we find it full of animosity for what man is? Why is it so full of conflict, superstition, adversity, and rivalry? Why do we learn such terrible things about man and the world from its pages, while from a Homer, a Shakespeare, or a Lawrence, we learn so much that is great and sublime? Why is the gamut of human emotion so limited and paltry in this book meant to reflect man as he lives and is? And why do we not laugh when we read these scriptures of Christianity? Why does it state that one small "chosen" coterie will enjoy dominion over all other nations and peoples? Why does this book of Jews and Christians not contain treatises from masters of astronomy or geometry, or of husbandry, pyramid-building, and navigation? And why is it so difficult to place the authors who have contributed to it, those Solomons, Isaiahs, and Jeremiahs? Why, in this most patristic book of pages do we not encounter hymns to the earth and goddess as we do in Lao Tzu or Chuang Tzu? And why nothing concerning the spiritual significance of animals that we find in the lore of so many antique nations? Why is Earth deemed so lowly in this lauded book? We do not find it so in the works of Wordsworth, Bronte, or Hardy. And why the talk of bad angels and infernal pits of fire and brimstone? Why plagues and famines unleashed upon the unsuspecting? Why a god so wrathful and jealous and so bent on retribution and destruction? Were we psychologists we might be motivated to ask whether the bible's strange chapters and verses reflect man as he truly is, or whether they reflect how man and his world were perceived by its few psychically demented authors obsessed on emphasizing and broadcasting their own superiority and prowess. Might we not tend to agree with Nietzsche's contention that it is the desire of Christians to see the world as ugly and bad that has made it ugly and bad? In any case, a great deal may hang upon the answers to our disquieting questions.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Fortunately the bible, like any book, will reveal its secrets, but only to those skeptical and persistent enough to follow the twists and turns in its convoluted text in order to ascertain what is true and what is false. Academics concede that the bible's text is full of "pious fraud." They admit that there are two gods being spoken of in the opening books and that as time went by these two gods (Elohim and Jehovah) became fused into one, known henceforth as the "Lord God." They concede that there are errors, fictions, and skewed facts and that there are stories concerning people who never lived. They freely admit that there are plagiarisms and renditions of pagan myths and legends, and that the very gospels were not written by those four "saints" after whom they are named. Yes, a lot of things have been conceded since bible study began in earnest a mere 100 years ago. And a lot has had to be conceded given the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Gnostic Gospels, texts from within Christianity that contradict some of the most revered but falsely authenticated tropes of the official testaments.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The religions of Christianity and Judaism originate from the same source, and that source is Egypt. Egyptian culture and religion had its source also, and that source is Ireland. Ireland's Druidic and proto-Druidic traditions, likewise, had their source in the pre-diluvian civilizations of Atlantis and Lemuria. These facts will come as something of a shock to the majority of those readers who have received their education from conventional sources and who have tended to blithely accept on faith all that pours forth from the mouths and pens of the so-called "historians"and "experts" who believe themselves informed about the world of the past.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Druids were the oldest priesthood from the oldest civilization on earth. Egyptian religion and Judeo-Christianity were plagiarizations and corruptions of Druidic teachings and traditions. The word Druid means "Doorway," and also "Servent of Truth."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

When we contemplate the mysteries of time and history, we see how everything that exists came into being for a reason. It is only intellectual lethargy, and the passage of time, that allows fallacies to appear before us in the guise of facts. Indeed, all that is required for a historical lie to be accepted as historical truth is the passage of historical time. This particular phenomenon has been, and continues to be, on the minds of the world's most devious mythmongers who seek to further the deceptive industry of their predecessors. Those who have arranged the subject of history, so that men see what they are meant to see and so they know only that which they are meant to know, are profoundly aware of how the simple passage of time aids them in their heinous work.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Although the earliest of the world's Mesolithic and Megalithic sites have proven to be more sophisticated in design and construction than those of later date, most people continue to accept the unsustainable fiction concerning the world of the past. Ancient man was primitive and modern man is civilized. This is what most people accept and believe. It is, however, one of the most egregious fallacies conceivable.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

As ex-rebels James Simon Kunen (Columbia University activist) and Jerry Kirk (Black Panthers) have already informed us, there are two main forms of rebellion - the soft and the hard. There is the “designer” or “chic” version that serves, in the long run, to reinforce the established status quo,and there is the authentic and radical form that attempts, and occasionally succeeds, in countering and demolishing the rotten status quo. The masses of discontented and inwardly discomfited who consider themselves as being “against the system” (and this includes the majority of pseudo-Communists, pseudo-Anarchists, and so on) are usually of the first variety and are, therefore, easily duped and led. More often than not these soft-rebels are also highly duplicitous, narcissistic and devious. They desire only to seize the reigns of power for themselves. After all, how many Stalins, Castros, Maos, and Mugabes of the world begin as zealous “opponents” of the status quo only to later become the most zealous of oppressors? As William Blake wrote:"...the fist that crushes the tyrants head becomes a tyrant in the tyrant's stead." So, although the masters of the game may occasionally permit this soft designer-rebelliousness, they are ever vigilant against the true hard form should it ever threaten to appear.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

What many paranoiacs, fear-mongers, and doomsday merchants imagine to be the countdown to extinction is actually the countdown to freedom. What many falsely imagine to be the instigation of a tyrannical “New World Order” is, in fact, going to be the removal of all such draconian order from the world, forever.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In psychological terms, Pluto is the “Shadow.” Symbolically speaking, it is nature's psychic surgeon or hygienist that arrives to cleanse the soul of its toxicity and repressed debris so that it may be chastened and virginal enough to perhaps receive the clear elixir of truth. That Plutonic Shadow, the emissary of the Holy Spirit, has already been manifesting in the world and it will continue to do so for a decade or more. Its presence is the harbinger of truth and above all - freedom. Therefore, only those imprisoners of human minds and souls haves something to fear from the coming "Age of Revealing." As the Scorpionic thirteenth card of the Tarot shows (Rider-Waite Deck) it is only the popes and kings, and their lieutenants, who will be leveled before Pluto's great steed. It is only the emotionally, morally, and spiritually toxic amongst us who have something to fear from the approach of Pluto's silver scythe. The rest can benefit from, and even enjoy, the healing that comes after the pestilence, the plague, and the offending virus has been eradicated. All we have to remember is that everything in our world is cleaned - our bodies, our cars, and our carpets. Only our emotions and psyche remain perpetually neglected and unhygienic. This is what the energy represented by Pluto comes in to confront and clear.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Symbolically speaking, we find it more than suggestive that the dove was chosen to represent the third party of the Blessed Trinity since it is not a Christian emblem. It is a very ancient pagan symbol. The origin of the mystical symbolism of the dove comes from astrology and from the gnosis of the ancient stellar cults. The dove is, in fact, the symbol for the sign of Scorpio, which is one of the two signs of the zodiac connected to the Spirit of Rebellion. So, we find it more than significant that the symbol chosen to represent the higher self - the true Holy Spirit - should relate directly and undeniably to the spirit and act of Rebellion, and to the Spirit of Contradiction.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Perhaps, we can now understand why it is that a man cannot be forgiven for sins committed against the “Holy Spirit,” that is, against his own Higher Self.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The abnegation of selfhood is tantamount to self-murder. Thanks to orthodox religion and its anti-human dogmas this sadism to the self is rampant throughout the world. We can find it in the East and in the West. Religion,government, and corporations, exist to rape men of their inherent sovereignty and to crush the Spirit of Rebellion. These forces are obscene contradictions to the true Holy Spirit. The church, in particular, is not the agent of the Holy Spirit but its greatest enemy. A careful reading of the bible reveals how many passages are given over to the question of slavery and how endorsed it is by god and his terrestrial agents.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The dove is merely a metaphor for the deconstructive energy that is astrologically symbolized by the sign of Scorpio and its ruling planet Pluto.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The abnegation of selfhood is tantamount to self-murder. Thanks to orthodox religion and its anti-human dogmas this sadism to the self is rampant throughout the world. We can find it in the East and in the West. Religion,government, and corporations, exist to rape men of their inherent sovereignty and to crush the Spirit of Rebellion. These forces are obscene contradictions to the true Holy Spirit. The church, in particular, is not the agent of the Holy Spirit but its greatest enemy. A careful reading of the bible reveals how many passages are given over to the question of slavery and how endorsed it is by god and his terrestrial agents.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

We understand that a rational man cannot say, like Christ is meant to have done, that: "I and my Father are One," unless we are each first one within ourselves to begin with. The "Father" is complete and if we are ourselves not complete then how can we possibly be one with him or with anyone? The Christian who imagines that being one with the Father implies the abnegation of selfhood is a sadist to his own being. He commits a cardinal sin with just this kind of illogical thinking. How can a mere nothing, a human zero, merge with god? After all, who is it that comprehends this state of oneness? Logically, it is only a self that can merge or bond with god's self.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The knowledge of god, or even of the son of god, is worthless to the one who does not deeply know him or herself. The chaos and debauch in our world is the result of this lack of self-knowledge. The casualties from drugs and from false spiritual paths and teachers also stand as testimony to our assertion and thesis.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

In truth, there is no enlightenment to be found outside oneself. There is nothing worth having or attaining that does not originate within one's own being. If there is such a thing as enlightenment it cannot be found in the company of gurus, priests, or experts. Only its antithesis can be found in such company. As it was written at Delphi, it is only when a man has ended his own inner division and come to rational clarity over the mystery of himself that he can inherit true wisdom.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Although most Christians will be loath to accept what we say, it is in accordance with true Christian precepts to identify this so-called “Holy Spirit” (the third spiritual essence and principle within the Trinity) as our own selfhood. The Holy Spirit was referred to as "Wisdom" (Sophia), and was equated with transcendent knowledge. This knowledge may extend to the son of god, and then to god himself, but it must first begin with self-knowledge.This is literally what Sophia of the Trinity is - knowledge of the self. The conspiring forces that sought to make this self-knowledge taboo, and who distorted and complicated our understanding and veneration of the true Holy Spirit, were attempting to blot out the self from the Holy Trinity and from the spiritual canon. To imagine the Holy Spirit to be some vague presence, or some indefinable aspect of the Virgin Mary, a white ethereal dove, an abstract metaphysical principle, or an inexplicable mystery, suited the desires of the Christian priestarchy but denied their flock their most valuable key to the gates of salvation. What we were not told is that without the key of knowledge of the self, the other keys, should they even come into our possession, are worthless.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

All of them, from Tonatiuh to Odin, from Apollonius and Socrates to Christ, were rebels, iconoclasts, and outcasts. And yet, each was sent to the world by the higher power to execute the will of the so-called “Holy Spirit.” Rebellion, the hallmark of all Servants of Truth is, therefore, a true service to the Holy Spirit. Rebellion against those authorities, systems, or ideas that attempt to molest, impede or confound our sacred individuality,sovereignty, and true voice, constitutes service to the Holy Spirit.Rebelliousness is the hallmark of the Holy Spirit.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

For every Christ and Muhammad there are a thousand other god-men, born of virgins, imbued with the deepest wisdom,and enamored with a divine mission. India is filled with such men and women today. So let it be known that there is nothing truly unique about the life of Jesus Christ. The only thing unique about Christ is the lengths to which the Cult, that has adopted his name, has gone to suppress the truth and to foist their unsustainable sectarian beliefs upon the world.

— Michael Tsarion; Michael Tsarion view

No, few care or have ever cared about the factuality of the bible's convoluted stories. Inwardly, subconsciously, most people know the improbability of such tales. It is apathy and conformity that motivate men to accept such fictions.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Although we may resist accepting it, the youth could care less about Jesus and God. The young ones who appear to care are often forced to do so as a consequence of the inevitable indoctrination process of punitive parents and guardians.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

No, the average believer wants Jesus to do something for him. He wants Jesus to act on his behalf and to provide various physical, emotional,and spiritual comforts and securities. Yes, what a great pleasure a mentally and emotionally destitute (“meek”) man finds knowing that for the nominal fee of blind obedience his jealous god will fulfill his needs and also dispense hell and damnation to his enemies. Who could pass up such a platinum deal? The day that Jesus and god fail to cut it, the guru gimmick-merchant on the block will do just as well.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

We overcome the direst enemies with knowledge and not might. We seek revelation to prevent revolution, to overcome evil with the force of our example not by the example of our force, but by psychological weaponry, and by total conviction in our cause and sovereign power. As said above, we understand lucidly that freedom is never free, and that silence is most definitely consent. Regardless of whether we are joined by others, or not, we proceed on our quest with conviction. There is the fairest of damsels to be saved and a Serpent's blood to redden our shields - that is all!

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

What may come after our efforts is not a primary concern.We are not interested in building new world systems but confine our energies to the destruction of old ones that must be rivaled and logically toppled at this time.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Servants of Truth know from experience how few friends are won, if and when they should endeavor to expose the dirty little secrets of religion's upper echelons.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Like children we have sought to prepare a dish and have exchanged sugar for salt because, in our innocence, we believed because they look alike they must taste alike. So it is with our error over the likeness of love and power. Therefore, it is hardly a surprise that we are not enjoying the dish we have prepared.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The Age of Revealing (or of Apocalypse) is a time when the masks of the false are removed, and when man gets his chance to see who and what he is without filter or censor. Works such as this one, which delve into hidden origins, are symptomatic of this phase-shift into the time when men get the rare chance to find out what has been kept from them, and to have the answers concerning their true origins and destiny. Primarily, the presence of Plutonic (and also Uranian) energy hearkens in a
Spirit of Rebellion. This spirit comes to assist in the process of revelation. It also compels us to resist conformity. As a result of its presence the autocratic forces in the world, that contrive to maintain group-think and who benefit from mankind's unquestioning obedience, become even more tyrannous and aggressive. They manufacture more ingenious devices to ensure that people do not go AWOL. Pluto signals major revisions in the social order, and large scale maneuvers from the power-brokers within governments.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Astrologically, this need to see beneath the surface of things is “ruled” by the planet-archetype Pluto. The energy represented by this planet-archetype (that of deconstruction, ending, and revelation) will be increasing in intensity during the early part of the new millennium. This increase will be experienced as very uncomfortable by people who have lived their entire lives under “consensus trance” and who have not developed the mental equipment to objectively critique their lifestyles or environment.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

To offer critiques concerning the five-senses reality is to come up against every one of the innumerable defenses that define the anatomy of the human ego. As the Freudians know, the human ego is little more than a mass of defenses. The Ego-Ideal and Super-Ego (complexes within consciousness) defend against content threatening to ego autonomy. The ego's defense apparatus operates in this way even at the cost of higher forms of expression and awareness. The defenses operate to secure the image that one has of oneself, even if the image has been largely implanted by external authorities. Indeed, the Super-Ego has been regarded as the psychic representative of external authority. And interestingly, its nature is binary. There are permissive defenses and prohibitive ones and, like most biotic functions, they operate unconsciously. These various ego-settings came into existence due to the titanic forces that beset our ego-consciousness from within and without, from the unconscious and from the world. Sanity is a balancing act and, as we say,there is a thin line between genius and madness. This thin line exists also between independence and conformity and between freedom and enslavement. If the human ego senses that the inner and outer threats are intensifying, it tightens and, like a shellfish, retracts from reality. This process is known to psychologists as regression. The egos' behavior is then more conservative and irrational. The regressive tendencies, together with many others (denial, repression, identification, sublimation, sado-masochism, aggression, self-destruction, perversity, insanity, etc) are manipulated by autocrats who seek to control the mass of mankind in the same manner as Wild-Child is controlled by an individual master who, like any animal-tamer,expertly displays his two faces - his permissive and prohibitive tendencies.

Wild-Child is soon trapped in a web from which he can never free himself. He becomes enmeshed in a net tighter yet more tensile than those prepared and laid for his erstwhile forest cousins. Instead of the sun and moon to look down upon him he has the All-Seeing Eye of his imperious master watching his every flex and twitch and peering deeply into the miasma of his mind. The smile he sees greeting him every morning becomes infinitely more sinister and troubling to him than any painful prod or incomprehensible laboratory test. Wild-Child despises the punitive aspects of master but is gratified and appeased when his “correctness” impresses his austere father. Wild-Child develops a “love versus hate” relationship with the master. He is attracted and repulsed at the same time. He detests the power his master has over him but covets that kind of power himself. He is subconsciously attracted to it and bides his time, waiting until he can gratuitously exercise control over creatures meeker than himself. Eventually, Wild-Child learns how the power structure works hierarchically and how even his own master is himself a servant of some other agency. He learns that there is pain in store for his tendency to malinger and that there are punishments in store for even questioning his lot. In the end he accepts his servitude and grows accustomed to his own place in the great invisible hierarchy. The experiment to change his essential nature occurred early and, despite resistance and recalcitrant urges, Wild-Child eventually becomes Tame-Child. He learns to adjust and to even be rather shameful of his previous form of existence that was more natural and free. He learns to disapprove of those who exist as he once did. His identification with the object of his own hatred turns him into an oppressor and a dominator.

In his ambivalent and schizoid state Tame-Child brings havoc to the world but his ego-censors prevent him from apprehending himself as the cause. The world's problems are mysterious in origin and have nothing to do with him. He may sensually deplore what he sees and he may try to topically remedy some of the blatant injustices and affronts he encounters, but looking deeply into causes and motives is certainly not his forte. Endeavors of that kind leave him feeling ineffectual and frustrated and he prefers to leave that kind of thing to others. His hours and days of sensual experimentation with the phenomena of the world must not be halted by thoughts concerning meaning. Life is life. It does not have meaning. Such becomes the credo of the Tame-Child. If and when his personal ideas of reality come under attack from external adversity he can escape into drugs and sexual gratification. He can eat, drink, party, get smashed, and put his blues behind him. The world is just a place he is in. It is outside and is rather threatening. It is full of foreign things he often has to pretend he likes. It does not belong to him and he is not its caretaker. That too is someone else's job. Freedom makes him uneasy and bored. He does not know what to do with it and prefers not to have it. He invents cunning arguments to cover the fact that what he really desires is freedom from freedom. He feigns lamentation about the absence of freedom, valor, and independence, but secretly he despises these things and is envious of those who appear to possess them. Above all, Tame-Child does not wish to think too deeply or revitalize his own ideas of reality. He finds that he can exist without being so bothered, and this knowledge brings him great satisfaction. He discovers that society will reward him for his avoidance and lack of attention to the questions that matter. Tame-Child does not need to think because someone will always be there to tell him what to do and how to do it. The routines, uniforms, repetitiveness, and conformity are very comforting. Doing what everyone else does and thinking as everyone else thinks is psychically elating. It is Tame-Child's satori.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

The ending of the Age can mean the end of the machinations of warlords and aristocratic tyrants. It can hearken in a time of enhanced freedom for those who sorely deserve it.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

It is almost impossible for a hypnotized, mind-controlled, illogical, desensitized, or psychopathic person to be aware of their own error or dementia.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

What is slightly less a matter for the conventional staff-room and laboratory is the question of how larger units of society might likewise suffer being controlled and manipulated by external interference.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Regardless, of the edification of scientists we can glean one simple point - a man, even a very primitive man, can have his behavior and personality shaped and changed.His essential character can be altered by the persistent and deliberate application of conditioning techniques. It matters little whether these impositions are natural or unnatural or whether they are moral or not. What matters is that a man is changed. Once-upon-a-time he was one thing and then, after interference, he becomes something else.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2 view

Man believed he could grow strong on a diet of pure materialism, and now wonders why he is vomiting forth his guts and dying of malnutrition.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The races of Egypt, Libya, and India, etc, knew these strange visitors as "Red Men," "Men of Gold," "Goat Men," and "Stag Men," etc. In the bible they are cryptically referred to as "Edomites." This name, attributed to the early Egyptians, simply meant "Red Men." This term has never been satisfactorily explained. However, the original Egyptians are described as having fair hair, and as being of red complexion. The redness mentioned is merely sunburn. Red is what a Caucasian man's skin turns in equatorial heat.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] evidence is now coming out showing that Egypt was colonized by Western people over 15,000 years ago.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

According to Beaumont, Edinburgh (Din Eidyn), the capital city of Scotia, or Scotland, was the <em>original</em> Zion, or Jerusalem.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Ancient historians claimed that Noah had come from the "Land of Seth" before the deluge. Beaumont believed that this was a reference to the Shetlands.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Osiris, considered by Egyptologists to be a god of the Earth, actually represented the Earth itself. He <em>was</em> the Earth. This is why we read that his ordeal involved a conflict with Set, the god of wastelands, and why we read of his dismemberment. Why this particular kind of death? Beaumont saw it as a device commemorating the tearing to pieces of the Earth by forces unleashed by comet Phaeton. The story of the god or hero torn apart, with his body parts scattered over all parts of the land, served as a retelling of actual terrestrial events. The resurrection of the hero involved the methodical piecing together of the body parts. This trope represents the parts of the Earth emerging again from receding waters and retracting or melting ice sheets.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The groups that managed to survive would inevitably have settled in foreign parts and gradually lost their racial uniqueness. They would eventually have assimilated into those tribes and nations that outnumbered them. If any were to return home in future ages it would have been descendants with blood mixed through interbreeding. What returned was never a pure stock. Those resettling ancestral homelands might not even recognize as their own the scant and faded remnants of civilization found amid the hills and valleys that had once been the sacred home of their fathers.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The erecting of obelisks and towers represented restored order and new life for the Earth. The tower was the Earth's phallus. Its erection symbolized hope and life. The symbolism also extended to the phenomenon of Earth's Polar Shift. Objects are straightened or set in place again once they have fallen or been toppled.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The "Jews," "Judites," or "Yahuds," were not Semites, Asians, or Orientals, from the Eastern hemisphere. They were the Iuda or Juda, the Duwes, or Deus - the "Godly Men" - from Britain and Scandinavia.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] "historical" civilizations first arose as <em>remnants</em> of older ones obliterated by these terrible upheavals

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Beaumont emphasized the swiftness of the catastrophic events, and it is this belief in the rapidity of the spectacle that separates Catastrophists from Uniformitarians

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Allan and Delair, like the main Catastrophist Theorists before them, understand that the massive casualties among the world's fauna did not occur due to movements of glaciers and ice sheets over millions of years. In the tradition of Beaumont and Velikovsky they review the extinction events that appear to have occurred over twelve millennia BC and that are also recorded in the world's myths and legends.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The <em>great</em> flood (for there were many lesser ones) of ancient myth was but one symptom of the global cataclysm.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

He [Comyns Beaumont] demonstrated in his books how most of the locations, events, heroes, kings, and miscellaneous characters mentioned in the bible existed in Britain and Ireland, or had connections to these places.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[Ignatius] Donnelly showed that it was on Atlantis, and/or on other similar prehistoric sites, that man first rose from barbarism to civilization. Contrary to what Donnelly supposed, we believe Atlantis to have been one specific locale or city-state upon a continental landmass (known as Appalachia) that was situated in the north Atlantic region, and known in antiquity as Hyperborea, or Ultima Thule. Donnelly was a friend of President Abraham Lincoln who, before he was assassinated, promised to order the US Naval vessel Dolphin to assist in the search for Atlantis. The project was cancelled following the president's murder by Jesuit-backed assassins.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Beaumont specifically pointed out that the cultural elements and idioms regarded as "Egyptian" could not have originated in the land of the Nile. This single fact is inviolate and cannot be denied. It is obvious to those who have taken the time to study the subject, that the Egyptian civilization was transplanted by Western adepts and elders.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The earliest Neolithic sites appear to be those at Mehgarh. They date back to approximately 7000 BC, to the period following the Age of Catastrophe.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

As the myths of Eastern people relate, it was white "god-men" from the far West who had arrived bringing wisdom. These myths merely recorded the migrations of exceptionally gifted peoples from lands ruined in the West. Some descendants of these migrating tribes would, during later periods of history, and after some semblance of normalcy had returned to their ancestral habitats, make the trek back again, taking with them their husbands, wives, and offspring of <em>foreign</em> race and blood.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Atlantean empires spoken of in the works of Athenian philosopher Plato, that reportedly lay beyond the so-called "Pillars of Hercules" originally existed, according to Beaumont, on ancient Albion or Logres, that is in the British Isles. These Isles were either remnants of Atlantis itself, or were fragmented landmasses once connected to a larger continental mass that may have included Scandinavia, Iceland, Greenland, and the Arctic. This "Atlantean" area was known to the ancients as Hyperborea (meaning "Beyond North") or as Ultima Tule, Tula, and Tollan, and also as Arktos or Atzlan.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Nothing was to block the idea that enlightenment was in a man's own keeping. It was not, and is not, something imposed or apprehended from outside. As the Egyptians so beautifully depicted in their papyri, enlightenment is a consequence of man's perpetual inner cleansing.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In some texts, the Essenes reveal that their philosophy is of Druidic origin. Three Elders were served by twelve attendants. And this is certainly a tradition based on astrology. Essene masters were known as "the Star" and referred to themselves as "Sons of Light" or as "the Elect."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Before their [Dead Sea Scrolls] discovery, the world had not heard of the Gnostics. We knew nothing of them or of their teachings. And this was by design.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Did the "great" Martin Luther, the rebel against Catholic oppression, stand with the Anabaptists? Did he support the Peasant's Rebellion that, inspired by him, rose up against royal and state tyranny? No! He did not. He condemned their actions and cursed them each and all. In doing so he showed his colors. He showed the world that he was a nothing more than a paid stooge of the Vatican, funded to fashion what appeared to be a more human religion in order to offset world wide revolution. The new religion of this Luther, and of his protégés Calvin, Knox, and Wesley, was a throw-back to the sadism and irrationality of the Old Testament. It posed no threat whatsoever to the executive of the Vatican. Had it done so, it would have been eradicated overnight. The Vatican had nothing to worry about, and neither did the monarchs and princes of the world. This "Protestantism" was a perfect police-state religion, instructing its followers to be servile and obedient to authority. The tyrants of religion were in perfect accord with the tyrants of politics.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

No such nonsense [redemption by proxy] was taught by the Servants of Truth. [...] The adept under the guidance of the Druid or Shaman faced nature and knew full well that there was no entrance to the halls of his gods as long as he remained morally impure and sodden.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The emperors, bishops, cardinals, and ministers conspired, and continue to conspire, to have their followers believe that Jesus will do the work for them. The man who converts and swallows this insinuation is hardly likely to work upon himself spiritually and psychologically. [...] His ultimate psychic satisfaction comes from the belief in redemption by proxy. That he does not need to deeply work on himself is the most subconsciously desired perk behind his religious allegiance. Along with a mass of others, equally hesitant to take responsibility for their own lives, he is convinced that he is privileged and special because he has been chosen by a spiritually perfected superior being who will do all his spiritual work for him. Jesus will watch over him. Jesus will prevent him from coming to harm. Jesus will lead him from temptation and reward him for performing good deeds and acting charitably toward others; and Jesus will save him from the seething evil of a devil trying to damage him morally and drag him to perdition.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The greatest travesty perpetrated by the destroyers of the Irish Church was the obliteration of the central tenet of all Druidic teaching concerning the sanctity of the self. The doctrine of selfhood was the number one greatest threat to the Roman Church.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Anat or Anath was based on the Aryan mother goddess Ana, who was also known as Dana or Danu. She was considered the "virginal" mother of the sun gods. Isis, Hathor, Astarte, Nut, and Neith, were virginal goddesses based on the Western antetype. As E. A. Wallis Budge wrote: <em>And the priests of the goddess Net (Neith) of Sais...held the view that she was self-begotten and self-produced, that she was the mother of the Sun-god, and at the same time a perpetual virgin-goddess</em>. There can be no doubt that these goddesses were the basis of Christianity's Virgin Mary.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

As we have shown, the deer and stag were insignias of the Arya, or Druid Elders.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Essentially, the Wicca were, like the Stoics and Cathars, one of the groups preserving, as best they could, the <em>Druidic Way</em>.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Under Pope John XXII, in the year 1320 AD, the interrogation and persecution of so-called "witches" was made law. A witch was, of course, an adept. He or she was part of the "Wicca" or "Wise Ones." They were keepers of the arcane archive of knowledge passed down from the earliest times.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

When the Church finally decided, at the Council of Ephesus in 431 AD, to include Mary as a divine aspect, and after it permitted her worship, innumerable pagan sites to the goddesses of old were converted into places sacred to her. The executive within the Roman church finally accepted how problematic it was to completely suppress the feminine principle. So, they simply deified Mary, knowing full well that she would serve them by appeasing the pagan sentiment impossible to wholly eradicate from the world.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Interestingly, we find that certain Christian and Judaic enclaves (such as the Gnostics and Essenes) also revered the goddess and the feminine principle. She is, for instance, mentioned in the Dead Sea Scrolls. In gospels such as that of Thomas (first translated into English by Professor Helmut Koester), we read of Sophia, the goddess of wisdom, and we sense a great reverence for the feminine aspects of deity totally absent in the orthodox branch of Judeo-Christianity. Then, to establish and emphasize our point, we find that these Gnostic sects predate Christianity and Judaism by centuries.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Like the Greeks, the Egyptians and Druids personified wisdom as a goddess. To the Greeks she was Sophia (a word meaning "serpent"), and to the Egyptians she was Ma'at, Nuith, or Taurt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

One of the most important ancient symbols for the goddess was the serpent. The Egyptian hieroglyphic for woman was a serpent.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

From birth to death the goddess played a part in the lives of the nobility of Ireland and Egypt. She played no active part in the lives of the Israelites of the bible.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Irish kings received their power and authority from the goddess. The same custom existed in Egypt, for the pharaoh. Pharaohs and Irish Chieftains alike ruled as ambassadors for the goddess.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Nuada (Nada) was the prehistoric king of the ancient pre-Celtic Irish. Chieftain of the Tuatha de Danann ("People of Goddess Danu"). His name comes from Naddred, the title of the High Druids, meaning "Wise Serpent." His name is the origin of the Biblical Noah (Nuah).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In ancient times the term virgin was attributed to any female who had left their wordly life in order to give themselves to the worship of a god. Such women were considered "born again virgins."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

This terrible travesty of gender dynamics and religious belief does not originate with the Jews or Christians. It originates with the Atonists of Lower Egypt - the first monotheists with a pathological fear and hatred toward nature, darkness, and the feminine principle.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

More importantly, the Jehovah of the bible was a corrupt rescripting of the ancient god of the moon, worshipped in Egypt and Ireland from the earliest days. As we have shown, his name (Yehew or Yahweh) originally came from the word for the yew tree.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The consort of Danu was Bel. Bel or Baal was worshipped by the Hittites, Canaanites, and Phoenicians, centuries before the so-called Israelites were even heard of. Bel was the first deity of the Druidic trinity. The bells that ring out from Christian churches to this day get the name bell from the god's name (pr. bayal). The Muslims know him still as their Al, or Allah, while to the Canaanites and Levites he was EL. The proto-Greek Pelasgians probably derive their name from Bel. The Hebrew god EL is merely a clever rendering of the Irish Bel.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The travelers gave their name to places such as Donetz, Danzig, Dneiper, Dneister, and Denmark, etc. In Norway, they are said to be the Donsk People. Sadly for Petrie, none of this nonsense is true. These places were not based on the Israelites who were most irreverent toward the goddess. They were named from much earlier traversals of Irish Druids, those most reverent toward their goddess Danu.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Without hesitation, therefore, we conclude that the spurious connections between Danites and de Dannan are a perfidious but subtle fabrication. We believe the word Dan, as used in the biblical scriptures, to be a later interpolation made to aid duplicitous historians tampering with occidental history.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Danites concern us because of the outrageous attempts by British-Israelites to identify them with the Tuatha de Danann. Although the four pre-diluvian homelands of the de Danann were nothing like Egypt or Palestine, and even though goddess worship distinguished the matriarchal Irish Elders, the British-Israelites insist that they and the Danites are one and the same people.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

If Jesus and his closest family members made their way Westward it was, in our opinion, not merely to escape persecution. It was a return, like so many before, to the lands of the ancestors.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In Irish myth the young solar king Lugh rides out to defend his people against he giant Balor of the Evil Eye. He kills his enemy with a sling. The story <em>predates</em> the rise of Judaism.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Haste was made to position "Eden," the home of the biblical Adam, the first man of the first race. It was to be found in the East of course, in the Northern plains of India. It could be identified with the Pamir Plateau, while the river Pison of Genesis was linked with the great Indus River that began there. This zone was erroneously designated, by British-Israelites and others, as the cradle of the Aryans. The main reason why the Himalayan regions were selected for the original homeland of the Aryans was because the main creation myths refer to a great central "White Mountain" that existed in Eden. This central mountain was known as Meru. Indeed, the Pamir Mountains, and those nearby known as Amu Darya, are the highest ranges in the world. However, the word Meru actually connotes Egypt and the pyramids. The pyramid of Giza was the "white mountain" of the legends, and Egypt was the biblical Eden.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The first king of the Phoenicians was King Tur, from whom the Teutonic Thor was derived, and also the British Artur or Arthur.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

When it could be shown that "Semites" did not exist as a definable race before 2000 BC, and when it could be proven that the Babylonians, Persians, Phoenicians, Syrians, and Etruscans, were not racially Semitic, the big heat began to fall upon the Judeo-Christian propagandists. With consummate skill they began to reveal a few smidgens of the truth they had kept hidden for centuries. They sought to maintain their academic credibility that had begun to crumble during the first few decades of the twentieth century. Their main ruse was to declare the Jews and the Israelites to be racially dissimilar. They declared that the people referred to as "Jews" were not Semitic after all, but that they were one and the same people as the "Aryans," who were being studied and known to be the fathers of civilization. Without overdoing it they tacitly began admitting that the biblical Levites had an intimate connection with the Hyksos people of Lower Egypt who had ruled there from the thirteenth dynasty. It was essential that the "Jews" be given a noble appearance. Nevertheless, with the admittance that the Jews were not Semitic, we get to see the truth coveted and secreted for so long. The propagandists were admitting what they knew to be the truth, namely that the "Jews" were related to the "Aryans" by way of the Egyptians and other Caucasian races such as the Phoenicians and Babylonians. They were not the children of Shem (Noah's son) at all, and were misnamed.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

According to British-Israelites and Zionist scholars, the pure-blooded unadulterated "Aryan-Israelite" elites eventually made their way Westward into Europe to civilize and bring the word of Jehovah to all pagan nations living in spiritual darkness. According to the insinuation, we are to look to these folk, these "Aryan-Israelites" from the East, for the origins of the civilizing elements and not to bother with earlier tree-worshipping, goddess-revering Druids or Phoenicians. Indeed, as the British-Israelite ideology developed, these very Druids were proclaimed to be of Israelite origins. Yes, the English, Irish, Scots, Welsh, Germans, and Norwegians, were all said to have descended from the people of the bible. When this nonsense began being accepted and believed by Western Christians, the truth of the true ancestry slowly faded.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Archaeological and anthropological discoveries, made throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, continued to raise important questions about the movement of races and the origins of Western nations. They also demanded a closer scientific look at the accounts within the bible and other scriptures. And it was this scrutiny by erudite and objective scholars that deeply unnerved the Judeo-Christian hegemony behind the rise of British-Israelitism. As the Western origins of civilization began to be proven, the case for the Judaic origins looked bleak. With these threatening new findings their false claims and illustrious image of being the great "holy people" would go out the window. The privilege they enjoyed from their deceptions might quickly end. Therefore, something had to be done. So, it was thought best to concede a little and allow a few historical facts to be accepted. The Egyptian connections would still remain obscure, but it could certainly be admitted that the Israelites were not racially Semitic after all. According to the British-Israelites, the Semitic blood entered in during the captivity in Babylon when the "Aryan-Israelites" consorted sexually with "foreign" elements. We find this hard to accept since the Babylonians, Persians, Medes, and Syrians were, in those days, of Aryan (Indo-European) stock. Nevertheless, it is asserted that the "mixed-blooded" were the ones who, infirmly, made their way back to Palestine at the cessation of the "Captivity." This infirm bunch were the "Jews" and not the more illustrious "Israelites."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Moses, the "goat-horned" prophet. The word Moses means "son." It is found in Tuthmosis, Ahmose, and Ramesis. Ramesis means "Son of Ra."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The early Phoenicians were known to have referred to themselves and their kings by the term Got or Gott, signifying goats. This is where we derive the words god and good, and where place names such as Gotland and Goteborg, etc, come from. The Gotts were called the Goths by the Romans. These Caucasian Goths considered horned animals, such as stags and goats, to be sacred symbols of their people and gods.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The term Anglo-Saxon came into use after the Roman invasion of the British Isles. The land of Britain was called simply Angle-Land or England by the new conquerors, the Germanic Angles, who were first invited to Britain by Christian kings to assist with the eviction of Scottish Picts during the 5th and 6th centuries AD. After assisting the Britons to push back the Picts, the cunning Angles plotted to remain and take Britain for themselves. They succeeded in this enterprise and almost annihilated the Britons. The few survivors fled to Wales for safety.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The "Israelites" were indeed of Indo-European stock. This made them kindred to the Greeks, Romans, Germans, Armenians, Scythians, Persians, Saxons, and the peoples of Northern India. In any case, racial type was not as important to ancient peoples as we have been led to believe. What mattered more was theology. Civilizations and peoples were kindred due to the gods worshipped and religious precepts followed. The term Aryan connoted the "White" or "Pure Ones," and referred to moral purity and spiritual status. It did not signify a racial distinction until it was deliberately mistranslated during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Those who sought to instill a false idea concerning the term Aryan belong to the same order as those concealing the West to East movement of the elements of civilization. They belong to the same species as those proposing that Eastern Israelites brought culture into Europe and Britain, and who imply that the symbols of the Houses and Kingdoms of Europe (to be seen on heraldry, flags, medallions, coins, and regalia) are Jewish in origin. They came into the West around 1000 BC. Actually, they were brought back by those whose ancestry lay in the West. Through the deliberate and pernicious tampering with the meaning of terms, names, and titles, this simple truth has been expertly obscured by the British-Israelites who excel at obfuscation.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

According to British-Israelites, it was the influx of Israelites that civilized Britain in the first place. In their minds Anglo-Saxons and Israelites were of the <em>same</em> blood, race, and ideology.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The British-Israelite propagandists sought to show that the Israelites of the bible were in fact "Aryans," that is, Caucasians or Indo-Europeans. The British-Israelites realized that if they conceded the Israelites to be of Aryan (or more correctly Indo-European) racial stock, they could conceal a much greater truth and make it seem that peoples and nations of the Western Hemisphere had received their cultural idioms from the East.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Basically, the rational for these preposterous fascist notions, is based upon the idea that the ten tribes of Israel succeeded moving East after their captivity at the hands of Assyrian King Tiglath Pilezer III. However, once we understand that the so-called ten tribes of Israel are not the same as the Atonist Judites, the British-Israelite agenda becomes transparent. The Atonists are the ones who work from behind the scenes. It is they who control the royalty of Britain. Their ancestry, as the symbolism indicates, is not purely Judaic, or even Roman, but <em>Egyptian</em>.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The central tenets of the British-Israelites are the following:

<ul>
<li>The British throne is that of King David</li>
<li>The English royal family descends from King David</li>
<li>The British royals, and their various European relatives, are descended from the Tribe of Judah and the Levites, by way of Zarah, the brother of Perez, son of Judah</li>
<li>The British Empire and Church of England are the modern-day manifestation of the true kingdom of god</li>
<li>The British have been chosen by god to build a world empire in order to rule the Earth</li>
</ul>

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The greatest slander toward the Druids is the assertion that they were compulsive sacrificers of animals and human beings. The image of blood-soaked altars and blazing wicker men sickens modern readers and helps to aggrandize the minions of Christianity, making them appear humane and elevated in spirit. But in truth, there exists not one factual account of any such practices among the Druids. The fiction of their mania for sacrifice was pure propaganda. And naturally this makes sense since the world's priests and literati, the Brahmins and Aryans, the Egyptians and Persians, would hardly have held the Druids in such high esteem if bloody sacrifices were their sport.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Greeks were merely broadcasters and disseminators of letters and culture. They are now known not to be the originators. It was the Phoenicians, Etruscans, Mycenaeans, Thracians, and Cretans, and Armenians, who originated what the world would inherit by way of Greeks and Romans. And these groups and tribes were Indo-European or Caucasian.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The cunning linguists downplayed the terms "Caucasian," "Nordic," "Gothic," and inserted the obscure terms "Celtic" and "Semitic," to mislead the curious. Whether the attacks on Ireland's sovereignty came from the original Roman Invasions (AD 43), or from Saint Patrick and his purges and book-burnings (443 AD), or from the Normans and their oppressive "Statutes of Kilkenny" (AD 1367), or from the bloody interference of the English Royals, or from the massacres of Oliver Cromwell (AD 1649), or from the artificially created Great Famine (1845-6), or from the ghastly Penal Laws imposed by England, or from the endless later "Catholic versus Protestant" conflicts, the object has remained very much the same - that we should never discover the sacred legacy of the Druids.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

As we have already mentioned, once the Druids and Bards were destroyed, the desecration and looting of their works began. The physical and ideological plunder lasted for generations. The perpetrators of this crime (the Atonists, Milesians, Culdean Monks, Templars, and Vatican) commissioned “historians” to scribble a new history of the British Isles, a fiction that Hans Christian Andersen would have been in awe of. In the place of the White Magi we have leprechauns. In place of the groves we have Jesuit colleges. And in place of the natural religion of the Druids, we have Judeo-Christianity with all its error, folly, and poison.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Roman governors knew their rule would be undermined by the Druids who traveled all over the country stirring up anti-Roman sentiment and spurring the people to rebel against foreign control. This patriotic anti-colonial stance was one political reason that contributed to the annihilation of the British Druids.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

It is almost impossible to point to something in Greek and Roman culture that is <em>original</em>.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The elements that we now associate with Judaism and Christianity were brought to the West (to Greece, Rome and Britain) by Atonists exiled from Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Later, in the eleventh century, Normans from France, under William the Conqueror, invaded Britain. William displaced the Saxon kings, slaughtering and humiliating them until his own people dominated the land. This bloodthirsty tyrant and his Templar generals were emissaries of Rome. Their castles, forts, and mansions, can still be seen across the British Isles today. Most of them were precisely geomantically positioned. The Templars had been taught well by their Atonist Culdean masters.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

After the Roman Empire collapsed, due to the successful spread of "barbaric" tribes, Britain was conquered by Norwegian Vikings, Danish Jutes, and Germanic Saxons. It was during and after this wave of invasion and settlement that the British became known as the "Anglo-Saxons," or as the "English," from Angle-Land. The Anglo-Saxon settlement occurred in the fifth century AD, two hundred years after the arrival of Christianity.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The average Christian is never meant to find out that, before it was warped and distorted, everything he reads about between the pages of his Bible, as well as every element of his religion, originally came from Egyptian Amenism and Irish Druidism.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The average Christian is not supposed to know that Jesus' home town of Nazareth did not actually exist, or that the key places mentioned in the Bible did not <em>physically</em> exist in the so-called "Holy Land." He is not meant to know that scholars have had greater success matching Biblical events and places with events and places in Britain rather than in Palestine.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The average Christian, however, is not meant to know that the earliest word for a believer in Jesus was <em>Galilean</em>, a word that derives from <em>Gael</em> or <em>Gaelic</em>. He is not supposed to know that St. Paul, and maybe even the man Jesus himself (given that he existed), was an agent of the elite Culdeans, Sadducees, and Romans.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Before we choose to merely laugh off the nonsense of the Bible and flippantly or indignantly dismiss the outlandish forgeries and fictions, let us realize that, as preposterous and spurious as most of the content surely is, it was not composed by pathologically impressionable or illiterate men with chronically naive minds. No, in our opinion, the Testaments were commissioned and composed by men of <em>high</em> intelligence for a cozened <em>audience</em> of impressionable, illiterate, and naive men ready to credulously believe the myriad fabulous lies spun by their imperious overlords. Sadly, this penchant for gullibility was not only a problem of bygone days. Man is as irrational and gullible as ever. Sadly, his zeal for demonstrating the level of his ignorance and fanaticism has not abated. Not in the least.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Atonism was building its new world order. Its new god of light would arise from the Middle East and eventually have his headquarters in Rome. His name was not Essa, but Jesus. He could be Jew or Gentile, depending upon what apostle was read. He could be a man or a god. He could be for or against official religion. And he could be for or against monarchy. He could be martyred and return one day from the dead. He could be forgiving and also damning. Yes, he could be just about anything depending upon the whim and expertise of his creators. He was then, and he still remains, anything his creators want him to be. He was composed, "Frankenstein-like," from a hundred pagan heroes and deities, from a dozen Messianic figures, from a welter of Egyptian pharaohs, and from zodiacal archetypes absorbed from every enlightened culture in the known world. He would truly be a man for all seasons. His followers were forbidden to question his authenticity. To do so meant being labeled as a heretic. It meant torture and death. And so, the follower learned to accept and believe what his Bible told him about Jesus and his twelve helpers. It does not say he was based on earlier prototypes, or on the Irish archetype Iesa. It does not say the Druids of the West venerated their sun-king thousands of years <em>before</em> the Bible was written, or before its Atonist authors were born.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

After its creation, the story of Jesus was transplanted from Britain, where it was invented, to Galilee and Judea. This was done so that Christianity would not appear to be conspicuously Druidic in nature. To conceive Christianity in Britain was one thing; to birth it there was another. The Atonists realized their warped religion was based on ancient Amenism and Druidism. They knew their Jesus (their Iesus or Yeshua) was based on the Druidic Iesa or Aesar, and that nearly every educated person in the world would know it also. Their difficulty concerned how to come up with a believable king of light sufficiently appealing to the world's many pagan nations. Their employees, such as St. Paul (Josephus Piso), were, therefore, allowed to plunder the archive of the pagans. They were instructed to draw from the canon of stellar gnosis and from the ancient solar theologies of Egypt, Chaldea, and Ireland. The archetypal elements would, like ingredients, simply be tossed about and rearranged and, most importantly, the territory of the new god-man would be re-situated to suit the plan.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Research into the Templars and their affiliated "Salt Line" dynasties, reveals that the seven great Crusades were not instigated and participated in for the reasons mentioned in most official history books. As we show here, the Templars were the military wing of the British and European Atonists. It was their job to conquer lands, decimate rivals, and rebuild the so-called "Temple of Solomon" or, more correctly, Akhenaton's New World Order.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

To this very day, the nobility of Europe and the East are controlled from London and Rome.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Atonist elite knew it was impossible to organize and control a worldwide empire from Britain. The British Isles were geographically too far West for such management. In order to be closer the the "markets," the Atonist corporate giants coveted the city of Rome.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

And when we take on board the interesting theory of author Ralph Ellis, who believes that St. Paul was none other than Josephus Piso, the Jewish-Roman historian[...]

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In short, it was not as much a case of Romans conquering and controlling Britain, as it was of Atonists controlling the world by way of <em>their</em> Rome based empire. In any case, the new rulers of Britain were on excellent terms with the government and religious leaders of pre- and post-Christian Rome The latter were in the employ of the former. This is the conclusion of our personal investigations into the occult roots of Christianity.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

We need to remember that these British nobles were in cahoots with the imperialistic Roman forces that official history books refer to as the <em>conquerors</em> of Britain. Like the Sadducees of Judea, the nobility of Britain conspired alongside their Roman collaborators.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The lion was and is one of the two most important symbols for Atonists. It ranks second to the sun.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The truth concerning the birth of Christianity, which has been guarded by the Vatican and the various secret societies, is that it was a religion devised by British nobles, those descended from the Gaels and Scythians, who sought dominion over valuable mining territories in Britain, France, Europe, and the East. After its invention, Christianity was transplanted to the Middle East. The reason for this has partly to do with the similarity of Christianity's main protagonist, Jesus, and the ancient god Iesa. One of the most important families behind the creation of a new religion was the Scots-Irish Clan of Menzies. Along with the St. Clairs, Stuarts, and other oligarchs with long bloodlines, they coveted the mineral rich territories upon which their stately homes, estates, and parishes now stand.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The keepers of the secret tradition, the preservers of the occult history of Christianity, know full well that their religion did not originate among those the world knows as "Jews." They know who the real "Jews" were. They know that both Judaism and Christianity were the brainchildren of Egyptian Atonists ensconced in Britain.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Atonists realized that their materialistic objectives could be achieved if they manufactured a religion that appeared to be a follow on from ancient Druidism. [...] In the early days, this religion was actually known as Culdeanism, or as Jessaeanism. Early Christians were known as Culdeans, Therapeuts, or suggestively as <em>Galileans</em>. Although they would be found spread throughout Europe and the Middle East, their origin was Britain.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The chieftains of this sun cult did not conceive of Christianity for its own sake or because they were intent on saving the world. They wanted to <em>conquer</em> the world, not save it.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Once we understand that Atonist Britain was the first and true incubator of Christianity, a lot of historical mysteries are solved. When we understand how the story of Jesus was transplanted to the East from the West, we will have total insight into all that has transpired throughout the ages since Christianity took birth.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The strange and controversial fact is that Judeo-Christianity began in Britain <em>before</em> the alleged date of the Crucifixion. It was the brainchild of the Atonists of Britain.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Christianity and Atonism are both rooted in Druidism or, more correctly, in a corruption of prehistoric Druidism.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The highest ranking members of Europe's nobility, as well as senior members of the Catholic and Protestant churches, know the truth of what we reveal here. Naturally, such men are sworn to keep these facts from the masses of the world and normally they do not admit the truth in words. However, the truth has been conveyed via the <em>symbolism</em> often employed by the hierarchs and their lieutenants down through the long ages to the present.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Anthropologists have always been perplexed as to how the "Celts" appeared short, round-headed, and swarthy, and also as tall, narrow-headed, and fair. These Celts were, obviously, two extremes of a wide spectrum of racial specimens from the Indo-European family. Unlike modern anthropologists and historians, these ancient peoples did not, in our opinion, care one jot about race. What was important to them was religion, and spiritual belief.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] the infamous mythmongers, known as the "British-Israelites" (the precursors of modern Zionists), strongly believe Britain is the seat of the Israelite kingdom and that all the tribes and strains finally congregated there after the Norman invasion in 1066 AD.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] we think that the Druidic Order within Ireland were Amenist sympathizers and therefore anti-Atonist and anti-Milesian.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The princess's nickname can also be rendered Scotia. Scota's real name was Meritaten ("Mary of Aton"), which means "Beloved of Aton." This means that the names of Ireland and Scotland were given by elite Atonists. Scota was the wife of King Mile, whose family were descended from Gaelic Scythians.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The land of Scotland is named after Akhenaton's daughter Scota. Her name signified the land of Ireland. When the Irish crossed over to Scotland, they took the name of their own land with them.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The identity of Scota is of central concern. A well known figure in Irish mythology, she has been revealed to have been princess Meritaten, the eldest daughter of Akhenaton and Nefertiti. She is known to have mysteriously disappeared after the fall of her father and the death of several of family members from a virulent plague that had swept the land. Since Scota was a direct descendant of the chief Atonists of Egypt, and one of their highest dignitaries, if follows that her husband, regardless of what country he actually came from, was a member of the Solar Cult. Yes, Mile, like his Scythian forefathers, Bratha, Breogan, and Niul, was clearly a powerful and privileged ally of the Atonist pharaohs of Lower Egypt. Nevertheless, foreign princes and kings did not just marry Egyptian princesses as a matter of course. Such events were very rare indeed. There were edicts against this occurrence from the earliest days of Egyptian history. It would have been a marked sign of rebellion had a princess of her own volition married a foreigner. She would have lost both her standing and wealth after such an act. It would have only been permissible if the Scythian princes and kings were none other than the Hyksos princes and kings of Lower Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

More importantly, these legends [early myths] show us that it was indeed Akhenaton's Atonists who made the journey West after their expulsion. The story of Mile and Scota is the story of Akhenaton and his descendants. It is the story of the <em>true</em> Israelites. In short, the Milesian conquest of Ireland, was the <em>Atonist</em> conquest.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

During their travels out of their homeland, the legends say that the expelled Scythians were directed by a prophet to proceed to Ireland.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Irish records clearly state that Niul was a contemporary of the biblical Moses and that, when the Israelites were departing from Egypt, traveling toward the Red Sea, they just happened to pitch their tents near to Niul's encampment. At this time, Niul is said to have wandered over to meet with the Israelites. Allegedly, he was met by Aaron who told him of Moses and their sundry adventures in Egypt. Niul then formed a strong bond of alliance with Aaron and Moses. He gave them food and then departed into the West taking the Israelite message with him. Later, when the Israelite tribes entered into Britain, they were welcomed by the Milesian descendants of Niul who had prepared the way for the chosen people of god. We can conclude that this fantastic tale, that is but one of many ludicrous ones concerning the meeting of Niul and the outcasts, works as a clever fictive device concealing the fact that it was Niul and his people who were the true "Israelites," or "wise ones," being expelled from Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

We believe the Milesians-Scythians were the belligerent Hyksos Kings of Upper Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The word Saca or Saka, meaning the Scythians, is the root of the word Saxon.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Indeed, they [Scythians] may even have been related to the infamous Hyksos people of Egypt that so many investigators have had difficulty identifying.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Legend has it that Fenius’ (whose name is connected to Phoenix and Phoenician) people, after losing their thrones in their own lands, eventually became rulers in Egypt. One of the remembered Scythian capitals was at Galilee ("place of the Gals"). It was known as Scythopolis, later as Beth Shean (clearly a Gaelic term), and finally as a Beisan. The biblical term for the Scythians was "Gog and Magog," meaning "giants," and "supernatural men." Early tribes, such as the Huns and Cimmerians, etc, referred to their own ancestors, the Irish, as Gug and Guas. The modern consensus is that Gog and Magog referred to Russia. This is partly true since Scythia encompassed part of modern Russia (the Ukrainian and Caucasus areas).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

There is no doubt in our minds, given the accounts, that Ith, Ir, Mile, Donn, and Heber, namely the "Milesians," were blood-related to the Egyptian Cult of Aton. It is these demagogues who sought to raise their own thrones upon those of the Druids, in a mineral wealthy, strategically well-placed, climatically temperate island known to them from their own childhoods as the "Fortunate Lands" in the West, beyond the "Pillars of the Giants" (The Giant's Causeway, County Antrim, Northern Ireland).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] the land of Ireland fell out of the hands of the “gods” and into the hands of “mortals.” We understand that the country's priestesses were predicting the decline of the golden age and the rise of another age dominated by spiritless people committed to debauchery, treachery, and evil. This "evil" was the consequence of the intrigues of those Eastern invaders who belligerently conquered the land of Ireland, taking it as a replacement for their lost Egyptian thrones.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Atonists had lost their thrones in Egypt, but the event did not signal the end of their history. In fact, it was just the beginning. They traveled West to Spain and Ireland not as wanderers without a hope or plan but because they knew of Ireland, and of its significance.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Atonists believed they would be welcomed in the land of their ancestors. However, they were wrong. We suppose the Druids chose to remain loyal to the Amenist pharaohs of Egypt and that, after hearing of Akhenaton's heresy and belligerence against the old gods and Egyptian people, they warily denied the Atonists entry into their land. As a result of this rejection, the Atonists regarded the Druids in a similar light as the Amenists. They reacted with open war.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Let us always bear in mind, however, that this campaign of eradication [of the Druids] did not begin with Romans or Christians. It began with these displaced invading Atonists who sought to erect a new global empire upon which the sun would never set.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

As we stated earlier, it was the Irish, and after them the Egyptians, who created and developed the occult doctrine known as the Kabala. And interestingly, the Kabalistic system has always been symbolized by a so-called "Tree of Life." The significance of this cannot be underestimated. It proves that Jews (as they have been habitually presented to us) were <em>not</em> the originators of Kabalism.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Eagle signifies "A" - the first letter of the Egyptian, Celtic, Hebrew and Greek alphabets

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

At some point, the term Iesaite (or Esite) was transmogrified to <em>Israelite</em>. The term is a composite of the names of Isa and Ra. In other words, it is made from the names of two of the most important sun gods, Iesa of the Druids and Amen Ra of the Amenists. The syllable "el" at the end of <em>Israel</em> simply means "messenger." Therefore, an "Israelite" was a "messenger" or "agent" of the sun gods. He was a member of the Solar Cult. That is all there was to it. The word did <em>not</em> signify race.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Let us remember Genesis Chapter 11:

<blockquote>The whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.</blockquote>

Yes, one speech indeed. Strange, however, that neither the bible nor the rabbis claimed this "one language" to be Hebrew. If it was the parent language we can be sure that the rabbis and clergymen would proclaim this fact loudly and clearly ad nauseam.

The closest approximations to this original language are Gaelic, Arabic, and Sanskrit, but others such as Aramaic and Hebrew are near relatives.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The vast majority of Jews in the world (approximately 80 percent) have no ethnic or racial ties to the holy land of old. The Ashkenaz Jews originated from a race in Southern Russia known as the Khazars. The Khazars lived near the Caspian Sea and were of Turko-Mongolic racial stock. They had close ties with the Hungarian Magyars and Bulgarian Bulgars. They were more akin to the Huns and Tartars than to the "Hebrews" of Judea. These ferocious pagan Khazars converted en masse to Judaism during the 7th century. We understand that any human being can convert to any religion that suits them. This was the case with the Khazarian king of the time. He became Jewish after religious conversion. As centuries pass, the descendants of the converts naturally believed themselves related to the old world "Israelites." They are quite willing to accept the official reports concerning the nature of these people they falsely consider ancestors. It does not occur to them to question it, or to discover that the Israelites were actually pharaohs. They conceive of themselves as "Jewish" with little idea what a Jew was. The predicament is no saner than that of a Hottentot converting to Mormonism and then believing himself a direct descendant of Joseph Smith.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Ibaru (or Ibri, Abri, or Abari) turn up in Egypt as the "Wise Ones" or "Elders." The letter "H," added as a prefix, simply meant "the," and so the word Hebrew meant "the Ebru" or "the Ibaru." This is the origin of the word Iberia that signified Spain, and Hibernia that signified Ireland. The word rabbi is a rendition or variant of this ancient name Abari or Ibaru. The Ibaru were Druidic Elders who had traveled to Egypt in remote periods bringing solar worship there. They were probably akin to the Shemsu Hor, the Disciples or Companions of Horus, the fair-complexioned technically endowed race whose remains were found in Nubia by eminent archaeologist Professor Walter B. Emery.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The term Judah in the bible (the fourth son of Jacob whose name was adapted as Jew) was not a name at all, but a title. It has been the clever ploy of duplicitous historians to have us erroneously believe that titles (for an initiate, king, or vizier, etc,) were personal names. This is the case with "Moses," "Joshua," "Jesus," "Aaron," and "John." Judah was the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, son of Abraham. Abraham's original name was Abram until, as chapter 17 of the Book of Genesis tells us, he was given his new title by the Lord. Sarah's original name was Sarai, and Jacob was renamed (re-titled) Israel. He probably received this title because, like his Levite family, he was very closely allied with the Cult of Aton. Being an initiate of the solar colleges he was eventually given a Druidic title to distinguish him as a "shining one."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The word Jew is, likewise, a Gaelic term. It did not refer to a racial group per se. It referred to any man or woman who rose up to study the great mysteries in order to attain spiritual perfection. It referred to those who shone like the sun, morally and spiritually, and to those who lived in harmony with nature. Its origin is the Gaelic Ibur, meaning "Yew Tree," or Iuh or Iudach (later Yudah or Judah) meaning "the "bright," or "the shining," or "the daylight." It referred to those awakened ones, the devotees of the stars. This is where we get the word "Judge." Thus, the original "Judites" were nothing less than the awakened ones who revered the twelve signs of the zodiac. They were the astrologers of Ireland and Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Religious Jews have been misled to believe that Hebrew is <em>their</em> national language. This is not the case. Not by a long chalk. The informed researcher, who has looked into the truth of the matter, soon finds out that Hebrew was a variant of the esoteric language employed by the Druids and Amenists, and related groups such as the Scythians, Gaels, and Celts.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Students of etymology and philology know that although there are great similarities between Arabic, Hebrew, and Sanskrit, these languages do not come out of one another but originate from a mysterious lost parent language. Scholars such as Conor MacDari and Godfrey Higgins proved this so-called "lost" parent language to have been Gaelic, a language almost eradicated due to the prohibitions of the English and Roman overlords.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] one of the greatest deceptions emanating from the controllers and editors of the world's history concerns the terms "Hebrew," "Jew," and "Israelite." The word "Hebrew" did not originally refer to a race, per se. It referred to the keepers of the secrets and advisors of pharaoh. The word also connoted the sacred mystery language of the adepts - the true “Israelites,” “Judites,” and “Jews.” The language was called Hebrew because it was that used by the Ibaru from Hibernia, or Ireland.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The American aboriginals, of both the South and the North, were eager and thrilled at first to receive the visitors. They erroneously believed they were the friendly god-men returning to their shores once again.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Roman Church was not at all happy when Columbus relentlessly began petitioning the royals of Spain and England for their favor, and when he was searching for funding for his Western expeditions. At first they tried to dissuade him but later, fearing he would find patronage and proceed with his venture, they conceded and financially backed his journey of discovery, making sure to put their henchmen all about him to watch his every move. They knew, all too well, that America had already been colonized by Irish mariners and that the far away country contained Irish stellar temples and megalithic sites filled with treasure. They had their minds set on pillaging this wealth, and making sure that the relics of Ireland's presence in the New World would be attributed to, and regarded as, yet another "unsolvable mystery."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The word Bard may derive from Boreads, that meant the extreme north (as in Hyperborea).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

From Dis came Deus, the Latin word for god.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] it was they [Phoenicians], and not the Israelites, who were the creators of the alphabet, the great temple builders, and the world's finest seafarers, astronomers, and adepts. What they still hesitate to accept is the Irish origins of the Phoenicians. This fact has been obscured due to the geographical dispersion of the Phoenicians. As we have said, this dispersion was a necessity after the Age of Catastrophe.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

When King Solomon desired to build the great Temple of Jerusalem he promptly called on Hiram Abiff, the Phoenician master architect to do the job for him. Since the Phoenicians had already given Egypt the skills to build the pyramids, a temple was no problem. Solomon knew who to call upon and it was not upon his “Jews.” The temple (that author Ralph Ellis believes was actually in the city of Tanis on the Western side of the Delta) was designed with sacred geometry and was a representation of man and not god. It was based on the proportions of the human temple.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Zeno Apathea (the father of Stoicism, one of the purest and most elevated philosophies) was born to Phoenicians.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Irish had traveled to every known country in ancient times. They bore the name Fenian or Fenician (from Fenii or Phenii) that later became transposed to Phoenician. The term may be connected to the planet and stellar archetype Venus (found as a root in veneration and also in places such as Venice and Vienna). The ancient navigators used this star when traveling, and the prows of their ships bore the female goddess form.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

There were two important reasons why the truth about the Phoenicians had to be suppressed and occluded. The first had to do with the fact that they were of Irish extraction, and the second was due to the fact that the Egyptians declared themselves to have inherited their civilization from the Phoenicians. Under no circumstances was this knowledge to become widely known. So the disinformation began to flow forth concerning this special and enlightened race. Almost everything we read about them is designed to deceive.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

IO = Horus

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Only alternative historians Ignatius Donnelly and Comyns Beaumont accepted the truth of the matter and accurately set the homeland of the Phoenician race in Ireland and Scotland.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

It has been conceded by anthropologists and linguists that the alphabet came into the world from the mysteriously endowed race known as the Phoenicians.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

One of the terms that the Phoenicians used to describe themselves was Bharat, Barata, or Parats. This was the name of one of their earliest kings, the Sumerian Brihat, or Bharat. We surmise that this king, like his seafaring people, were actually named after the land of their ancestors, namely Barata, Brita, or Britain. [...] One of the most important Phoenician goddesses was known as Brit Ana meaning "Lady of the Waters."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The British Isles are named after Baratana, or Britana, the goddess of the Barats or Bharats (Phoenicians). They were referred to as "Aryans."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The original Irish, who had survived immense cataclysms, knew they needed access to the rest of the world in order to survive. They knew this meant the development of a "navy." So, the navigators were created. They were the Phoenicians, the expert observers of the heavens and mappers of the world. Their sidereal knowledge was an extension of Druidic wisdom perfected over centuries in North-Western lands. This knowledge allowed the "Hyperborean" Phoenicians to expertly navigate the oceans of the world. Like later Vikings and Danes, the Phoenicians sailed to the East (and West) creating small settlements on the coasts of lands they visited, traded with, and mined. Because of their prolonged commercial interaction with Asians and Orientals, the Phoenicians' alphabet, as well as many other Phoenician customs and practices, were adopted. Eventually, at the time of the Roman expansion, and after their roving decreased, the Phoenicians co-meddled with races of foreign blood and slowly began to lose their own racial distinctiveness.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

We concur with Professor Waddell's conjecture that the Phoenicians were not members of the Semitic racial family. The archaeological evidence clearly shows that they were, like the Irish, ethnically and racially Gothic, Nordic, Indo-European, and Caucasian or, as Professor Waddell preferred, "Aryan."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Author and researcher Andrew Power (Ireland: Land of the Pharaohs) has found evidence that pyramidical structures also existed at the Newgrange site before being deliberately removed.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

We believe that the Cult of Amun Ra had its origins in Ireland.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In light of this, we do not accept as accurate the official dates given for the rise of the Phoenicians (a few hundred years BC). We agree with Comyns Beaumont and L. A. Waddell that their ancestry went much further back in time.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Although Mediterranean and Asian cultures went on to develop, refine, and also distort the cultural elements they inherited from the Western Elders, they were not the original manufacturers of them. The seeds of Eastern European and Asian civilization were transmitted not from Scythia, as most "Celtic" scholars concede, but from much farther West, from the greatly endowed "Atlantean" inhabitants of the "Furthest West Sunset Land," who fashioned by their art the colossal Western temples still to be seen at Stonehenge, Newgrange, Carrowkeel, Avebury, and Carnac.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Adonis was also known as Adon, a name that meant "Lord." He was the supreme god of the Phoenicians.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] there can be little doubt, given the philological evidence, that the Phoenicians and Sumerians were one and the same people. However, unlike Professor Waddell, we do not believe the original homeland of the Phoenicians and Sumerians to have been either Cappadocia in modern Turkey, or the Danube Valley. We believe it to have been Britain. It is, therefore, through the travels of the Phoenicians that the world's parent language dispersed. Additionally, from the Phoenicians came the first unadulterated stellar and solar religion and first organized pantheons, as well as other techniques of science, architecture, music, and art.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The new evidence slowly coming to light, regarding pre-diluvian civilizations in the West, and concerning lost land bridges, strengthens our strong belief in the Western origins of the Phoenician people.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

An objective study of the evidence shows that Aramaic, Hebrew, Arabic, Syriac, and Armenian, as well as many other ancient languages, were enriched by the infusion of Phoenician religious and cultural elements.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Phoenicians (or more correctly the Kab Ari) were one of the greatest maritime races in the history of the world. They were masters of the oceans and the world's most proficient architects, shipwrights, woodworkers, traders, and astronomers. There was not a civilization in ancient Europe and Asia that did not owe their existence to the influence of the Phoenicians. This was especially the case with the Egyptians. The civilizations of predynastic Egypt were founded by these mysterious people of unknown origin. The first dynasty of Egypt was made up of Phoenician kings, and the languages of the two countries are strikingly similar. The language of the Phoenicians was not, as most scholars are wont to believe and advocate, a dialect of Egyptian. On the contrary, the Egyptian language was derived from Phoenician.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

An early Babylonian "Lord of all Gods," was known as Merodach, which sounds like the Scots-Gaelic Murdoch. Merodach (Marduk) was the same as the sun god Bel.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The word Sumer comes from a Scots-Gaelic word meaning "Serpent." The root Mer, of Sumer, means "ocean" and also "Wise Ones."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In any case, the wisdom of the Chaldeans and their kings was, we maintain, an inheritance from the West.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The bible, as expected, has nothing good to say about the Chaldeans. It refers to them as Kasdim or Chasadim. The outrageously fantastical Book of Daniel was, in our opinion, composed to ensure their skills as prophets and soothsayers were contrasted with the Judaic prophet and seen to be less dramatic and competent. The bible mythmongers took pains to compose wildly hyperbolic accounts in order to exalt their extraordinarily god-inspired, lion-taming prophet Daniel. Like Joseph, Daniel was beloved of god and not the devious and incompetent Chaldeans.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

This story [Solomon's Temple] is not, however, about one physical construction. It is a cryptic masonic allegory concerning the worldwide temples and stellar colleges of the Druids, the sons of the sun and moon ("Solomon"). These great colleges were later destroyed, built over, and/or occupied by imposters who took centuries to rescript the ancient gnosis to serve their own vile purposes.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

It was Phoenicians who were commissioned by King Solomon to construct his temple.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Chaldeans were known for their prodigious talents and learning. They were the envy of the world, and for this reason their true identity and significance has been obscured. The Chaldeans were very probably closely related to the Phoenicians who were the great navigators and shipwrights, and whose own land was not far away.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The language of the Chaldeans predates Arabic that predates Sanskrit. Indeed, Sanskrit was not native to India but was brought Eastward by the Aryan invaders or Vedics (from Vates or Faidh, the poets of Irish renown).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Ishtar later became Aphrodite of the Greeks and Venus of the Romans. She was also a major deity for the Assyrians and Babylonians, and presumably for the Chaldeans. She was the Astarte of the Sumerians. The words Esther and Easter derive from her name and worship. The word star also derives from Ishtar. Similar to the Egyptian Isis and Nuith, Ishtar was a goddess of the heavens. She was a prototype for the Christian Mary.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Akkadians were a matriarchal people whose supreme goddess was Ishtar. And this suffix tar, is reminiscent of Tara, Ara, Arya, or Eri, meaning Ireland.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Moreover, the Assyrian language was undoubtedly <em>not</em> Semitic.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The language of these Chaldeans, said to be practically the same as Akkadian, Assyrian and Babylonian, is known to have pre-dated Aramaic, the language of the bible.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Another group of adepts who can be termed "Aryans" were the Bronze Age people known as the Chaldeans. Unquestionably connected to the Irish, and perhaps even from Ireland, the "Babylonian" Chaldeans were expert at manufacturing iron. The bible refers to their land as "Ur of the Chaldees." Ur is a variant of Hur or H'ur, from Horus. [...] In Ireland the Chaldeans were the Kaltach meaning "Stargazers" or "Astrologers."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Stonehenge is perfectly aligned with the Great Pyramid in Egypt. The great Megalithic henges have often been described as doorways or portals. The word door comes from duar, which meant "Druid." Another meaning of the word Druid is to "encircle" or "enclose within a circle."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The dog was a seminal symbol in early Irish myth.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

It is still an act of academic heresy to regard Egypt as the cradle of civilization and originator of Jewish and Christian religious traditions.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Osiris was associated, and even fused, with the Old Kingdom god Seker (or Sokar). Seker was depicted as a mummified deity, falcon or hawk-headed, and with green skin that represented rebirth. Of course, this green coloring parallels the Irish Herne or Cernunnos, god of nature. Seker was often shown hovering on wings above the body of the deceased. He was, therefore, the basis of the Christian Holy Spirit.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The "underworld" that Osiris and the gods frequented was not, as we have been told, merely a mythical realm, but a <em>physical</em> region. It was the ancestral lands of the North-West that had been ruined by a natural disaster. It was the land of the setting sun, of darkness and death, into which the sun (Osiris) retired or returned at day's end. The enemy of Osiris and Horus was the serpentine Typhon. (This is where we get the word Typhoon.) Typhon represented the destructive force of nature. Osiris traveled westward every night to sacrificially enter into combat with Typhon. His victory over the serpent of destruction ensured that another cataclysm would not reoccur to destroy the world. To symbolize the victory of Osiris, and the return of order, the Egyptians took a pillar or obelisk (known as the Tat or Djed) and ritually raised it from a horizontal to a vertical position.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Scholars accept without question that the Greeks and Romans fused several deities together to form individual members of their own pantheons. Serapis, Dionysus, Mithras, and even Zeus, were composites of archaic Egyptian and Sumerian gods. The Egyptians were not above the same plagiarization. Many of their gods and goddesses were fusions of more ancient figures. This is particularly true of Hathor, Ptah, Osiris, and Horus. Scholars readily accept that the Greeks and Romans borrowed their gods from Egypt. They are, however, not as receptive to the idea that the Egyptians had done something similar. The Western origins of Egyptian cultural elements is not to be broached or considered.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

He [Osiris] symbolized the sun after setting. Horus represented the sun after its daily or annual rise in the east.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

To this very day Christians end prayers with the word Amen. This word is Egyptian for sure, and it referred to the most ancient sun god Amen Ra, primarily worshipped at Thebes. Interestingly, however, the word Amen (from Amentet) meant "Western," or "Western side."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Her ancestry is considered a "mystery." She was Akhenaton's favorite wife, and most likely the mother of Tutankhamun. Her name Kiyah is close to the Hebrew Khiyah, meaning life. When spelt as Khavah the name gives the biblical "Eve."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] Khufu who is believed to have been the pharaoh who commissioned the building of the great pyramid at Giza.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] the Irish traveled to America long before other groups, and were plying their trade and building settlements there hundreds of years before the arrival of Columbus.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] Horus was often referred to as the "blue-eyed" god.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The first pharaoh of the first dynasty of Egypt, and founder of the great city of Memphis, King Menes is buried in Northern Ireland. [...] It is not surprising, therefore, that he should have wished to travel to Ireland, the original homeland of his ancestors.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Caucasian features described by Sir Elliot Smith are to be seen on the face of Queen Nefertiti, her sister Mutnodjmet (wife of Pharaoh Heremheb), and her daughter Meritaten (Scota). Indeed, there is little doubt in our minds that Nefertiti and her family were of <em>Western</em> ancestry. This explains why Scota, her eldest daughter, traveled to Ireland by way of Spain after the fall of Akhenaton's corrupt dynasty and why her grave was found, not in Egypt, but in Ireland's County Kerry.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The word root Har signified the hawk, and the god Horus. The term is still employed today. A good example is the Air Force jet known as the "Harrier." The first version of the war plane was even known as the "Hawker."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[Ralph] Ellis maintains that this mysterious sect of specially appointed guards was despised by the Hyksos people who were none other than the Israelites of the bible

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

We believe the term Hor (for Horus the falcon or hawk-headed god of the sun) represented the Ari or Aryans. The letter "H" was often used in the same way as "The" or as "Le" in French. Therefore, Har or Harri was "The Ari." The eagle or hawk was the symbol of the sun and of the enlightened ones of old.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

According to the ancient tablets, known as The History of Thoth: The Atlantean, the Shemsu Hor (or Disciples of Horus), were a race of enlighteners who dwelt on ten pre-diluvian islands. One of their magi was the god Thoth, known by the Greeks as Hermes, and by the Romans as Mercury

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

One of the most important finds within the land of Egypt occurred when the Egyptologist and archaeologist Professor Walter B. Emery (1903-1971) was excavating tombs at the necropolis of Saqqara, one of the oldest cities in the land. There Professor Emery discovered men with blond hair and fair complexions. These individuals were revered and honored by the Egyptians as specially endowed elite.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

[...] the vast majority of words, place names, and personal names in the bible, are of Irish origin [...]

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The idea of three wise men or kings is astrological and Druidic in origin. The four animals depicted around the Christ represent the four cardinal signs of the zodiac. The three wise men, shepherds, or kings, represent the constellation of Orion through which the soul of "great kings" was believed to incarnate and then depart. The figure of the Virgin Mary represents the night sky. This particular artist suggests the round of the zodiac by the circular hem of the Madonna's cloak. Christ is the sun born into the sign of Virgo, the Virgin. Joseph, the "Carpenter" looks up toward the heavens. He is contemplating the signs, and represents the ancient gnosis suppressed by the Church of Rome. In Egyptian the word for "carpenter" was Setepenre. This word was one of the titles for a pharaoh. Jesus was indeed of a pharaonic bloodline, as the painting figuratively connotes. The man standing at the back right carrying the lamb represents the Cult of Atonists who observed the sun's move from the sign of Taurus into Aries. The ass or donkey is still used as a symbol today in US politics. The ass represents the god Set and the Hyksos Kings of Lower Egypt. The bull represents the Amenists of Upper Egypt, as well as the Irish Druids. The Roman columns emphasize Jesus' Roman ancestry.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Druidic motifs, such as the vine, tree, cross, and stone, abound in the bible. The concept of sacrifice, death, and renewal, are Druidic in origin.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Officially, the Gnostics were Gentile Christians and Essenes were allegedly Jewish Christians. Both groups believed that Jesus had lived centuries before the orthodox enclaves were insisting in the bible. And both groups knew that the Christ archetype was not their own creation or concept. It was for these reasons that the hierarchs of the early Church in Rome decided to persecute and eradicate these sects and, in more recent times, tried to ban and sequester their various texts (the Dead Sea Scrolls and Gnostic Gospels, etc). Vatican-appointed priests and agents were on site to monitor every stage of the translation of the apocryphal Dead Sea Scrolls after their discovery in 1947.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Essenes were clearly named after Essa. [...] there is considerable doubt as to whether the Essenes were really Jewish. We suspect they were a sect, like the Stoics, that preserved Druidic precepts.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Prior to Constantine's Council of Nicea, organized to unify the world's creeds and cement the power of the Roman Church, Iesa was acknowledged throughout Europe. His origins were understood to be in Ireland, and not Judea or Egypt. The ancients of India referred to the British Isles as Britashtan, a word that meant "Seat of Religion." Iesa's aspects were worshipped under various names depending upon the culture and the facet that was being venerated. He was Osiris, Mentu, Horus, Set, Aton, Amun-Ra, Ptah, Serapis, Mithras, Apollo, Dionysus, Orpheus, Zeus, Jupiter, and Sol. He was all of them and yet he was one.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The biblical name Isaac has its origin in Isa. Isaac was the son of Sarah and Pharaoh Tuthmosis III - the true father of the twelve tribes of Israel.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Dion-ESUS, Orph-ESUS, OR Bacc-ESUS - its Irish all the way. Zeus, the father of Dionysus, had turned himself into a serpent to give him birth, and Dionysus himself was often shown in the form of the goat that links him the Nordic Goths

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Druidic knowledge of astromancy was transcribed by the Bards (Poets), Ovates (Speakers), and Minstrels (Singers) into songs, tales, and legends of "historical" personalities with no physical existence. The idea was always that mortals should model themselves on these fictional but archetypal renditions.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In Egypt the staff was rendered as a shepherd's crook that was a symbol for the pharaohs, the Druids of Egypt. The pharaohs wore the serpent on their headgear and the serpent was the symbol of the Magi of Ireland, the Naddreds, or Druids.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The scandalous attempts of later Judeo-Christian mythmongers to transfer Iesa's qualities to a stereotype of their own limited manufacture does not detract from this fact. As we saw above, the root is the Irish duw that becomes the Latin deus and the Anglo-Saxon Jeus, or Jesus. It becomes the Grecian Zeus.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

During their rites, the Druids would find a tree in the shape of a cross, or would lop off the branches of a specifically chosen oak to make a cruciform. Upon this tree the name Hesus was usually inscribed. The party of Druids present at the ceremony of Iesa would face Eastward toward the rising of the sun and sing hymns and chant to the new-born son of the sun. The very word east comes from his name. It was only after later mythmongers assimilated the custom and made a travesty of it that a physical man would appear hanging in pain from a tree, or was said to have been in the presence of god at a burning bush.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In the New Testament, the three "wise men" who allegedly visited the stable where Jesus was born, represent the three aligned stars of Orion. This is because the Jesus story, like many other myths, is <em>astrological</em> (or sidereal) in nature. It is not the biography of a man who physically lived, at least as the New Testament portrays him.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Even during the course of a single day the sun possessed three important aspects. It was young at the Eastern horizon, full grown at midday, and old and wise at sunset. These facets of a single entity were incorporated into the story of the Sun King who represented the powers of the sun upon the Earth. [...] The priests worshipped the solar facets and took to personifying them as separate gods or deities although they never forgot that it was one being, and one concept, that was ultimately being revered. [...] As modern Christians accept a tripartite division of godhead (God, the Son, and the Holy Spirit) so did the ancients understand that there were many facets to the king of light. As the sun has three aspects (rising, midday, and setting) so did the Sun King also have three faces. The Hindu Trinity (Trimurti), as well as the Christian one, are remnants of this Astro-Theological principle. The twelve aspects of the heavenly sun were rescripted into the twelve tribes of Israel, the twelve sons of Jacob, the twelve judges, and the twelve disciples or followers of Jesus, the physical son of god.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Once we understand the hermetic devises used by the biblical mythographers to encode zodiacal symbolism we will finally find sanity in the testaments. We will see the metaphors for what they are and acknowledge the Druidical and astrological origins of Christianity.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Christianity is patently a solar centric theology and whether its modern-day adherents know or accept this or not is unimportant.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In astrological terms, the sun was one element of the zodiac. The moon, planets, and stars were equally important. This is why the homogenized solar zodiac is a quite recent historical phenomenon. Most ancient cultures employed a stellar or sidereal zodiac in which the various animal totems represented aspects of consciousness.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In other words, the signs of the zodiac represent hidden aspects of consciousness that must eventually come to light. The movement of the sun into a house represents a man's discovery of a secret truth about his own being. This is because the zodiac and consciousness are intimately connected. This fact was understood by Elders of the Stellar Cult. They knew that a horoscope is merely a external projection of the anatomy of the psyche. It is a life-map delineating strengths and weaknesses, and the relationship between Dharma and Karma.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Druids, like the Celts who came after them, were also very conscious of the dual nature of things. As night follows day, and death follows life, so did all things in life possess their "negative" side. The sun and solar-god were no different. The dark side of Apollo was Dionysus. The dark side of Ahura Mazda was Ahriman, the dark side of Horus was Set, and the dark side of God was Lucifer. It was only later that the pretender solar church of Rome decided to abolish the logic of the dualist metaphysic and divide the sides of one personality into two separate and distinct entities forever adverse to one another and never to be reconciled.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Like the later Freemasons, who appropriated their symbolic tropes, the ancient Druids venerated the number three and tripartite metaphysical principles. From the earliest days of the Irish the custom was for three kings to simultaneously govern. This is a phenomenon we find employed in Egypt where each of the fourteen or more nomes, or sacred cities, along the Nile were ruled over by a trinity of gods.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Long before the age of Galileo, the Renaissance, and the so-called "Age of Enlightenment," the Druids (like the Maya) possessed telescopes by which they observed the heavens. They were experts at building tall stone observatories and they knew the complex ordinances of their vast sky temple in which the sun and moon were god and goddess. The former was the representation of light and worldly wisdom, the latter of inwardness and self-knowledge.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Indeed, the prowess of Christian magic was always overstated. The miracle-working prophets and saviors of Christianity had, after all, a lot to compete with. In our estimation, there is little doubt that the astonishing accounts of Christian miracle healings and banishings - from the wizardry of Moses in the wilderness to the raising of the dead talent of Jesus to the feats of St. Patrick and St. Columba - were deliberately concocted and added to the Christian canon in order to outdo the legacy of the Druids. The alleged healing powers of the waters at Lourdes is, for instance, about as pagan a motif as anyone might conceive. In the end we must be aware that the Druidism of post-Christian times, as well as the Druidism presented to us in official accounts, is not the same thing as actual Druidism. It is mere propaganda and distortion.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In light of this, when we read in Irish legends of the arrival of Saint Patrick, and of his casting out "serpents" from the land, we understand that the reference was not to physical snakes but to the non-Christian Druidic "Serpent Priesthood" he was apparently sent to depose and eradicate.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

One of the monograms for Christ is the Greek Chi Ro. The word "carpenter" comes from the Hebrew naggar that is thought to mean "learned man" but which is very close to the Hindi naga and the Gaelic Gnadir, that mean "serpent." However, this title is very near to the term cheiro, meaning "Serpent Holder."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

One of the titles for the biblical John the Baptist was the "Great Nazar." Clearly, this initiator of Jesus was himself connected to the Nazarenes and Serpent Priests.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Jesus is said to have been from the town of Nazareth. It is known that no such place ever existed. It is also known that the word was blatantly mistranslated to signify a place instead of a sect or cult. In fact, it has been revealed to be more likely that the man given the name Jesus was a "Nazarene" from the sect of that name. This gives us greater insight, since this cult's name bears great similarity to the Naasarites or Naassians - the "Serpent Priests" who followed Moses out of Egypt. It was this Egyptian connection that had to be obscured. And so the editors of the bible's testaments cleverly rendered Nazareth as a place name.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The symbol of the serpent is found throughout Ireland where physical snakes never existed. This is because there is a world of difference between physical snakes and the symbols of dragons or serpents. "Wise Serpent" refers to those who were initiated into the highest mysteries. It signified those who possessed healing abilities and great knowledge of astronomy and astrology. The Magi of Ireland were expert architects and they had the most intimate connection to flora and fauna. Like the pharaohs of Egypt they were semi-enlightened beings who lived in harmony with each other and with nature. They obeyed nature's superordinate laws and knew well the penalties for breaching them.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Druids held the symbols of the serpent and the dragon in the highest esteem and considered them insignias of royalty. They referred to themselves as Naddreds. This word means "Wise Serpent."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

There have never been snakes in Ireland. So who or what were the "Serpents" that were cast out by Christianity?

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Romans ruled the British Isles for over 400 years, from 40 to 410 AD. They had more than enough time to obliterate records and crush traditions of great antiquity. The villainous historians under their employ wrote what they were instructed to write, and little of their nonsense does justice to the people they conquered and suppressed. The Romans rank among history's worst desecrators of ancient gnosis. Julius Caesar himself ordered the utter destruction of the great library of Alexandria, that was later burned twice by Christians and Moslems. The student unwittingly seduced into accepting the scurrilously prejudiced and generally unreliable Roman and Saxon compositions as authentic accounts is seriously disadvantaged in his study.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Doctor Geoffrey Keating (1569-1644), in his masterpiece on Ireland, lays out numerous instances of blatant and egregious literary fraudulence concerning the history of Ireland's customs, people, and past. He accuses the worst offenders and reminds us to doubt all accounts of early British historians ignorant as to the origin of their country's name.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Author Peter Berresford Ellis reminds us that the Druids were not only exemplary healers but the first to take interest in the welfare of their lower classes.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The word city comes from the Gaelic Cyfaith, meaning "Seat of the Druids."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The original Western Levites were astrologers, priests, and teachers. The Biblical "Levites" adopted the old Druidic title was their own, either because they had descended from Western Druids or because they were initiates and adepts from Druidic colleges.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

So, were the "Jews" originally "men of the Yew" - that is initiates of Druidic colleges?

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The original birthday of Jesus was positioned by the church's mythmongers in the month of July. This was to align the birth of Jesus (the sun) with the rising of the star Sirius. Eventually, however, the birthday was moved to December in order to occlude the connection between the Christian Jesus and the Egyptian gods.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

An analysis of the poetry and iconography of English poet William Blake leads us to believe that the word Jerusalem may have originally been a reference to Britain, the land of the Druids. The correct rendering of the word may be Darusalem or Derusalem. The phonetically similar letters "J" and "D" were often interchanged.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The first letter of the name Jehovah is probably derived from the Irish letter Jodh that is the origin of the Hebrew Yod, the first letter of god's name. This letter Jodh or Yodh (the Greek Iota) gives our modern letters "I" and "J." The Irish Druids associated this letter with the tree we refer to as the Yew (from Yeu or Yodh). From this word we derive Jul, Jew, and also Yule meaning Christmas, or the time of the winter solstice.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

These Servants of Truth held greater power than the kings who took advice from them

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The word has several probable related origins. Most likely it derives from the Gaelic draeidh (pronounced dhree) meaning "kindred;" or from druvid that means "one who knows" or "one who has knowledge." The suffix vid (also wid) is the root of wizard and wise. We find this syllable in vedic and veda that connote the highest wisdom. It may also derive from druthin that means "servant of truth." In German it means "of god." An Irish priestess was also known as a druith. We derive the word truth from druthin. The hard "D" sound becomes Anglesized as "T." Another acceptable rendering is from Welsh Gaelic - der wydd, meaning "superior-priest" or "inspector," and from draoith meaning "magician." In Persian we have duree, meaning "noble and holy man," and duracht. In Arabic it is dere, a "wise man," and in Persian it is daru, meaning "Magus." In Punjabi the word dara means "to dare" or to be "fearful," (or "awesome") fearless," "brave," and "bold." We get the word dare from this root. The English dear ("beloved one") derives from the same root. And related also is the Sanskrit Deva (from Duw) meaning “one without darkness.” The word can also mean "to shine," and it clearly referred to the sun and to the gods of light such as Indra, Agni, Adonai, and Aton, etc. Undoubtedly, deva is the origin of the word dove and the title David, as used by the Levites to denote their military commanders and chieftains (for instance Tuthmosis III).

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Biblical legend states that Harran was where Adam and Even went after their expulsion from Eden. Terah, the father of Abraham, is also connected with Harran. The moon god Sin was worshipped there.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Naturally, it is not commonly known that the various symbols and theological idioms of Judaism and Christianity (and even Brahmanism) are of <em>Druidic</em> origin.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In short, it was men without <em>spiritual</em> distinction who sought a <em>racial</em> one to take its place.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Importantly, recent discoveries made by Jewish and Gentile investigators alike conclusively prove that the so-called "Israelites" (those arch-enemies of would-be "Aryans") were not racially <em>Semitic</em> after all. Like the "Aryans," they too were racially Indo-European. Their language, Hebrew, was identical with Egyptian. Therefore, in our mind the term "Semite" can and must henceforth be dropped as a racial definition for the Bible's "chosen people." [...] the terms "Israelite" and "Judite" do not define <em>races</em>. The terms were religious and theological, and defined <em>cult</em> not race. The Israelites and Judites were conglomerated groups closely affiliated with and probably blood-related to the Hyksos pharaohs of old, a fact confirmed by top Jewish historians.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Aryan who is spiritually and technically advanced automatically benefits and civilizes the world he inhabits. No amount of ordinary men can achieve what he achieves. Furthermore, an Aryan can be Jew or Gentile, Saxon or Hindu, Celt or Egyptian, Oriental or Nordic, Maya or Maori. Originally, the Aryans were the technically and spiritually endowed Seers, Sages, or Elders of Atlantis, Lemuria, and the other lost civilizations that flourished and then fell over ten thousand years ago. In this sense the word "Aryan" is interchangeable with "Druid."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

We are only too well aware of the Freemason (Atonist) origins and tendencies of the German Order, List Society, Order of the New Templars, Thule Society, Armaneschaft, Edda Society, Schlaraffia Lodge, German Workers Party, Nazi Party, and other allegedly pro-Aryan (anti-Semitic) organizations that succeeded (through their elaborate machinations, dissemination of pseudo-historical theories, and campaigns of mass indoctrination) in bringing ruin to Germany, Austria, and their neighboring European countries.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Like Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, and the Nazi hierarchy, these men were, for the most part, British agents.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The original official consensus deemed the Aryans to have first come into being as a race over eighteen thousand years ago in Africa. They were believed to be an offshoot of the so-called "Hamitic" ethnic group that, according to theologians, originated with Ham the son of Noah. The Egyptians and Canaanites, among other Asian and Mediterranean groups, were considered racially Hamitic, that is, descended from Ham, the son of Noah, who was believed to have been the progenitor of all African peoples. This consensus was finally proven to be unsustainable academic nonsense and was rejected as a symptom of the colonialist mindset that notoriously and prejudiciously categorized certain races and tribes as "inferior" and "recalcitrant." The preposterous travesty is clarified once it is understood that the term Hamitic originally referred to Egypt and its non-Semitic inhabitants. One of the earliest names for Egypt was Ham, and also Kham. The Hamites were, therefore, Egyptians and not some indefinite Semitic group. One would have wished that the scholars who eventually refuted the Hamitic myth would also have rectified the Aryan myth and discarded the racial denotation of this sorely misused term.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In the Bible, the Aryans are referred to as the Persians, Hittites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Philistines, and perhaps even as the Amorites, the race that markedly influenced the Babylonian civilization. Most of these cultures employed the symbol of the hawk or eagle.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Ares was the son of Hera and Zeus. He was also known as Ari and was closely associated with Ptah the architect god of Egypt. He is probably a Grecian corruption of the Egyptian god. His name suggests the Arya who were also great builders. He was a personification of the men of the West. His consort was called Eri, a name borrowed from the Irish goddess of the same name.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

As doctors and surgeons attend a casualty of an automobile wreck, so the men who came to be known as the "Druids" attempted to heal the Earth's grievous wounds. They did not regard catastrophes as we do today in our spiritless times. To them there was no such thing as a random act of fate or nature. Everything that occurred had meaning. All that happened in the natural world did so to instruct and guide. The lessons of nature, the ultimate teacher, were to be heeded and cherished. It was never a case of "bad" and "good", for these were not unsophisticated men drunk with superstition as we have been led to believe by those wretches whose minds are truly rank and foul. The Arya, the Elders, the Druids, were the purified ones who had made themselves eligible to work with the subtle energies of the Earth. Few were pure enough for such science. Only those hygienic in mind and heart dare attend to duties of this kind. The Druidic Order of Aryan Elders reverenced the Earth and commissioned the construction of the many Mesolithic and Megalithic sites that cover Britain, France, and Scandinavia. They were the Magi who instructed the world' hierophants how to undo what had been done, and how to again set upright the pillar.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The word Ireland comes from Ari- or Ariya-Land, meaning the "Land of the Arya" or "aryans." In Indo-European languages the term Aliyan meant "lord" or "god." The letter "A" was transposed to "E," and so we have Eri, Eire, Erainn, and Erin.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Greek historians and writers were not authorities on the origins and nature of Western peoples and their reports on the Irish, so-called "Celts," and other world cultures, are not to be accepted as accurate. The same thing goes for the Romans. The Romans conquered the world, yes, but they were very reluctant to let the world they owned remember that there had once been an Irish empire in existence long before their own.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Our point is that the Greek civilization and the first Grecian journalism on foreign parts came centuries <em>after</em> the rise of the Irish and their worldwide civilizations.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Romans who rose to fall into oblivion in a historical instant were not the fathers of civilization any more than the Greeks were.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The desire of the Vatican mythographers was to falsely situate the seat of culture in the Middle-East and as far away from the Atlantic zone as possible. These mythographers knew full well that Ireland (Eri or Eire) was a remnant of Atlantis and that its primordial "Megalithic" inhabitants had been evacuated to the Continent <em>en masse</em>.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Although the majority of the kings and chiefs of the Fomorians were hideous in physical aspect, their king Elathan was considered the most beautiful of beings. His son Breas was also known as "the Beautiful." Brea's mother was a De Danann and by way of her he had legitimate claim to the throne of the Children of Danu. After attaining the throne he sided with his father's race and hard pressed the De Danann by taxes and unfair judgments. His actions precipitated the final conflict between the sons of light and sons of darkness.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Apparently, the Formorians were a devilish hybrid race, similar to the Titans, who had harassed every tribe that had attempted to seek refuge on Ireland. [...] We conclude that the Fomorians were not from <em>under</em> the sea but from <em>civilizations</em> that had sunk beneath the sea.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Fir Bolg get their name from <em>fir</em> (meaning "men"), and <em>bel</em> (meaning "fair" or "beautiful"), or <em>belos</em> (meaning "shining" or "bright"). They may even have been worshippers on the primordial Irish god Bel.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

According to the legends, the De Danaan were obliged to fight wars against the resident Fomorians and Iberian Fir Bolg in order to gain control over the land. [...] The De Danann and Fir Bolg were of the same race and, after their combat, Ireland was divided between them.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Tarot first appears in Irish mythology. The prototypes of the Tarot suits were brought to Ireland from four lost islands, one of which was called "Murias" (Lemuria). The Tarot links Ireland's Elders (the Druids) to Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

According to their own lore (found in the <em>Lebar Gabala</em>, or "Book of Invasions") the De Danann were survivors from four paradisiacal <em>Western</em> (Atlantic) islands that either foundered or suffered enormous natural assault during a great natural catastrophe or flood. These original homelands were called Falias, Murias, Gorias, and Finias.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The term tuatha (from the Old Irish root tuath) does mean "tribe." However, the term comes from the same root as thuaidh, meaning "Northern" or "Northern Point." The De Danann were from the North-West, as their own legends stated. They were the Hyperboreans and were clearly the ancestors of the so-called Teutons (an early Germanic tribe). The word is also connotatively related to the Old Irish tuas or thuas meaning "up" or "above;" to tuaithe that signified "sorcerers" or "magicians;" and to tuathgeinte meaning "elven," or "faerie," or "blessed good folk." The term Danu relates to the Irish goddess of that name. She was a goddess of art, craft, and beauty. Some scholars prefer, therefore, to regard and describe the Tuatha de Danann as the "People of Art" or the "Artful Ones." And we think this is an accurate title given the exquisiteness of their craftsmanship in silver and stone.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Duplicitous historians, desperate to conceal the Western origins of the De Dannan, erroneously insist that they were related to the Danes, Trojans, or even to the biblical Tribe of Dan. They have also sought to arouse doubt as to whether the De Dannan magi of Ireland were of the Caucasian (Indo-European) Race. However, it is not that the De Dannan were descended from the tribe of Dan but that the bible's Danites were related, either racially or ideologically, to the Irish De Dannan. In any case, after their final defeat at the hands of the Milesians (the Gaels), the De Danann transmuted their physical form and thereby became the mysterious Sidhe (pronounced Shee), or dei terreni ("gods of the Earth"), that is the Faerie Race who reputedly inhabited the inner Earth.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Despite the best efforts of clerics and historians it is only the last group of invaders - the Milesians - who can positively be shown to have come to Ireland from the East for the first time. The story of the visitation of the Milesians is of central importance to our work. We will explore it in greater detail in another chapter. What interests us is that these Milesians, the descendants of Celts from Scythia, have been linked with the Israelites whose exodus from Egypt occurred after the fall of Akhenaton around 1300 BC. Historians date the Milesian invasion of Ireland to approximately 1000 BC, but we believe it to have occurred at a few hundred years earlier. This is because a daughter of Akhenaton, named Scota, is believed to have accompanied the Milesians on their journey to Ireland. Her real name was Meritaten and she (or a namesake daughter) is buried in Country Kerry. It is from the time of the Milesian invasion from the Eastern lands that Ireland's so-called "Historical Cycle" begins. According to records and accounts the Milesians regarded their predecessors, the Tuatha De Danann, as nothing less than gods.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In our reappraisal, we conclude that the Fomorians were Atlanteans. We conclude that the British Isles and Scandinavia were part of the Hyperborean or Atlantean civilization. The Fomorians were also known as the Men of Lochlann. This is a reference to Norway, the land of lakes. Clearly, the Fomorians had taken to the seas in order to survive the after-effects of the deluge but did not evacuate the North-Western climes as other tribes had. They made use of whatever landmasses remained above the water level. They attempted, as best they could, to police those lands that, though wrecked by disaster, would again be habitable. They attempted to aggressively repel any tribe or contingent trying to return and resettle on lands they claimed either by right or might. We conclude that the Megalithic people, the original inhabitants of Ireland, hurriedly evacuated the torn lands by fleeing across the land bridges into Europe. Later, after a semblance of normality returned to the North-West, the descendants of the indigenous but displaced inhabitants of Ireland and England made their way back across the same land bridges now lost beneath the waves of the Irish and North Sea. What we deny, and deny utterly, is that these indigenous people (of whatever race) were visiting the British Isles from the East for the first time. We adamantly maintain that the Partholans, Nemedians, and De Danann of the history books had occupied Ireland millennia before the "Age of Catastrophe" dispersed them to the corners of the world, and that they originated in Western climes. To the Eastern lands they went, taking with them their skills and expertise in so many areas. And there they may have remained for as long a period as 5,000 years. In that time they, as inveterate rovers and intrepid explorers, visited France, Spain, Babylon, Syria, Africa, Egypt, China, and places further afield. We believe they maintained settlements in the Indus Valley until the drying up of the great Saraswati River. Nowadays, not a month goes by without evidence coming forth confirming the presence of Western men in the far off reaches of the world.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The monkish chroniclers betray the fact that they did not know about the land bridges that once existed between Ireland and England, and England and Scandinavia. These land bridges existed up until 3000 BC when rising sea levels obliterated them. Satellite photography has recently confirmed the theories of the geologist, Professor Ulf Erlingsson, who set about proving the existence of these bridges. His findings have had a most important effect on the false ideas concerning the remoteness of the British Isles. His scientific discoveries verify that Britain was a part of Atlantis, and confirm our suspicions concerning the historical inversion perpetrated by the Christian monks who wished it to appear that Eastern migrants had first colonized an unoccupied Ireland. As said, these monks were not inclined to accept or admit that the Earth had been host to advanced pre-diluvian civilizations, or that the Earth itself was over 4,000 years old. Whatever existed was mentioned in the bible and there was little to add. What was written in the bible was all a monk had to know about his world. For the Christian there could be no Atlantis or Lemuria. There could be nothing that was not contained in the bible. The bible did speak of the giants and of titanic fallen angels, and so a scribe could permissibly claim the Formorians to be of such lineage. The bible did speak of technically endowed Adamites and Canaanites, and so a scribe could permissibly speak of the Iberians and Tuatha de Danann. If it corroborated the bible it was entered as history. If it did not corroborate the bible it would be skewed or suppressed and most likely never see the light of day. For these reasons, it is irrational to believe that the monkish scribes of Ireland have provided us with historically accurate accounts concerning the world of the past. We can merely endeavor to take on board the newly discovered scientific evidence about Ireland and its geographical tribulations and surmise what we have not been told about Britain. Once we have an idea of what was omitted from the annals and chronicles we can gradually reconstruct the facts about pre-diluvian Ireland.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Those monks who were busy editing Ireland's history were not interested in having their readers find out that advanced pre-diluvian civilizations existed long before the time posited for the biblical creation. And so they were compelled to write their histories as we find them today. They were bound to present Ireland as an unpopulated country frequented by demonic titans who preferred to live on remote islands and high seas. And most importantly, they were bound to have the world believe that Ireland was first inhabited by migrants from the East. This deception has worked its magic. This is exactly what the vast majority of historians and interested parties believe about Ireland. What needs to be understood, and what we are adamantly convinced must be now disclosed to the world, is that these migrations from the East did indeed occur. The tribes of the mythological cycle of Irish prehistory did indeed enter Ireland from the East. But they were not coming to Ireland from that direction for the first time. They were returning after a prolonged period of forced exodus. They were the indigenous people of Ireland returning to their wrecked homes in order to begin the resettlement of their ancestral habitat. Once back they would have found their aspirations compromised by the return of other migrants from the East, and the arrival of those coming in for the first time in order to invade and conquer. The maintenance of order and security would have been dependent upon constant vigilance and a concerted aggressive resistance against hostile newcomers. This is what we deduce from various legends. In this regard, at least, we can assume the records of battles between rival races, common to the mythological cycle, to be generally accurate.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

So, when we read that Ireland was largely uninhabited after the time of the biblical flood, we understand that it was inhabited before that destructive event took place. It might also be logical to suspect those indigenous occupants to be the same people who were displaced by the upheavals and who returned to their homes after a semblance of normalcy returned to their ancestral homes. This is exactly what happens today during a natural disaster and during its aftermath. It happens today and it happened in the past. Once we accept this simple premise we can make sense of the convoluted stories composed by mythmongers regarding Ireland's prehistory. These deceptive writers sought to begin Ireland's history from the time of the returns. This falsity can no longer be accepted by anyone wishing to research the West to East movement of the elements of civilization.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

From the writings of the historians we discover that there were seven major phases or waves of "invasion" and colonization to Ireland after the great deluge believed to have occurred shortly after the creation. Although there has been little consensus over the order of visitations during the Mythological Cycle, the order of arrival and occupation usually delineated is as follows:

<ul>
<li>The Fomorian Race - (considered cyclopean titans and adversaries of all who came after)</li>
<li>The People of Kesair - (granddaughter of Noah, daughter of Bith, she allegedly arrived 40 days before the great flood)</li>
<li>The Children of Partholan - (Arrival dated 2550 BC, they came from the West, and were decimated by war and disease)</li>
<li>The Children of Nemed - (Arrival dated 2859 BC. They are also said to have been wasted by war and disease)</li>
<li>The Iberians - (Fir Bolg, Fir Gaileon, and Fir Domnann)</li>
<li>The Tuatha De Danann - (Tribe of the Goddess Danu, from lost islands in the North-West. Their arrival date was presumed to be approximately 2000 BC)</li>
<li>The Children of Mil, or Mile (Goidelic Celts presumed to have come from Scythia in the East around 1000 BC)</li>
</ul>

It is important for us to analyze this order and fathom what the monks who archived Ireland's myths were attempting to hide and distort. For let us not doubt that there has been considerable distortion from Christian sources when it comes to Ireland's prehistory, particularly in regards event dating. What has been written and codified is not as important as what was not written or admitted. And the omissions, once rediscovered and understood, change everything we know about the history of Ireland and the world.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The student who contemptuously or ignorantly dismisses the existence of Atlantis and other pre-diluvian civilizations will never come to understand the true history of Ireland. Recognition of the existence and importance of Atlantis in world affairs is an essential prerequisite to the study of the history of the world, and particularly of the British Isles and Scandinavia. To acknowledge the existence of pre-diluvian empires is to have the clouds of darkness over Ireland's prehistory disperse. The veils and webs of confusion are removed while scintillating beams of light illuminate the mysteries of that great country's ancient past.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Certain researchers and experts on British prehistory have voiced doubts as to whether any so-called "Celtic" tribes ever actually invaded Ireland. L. A. Waddell and Beaumont found the idea preposterous. And the new science of DNA substantially corroborates their doubts concerning the spuriousness of "Celtic" East to West migration theories. Geneticist and genealogist, Professor Brian Sykes confirms, in his book Saxons, Vikings and Celts: The Genetic Roots of Britain and Ireland, that the Celts did not contribute to the DNA of the original inhabitants of Ireland. He shows that migrations from the East had no substantial effect on the genetic makeup of the aboriginal Irish. Moreover, he confirms that 9,000 years ago the ancestors of the Irish, Welsh, Scots, and English, crossed land bridges connecting their lands to Europe. Moving Eastwards these tribes found Europe to be drastically underpopulated.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

In 1929, the author Elena Maria Whitshaw, wrote in her book Atlantis in Spain that the Spanish mariners and explorers, particularly during the time of Columbus, frequently visited the shores of Southern Ireland searching for evidence concerning the lost continent they referred to as Antilia. Clearly, the Spanish were in no doubt where to look for knowledge concerning the world that existed before the flood.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The historian of merit asks if there existed a single society that did <em>not</em> record the fact that the world had arisen from a pyre or that the world's upturning had ended the epoch of ancestral god-kings.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Britain and Ireland were the remnants, wrote Beaumont, of the empires of Atlantis. And it is from these regions that the most civilized and sophisticated peoples originated.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Even though the devastating cataclysms that obliterated the antique civilizations left survivors in a desperate physical state, it did not leave them in as primitive a condition as we are compelled to believe from the writings of historians of later ages, erroneously convinced their Neolithic cave-dwellers were the first civilized specimens on Earth. A study of the myriad Mesolithic and Megalithic ruins of Britain and Europe (created as requiems in stone to vanished technology of lost ages), of the various cyclopean remains of sunken cities and Earth zodiacs, and of the worldwide petroglyphic record, convinces us that the official dates given for human technological development are inaccurate and unsustainable. In short, there is a big difference between the sorry prehistoric creatures conjured before us by myopic historians and those who, having been robbed of their advanced cultural trappings and displaced from ancestral habitats, were subsequently compelled to rebuild empires after the originals had been obliterated by ferocious forces believed to have been unleashed by angry and vengeful gods.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Despite the consensus of orthodox anthropologists, the fact is that neither the Irish nor their Druidic Elders descended from the Kurgans or early Ukrainian hunter-gatherers. They did not, as most stubborn historians and commentators believe, hail from the Steppes of Russia, Harz Mountains, Balkans, or Danube Valley. Their origins are to be found exactly where their own legends state, in the ancient civilizations that existed and thrived before recorded history.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Ireland, England and Scotland were connected by land bridges that have since disappeared beneath the waves. England was connected to Scandinavia by a large land bridge that is believed to have been still in existence approximately 2,500 to 3,000 years BC.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Yes, great structures such as the Giza Pyramid stand upon Egyptian soil, but the structure bears no hieroglyphs and has no dead Egyptian inside. Moreover, the vast majority of the "tombs" of Egypt were plundered not by poor scoundrels, as we are told, but by very rich and powerful ones from Rome hoping to occlude the facts concerning the origins of their architects.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Those who come to browse the subject may be fooled into thinking that Wales, and not Ireland, was the original seat of Druidry.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Druidic Order was apparently tripartite in nature. There were the Druids, the Bards, and the Ovates. The Druids were the perfected ones, the elite who presided over all. The order was not to enforce hierarchy but to make sure that only the pure had access to sacred knowledge. The word <em>Ovate</em> or <em>Vate</em> comes from the Gaelic word <em>Faidh</em>. This word also gives us the modern words <em>Vatican</em>, <em>Fate</em> and <em>Faith</em>. The Druids were literally those who were "masters of fate" or the "men of faith."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The antique unadulterated form of "Christianity" (Druidism) that existed in Ireland from the earliest times was a remnant of pre-diluvian theology. It was based on the observance and veneration of the stars, of the sun, the moon, and the zodiac. It was, from its inception a stellar religion. The bible, therefore, is not only based on Druidic philosophy, it is a sidereal testament disguised as a biography and history of physical personages who, for the most part, had no historical existence. How this antique Druidic philosophy was flagrantly appropriated and abused is a fascinating story that must be told. We are personally interested in the reasons why it was thought best to denude the ancient theology of its connection to the stars and why it was then foisted upon the world in its present contorted and preposterous form. To this day, the ancient mystery school subjects of Astrology and Kabala, etc, are still taught to the elites within the Christian and Judaic colleges, to those of the highest caliber and lineage. This secret is not known by the lower rank and file and great steps have been taken to downplay the Astro-Theological aspect of the major religions. Although innumerable books are now in circulation, attempting to shine light into Christianity's darker corners, the sidereal and sabean connections have rarely been exposed. This kind of revelation is, perhaps, too controversial even to most revisionists, especially to those of the "soft" variety. Obviously, should this gnosis reach the ears of the masses not much will be left of the vile edifice of Vatican-style religion.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Our revisionist work is made somewhat more challenging because most Christians know very little about the true origins of their religion and do not realize that most of what they read and hear about from priests and potentates is pure fiction with little to no basis in fact. They are not aware of how the Roman Church has fostered and unleashed upon their unsuspecting minds a battery of lies and fables in order to disguise the actual origins of religion. Nevertheless, we seek to show in the course of this work that Christianity, and its so-called parent Judaism, have their roots in Egypt and Ireland. And this holds true for the language and cultural idioms. This fact was commonly known the world over before the rise of the present imposter Roman hegemony. It was known in ancient times that Christianity, in its purest and most antique form, was nothing more nor less than <em>Druidism</em> from Ireland.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was the author of <em>New Atlantis</em>. He served as Lord Chancellor of England under James I, and during the reign of Elizabeth I he was the adviser to Lord Robert Devereux, the ill-fated Earl of Essex who, under orders from the despotic queen to suppress Irish rebels, led the largest expeditionary force ever sent to Ireland. Considered a paragon among enlightened men, this maniac wrote an essay entitled: <em>An Advertisement Touching an Holy War</em>, in which he set the English above every other nation, declaring it a right of every Englishman to cruelly eliminate anyone who was considered socially unworthy or undesirable. The "extirpation and debellating of giants, monsters, and foreign tyrants," he wrote, was not only good and lawful, but "meritorious" and divinely honourable.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Judeo-Christianity, as we know it, is a creation of the Solar Cults of the ancient world. As an institution it is a construct of the Atonists, the renegade outcasts of Egypt’s eighteenth dynasty. After the termination of their dominion, the commanders of this powerful cult, seeking new empires, guided their people back to the place of beginning and subsequently set about erasing the archaic and sophisticated culture they found there. They overlaid their own corrupted traditions upon the more antique one that was soon forgotten.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The vile Judeo-Christian institution and its inhuman ideology would not have been able to endure if the pristine marvel of Irish Druidism remained strong and bright in the world of men.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Regarding the origin of the Church, Christianity <em>moved</em> to Rome by way of Byzantium and Britain and its roots are to be found in ancient Ireland. It certainly did not originate in Rome.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The subject of history is less than 200 years old. In that time men have convinced themselves of the following suppositions, some of which have been regarded as irrefutable truths.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

After all, what is the subject of history? It is the study of the past, certainly. But it is also the study of man. It is the attempt by men to find out who they are by analyzing and reviewing what they have been. Even though scientific methodologies have a role within the subject of history, history is not science. Most importantly, students of history can easily be misled.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Most historians accept that Egypt was a cradle of civilization, and that many cultural idioms and traditions come from there. What has yet to be understood, however, is the manner in which Egypt inherited its cultural elements from the lands of the North-West. This fact is not known today because of the threat it poses to Rome and London, the Vatican and Crown, and to all those who have profited from the suppression of knowledge.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Jacob is the sun which "rests" its light and "sleeps" upon this stone during the solstice. Jacob, or Jack, is the sun. The nursery rhyme that reads "Jack be nimble, Jack be quick, Jack jump over the candlestick" refers to the sun passing over the celestial pole. The rhyme of "Jack and Jill" going "up the hill" is likewise a Astro-Theological device cryptically referring to the passage of the sun (Jack) and moon (Jill) through the northern zodiacal arch and their subsequent "Fall" into autumn and winter. England's "Union Jack" is really of "Jacob," cryptically referring to a Solar (or Atonist) Union.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

From these Elders [Druids] the arcane archive of knowledge was surreptitiously appropriated by their enemies, the servants of darkness, whose biological and ideological descendants now rule the world.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The first people in recorded history to study the operations of the heavens and zodiac, and to understand the strange but intimate connections between physical and psychic energy, were the Druids from the "Fortunate" or "Blessed Isles."

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

It [the zodiac] was referred to as the celestial mystery school for good reason since, strange as it may seem at first, the zodiac mirrors consciousness. The men who looked up into the night sky were really looking into themselves. The gnosis of the heavens is the gnosis of the soul.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Certainly, we are not in opposition to religion as it is practiced by the sincere independent devotee. We do not seek to intrude into that space reserved for private worship. But we do stand opposed to the <em>institutions</em> that have inserted themselves and their mythology between the individual and his creator.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Gaels, or Goidels, were another branch of the Celtic groups from Europe who allegedly crossed to Ireland around the fourth, fifth, or sixth centuries BC (depending on which officially posited theory one believes). These Goidels were known by the Irish mythographers as the “Milesians” or “Children of Mil.” They were descendants of the Scythian “Celts” who had visited Egypt and returned to their Western homelands after the reign of Pharaoh Akhenaton. Among their number was Scota, the daughter of the Atonist pharaoh and his consort Nefertiti.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The Irish were not “Celtic.” They were Celticized by invading foreign powers; particularly those from Rome.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The term “Celt” did not exist in the ancient languages of the Irish, Scots, or Welsh. There is only the Pictish Khaltis, most likely signifying invaders from France, Belgium, Germany, Galatia, and the Ukraine. The term “Celt” (Keltoi) was first employed by the incompetent Greek historian Herodotus to describe Western Europeans such as the Irish, Scots, and Gauls, etc. After his time other historians, such as Caesar and Strabo, continued to use this vague term to broadly denote any foreign tribe that Rome considered barbaric and antagonistic.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Thirdly, we reject the term “Celtic,” and refuse to use it when describing the ancient inhabitants existing in Ireland before 600 BC. We tentatively accept that Britain was finally reached by people who have been called “Goidelic” and “Brythonic” Celts after 600 BC; groups that anthropologists and historians finally had to admit were merely fragments of the larger Indo-European race. Of these invasions have Tacitus, Caesar, and Pythias the Greek, written. Nevertheless, we prefer to deal with the pre-Celtic inhabitants and their antique civilization that had, in remote ages, spread Eastward into Europe and Asia. We leave the word “Celtic” intact when quoting, confident that the reader will understand that it is a blanket term often used indiscriminately by authors referring to Ireland’s exceptionally gifted inhabitants who are, more correctly, the “Mesolithic” or even “Megalithic” people; builders of the cyclopean temples of Ireland and the world that still stand as silent testaments to their august presence. The Celtic tribes of the Iron Age, believed to have entered Ireland after 600 BC, built their own civilizations upon the foundations of earlier ones they found there, which they reckoned had been erected by the “gods.”

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

Secondly, we contend that the term <em>Aryan</em> has been most egregiously misused. We believe it referred not to race but <em>caste</em>. It was a term that simply distinguished spiritual and moral status. In our work, therefore, we use the term to refer to men from <em>any</em> racial stock who had perfected themselves in schools of initiation and who were adepts of high order. We use the term to identify the Irish Druids and their Mesolithic ancestors, the European Sami, the Phoenician and Median Magi, the Egyptian Disciples of Horus, the Mer, the Ibaru, and any other group of bards, poets, seers, prophets, hierophants, archimandrites, and architects of distinction. The term <em>Aryan</em> was erroneously accepted as a <em>racial</em> distinction after its discovery by the eighteenth century scholar and Chief Justice Sir William Jones of Calcutta. Jones discovered that the Hindus referred to their ancestors who appeared in Northern India and Pakistan during the seventh century BC, as the “Arya.” He did not realize that the term signified <em>spiritual</em> qualities rather than racial, ethnic, or linguistic ones. As linguists adopt the term to signify a class of languages, so we adopt it in a purest context to represent those Elders of any racial background possessed of exalted minds and hearts. We are convinced that our rendition and interpretation will serve to clarify many historical anomalies and mysteries. When speaking of the racial origins or nature of the Mesolithic and Megalithic Irish, we prefer to use the more descriptive and accurate terms “Nordic,” “Gothic,” “Caucasian,” and “Indo-European.”

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

The first and most important argument concerns the <em>West to East</em> migration of the elements of civilization. This theory rests upon the understanding that there were, in prehistoric times, highly developed civilizations situated in the Western hemisphere. These civilizations were brought to an abrupt end approximately 13,000 years BC, by terrestrial upheavals of an unimaginable scale. The gnosis that had been accumulated by the advanced inhabitants of these hoary civilizations originated on the landmasses known today as Ireland, England, Scotland, and Wales. These countries were once part of Atlantis or, more specifically, of the great continent of Appalachia. From these locations the gnosis was eventually carried Eastward across lost land bridges into Europe and Asia.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 1 view

A chess master will give his student audience four pieces of advice from which we can learn. He will say that the first thing that is needed is a sense of patience. He will say next that a sense of timing is essential. Then comes one’s knowledge of the opponent, and finally, the clincher, the willingness to make any and all sacrifices to win. Now, can we see why we have the problems we do? The good have no patience, no sense of timing, zero knowledge of the opponent, and because of their inherent morality, are not able to make the necessary sacrifices. Compare this to the enemy. They have endless patience, with strategies lasting millennia; they have an excellent sense of timing, moving in gradual stages while planning a long way ahead; they have intense knowledge of us; and most importantly, they are not the least bit hesitant to make any and all sacrifices that are needed. In fact, that is exactly what they have been doing.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

When the Earth is utterly exhausted, as it is soon to be, the progeny of the Atlantean sorcerers will again seek transplantation elsewhere. Each world to which they attach is always in spiritual or intellectual infancy, a necessary condition to prevent discovery and facilitate concealment. If they can find a way of breaking through the Stargate, they will vacate Earth in their “arks” taking some of us with them for seeding their new home planets with more slaves.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Moreover, the Nephilim have not, as some scholars ludicrously assert, left this planet in the days of old. Therefore, they are not about to return to save us all from ourselves. They have never been away and they have brought the conditions that plague us. The Earth is considered nothing more than a prison to them, a place of internment which is almost unendurable.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

It is the “Fallen Ones” who seek to encourage their human slaves to think that they too have descended from the depths of space. The fact is, as the Pagans have understood, that this Earth is our one and only Garden of Eden. How is it that from this paradise one can look out to the nether and fantasize that “home” is somewhere out there? Only Satan and his hordes and those they have deluded the world would do such a bizarre thing. These ancient stories are extremely pertinent to the condition of the present. Genesis means the “Genes of Isis.” Isis is the Queen of the Earth, and we of the Earth are Her offspring, suffering from amnesia about our Earth-connection, convinced that the black void above is the real home we have lost. So our perception is in total reverse. Nothing measures the loss of reason more than the pervasiveness of this outlandish, incongruent notion. It is consistent only with the duped and controlled masses who are now psychologically identifying with the desires of the alien oppressors, instead of affirming with pride and love that they are children of this perfumed garden Earth.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Now, it so happens that the pages of the ancient scriptures and myths also mention the same aspiration, only it is not that of the human race, of any patriarch, or prophet. In the Bible and the ancient myths, one hears of Lucifer, or the dark angels, despising their sojourn in Paradise or Eden and consumed with mania and false aspiration, eventually leaving or being cast out of their home into the abyss and banished as defilers and ingrates. Perhaps the reality is that today the ones who are spiritually despondent and filled with the sense of futility are actually the true children of the Earth, while those who appear content and adjusted are from “out there,” transplanted centuries ago to exploit the Earth and its indigenous inhabitants. These “adjusted” ones must be those who align with their alien DNA and who police those who have a problem with the present conditions of the planet.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The progeny of the Nephilim, like their alien fathers, have been making use of deep underground caverns, some of which are hundreds of miles wide. They do not find it suitable on the surface of the planet and prefer the underworld. This is one reason why their monopolies are so adroit at leveling the forests and polluting the atmosphere. It is the ordinary Adamic human that suffers, while they remain impervious in their underground cities.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The “greys” that are common in eyewitness reports are not the actual aliens, but are semiorganic automatons created by their masters who control them via advanced forms of remote control. This is betrayed by eyewitness reports of their strange movements and stoic attitudes.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The hole in the ozone layer was not only caused by CFCs, but by microwave technology from HAARP. Microwaves were beamed onto the Stargate to break it, but instead they superheated the atmosphere causing permanent damage to the ozone layer. HAARP and microwaves are also behind the “Greenhouse Effect.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

There is also good reason to believe that the phenomenon known as the “crop-circles” have been created via satellites by the microwave technology known as HAARP. These circles and formations are not caused by doodling extraterrestrials with nothing better to do. The technology to create even the most complex crop mandalas is certainly in existence, regardless of the denials of scientists and science buffs.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The Atlanteans’ bloodkin do not like the human traits within themselves, nor do they relish human beings. They have always preferred to be served by robots of a mechanical or cybernetic kind and would have done away with humans long ago had that been feasible. They keep us alive because the Macrobes need their sacrifices, and also because they think that they can have the “robots” they prefer by dumbing down humans to the level of the automaton. In this way, they have the best servants. And this is exactly what has been happening since the sixteenth century, or the time when the “Regents of Darkness” discovered that they may have to remain here on Earth permanently.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The aliens on this planet are also attempting to clone or replicate the human form artificially. Their original form, being humanoid, cannot pass the field that was established around the Earth. But if they can clone or cybernetically change their forms, it may help their designs. This is why virtual reality, cybernetics, cloning, and nanotechnology are in vogue today.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The Nephilim who fell to Earth from the netherworld are trying desperately to regain their freedom. They have been chained in the pit (Earth), but are convinced that there is a way out of their terrestrial prison. This is why the space program exists, and why there is exorbitant and frenzied expenditure in satellites and the exploration of outer space.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Beyond the Moon’s circlet of apotropaic power, the true governing angelic agencies reign. They are the ones that create the glitches in the modules, satellites, and space telescopes that our satanic demigods put into orbit. The Moon’s orbit was precisely synchronized to move with the Earth. Being exactly the same size as the Sun seen from Earth, and we always only perceive one side of the Moon. The Moon is much larger than the satellites of other planets and is conjectured to be a recent addition to our sky.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The space program and all its attendant fields exist because the secret Brotherhood cannot of their own volition leave the planet. The supra-celestial forces have incarcerated them here permanently. The means of their entrapment is the Moon’s orbit, which is a barrier of etheric energy, the nature of which remains largely unknown to them and us. This orbit encloses the Earth, and this is the reason why there have been no manned excursions beyond the Moon. They can go to the Moon but cannot venture beyond, although machines can. This has caused them enormous frustration, and they will not rest until they find the means to break through this energy field. The Moon’s orbit has long been associated with power, protection, and ethereal energies. The Chinese refer to its encirclement as the coils of the “Great Dragon,” and this is what their dragon dances are partly about. Even in modern astrology and astronomy, we have the Moon’s “nodes,” also known as the “circling dragon.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The space program, the “Silicon Revolution,” all the genetic, pharmaceutical, and military budgets and researches are convened with this objective in mind. Today’s “Silicon Revolution” is the culmination of operations set into motion in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. It has been long awaited. Its frontmen are made fabulously wealthy (though they personally own little of their own companies), and all doors are open to them. No one questions why they use the logos that they do (Apple Macintosh, Sun, NEC, Gateway, etc,). Few question the connection of these frontmen to powerful European financiers or question why they receive prestigious honors from royals.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

There is a premise or a clause in the lexicons of the black sorcerers that they do in fact obey. It is obligatory for them to tell us in one way or another what their machinations and designs are, and what is happening or ever going to happen to their prospective victims. And they are letting us know right now, often by way of the media, but the so-called “good” are persistently unable to read the signs, being symbolically illiterate and recalcitrant. Therefore, we collude in our own fleecing. Evil always exists by the indulgence of the good. In the game of chess, if one does not occupy a square, then by rights the opponent can.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

They have polluted the oceans and the atmosphere, reduced the oxygen and the electron count, burned holes in the ozone, devastated the forests, relentlessly annihilated the flora and fauna, caused havoc within the food chain, demineralized human food, poisoned the lakes, slaughtered the best of the human gene pool in wars for profit, eradicated entire nations and indigenous peoples, enslaved the ancient races, divided the lands, incarcerated the innocent, martyred the meek and the sensitive, dug caverns deep into the tissues of the Earth, altered the electromagnetic frequency of the human body through the misuse of electricity, torn through the veil of the subatomic realms, massacred millions with their “nuclear” and “atomic” assaults, messed with mind control, perverted the subject of history, lead millions down the path of mania and self destruction through devastating psychedelic drugs, peddled all kinds of pharmaceutical poisons, incubated every vice and addiction that one can imagine, imposed debt slavery, and basically industrialized the entire world.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The youth are especially vulnerable. Drugs and perversions of every kind, are made attractive and chic. The hard drugs that are taken by teens are also made available by the elites and the modern Dionysian Cults they fund. Every decade they provide some other bromide or toy to distract and befuddle the masses.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

One manner of keeping the masses in check, as well as helping them lose their senses and commit slow suicide, concerns the purveyance of alcoholic beverages called “spirits” in taverns and inns. This custom was started under the tax exempt Knights Templars who opened most of the inns in England. These dens all have patently occult names (like Green Dragon, or Black Horse, Raven's Head, Red Lion, Plough and Stars, Rose and Crown, etc.). They also commonly bore the name “Arms” to commemorate that they were established by the military orders. They were also known down through history as venues for all kinds of revolutionaries and malcontents (see Daphne Du Maurier’s Jamaica Inn). And the cult of hallucinogens has been growing stronger for generations. They still provide one of the best means of creating family dislocation and personal existential malaise.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

In the past, when one of the “Serpent Masters” or one of the “Sons of the Serpents” ended their long life, their confederates would generally commemorate their lives in stone by building a monument which encapsulated through its design and geometry the existence of the deceased alien or semi-alien being. We know these monuments today, for they are the cyclopean ruins that exist in almost every country of the world. Others, like the complex at Giza in Egypt, were constructed afterward. Such edifices are not tombs but cenotaphs. These monuments of commemoration are not to be confused with the circles, calendars, and earthworks that were made for utilitarian purposes.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Ovason then goes on to give one reason why the city was constructed according to such specific designs and dates. He speaks of the presence or existence of angelic beings, or overlords, who are being invoked to literally take part in the terrestrial operations of mankind.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

It has rarely been revealed that the Vatican (one of the most truly Satanic edifices in mankind’s history) has spent literally billions of dollars to give mankind a false notion of Magic and the Black Arts. Their efforts and expenditure go into the making and purveying of popular music and movies which are exploitative and gratuitous and which generate deviant messages about the nature of Satanism. The famous black and white classic horror movies (Dracula, The Mummy, The Werewolf, and Invisible Man, etc.), the “B” movies of the 50s and 60s, and the “slasher” or “occult” movies (The Exorcist, Friday 13th, Halloween, Evil Dead, Poltergeist, The Shining, etc.,) of more recent times, are perfect examples of their artifice. Along with certain popular genres of music which have occult themes and imagery (which may appear anti-Christian), these films and their creators are, in actual fact, surreptitiously funded by the Vatican (also by the Jesuits and the Illuminati) via the record companies, marketing agents, and publicity houses. There is a reason why the pop icon Madonna, for instance, has this moniker and why she constantly displays the cross or crucifix. It is why the imagery in her videos is of the type it is and why she is so personally wealthy. It has to do with whom she and her promoters serve. The same goes for the Rolling Stones (listen to Sympathy for the Devil, 200 Light Years from Home, Midnight Rambler, Paint It Black, Goat's Head Soup, Their Satanic Majesty's Request, etc.,) the Beatles, and the Grateful Dead. And these are but three examples of thousands. The public would be shocked to their core if they were to find out the facts about this particular study and about what has been infiltrated into their minds and the minds of their young.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

As we mentioned before, all we know, or think we know about the theme of Satanism actually refers to the alien presence and influence on this planet, and to no other source.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Somehow, the planet Saturn and its symbolism became confused with that of Tiamat, which was thought to be the second sun that fell to Earth. Kings of the Earth were said to rule as Saturn, or for Saturn. The Hebrews identified Saturn with Lucifer or Satan, god of restriction, materialism, negativity, and chaos, who also fell from “heaven.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The most common symbol used by the Merovingians was the serpent, or the dragon. Indeed, the most well known amphibian god was Dagon, whose name connotes Dragon. One of the Merovingian kings bore the name Dagobert.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Sir John Dee, one of the greatest satanic occultists that ever lived, was extremely well connected throughout the Europe. Along with Edward Kelley and others, he set about opening portals to other dimensions in order to speak with the “angels.” His fraternal counterparts in Europe, under his instruction, performed similar rites. Their obsession was to contact extra-terrestrial, or preferably, pan-dimensional beings, the “Archons.” To do this, he invented what was known as “Enochian Magic” which, due to their adroit camouflaging, has been misunderstood to this day.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Sir John Dee was court ambassador to the Tudors (sic, Tutors). He would dutifully visit foreign courts, meeting with money men and master occultists of Europe, and then when sending back intelligence in writing to the court, he would sign his letters with the sigil 007. John Dee was a spy by royal appointment, literally, “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.” The modern MI5 comes from his time, as do many other idioms and customs that are taken as English today.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Elizabeth (E-Liza-beth) was known, suggestively, as the “Virgin Queen” (said to do with her being a Virgo), but really because the term indicates bloodlink to the “Serpent Masters” and possibly to the Reptilians. The name Elizabeth means “beloved of the Gods.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

When the predicament of the Stargate was fully accepted, the scions of Atlantis knew something had to be done, lest all their aeons of effort and tribulation would be for nothing. They convinced themselves that what technology could erect, technology could eventually take down. It became their avowed and solemn intention to move humanity forward to the point where it became intellectually evolved and capable enough to develop the high technical sciences that could expedite their freedom. So, it was decided by the Royals of England, the Tudor Dynasty, that though their present researches and operations would not be halted, a new approach was needed. The man with the idea for this new approach and the one who would undertake its execution was Sir John Dee, the court astrologer and ambassador of Queen Elizabeth Tudor.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Before their discovery of the existence of the “Stargate,” the Nephilim intended to one day vacate this planet that has long been their terrible prison. They did not come here by choice and have not had a good time of it since their forced arrival. They have been as the Bible relates, “chained into the pit.” It is their intention to break their chains and change galactic address as soon as the technology exists to make this possible.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The masters of the Nephilim were relatively convinced that even if their enemies were on Earth they could not survive the paroxysms and furor that Tiamat’s obliteration would bring on. However, these unknown pursuers did not just leave our solar system without instigating precautionary measures. Before they made the journey back to their own planet, they established an etheric barrier around our planet that would be along the same orbit trajectory as the Moon’s around the Earth. This barrier still exists and is utterly impenetrable to the Atlantean progeny, because the technology by which it was erected was of an extremely advanced level.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The "Holy Spirit," of the Trinity, equals, the self... that is... YOU

— Michael Tsarion; Divination & The Goddess Tradition view

History is distorted by diachronic and synchronic manipulation. And those revisionists who attempt to bring the truth to the attention of the masses are constantly being thwarted and undermined by the minions of those who stand to be exposed.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The Biblical references to the Arc of the Covenant and Moses’ warnings about its powers clearly denote some kind of unpredictable and deadly radioactivity. It is also rumored that the arc contained the remains of the leader of the “Fallen Angels” or others of his 200. The word arc comes from arche, meaning the first, the original, or even, the originator, and also from arca, which translates as “tomb.” And the Israelites declared the so-called arc to “contain” God himself. Words like arcadia, monarch, archon, and arktos contain this strange prefix.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

1859 Darwin’s Origin of the Species is published.
Comment (Michael Tsarion)
The full name of this book was Origin of the Species and Preservation of the Favored Races.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The Eves who were receptive to the counsel of the “Sons of the Serpent” in the garden became the first that were “awakened” and exalted by their more advanced cousins. They were initiated into the secrets of technology.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The hybrid progeny of the original fully alien masters could also eventually reproduce both sexually and genetically. Many dynasties and their tyrannical “royal” lines and leaders owe their existence to this, as a close study of their symbolism, deeds, and history reveals. This is the origin of the royal or “holy bloodlines,” like the Merovingians, Hapsburgs, Hanoverians, and Guelphs (Windsors).

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

For instance, in the Book of Enoch, we read of the birth of Lamech’s strange son:

<blockquote>
I have begotten a strange son. He is not like an ordinary human being, but looks like the
children of the angels of heaven to me. His form is different and he is not like us…it does not
seem to me that he is of me but of the angels…

Behold, I thought then within my heart that conception was due to the Watchers and the Holy Ones…and the Nephilim…and my heart was troubled within me because of this child.
</blockquote>

Lamech's father, Mathusala, eventually consults the prophet Enoch about the strange grandchild. The latter says to the concerned grandfather:

<blockquote>
This child which is born to you shall survive on the Earth, and his sons shall be saved with him. When all mankind who are on the earth die, he shall be safe. And this posterity shall beget on the earth giants, not spiritual, but carnal. Now therefore inform thy son Lamech that he who is born is his child in truth; and he shall call his name Noah, for he shall be to you a survivor.
</blockquote>

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The euphemism that has come down to describe a female reserved for crossing with part alien being was “virgin.” The offspring of these relations were referred to as being of “virgin birth.” Other terms which implied genetics are “Blood” (as in “Blood of the Lamb”), “Seed” (as in “Seed of David”), and “Immaculate” (as in the “Immaculate Conception.”) This latter term connotes progeny who were created genetically, rather than sexually.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

When the moral “Sons of the Serpents” in their diasporas came upon a welcoming tribe or a suitable place to reside they set up their base. It is from these regions that we find traces of great advancement, amid later primitivism. At these new locations, the “Sons of the Serpent” would also continue their genetic studies and work. They had “fixed” the Adamic peoples so that they would be intelligent and creative. They also made it possible for the Eves to reproduce sexually. This was primarily to pacify the normal urges of the now freed male Adams. And it is known that members of the “Sons of the Serpent” would “mate” with the Eves, producing exceptional progeny.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The “Reptilians” did indeed serve their masters well. They were part alien, part reptile, with no human DNA at all. Some, like their creators, looked entirely humanoid. Others were distinctly reptoid. They operated from the limbic mode of consciousness and possessed the physical endurance and strength, not to mention the guile, of the humble Earth reptile. From these beings, we inherit the term “coldblooded evil.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

They [the Atlanteans] decided that their main error was the experimentation on Homo Sapiens (also Erectus, Cro-Magnon, etc.) for it was certainly that which brought them problems. But humans were not the only life forms on the Earth. So, it was decided that experiments would be made on animal DNA instead. They began looking to the fauna, making genetic tests on certain animals. It was found that the DNA of the reptiles was the most suitable for their purposes. The alien masters then crossed their own DNA with that of certain reptiles, and it is from this that the “Reptilian” (dragon) beings of the storybooks were born.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Ergo, it is not St. George who is the patron saint of England, but Set of the Hyksos. In general terms whenever the code term "red" is used in the Old Testament, it denotes the Hyksos dynasty. Connected to the Order of the Garter, is the Most Distinguished Order of St. Michael and St. George, formed in 1818. Aditionally, legend has it that the senior members of the Merovingian dynasty of France (founders of the Knights Templar) had birthmarks in the shape of a red cross.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization Bonus Disc view

The Vatican is a front for the all-powerful Cult of Aton, which also funds the Illuminati and the Masonic Orders. The chief Jesuit is referred to as "The General" a term Akhenaton used for himself. The skull cap, that is also worn by Jewish rabbis, was originally worn by the sun priests of Egypt.

— Michael Tsarion; The Irish Origins of Civilization Bonus Disc view

The Druids did not permit themselves the luxury of cutting a single living thing with a sharpened edge.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Later, as the Atlantean sorcerers gained power again and were successful in infiltrating a culture established by their humane scions, they would instigate the atrocity of human sacrifice. Appearing and presenting themselves as the gods of the “fathers,” they would seduce and then ritually slaughter countless thousands.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The hybrid progeny of the original fully alien masters could also eventually reproduce both sexually and genetically. Many dynasties and their tyrannical “royal” lines and leaders owe their existence to this, as a close study of their symbolism, deeds, and history reveals. This is the origin of the royal or “holy bloodlines,” like the Merovingians, Hapsburgs, Hanoverians, and Guelphs (Windsors).

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The euphemism that has come down to describe a female reserved for crossing with part alien being was “virgin.” The offspring of these relations were referred to as being of “virgin birth.” Other terms which implied genetics are “Blood” (as in “Blood of the Lamb”), “Seed” (as in “Seed of David”), and “Immaculate” (as in the “Immaculate Conception.”) This latter term connotes progeny who were created genetically, rather than sexually. Properly, it was to designate that they were special children, the offspring of the gods. Eventually, the “Sons of the Serpents” interacted with human women in the normal sexual manner.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

When the moral “Sons of the Serpents” in their diasporas came upon a welcoming tribe or a suitable place to reside they set up their base. It is from these regions that we find traces of great advancement, amid later primitivism. At these new locations, the “Sons of the Serpent” would also continue their genetic studies and work. They had “fixed” the Adamic peoples so that they would be intelligent and creative. They also made it possible for the Eves to reproduce sexually. This was primarily to pacify the normal urges of the now freed male Adams. And it is known that members of the “Sons of the Serpent” would “mate” with the Eves, producing exceptional progeny.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The Reptilians preferred to live beneath the ground or in dark caverns, their needs being seen to by other genetic mutants or even by compliant Adams who still remained in the ignorant state. They periodically demanded live sacrifices to be made to them and would go in search of the enemies of their masters.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The “Reptilians” did indeed serve their masters well. They were part alien, part reptile, with no human DNA at all. Some, like their creators, looked entirely humanoid. Others were distinctly reptoid.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

They decided that their main error was the experimentation on Homo Sapiens (also Erectus, Cro-Magnon, etc.) for it was certainly that which brought them problems. But humans were not the only life forms on the Earth. So, it was decided that experiments would be made on animal DNA instead. They began looking to the fauna, making genetic tests on certain animals. It was found that the DNA of the reptiles was the most suitable for their purposes. The alien masters then crossed their own DNA with that of certain reptiles, and it is from this that the “Reptilian” (dragon) beings of the storybooks were born.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The coming of the original “Serpent Race” was probably around 50,000 years ago (but could have been as recently as 30,000 years ago). Genetic experiments and hybridization took place some time after the building of Atlantis, for which the services of Neanderthal Man seems to have been required.

The wars of the “gods” probably began around 13,000 years ago, with the Pole Shift following soon after. The Earth attains a semblance of normalcy as the centuries pass.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The warlocks of Atlantis, who were never many to begin with, suffered heavy losses in the destruction of their continent, Atlantis. It can be conjectured that there were less than 100 of these totally alien beings left, though there is little to no certainty about this. They also lost most of their sophisticated alien technology. And the “Sons of the Serpents” together with their Adamic wards suffered enormous casualties also. It may be conjectured that there were only about 1,000 true “Sons of the Serpents” left in existence.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

In the Old Testament, passages relating to the twins, Jacob and Esau, may well refer obliquely to the pre-diluvian bipartisanism and their ongoing antagonism.

<blockquote>
In your limbs lie nations twain,
Rival races from their birth;
One the mastery shall gain,
The younger o’er the elder reign.
</blockquote>

The meaning behind the euphemisms of the combating “Serpents” or “Dragons” has to do with the antagonism within the biology of the Homo Atlantis. The reference is to the coils of DNA, to the alien and human strands and their incompatibility. The folktales which have to do with the evil and good twin, the dark and fair sisters, the white and black witches, the twin towers, the true and false knights, the heroes descent and ascent, etc., also conceal the same meta-theme.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The very name Pendragon means “Head of the Dragons,” that is, the race of good “Serpents,” from which the Celts and Gaels descended.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The second revealing anecdote happens when Moses and Aaron are in the presence of the Pharaoh. The scriptures speak of them having to prove their credentials to Pharaoh by changing Aaron’s rod into a serpent. This is strange, since Israelites were forbidden by Jehovah to engage in “magical practices.” Anyway, the Egyptians produce their own rod, which likewise becomes a serpent, and so on. This tale of the conflict between the two serpents is a barely disguised reference to that between the races.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

...we hear of the strange meeting Moses had at the “burning bush.” This has long been a point of conjecture, but can easily be explained when the imagery is replaced by fact. Jehovah announces to Moses’s question, “I am the god of thy Fathers.” Scholars have pointed out that Moses’s doubt as to the nature and pre-eminence of Jehovah is strange, to say the least, and that Jehovah should need no introduction to a devoted Israelite. Moreover, the introduction clearly implies that Moses is in fact one of the progeny of the “Sons of the Serpents” (his “fathers”), but has now had the misfortune to come into contact with one of their fathers, that is, one of the original “Serpent Masters,” maybe even the “main man.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Elohim, comes from Ellu, meaning “the Shining Ones.” “Shining Ones” is an ambivalent term used for both the Nephilim and their first born. The “Shining Ones” are often depicted with horns on their heads. This was a symbol of wisdom, but also of rulership. This is why shamans, priests, and kings adopted the convention of wearing horns also, especially in the form of the crown. This was to primarily indicate that they were descendants of either the Atlanteans or the Lemurians and were endowed with power. Michelangelo sculpted Moses with horns on his head to indicate his blood-bond to the ante-diluvian kings.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Things become easier still when we identify the “Serpent Masters” with the “Race of Jehovah” and the “Sons” with the “Elohim.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

“First Born” relates to the original progeny of the “Serpent Masters,” that is, the members of the Lemurian Race.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

There is good reason to believe that the terms “Sodom” and “Gomorrah” originally referred to Atlantis (Appalachia) and Lemuria.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

In the account of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, the fleeing prophet, Lot, is told by the “angels of the Lord” not to turn back, because the “wrath of the Lord” was coming to that place. Lot’s wife does look back and is straightaway turned into what is described as a “pillar of salt.” But this is a mistranslation. The word is more like our English “vapor.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

In the 1950s the father of the Atomic Bomb, Robert Oppenheimer (who frequently quoted the Mahabharata), was asked by a student at Rochester University, whether his Atomic Bomb was the first in history to be exploded, he suggestively answered: “Well yes, in modern times, of course.”

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The Celts had the strange prohibition that no king could rule who was “blemished.” This does not make sense until we realize what it relates to is genetic alteration.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Eventually, the exodus of the Adamic race became known to the “Serpent Masters,” who grew furious and vengeful. This was the third time that their plans and exploits had been thwarted. First, they were banished from their home planet. Then after coming to a new one, they created a race to serve them, but which did not; and when they finally created the perfect servant, they found them permanently seduced away from their duties. The ire of the Atlanteans at this snubbing was so intense that they unleashed an atomic war on the “Sons of the Serpent” and their Adamic wards, now resident on Lemuria (Oceania). These latter were not unprepared, however, and being technically advanced, set up to defend themselves and retaliate against their evil adversaries on Atlantis. So, there was on Earth a nuclear war. It was an event that changed the face of Earth history. The war between the gods (the “Serpent Masters” and the “Sons of the Serpents”)

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

These cults of power women existed down to Medieval times, when the Brotherhood of the Snake, under the guise of Catholicism, rose up to destroy them, en masse. The Eves have never been forgiven for their abandonment
of the alien hegemony. Their decision sealed their fate. That the compilers of the Old Testament and the creators of the Anthrocentric, monotheistic religions propound the subservience of woman should be enough proof of whom they serve.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

However, something happened that thwarted their plans for a third time. The “Sons of the Serpents” on Lemuria found out what their fathers were doing and about the newly created race that had taken their place as unwitting servants to evil. It occurred to them that such experiments were wrong and that this latest servant race was, although ignorant, part human and, therefore, “cousins” to themselves. It was decided that emissaries of the “Sons of the Serpents” would make contact with the new race.

Members of the “Sons of the Serpents” entered the “Garden” to open dialogue with their cousins in bondage and spiritual ignorance. The male Adams were not that interested in the counsel of their visitors. But the females, the Eves, were. It is said that the Eves found the newcomers comely and attractive. The visitors told those Adams and Eves who would listen that they were being kept in a state of induced ignorance and servitude, but that it was within them to become “gods” themselves, and that if they left the garden and came to Lemuria (Oceania), they would be shown all that had been hidden from them and be awakened to their true natures. Finally, because of this intercession, a great multitude of the Adamic race did follow their wise visitors to their island paradise. They were taken to Lemuria by spacecraft.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The Serpent Masters deduced that the first time round they had made a fundamental mistake. They had given their progeny the same intellectual capacities that they themselves possessed, which meant their creations also understood all about genetic science. This time, it was decided that such invaluable knowledge would be completely withheld and that the biological and cerebral centers of higher intelligence would be blocked. This would entail genetic modification. And the euphemism that has come down to us connoting this state of ignorance concerning the high sciences is “naked.” The members of this new slave race who were termed “Adamic” (meaning “from the Earth”) would be kept “naked” in the garden.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Unluckily for the “Serpent Masters,” this first-born progeny eventually began to chafe against their imposed servitude. Their human qualities and sensibilities were such that they were not only lofty of intellect, but were possessed of a moral and spiritual dimension utterly lacking in their extraterrestrial masters. As a result of this, they openly began to resist their creators whom they disliked and came to physically outnumber. It is written that these “Sons of the Serpent” would not recognize the superiority of their masters, since they lacked the exalted qualities. Finally, after an unspecified period of time, the majority of the “Sons of the Serpents” leave the “Gardens of Edinu” (Atlantis) and vacate the continent of Appalachia, relocating to the island of Oceania, later known as Lemuria, where today’s Pacific Ocean is. Here they establish a thriving civilization where they also practiced the high sciences. The sublime cultural inventions and philosophies that enrich humankind then and now originate from them.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The original pre-visitation Earth inhabitants were probably the Cro-Magnon, Engis, Homo Erectus or Neanderthals. There could have been some other race altogether, but given the suppression of data in these subjects, it is doubtful if we will ever know the truth about our Earth ancestors. Recent findings seem to indicate that both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon races were genetically interfered with and were the victims of hybridization.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

More importantly, the offspring of those who had been genetically altered also continued to exist and procreate. They had within them the instincts of aggression and power mania innate to their forefathers. It is these persons who moved from the limbic and later the left-brain modality who excelled in the technological sciences and were predisposed to feeling separate, distinct from, or superior to the planet’s natural inhabitants. They were the ones who found it easy to destroy nature and to manipulate and murder their fellow human beings. Throughout historical time, we find personages rising to the top of political and cultural life who labor so assiduously for technological advance and yet who demonstrably display little love or concern for humanity.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Many of the people who left Atlantis after the overthrow were themselves genetically altered and possessed what was called “magical powers,” which awed all that were witness to them. The extraterrestrial priests who sided with the Earth-people set themselves up as kings or more likely as the advisors of the indigenous but “magically endowed” kings. The Arthurian legends speak of such beings, for instance, Merlin. In other Celtic myths, we have Taliesin, Amergin, Tuan, Breas, Balor, Diancecht, Indech, Elathan, Lugh, Nuada, Culhulainn, Ossian, Finn Mac Cumhail, and a host of others. In these and other stories, the advisor, leader, or king has pronounced strength, wisdom, clairvoyance, beauty, and long life, which are all the possible results of genetic modification.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Those ever so “lucky” persons who were chosen for hybridization by the Nephilim inherited the alien DNA and became morally corrupt. Some of these persons were sent back into their tribes as kings possessed of powerful magic and wealth. Henceforth, bloodline would be extremely important to the monarchs of the Earth. Records were kept in Atlantis of all their engineered slaves, and from then onwards, the progeny of those persons would be favored and protected. Some writers contend that after hybridization the genetically manipulated individuals had very extended lifetimes and could maintain the same form for many hundreds of years.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

It is known, however, that these Neanderthals suddenly vanished from the Earth for no known reason.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

It may be noted that though it is now common, it is not normal for mankind to congregate and live in cities. This is entirely artificial.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

An interesting anecdote which repeats throughout the ancient records and accounts is that the beings who visited the various countries were never numerically many. The records say that they appeared in groups of three or four members. The fact that the visitors were of such a small number is suggestive that they were actually contingents of a larger mass centered elsewhere, that they were on reconnaissance missions, and that were data gatherers and ambassadors sent out to the corners of the globe.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

The Nephilim established their main headquarters, Atlantis, on the continent of Appalachia. From this center they would corral and experiment on the indigenous Earth inhabitants taken from cultures and tribes that were shaken asunder by the recent celestial catastrophe.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

There is a great deal of information coming out of the ancient legends that convinces this writer that the visitors, for all their intellectual acumen and technological expertise, were morally corrupt, without spiritual sensibilities of any kind. These alien, criminal renegades took their cover on Earth, met with the indigenous tribes, were considered gods, and took full advantage of the relative credulity of their hosts. Having no love for the people of Earth, they almost immediately sought to enslave them. It is our opinion that they were successful and that no one can have a real grasp of the history and progress of humankind without taking into consideration the idea of alien colonization.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

We read from various sources that approximately 50,000 years ago a certain planetary body in our own solar system was mysteriously destroyed. This body has been called Tiamat, Phaeton, Lucifer, Marduk, Maldek, Rahab, and even Luna (not connected to the name later given to the moon). It was believed to have existed between Mars and Jupiter and was referred to as the “second sun” and may have been mistaken as such, because its atmosphere was resplendent with reflections of the actual sun...

Around the time of this event, the solar system, and later the Earth, was colonized by extra-terrestrial beings who were either attracted to this solar system by that conflagration or upon coming here caused the calamity themselves. Whether the disaster was natural or not, the result was that mankind on Earth experienced total and long lasting chaos and confusion. The surface of the planet Tiamat consisted mostly of great oceans. Upon its destruction, these vast saline waters entered into the Earth’s atmosphere causing the first of two massive prehistoric deluges and tribulations that mankind would experience. It is thought that the alien invaders took full advantage of this predicament and moved in to bring about colonization. They met no resistance from the disoriented and weakened inhabitants of the Earth who believed their visitors were powerful gods.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view

Atlantis was not a center of advanced human civilization, but was, rather, the creation of and home to alien beings that colonized the Earth.

— Michael Tsarion; Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation view