The edifice of the "New World Order" is almost complete. It has been constructed brick by masonic brick down through the centuries. Symbolically speaking, the last layer is already in place and it only remains for the "capstone" to be set. When the time is right the architects of doom will finally haul it into place. Once this towering Atonist pyramid of control is complete the black light of the "All-Seeing Eye" will be cast down upon the world's enslaved men and women marching like sleepwalkers beneath its black shadow. The men and women of the world appear eager to help construct freedom's tombstone, the altar upon which their own hearts will be torn out and offered to the blood-gorged gods.
The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown. In book and films of this kind, what might be referred to as the "esoteric branch" within Christianity, is depicted as being in conflict with the orthodox or "exoteric brand." The establishment appears to be gradually admitting the existence of the esoteric branch and the media often glamorizes the various secret societies and their members so that the public at large may easily condone their activities and even imagine them to be decent, god-loving, keepers of mysterious secrets and occult powers. We might question what establishment or group would profit from such flagrantly fabricated depictions. And might ask why the public would be given the impression that certain secret societies, such as the Priory of Sion, are great if shadowy benefactors of mankind.
Through a series of clever strategies involving forgery, exposure of forgery, and media hype surrounding the literary creations of their own obscurantist agents (Dan Brown and the authors of the Holy Blood and the Holy Grail) the Order of Zion has successfully convinced many in the world that it was a pseudo society dreamt into existence by duplicitous, fame-hungry, catchpenny, opportunists and charlatans. In Dan Brown's fiction the order is skillfully portrayed as a benign group of high brow adepts harried by ultra conservative fanatics within the Roman Catholic Church. This spurious idea was first broadcast by authors Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln. In their work Holy Blood and Holy Grail, the grand masters of the Order of Zion were, and are, custodians of secret knowledge that will eventually benefit all mankind. They are invariably inspired revolutionaries, free-thinkers, and humanitarians of scientific and artistic genius, such as Leonardo da Vinci, Victor Hugo, Nicholas Poussin, Isaac Newton, and Charles Nodier. In this way the order was able to popularize the fictive elements that they know lead people away from the truth of their existence. Broadcasting the rumor that the order was virulently anti-Semitic was just another ruse to conceal its close affiliation with the ancient Judites and Cult of Aton. The order, for obvious reasons, does not wish its true identity to be known, nor for its deeds or true agenda to be discovered and publicized. Their agents in the media were directed to borrow from several esoteric traditions in order to concoct the intriguing, semi-believable, controversial, but approved, spin that part aggrandizes, part obscures, the true nature and origin of the order they serve. These media agents of the true Order of Sion are indeed opportunists, but not in the way that their detractors and critics commonly suppose.
Researchers into the history and influence of the Order of Sion have established the fact that it instigated what is known as the "Scottish Rite" Freemasonic system prevalent in the United States of America. Agents of the order, such as Chevalier Ramsey and Albert Pike, were very active propagators of the "Scottish Rite" systems and practices, those which for all their mystique are merely vehicles carrying forth a very old and insidious agenda.
George W. Bush is a direct descendant of Godfroi de Bouillon, first crusader king of Jerusalem.
We also derive the word dove from David, and the white dove is a frequently used cryptic insignia for the "House" and "Seed" of David, (and therefore for the Cult of Aton). In Latin dove is columba, giving us the Knights of Columbus, the District of Columbia, Christopher Columbus, Columbia Broadcasting Company (CBS), and so on. The dove can also be seen on standards of the British Royal Family, on the Greenpeace logo, on Visa credit cards, and several other corporate emblems.
However, the title David (from DWD or TWT, meaning "Beloved" - hence TUTankhamen) has been found to refer to the kings of the Egyptian eighteenth dynasty, that is, to the Cult of Aton. The word david was a title given to military commanders. In other words, there was not one "David," but many. The word had a similar meaning to "General" "Field Marshal," or "Commander."
The term Sion (or Zion) can be found in the Book of Samuel. It was the city adopted as a capital city by King David, of the "House of Judah."
The symbol for the province, and the dukes, of Lorraine is literally the "double cross."
The Cult of Aton's chiefs consider themselves the true regents of this Earth. It is they who appoint the commonly obvious presidents, prime ministers, church potentates and lodge grand masters. The dominion of these minions is entirely dependent upon the will of their reclusive masters, the hierarchs whose word is law. As in any corporation, when lay-offs become inevitable, it is usually not top executives who "get the sack." If a lodge or even an entire order begins to displease, it can be penalized or even eradicated. The many orders and fraternities under the dominion of the Cult of Aton are merely means to ends. They are as significant as houses on a "Monopoly" board-game. They are expendable as are the operatives within them.
Monarchies are preferred over democracies by the secret societies although political demarcations are, when all is said and done, of little consequence to them. They are useful to a point and are done away with when they cease to be useful. If a monarch looks as if he is going to be a problem, or if he might make a appropriate sacrificial victim, he can be disposed of.
It is this infamous Order of Zion that funds and controls the Freemasonic Order, Knights Templar, Bavarian Illuminati, and Grand Orient Lodges whose overlord, Duke d' Orleans of the Guise dynasty, was a prime mover instigating the French Revolution and ritual slaughter of the Bourbon monarch Louis XVI and his court.
It is likely that the city of Avaris was first settled in ancient times by the Phoenicians. The Phoenicians had settled at Thebes from the earliest times and since we understand the Phoenicians to be Aryans (Irish), as well as sun-worshippers, we are most receptive to the suggestion that they were the predynastic founders of Avaris and of other Egyptian cities.
Scholars surmise that the Templar-Freemasonic order takes its name, Sion (pronounced sheeon), from the first letters of the holy family of Egypt - Set, Isis, Osiris and Nephthys. These four deities were sacred to the ancient Egyptians as well as to those with ancestral ties to the land of Egypt. And this, together with the implications of the term "Zion," gives us our connection to the Egyptian Cult of Aton. The Atonist Levites had occupied the Hyksos city of Zoan, or Zion, also known as Avaris - the real City of David. The word Zion comes from the Irish Zon that denoted the sun, as well as sun-worshippers. This proves that the Levites were dyed-in-the-flesh sun-worshippers.
Whether the Priory de Sion of more modern times is identical with this earlier order [Order of Zion], is difficult to establish. It may well be. The fact that the new order was registered and closely affiliated with Switzerland's most illustrious Freemasonic Order, Grand Lodge Alpina, certainly gives us food for thought. This Swiss Order is itself in command over the infamous P2 Lodge of Freemasons in Rome. And P2 certainly exists.
According to legend, in the year 1188, the Order of Zion, is purported to have broken off from their twin order, the Knights Templar. It is possible that the Order of Sion was disbanded, or assimilated, at this time. It may simply have changed its name and obvious identity.
The earliest reports on the Order of Zion concern its creation in Alexandria Egypt by an adept calling himself Ormesius (or Ormus), who concerned himself with "blending" Egyptian paganism and Christianity. In 1070, Ormesius took his new order to Italy and then, later, on to France. In France his order was headed by arch-crusader and knight, Godfroi de Bouillon. At this time the order was renamed "Ordre de Sion."
From the same womb that bore the Templars came the Order of Sion (or Zion). This order hailed from the same Templar cities of Burgundy and Champagne. Undoubtedly, its heads were the same coterie of secret Culdeans, Jews, and Kabalists who had accompanied Godfroi and Baldwin to Jerusalem and guided their hands there. The elite members of the Order of Sion are believed to own over 10,000 castles in France alone.
Our research convinces us that the Templars, like the Freemasons and Rosicrucians, operated as a front organization for the Cult of Aton. The latter were behind the rise of the Merovingian kings of France, behind many Frankish backed princes and popes, behind the Sinclairs of Scotland, the Culdean monks of Ireland, and behind the seizure of the so-called "City of Jerusalem." What we read of Templar history concerns Atonist history. This fact must be always borne in mind when studying the world's most powerful secret societies.
So many good people who discover that the world is going to hell in a hand-basket wonder why it is that men and women, apparently just like themselves, are so complicit and dedicated to the illogical destruction of the planet and the enslavement of the human race. Observers with greater intelligence understand that the cell-system has been employed to great effect to keep people inline and from knowing the consequences of the work they do. This is one of the reasons why the Illuminati decided to operate from behind the Order of Freemasonry, that used this fraternity grading system. Meritocracies work well for secret societies in the same way they operate so well in universities and colleges. Up and coming members can be vetted and screened. Moral men and women can be prevented from progressing while immoral ones can enjoy promotion and prosperity. Moreover, when some aspiring neophyte rises to senior rank, and begins to know what the real "Royal Secret" is, they are not likely to disdain their station or forfeit their rank. Indeed, they will be all the more ardent in carrying out the orders they are given. This is the case in the police force, army, navy, and priesthood, and it is the case in Freemasonry. Individuals of privilege, those politicians, pastors, and priests are more than impressed to discover the illustrious lineage of the masters whom they serve. When a Winston Churchill, for example, finds out that his masters are not just some minor secret society elite but pharaohs from ancient Egypt, his attitude dramatically changes. The man privileged enough to discover that the boss of bosses is a bloodline descendant of men who occupied the great thrones of old and whose relatives were prototypes for the biblical dramatis personae, is not likely to be thinking of anything other than his own personal prospects and good fortune. Such a man is all too proud to know that he acts for the true Christ. He has the obsession and blind belief of the average attendee of Mass magnified many times. So let us not be surprised when we see little to no positive change from within the tiers of the hierarchy set up to exploit and enslave. It is just a matter of course. Kings are not kings without their court, and masters are not masters without their underlings. As in any royal court, there are the fobs, buffoons, sycophants, exxons, pages, and jesters. It takes all sorts to make a kingdom, and all sorts to run an empire.
More recently in history, we find that the politically vacillating aristocrat Winston Churchill was content to be a field agent for the dark brotherhoods he once sought to expose. In the end, this descendant of the Dukes of Marlborough was one of their most resourceful agents and, like the proverbial puppet on a string, he allowed himself to be thoroughly manipulated. The souls of the dead, slaughtered in the mass blood ritual of world war point their disincarnate fingers at this foul degenerate who, like his brethren in slaughter, Stalin and Roosevelt, are still paraded before us in the media as super-heroes and saviors of their race.
Research has exposed the fact that Sir Francis Bacon, master translator of the King James Bible,and father of science, was such an outer adept. And it is rumored that he even adopted the ruse himself and had several personas. Some scholars are even of the opinion that Bacon was the true author of the works of the enigmatic William Shakespeare.
It should be borne in mind that powerful coteries such as the Knights Templar, Knights of Malta, Knights of St. John, Order of Sion, Ordo Templi Orientis, Skull and Bones, and Freemasons, etc, have outer lodges that are known to the layman, and inner divisions that are kept as secret as possible.
It is partly due to this psychic dictatorship that the average man lacks the passion and inclination for anything other than the pursuit of sensual gratification and personal narcissistic titillation.
Given these facts, and given the new evidence coming forth concerning the true power and wealth of the Templars, it is inconceivable that the Templar order ceased to exist after Philip IV rose up against them in the fourteenth century. A cabal, at least 300 hundred years old, with as much insider information as these Templars commanded, would hardly have operated so incompetently as to allow themselves to be outwitted and taken by surprise by a single, obviously hostile, king with an axe to grind. Although history records that key Templars were arrested and tortured, it also records that virtually none of their considerable wealth was ever located by their supposed enemies. Experts now realize that the Templars knew all about the plans of their enemies and simply prepared for the worst by handing over their wealth to their brethren (the Knights of St. John Hospitaler, Knights of Malta, and Knights of Rhodes), and to other kindred secret societies. In short, the temple may have lost a brick or two, but remained standing just where it was.
The Templars were the first bankers of Europe. This occupation enabled them to control the economic destiny of the world from the eleventh century onward. In their capacity as the brokers for French princes, dukes, and kings, and for the Vatican, the Templars were able to decide the fate of any agency or individual who stood against them. As the symbolism of the great banks reveals, the Templars do indeed own the world. They have been actively using their financial muscle to buy politicians, statesmen, lawyers, judges, police chiefs, mayors, generals, intellectuals, city planners, and media icons, and to purvey all manner of addictive substances through their innumerable ale houses, taverns, and inns, while at the same time they have poisoned humanity through their pharmaceutical monopolies, organized and operated by their brethren, the Knights of St. John Hospitaler. From architecture to munitions, from ship building to space flight, there is not an organization or enterprise of significance that has not been seeded with, or guided by, their minions.
Cardinal Francis Spellman was a patron and affiliate of the American Association of Malta Knights, founded in 1926. Spellman was the Jesuit "Black Pope," who wielded the true power of the Vatican. His attitude toward the Knights of Malta demonstrated the close connections that exist between the Church and the premier secret societies, and that confound the alternative theories of misinformed or duplicitous critics and cynics.
Cardinal Nicola Canali was one of the most important and powerful Cardinals of Rome. He was instrumental in the election of Pius XII and in 1944 he was put in charge of the financial affairs of the Church's administration. He was to all intents and purposes the Vatican's Minister of Finance. He was a high ranking Knight of Malta. The headquarters of the Order is in the city of Rome, close to the Vatican.
A key year for the order [Knights Templar] was 1139, when Pope Innocent II saw to it that the Templars were made independent of the dominion of kings and emperors. He made them legally sacrosanct and answerable only to him.
Evidence suggests that the Frankish Templars were enhancing their power base in order to overthrow the corrupt Church of Rome and thereby erect in its place a form of Christianity closer to its pagan roots and infinitely more tolerant. In the end, it is all solar theology, all Atonism. Whether it is Roman Christianity, or Frankish, or Irish, it is just a matter of degree. Dynastic rivalries aside, the bloody exploits of the Templars, that brought them to the gates of Jerusalem, are enough to show us that there was little substantial difference between their power-hunger and brutality and the form they conspired to overthrow and replace in Rome.
So what were the Templars doing? Why had they even set out to capture the city of Jerusalem and the "holy land?" Nothing in the bible specifically demanded such effort. And who were the powerful men that secretly accompanied the Templars to the East? Who were the "Jewish scholars" ensconced at Bernard's abbey in Champagne? What did they have to do with the"Christian" Templars and nobility of France? If some of these men accompanying Godfroi's Templars, such as the enigmatic Peter the Hermit, were Jewish Essenes or Kabalists, or if they were Culdees from Ireland, or a secret cabal of Merovingians, would their return East not have been understandable? If the Merovingian elite were related in some way to the Atonists of old, then a return to Judea, Palestine, and nearby Egypt, would have been a highly significant ritual for all concerned. And would not their connection to the Atonist dynasty of Hyksos pharaohs also have taken care of the astronomical bills accrued during their crusading ventures? It certainly would. After all, no one has really established where the real Templar expense account came from. Their immense wealth enabled the Templars to virtually own kingdoms and countries and to have almost complete control over the political decisions that shape the world. It also gave them power to undermine and obliterate rivals who stood in their way, including popes and kings. It allowed them to benefit from the various squabbles between rival dynasties or nations and to work from all ends of the political spectrum.
Once Innocent II was installed in Rome he enabled the Templar empire to expand without hindrance. They enjoyed more freedom and privilege. They were also masters of Jerusalem. Their kinsman Baldwin had been made king of the "holy" city. The Templars truly felt like lords of the world and the dark days of the fourteenth century, when the Roman church allegedly sought their destruction, were far off. Their supposed vow of poverty, of walking as Christ and his disciples walked, was a pure sham. The wealth of the Templars was beyond measure.
Did the Knights of the Temple of Solomon adopt their name because they admired this old world, Old Testament, figure more than Jesus Christ?
According to these authors Hugh de Champagne, together with Andre de Montbard, and others, was conspiring to overthrow the same Roman Church that had, with his own family's military assistance, just established its dominion over Jerusalem.
The kings of the Merovingian dynasty wore their hair long in to emulate a lion's mane, and were believed to possess birth marks between their shoulder blades in the shape of a red cross. One of the main symbols of the Merovingians was the fish, that Christians used to signify Jesus. The Latin wordf or fish is luce, that connotes Lucifer, that is, Aton. King Dagobert of the Merovingian dynasty may have been named after Dagon, an ancient pagan god of the sea.
In our opinion, the Merovingian and Carolingian dynasties were connected to the Atonists of Egypt and to the Israelites of biblical history. Interestingly, the Merovingians descended from the female line of the Sicambrian Franks (a Germanic tribe, first century BC) whose kings referred to themselves as "People of the Covenant." The Emperor Charlemagne was of Frankish blood. The Sicambri are believed to have been related to the ancient Scythians whose kings and princes had close connections to Egypt of the 18th dynasty, and to the Milesian (Atonist) conquerors of Ireland.
Templar researchers insist that the Templar "Christ" was not Jesus but John, the initiate and hierophant of the solar colleges of Egypt. Certainly, the Vatican accused the Templars of venerating a severed bearded head. And as the bible relates, John the Baptist was decapitated by his enemies. Symbolically of course, the act of severing the head can mean the transference of power and seniority from one grand master to another. The source of the symbolism is astrological. The sun is the head severed every winter. The rays (or hair) of the sun are reduced in radiance and power while the solar orb descends into the cold depths of winter. A female had connived the murder of the Baptist because the sun weakens and makes its descent into the realms of death through the female signs of Virgo and Libra. Alternatively, the long flowing hair of John can represent the feminine principle.
As the majority of the historical accounts will relate, the Templars were formed to invade and capture the City of Jerusalem for the pope and for Christianity. Upon their successful crusade, in1099 AD, they established their headquarters at Jerusalem's Temple Mount. This is where their name is said to have originated. Some researchers into Templar history maintain that while they were residing in the "holy land" the Templar elite cultivated long lasting collaborations with many Gnostic sects and secret societies. Among these secret affiliates were the Mandeans and Assassins. Interestingly, a chief hierophant of the Mandean sect had been John the Baptist who was entitled the "King of Light." It is alleged that, since the time of the First Crusade, the Templars, as well as the Order of Sion, have maintained their veneration of John, the beheaded initiator of Christ. The Order of Sion, in particular, are believed to have entitled their own chiefs "Jean" or "John," while a major worldwide Templar Order also dating from the crusades was known as the "Knights of St. John." Allegedly, this allegiance to John was one of the reasons why the Templars were targeted by the Vatican hierarchs.
The Knights Templar were, therefore, knights of the sun, the moon, and stars. They were an esoteric order that encapsulated the secret teaching of the solar, lunar, and stellar cults of antiquity. Even the most cursory perusal of the symbolism that this order and its affiliates employed confirms this to be true. The Templar Order was a repository for the arcane lore of ages, for the astrological gnosis that exalted the hierarchs of Christian (Atonist) Rome but that had to remain unseen and unknown to the common uninitiated believer. In short, the Templars were descendants of the Cult of Aton. In fact, the creators of the Knights Templar were the descendants of the Merovingian dynasty headquartered in France and that, according to the three authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail, had the biblical Jesus among their family members. This powerful dynasty has been traced by some researchers back to the Amorites and to the Hyksos pharaohs of Egypt.
It helps us to know that the term Solomon refers to the sun in the languages of Indo-Europeans, Semites, and Egyptians - Sol, Om and On. It is,therefore, not a name but a title. Like the titles David, Aaron, Jesus, Joshua, Joseph, John, and even Abraham and Mary, it does not refer to a person as much as to his dynasty, theology, and lineage.
We agree wholeheartedly with the great scholar Godfrey Higgins who emphasized that the Templars were an older body than commonly supposed and that it was not founded during the time of the first crusade. The order merely allowed itself to become publicly known during that era. Its true origins go much further back in time.
According to most official theories, the Templars were first brought into existence by order of the Roman popes. However, the illustrious Templars families had allegiance to beings infinitely more exalted that the rotten power-mad bishops of Rome, Burgundy, and Champagne.
Amenhotep III was the father of Akhenaton. A good candidate for the biblical Solomon. His title was "Shining Solar Disk of All the Land"
When examining the role of the Templars we need to first pay attention to their title. The masonic term "Solomon" does not refer to a place or a physical structure. It relates to the sun and to the cult of the sun. It relates to Aton and the light of Aton. As we have shown, modern researchers have offered evidence to show the Egyptian Pharaoh Amenhotep III, was one of the most likely candidates for the biblical King Solomon. And he was the father of Akhenaton. Although he openly venerated the state god Amen Ra, Amenhotep III actively promoted the worship of Aton. His own title was "The Dazzling Sun Disk of All the Land." So when we seek to determine the true time of origin of the so-called Templars we need to consider ancient Egypt and not eleventh century Burgundy. What arose in France of that period was merely an offshoot of a much more ancient order. Once this fact is understood, a study of the Templars and their affiliated organizations (Cistercians, Knights of St. John, Knights of Malta, Knights of Rhodes, and Order of Sion, etc), will make a great deal more sense.
Although many of the world's orders and fraternities were created and funded by the Cult of Aton, some were not. And because one has to advance quite high in the masonic hierarchy before becoming privy to the real agenda, a few well-meaning masons, due to their natural humanism, have attempted to expose the darker corners of their own organization. Winston Churchill was one such whistle-blower. For a short period during his political career he appeared dedicated to exposing corruption in high places. When a whistle-blower, such as Churchill, operates from within the system, the "higher-ups" have two main ways of dealing with them. The first method commonly used is assassination, of either the professional or physical kind. The second method involves initiating the whistle-blower to a higher position in the hierarchy. This provides them with a deeper insight into the master plan than they previously possessed. This promotion is usually attended by material reward. This method has proved very successful down through the years and has served to silence potentially rogue voices. Some esteemed masons spoke openly against what they imagined to be the subversion of their humanitarian order. Perhaps, they took masonry for what it was meant to be, for what it was said to be, or for what they imagined it to be, as they reverently advanced through its many ranks. Masons are, after all, not the only ones to be duped by the company they keep or by the societies they serve. In any case, the warning calls of the suspicious and aware, in masonry, went largely unheeded.
This perfidious cabal [Cult of Aton] also funds and controls the world's major charities, the majority of the US Protestant (pro-Zionist) evangelist pastors, the newspapers and media networks for the youth, the music and pharmaceutical monopolies, the Federal Reserve and its banks, the United Nations, the Vatican, and the Jesuits, and the major think-tanks and space programs (NASA - "...the Eagle has landed"). The symbols on the currency (notes and coins) that government (British and American) buys from the private banks in order to sustain its existence, furnish the student with proof-positive as to the truth of this last statement. Moreover, the terms "Camp David" and "Capitol Hill" are oblique references to the City of Jerusalem and traditions of the Levites. The term "breaking the law" is a reference to Moses (Akhenaton) literally breaking the "Law of the Covenant." The red carpet that potentates and politicians habitually walk upon represents the bloodline of the ancient Luciferian dynasty whose origins are lost in the opaque mists of time.
Controlled and funded by the Cult of Aton, the Judites were content to eventually accept Aton (or Adonai) as their god. The thirteen levels of the pyramid and the thirteen stars above the eagle's head, together with every other emblem therein, represent the ancient cults. They particularly denote the Solar Cult of Aton that conceals itself behind Judaism, Christianity, and the secret societies such as the Knights of Columbus, Knights Templar, Freemasons, Jesuits, and Illuminati, etc. If we look closely, we will see 33 feathers in the wing of Aton’s eagle. This number represents the masonic order that has 33 main degrees of initiation in its hierarchical pyramidical structure. This occult family of Aton sits at the top of the power pyramid and has operated by way of its many lieutenants, the Levites, Pharisees, Greeks, Romans, Venetians, Hanovers of Holland, French and Italian Popes, British Royals (Plantagenet, Tudor, Stuart, and Windsor dynasties),and exploitatory conglomerates such as the East-Indian Company and Russell Trust (Virginia and Hudson Bay Companies), that were behind the "discovery" of America's original thirteen states (New Israel), and that own and control both political parties within America today.
Above his door in the Frankfurt ghetto Amschel Mayer Rothschild displayed the royal Eagle of Aton, with five arrows in its claws. This insignia is close to that found on the American one-dollar bill, for reasons that should, by now, be obvious. Scholars have done their best to explain this device but they admit that it is an ancient Judaic symbol. In fact, it is an Atonist symbol. Amschel probably began displaying it after he was under the employ of the Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, his royal benefactor.
The reader may have noticed how often we see the world leaders walking upon a red carpet. This is an old symbol dating back through the concocted story of the Old Testament twins Pharez and Zarah to the time of the Druids. The red carpet is a motif representing the blood-path or bloodline coming down from the past and running into the future. The guards at the Tower of London wear the red sash around their waists for the same reason and the British troops were known once as the "Red Coats." Today, we often speak of being caught in "red-tape," or of being "in the red," when we are "under the gun" of the state apparatus. Many corporate logos feature the red square motif and we can also find it on many flags. The center of Communist Russia was near "Red Square." The Rothschild dynasty got their name from "Red Shield." This is a reference not to a street in Frankfurt (as we are told) but to their symbolically blood-soaked "shields" as used in battle. This blood is, of course, more than merely figurative. It has come from their many brave enemies, from those who have dared to stand in their way and expose their clandestine rampage through history.
The farcical socialistic rhetoric of the Illuminati and their directed revolutionary iconoclasts was a ploy to engender necessary camaraderie between disaffected men who were no longer able to stomach religious or political affiliation. No less a theocracy, it was a replacement for Christianity and Judaism that were no longer attractive to the newly literate men and women of the lower and middle classes. Communism, Humanism, and Socialism had become a thinking man's new religions.
Not only was Weishaupt (who considered himself a "true Christian") cryptically referring to Akhenaton and his times, but his words help us to understand that he was an emissary of the Vatican. He speaks of the secret tradition or agenda of Jesus. And he knew well what this meant. He goes on to say in his writings that this secret doctrine was part of a tradition handed down by a line of masters who "hid themselves and their doctrine under the cover of Freemasonry." This doctrine of Christ could not be understood to the common man. It was known only by those men who were correctly initiated into its mysteries and who possessed the symbolic keys to decipher its secrets.
Adam Weishaupt may have repudiated nationalistic tendencies but, unlike so many later Communists, he never desisted from praising the Christian Christ. He could do this because he knew what others did not. He knew that the Jesus Christ he was lauding was not the same as that commonly worshipped. His Jesus was not only the savior of the sinner, but the King of the World.
The churchmen promise a paradise in the next world while the Socialists promise a utopia upon the Earth. Most men fall for one fiction or the other; neither of which ever has, or ever will, come to pass.
Another choice symbol that figuratively encapsulates this schemata and that is also used by these secret societies is the Maltese Cross. Curiously, this cross is, geometrically speaking, merely a flattened pyramid. This cross can be seen on the Imperial and St. Edward's crowns of the British royals.
This family [House of Rothschild] began their rise to prominence in the eighteenth century, in Frankfurt-on-Main. Their family's insignia - an eagle with arrows - appears on the American one dollar bill. The symbol can be traced back to the so-called Tribe of Manasseh or, more correctly, to the Atonist Solar Cults of Egypt. A great deal of modern history can be understood when we realize that powerful noble families such as Rothschild, Sassoon, Bauer, Oppenheimer, Warburg, Mocatta, Lazard, Montagu, Goldman Sachs, and Schiff, etc, with seats in the House of Lords, with daughters and sons married into royalty, and with the lion's share of worldly wealth, are merely lieutenants for imperialists who prefer to remain in the shadows of history. The ancient Caesars of Rome were never seen in public. The modern Caesars, who truly control the world, also avoid the limelight. Their ship of state is steered by lesser hands. Even their officially endorsed biographies (such as that by Fredrick Norton) speak of their scandalous antics and business machinations.
The intimate connections between the banking families and royals of the world is no secret. However, let there be no confusion over who governs who. The official theory, that the bankers and financiers come first in the hierarchy, is the incorrect theory. It is the media friendly theory perpetually put forward to befuddle and conceal the truth.
John Calvin, Swiss born founder of Calvinism, the form of Protestantism that appeared to rival Catholicism. His real name was Cohen, and he was a Jewish agent for the Black Venetians and for the Vatican
Queen Elizabeth I of England, of the Saxe-Coburg Gotha and Guelph dynasties ("Black Nobility") is the head of English Freemasonry. The Duke of Kent is Grand Master of English masonry and has honorary positions in several important lodges. An Atonist-Levite "Star of David" can be found emblazoned upon his throne that sits in the Grand Temple of Masonry in London. The Duke's younger brother, Prince Michael of Kent, is Grand Master of a branch of English masonry known as the "Order of Mark Masons" that, suggestively, has as its primary agenda the re-building of Solomon's Temple. During the coronation of British monarchs the following lines from Handel's Zadok the Priest are sung:"Zadok the priest and Nathan crowned King Solomon." The Duke of Kent played an important part in the coronation ceremony of Queen Elizabeth II.
It must not be forgotten for an instant when we consider the House of Rothschild, and their kind, that their financial power came to them from the European Atonist royalty they served. Although it is often overlooked, it is of great importance to remember that Mayer Amschel Rothschild was an agent of the descendants of ancient bloodlines. He worked for, and was promoted to his station, by Wilhelm IX Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel (originally Kurhessen), of the House of Orange. This dynasty has produced kings of Sweden and Finland.
The anomaly is explained when we understand the common Atonist (Egyptian) origins of Judaism and Freemasonry. The most illustrious rabbi in Frankfurt, Zvi Hirsch was, along with Rothschild agent Sigismund Geisenheimer, the chief founder of the lodge that had members from almost every powerful Jewish banking family in Frankfurt. Author Eustace Mullins reveals that the lodge, that was closely connected with the Paris Sanhedrin, was made up of members from the Rothschild, Adler, Speyer, Hanuer, and Goldschmidt families. A little more research reveals that Duke Carl von Hessen of the aristocratic "Black Nobility" family of Schleswig was the head of all German masonry at the time. Gentiles might want, then, to question why such a nobleman would be doing heading masonic lodges made up of powerful Jews. Again, the anomaly is explained once we know the Atonist connections between European royals and oriental occultists. Powerful Atonist Jews enjoyed close occult affiliation not only with members of European royalty but also with the Vatican. The Jewish families of repute undertook those deeds that the Vatican was loath to execute for the sake of its image and reputation. For service rendered the Jewish families were well rewarded. Their Jewishness is little more than a cunning and necessary camouflage.
The "State of Israel" was legally established by the Zionists on May 15th - the Mercuralia - the very day when the heads of the Illuminati meet for their annual rites and meetings. It is referred to as a "State" because it is an extension of the United States of America. It is, economically speaking, the 51st Federal State. Without billions of dollars from America's pro-Zionist governments, Israel's economy would collapse.
We have little doubt that it is the descendants of the Gaonim who funded and fostered the modern Zionist movement, via their super-rich magnate families (Montefiore, Rothschild, Oppenheimer, Bauer, etc), their obsessive lieutenants (Mordecai Manuel, Moses Hess, Nathan Burnbaum, Petah Tikva, Vladimir Jabotinsky, Lenni Brennar, Theodor Herzl, Chaim Weizmann,Henry Morgenthau, David Ben Gurion, and Albert Einstein, etc), American puppet president Harry S. Truman, and British Foreign Office stooge Arthur Balfour. These treacherous and obsessed lieutenants have brought ruin to millions of lives (Christian, Jewish, and Moslem) and have caused the displacement of millions of religious moral Jews who would have otherwise remained assimilated where they were.
After the massacres and devastation by Roman forces in Jerusalem, the Levites moved to the cities of Jamnia, Pumbedita, and Usha, in Babylon, and formed their talmudic academies that lasted for centuries.It was in these cities that the talmudists collated the esoteric knowledge acquired from Egypt. It is from these cities that they conceived their plans for world domination. After their establishment in Babylon, the dispersed lower-class Israelites and Judites of the world knew to look to the talmudic academies for guidance and education in Jewish history. Interestingly, the head potentates of these ancient academies were known as the Gaonim. These Gaonim were considered princes of sacred knowledge and, as such, they commanded the greatest reverence imaginable. It is, therefore, our opinion that these Levitical Gaonim, resident in Palestine and Babylon, were the descendants of the even more ancient Cult of Aton. Furthermore, it is our contention that the masonic letter or cipher "G" stands for these self-proclaimed Exilarchs, the "Princes of Light" - the Gaonim. In short, we do not think that it is far-fetched to suppose that the Compass and Square might refer to the builder's guilds and to the construction of the Temple of Sol-Aton, as well as to the socio-political New World Order. As Ralph Ellis has shown, the pyramids of Giza were considered personal property by the Hyksos during their domination of the Delta area.
Behind the masonic lodges hides the same "Brotherhood of the Snake," or Cult of Aton, that created Christianity (and its many denominations), that established the Vatican, and set its many popes, bishops, and priests in place. This same organization established the Illuminati, Rosicrucians, and Knights Templar that, in turn, control the world's myriad secret societies, fraternities, and charities. Let us not doubt why it is that Per me reges regnant ("through me kings reign") is a chief masonic motto. Let us not doubt what historical person masons have enthroned at the top of their Egyptian pyramid.
Naturally, there are those voices who refute the idea that the Orders of Freemasonry have any such allegiance. Nevertheless, those who have done their homework and spent time tracking the connections between Freemasonry, religion, and politics, are not wavered in their suspicion of dark intent. It is not the street level lodge members that are malign or of concern. It is the bloodline masons from prominent royal dynasties who are the subject of a critique of Freemasonry. As any organization is wont to do, the masons work to endear the curious by admitting membership of men whose creative or intellectual greatness is publicly held in high regard.
The number 13 is utilized by Freemasons the world over. It is used by occult fraternities because long ago the number was once sacred to the Druids. Since the destruction of the Druids the number has been appropriated by the Masons and Atonists and is used to empower them in their political and social rituals. The chief executive of the modern European Union operates from the thirteenth floor of their headquarters in Brussels, and the number can be found in dozens of permutations on the American one-dollar bill. The flag of the European Union contains thirteen stars, twelve obvious stars and one invisible star that can be geometrically configured from the circle of twelve. As investigator into masonry, Eustace Mullins, reminds us, the Rockefeller family chose number 1313 as a street address to establish their organization called the “Council of State Governments” that would oversee state legislatures. Two times 13 equals 26 - the number of god. In Hebrew, Egyptian, and English, the letters of the word god total 26. In the Hebrew language, the letters of the word Jehovah (IHVH - 10, 5, 6, 5) come to 26. And as we know, Jehovah is Aton. Furthermore, in the year 1813 the Duke of Sussex, the son of King George III became the Grand Master of Freemasonry in England and, thereafter, thirteen stars as well as a Star of David appeared on American currency.
The various masonic lodges are dependent upon the patronage of the descendants of the Atonists, the great royal dynasties of Europe (Hapsburg, Hanoverian, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Merovingian, Guise, Stuart, Savoy, Battenberg, Bowes-Lyon, and so on). Senior members of these Houses were, and still are, either the biological or the ideological descendants of Akhenaton's Cult of Aton and of the "Brotherhood of the Snake." Their symbolism betrays this if nothing else does. In the case of the name Merovingian, we might again note that the syllable mer meant "pyramid," and also "high ones." In regards to the name Capetian, we see the word is similar to cap, and also to captain which, again, connotes a chief or leader. The Capetians were known as the "big heads."
The Druids, we are told, were mostly involved with an oral tradition and an oral transmission of knowledge. But whose word must we take for this? That is the rather unnerving question. We can surmise that the Druids and Bards, like the Scalds and Brahmins, did indeed write things down. We can also surmise where these texts are languishing today.
Perhaps the secret is that the masons are the descendants, physically or ideologically, of the old temple builders, or perhaps even of the ancient priests of the sun who chose the pharaoh and dominated the ancient land of Egypt. Perhaps their references to the temple are suggestive of their origins. Perhaps the temple they are attempting to create is that which was once destroyed. Perhaps the light they revere is the light of "Aton the Great" - before whom both priests and pharaohs bowed.
If we remain attentive to the symbolism that masonry employs, we are on safe ground when drawing our conclusions as to the orientation and agendas of the secretive cabal. We ardently believe the symbolism to be an accurate revealer of masonry's purpose. The symbols, words, terms, and rituals employed by the world's masonic orders clearly originate from two ancient sources - Egypt and Ireland. It is a futile endeavor for anyone to dispute this fact. The philosophy of masonry is patently solar and, although it may not be strictly "monotheistic," there can be little doubt that masons are, metaphysically speaking, primarily concerned with the veneration of light.
Christianity is child of Atonism. It's about light, but what is light? And does light have a dark side? The "Dark Side of Light" simply refers to the destruction that results from the deliberate misuse of light and knowledge.
It is not clear whether the Freemasonic echelon were aware of the exact identity of the cult we now expose. It is likely that many masons (particularly those obsessed with Egyptology) might have approved of the take-over of their order. In any case, by the time the Illuminati were exposed it was too late for Freemasonry. The French Grand Orient Lodge was one of the very first to fall under Illuminist control. The senior masons from the Houses of Lorraine and Guise may have had something to do with it.
One of the main reasons why it was decided necessary to infiltrate and take over the Freemasonic Order has to do with the manner in which Freemasonry was, and is, organized. Freemasons employ the cell-structure and organize their lodges and initiation rites hierarchically. This arrangement is complex but extremely beneficial if secrecy and deception are one's obsession. So, rather than found a new order, and hope that members of stature would join up (that was the way of the Illuminati in the beginning), it was decided best to not re-invent the wheel, so to speak, and to make use of the Grand Orient Freemasonic Lodges already established and functioning.
The Freemasonic Order of the Illuminati was founded on May 1st because of this day's significance in Solar Cult ritual. As Albert Pike himself wrote in his Morals and Dogma, the pagan festival of May Day was a "festival in honor of the sun." It is this Egyptian Atonism that controls Freemasonry. This, we believe, is the secret tradition that is revealed to the higher degree members of the masonic secret societies.
Yahweh (Aton) is veneratedby the Freemasons and Knights Templar under the pseudonym Jabulon that is a composite word made from three gods - Yahweh (Mars), Baal (Saturn), and On (Sun).
Yahweh/Jehovah was a rescripting of Aton, Akhenaton's god of light. Aton was not originally worshiped by the people of Egypt. Like Ra, he was largely a private god worshiped for centuries by the Hyksos pharaohs and sun priests of Heliopolis, Avaris, and Amarna. He rose to power during Akhenaton's reign because he was under the influence of the Israelite Queen Tire. She was most probably an agent of the descendants of the Hyksos kings expelled from Egypt at the beginning of the eighteenth dynasty by Ahmose I. These despotic lords subsequently took refuge in Tanis and other cities in and around Egypt. We believe that Akhenaton was, like Tiye, under their control.
Jewish priests blew a ram's horn at the eastern door of their temples. The ram is the symbol of Aries, a sign revered by Atonists, the real Jews or Judites.
The reason why light is venerated by those "in the know," has to do with the fact that light conceals more than it reveals. This is a fact not commonly contemplated. "God is light" and "in the beginning was the light" are the mantras we constantly hear and read from Judeo-Christian sources. We need to realize what is implied by these high-sounding phrases and by the habitual conjunction of divinity with the phenomenon known as "light." What is light? And what is darkness? What is the true difference between them? Why is the sun important to the Solar Cult? Why were the stars and moon more important to the members of the Stellar and Lunar Cults? Does not the sun, upon its daily rise, draw a veil of light across the theatre of the stars? Moreover, should someone shine a bright light in your eyes, are they not then hidden from your view? And are you not briefly blinded and incapable of seeing clearly? Additionally, when light is cast upon an object, is not a shadow instantly thrown? Yes, there are many things we need to comprehend about the nature and dynamics of light. It is always before our eyes and we believe we see all there is to see because of it. We do not think of light as a weapon and we have left ourselves open to serious violation from those elites who expertly and surreptitiously wield their "industrial" magic of light and who have fashioned this present super-lit fluorescent world.
The birthday of Jesus was deliberately changed to December, because Churchmen desperately wanted to conceal the Egyptian (or Osirian) origins of their main religious traditions.
This is why the Egyptian sphinx has the front of a woman and the body of a lion. The sphinx was a symbol for the opening and closing of the Egyptian stellar year.
The true sun kings of old, the "Christs," were given solar symbolism due to the fact that they were brought into life and celebrated during the rise of the star Sirius, an event that occurred during the summer month of July, or during the signs of Leo and Virgo. Virgo was the Virgin who, astrologically speaking, gave birth to the sun-child. This sun-child was known as Lucifer, the son of the morning or dawning, the bright young star (youngster). Later these dates, together with the symbolism, were inverted and the sun-child was said to have been born in the middle of winter. The role of John was downplayed and the role of Christ made more conspicuous. Secret societies, like the Knights Templar and their appropriately named associates the Knights of St. John, continued to honor the truth. They continued to venerate the severed and bearded head - the head of John the Baptist. The "Christs," or sun kings are, to this day, associated with the sun and the lion due to ancient astrological reckoning. The "Lion of Judah" was the term used by the leaders of the sun churches and is still used as an epithet. The opening of the Egyptian new year corresponded with the rise of the sacred star Sirius and with the rising of the waters of the Nile. This rising was most auspicious and it occurred during the week of July 25, in the sign of Leo. The river's waters brought life to the parched land. The crops and vines began to grow and thrive throughout the sign of Virgo. So it was said that the sun of god, the light of the world (Lucifer), was born of a Virgin.
The present date for the birth of Jesus Christ - December 25 (Christmas) - was actually that for John the Baptist, the radical preacher and rival of the Jerusalem Church. This is why January bears the name it does. Jan is Jon or John - literally the time of John. And January corresponds to the astrological sign of Aquarius, the "Water-Bearer" (the sign of Baptism).
The term or title Lucifer originally referred to the solar Christ who was, from an Egyptian perspective, born when the sun entered into the sign of Virgo. This action began the Egyptian New Year. The Egyptian New Year opened in the summer not winter.
Now, a Christian is, in fact, a Luciferian. This fact is not altered one jot by the resistance and rebuttal of Christians. Christians, Muslims, and Jews, are worshippers of light, although most have never spent a minute of their lives thinking about light and exactly what its properties are.They do not need to think. They are believers and they have faith. And where there is faith there is often little reason or sanity. In the place of reason we will find, for the most part, superstition, prejudice, contempt, fear, hatred and the whole loathsome cocktail that drugs and stupefies,prepared for us by the smiling barristas of Aton.
Lucifer is, however, not the same thing as Satan. The word Satan simply meant "one who tempts" and it merely referred to any contradicting, skeptical, or accusatory agent and their argument. Within holy orders, like the Essenes and Gnostics, a "Satan" was any detractor or opposition party. There was nothing supernatural about a Satan. There is little doubt that the term and concept has its origins in the Egyptian god Set, the opposer of Horus his twin. To oppose any hegemony is, therefore, to be "Satanic." So we see that there is a big difference between Satan and Lucifer. Lucifer was originally based upon the pagan god Mars and, eventually, Satan also became identified with the red fiery planet and its astrological energy. In the bible we have Jesus turning to Peter saying "get thee behind me Satan." If we accept Jesus to be the sun then we can take this statement to be of Astro-Theological significance. Mars occasionally rises heliacally, that is, with or even before the sun. The priests of the sun would exclaim from their temples "get thee down" or "get thee below" or "get thee behind Satan," in order not to have their deity be ousted, rivaled, and outshone.
If someone shines a very bright light in front of our eyes there are two main reactions that occur. First we are blinded. Secondly, the person shining the light is concealed by that light. They have used light as a weapon and as a shield. Take this analogy up a notch to the metaphysical level and we gain insight into the manner in which the Illuminati, the Princes of Light, operate to attain the power that does not belong to them by right. Such is the intrigue of the Luciferians.
This dualism begins with the symbol of the sun, and with the phenomena of light. The sun gives warmth and the sun illuminates. But the sun can also scorch and blind. The sun is attractive but it can not be gazed upon directly. The sun is magnificent and powerful yet its heat and light are finite. A match or a candle, a torch or a flame, burns brightly and attractively but burns to burn out. Yes, there are many properties of light that we might not be too aware of. To the ancients the sun had at least three faces or aspects. There was the sun in the morning, the sun at midday,and the sun at evening. Then there was the southern sun, and the black sun of the galactic center. Even science knows of the billions of suns contained in the universe.
Beauty has a dark side. Sexuality has one. Mercy has a dark side and so does love. Anger has a good side and hate also. This is the way that the ancients saw life. For gods of light there were the gods of darkness. For gods of the overworld there were the gods of the underworld. However, it would be more correct to say that the gods of light had a dark side. It was only later, after the ruination of the original stellar gnosis, that mythmongers and priests began to push the notion that the two aspects of a single archetype were distinct entities, separate, divided, adversarial, and irreconcilable. Nothing of this kind was taught in the mystery schools of old. It is a concoction of the perverse and it has caused untold folly to occur. Aton, like Jehovah, has his two sides; the benign and the wrathful.
If one were to say Aton was Lucifer, they would be quite right. If one were to say that Jehovah was Lucifer, they would also be correct.
Akhenaton not only brought political havoc to his country, he brought theological havoc to the world of religious ideas as well. He and his coterie, the "Brotherhood of the Snake," did not worship light in the manner of the Druids. Their understanding of the sun and of light was not akin to that that we possess today. Judeo-Christianity is the child of Atonism and is also controlled by those elites involved in the worship of what might be referred to as "the dark side of the sun." Another word for this kind of worship is Luciferianism. Lucifer is a god of light, or rather, of the dark side of light.
As we have shown, Jehovah is Adon and Adon is Aton. He is the Phoenician and Persian Yawnah, the Welsh Jawnah, the German Donar, and the English Jon (meaning "sun"). Aton is Adni or Agni, the sun lord of the Hindus. He is Don of the ancient Irish and Adonis of the Phoenicians. The Druids, who taught in the schools of these cities, brought the world the original unadulterated solar theocracy later corrupted into Atonism and Judeo-Christianity.
The origin of Luciferianism is Atonism.
Cecil Rhodes was a British born magnate, politician, and megalomaniac, who made his fortune from diamond mining operations in South Africa. He was the founder of the De Beers Company which still controls sixty percent of the rough diamond markets, and once controlled ninety percent of that trade. Ostensibly one of his age's most powerful men, the country of Rhodesia (present day Zimbabwe) was named after him. He formed the secret Round Table Group in order to recruit intelligent men and women to the cause of British imperialism. Those who receive a Rhodes Scholarship are summarily sent to Oxford University in England for their education and indoctrination. Under the cunning guidse of extending the domination of the "Anglo-Saxon" race, he successfully furthered the interests of his royal masters of England and the various Atonist dynasties of Europe. Although he was actively involved in the Boer War, he was despised by the military commanders and troops who saw him as an opinionated, domineering, megalomaniacal busy body. The machinations of this demagogue and his cronies have been thoroughly exposed in the works of G. Edward Griffin, Dr. John Coleman, Anthony Sutton, Lyndon Larouche, and Dr. Caroll Quigley.
Lord Alfred Milner (1854-1925) was a major architect of the "One World Order." He recruited his proteges through his so-called "Milner Kindergarten." A close colleague of Cecil Rhodes, his objective was all out British imperialism. He was the chief author of the Balfour Declaration and was appointed as Secretary of State for War during the years of World War I. He actively supported Lord Kitchener and the Boer War for domination over the mineral wealth of South Africa. He was also the chairman for the Rio Tinto Zinc efforts by King Edward VII.
The establishment of the imperialistic New World Order stands explained once we realize that the architects of control actually believe in these Covenants [Genesis 48, etc]. They know that they do not involve god as a Christian would understand the term. They know their pact is with Aton, the lord of light.
One of the most powerful secret societies that orchestrates world events goes by the name "Order of the Skull and Bones." It is also known as the "Brotherhood of Death." The symbol of this order is a death's head skull with two crossed arm bones beneath which is the number 322. This number connotes the Spring Equinox and the sign of Aries. Astrologically, Aries is a "Cardinal Fire." It is sacred to Atonists who divided from their rivals because of the precessional changeover from the astrological "Age of Taurus" to the "Age of Aries," that began taking place approximately 1400 years BC, during the reign of Akhenaton. Before it was employed by the Skull and Bones, the emblem was used by the Knights Templar. Today it can be seen in the architecture of monasteries, Templar churches, Vatican City buildings, and it was used by the pirates commissioned by the Atonist Tudor dynasty of England. It was also used as a symbol by the Nazis during their British-backed destruction of Germany. There have been many speculations as to where this strange and sinister motif actually originated. It is our belief that it may have its origins in Genesis Chapter 48 and in the blessing of Ephraim and Manasseh.
As explained earlier, this Joseph was himself descended from Jacob. Jacob, the brother of Esau, was later re-named Israel. He was the son of Isaac. And Isaac was the son of Sarai, not by way of Abraham (as official legend has it), but by way of Tuthmosis III, the warrior pharaoh of Egypt's eighteenth dynasty. So, the sense of importance that modern politicians get from aligning themselves with the events, characters, and rhetoric of the Old Testament derives from this fact and should be understood in this context. These facts have long been guarded by the royals and masons of the world. The basic truth understood by initiates is that Tuthmosis III was the true father of the so-called "Twelve Tribes of Israel," and not Abraham. The birthright that Esau rejected and that passed onto his brother Jacob was their royal Egyptian legacy.
The preposterous nonsense of new Israelite Kingdoms in the West, as spouted and screamed from the pulpits by rabid mouthed Atonists and British-Israelites, arose because of a deliberately erroneous interpretation concerning Genesis Chapter 48. This chapter concerns the blessing of Jacob upon his grandson's Ephraim and Manasseh. These two boys were the sons of Jacob's favorite son Joseph and were, suggestively, born in Egypt while Joseph was "Governor" (or Atonist Commander) there. The boys are blessed and Joseph is informed that they will go on to found the great "Israelite" nations of the future.
The word British means "Man of the Covenant." This connotes the Atonists and their agenda. The flag of Britain is known as the "Union Jack," and this name connotes Jacob the Hyksos pharaoh of old. It is the flag of Set, the "Red King" of the Hyksos and Atonists.
According to those scholars and thinkers who have been tracking the alleged progress of the assimilated tribes, Britain and America are the "New Israel."
The unfortunate over-worked, apathetic, and brain-washed masses have neither the time nor inclination to discover for themselves whether there is a shred of truth in all the myriad high-sounding fables of the bible. As the great Astro-Theologist of the nineteenth century, Rev. Robert Taylor, perceptively wrote: Men have been trained to prefer ignorance to learning, and have chosen to be driven mad and wild by faith, rather than to be instructed, enlightened and improved by reason and philosophy.
The Cult of Aton is behind the so-called "New Age Movement" that rose to power in the 1960s and '70s. It is the force behind Fabianism, Zionism, and Spiritualism, and its agents also operate and fund many secret societies, fraternal orders, charities, and think-tanks throughout the world. Its agents operate in every corner of the world and infest political and secular communities. Its lieutenants can be identified as the Jesuit Order, the Illuminati, the Freemasons, Knights Templar, Knights of Malta, and the myriad other secret and semi-secret organizations that exist.
So, given that our timing is appropriate, it can now be stated openly that the engine of deception known as the "Vatican" is under the auspices of the Cult of Aton. This most perverse of cults is also responsible for the rise of Protestantism that is, in truth, merely a branch of the tree of Vatican Catholicism. Both religions have roots in Egypt of the eighteenth dynasty and the time of Akhenaton.
Paul's Jesus was a sanitized version of the Messiah of the hardline Zadokite Order that dates back to the Atonists of Egypt and to the time of Akhenaton.
Once we accept that Jehovah and Aton are one and the same, and that Akhenaton's priestly descendants - the Judites/Levite/Atonists - contrived the content of the Old Testament, we understand the meaning of the Abrahamic and Davidic "Covenants" mentioned therein.
The aggressive and wrathful aspect of this Jehovah has also been established through readings of the scriptures. We do not need to restate the innumerable passages from Exodus, Deuteronomy, and the other early books of the bible, to emphasize the sadistic temperament of this god of volcanoes. We can only ask the reader to ponder whether there is a connection between these characteristics and the martial character of Akhenaton who was rarely if ever depicted without his blue war crown and whose court was almost entirely, and for the first time in Egyptian history, full of military personnel.
The state within a state, known as the "Vatican," appears to casual observers to be officiated over by an elected "pope." The truth is that he, like so many other potentates and politicians living and deceased, is but a public-relations officers for the solar church of ancient times, coming not only from Babylon but from Egypt. The "white" pope who addresses the mass of Roman Catholics from his balcony at St. Peter's Square is a puppet of the "black" pope - the Jesuit "General" - who is himself a puppet of the Keepers of the Royal Secret who officiate for the bloodline descendants of the original solar church, that hideous hydra conceived and birthed in Egypt, educated abroad, and finally deployed to all parts and principalities.
Many Catholics are not aware of the close ties between the Vatican and the Jewish money power of the world. The Vatican has, for instance, had the closest business connections with the Rothschild dynasty, as well as with other Jewish families and financial institutions. Relations with the Rothschilds can be traced back to the 1800s.
General Mirkovich discovered documents that proved to him that the Vatican had been funding all three factions [Yugoslavia, Italy, Germany] involved in the war [World War II].
Disturbingly, we are reminded by Avro Manhattan, Jon Phelps, Bill Hughes, and other scholars who have researched the role of the Vatican in the world wars, that the far-seeing organization, supposed to be operating in the name of Christ and St. Peter, had made significant investments in the machinery of war before war in Europe became a terrible reality. The Vatican had money invested with both the Fascists and the Allies prior to the onset of hostilities. Its pose of neutrality was the perfect ruse enabling it to operate unmolested throughout the world, but it was far from being an accurate stance.
Dealing with the Fascists (Mussolini, Franco of Spain, Hitler of Germany) brought exploding profits for the Vatican. Yes, war was an earner. Even though Europe was decimated and although borders were closed and travel severely restricted, the agents of the Vatican could move freely throughout Europe to carry on their financial dealings. Monies were moved around, taken in and out of countries, while all sorts of deals continued to be made. Nothing abated or impeded the economic enterprise of the Church. The Vatican was also able to make good use of its international intelligence network and knew what direction to move after it appeared their great protector and benefactor, Hitler, was in trouble. Toward the end of the Second World War the Vatican secretly began moving its assets to Canada and America. This deed would protect their holdings from the Communists should they, after the fall of Fascism, rise to power in Italy. Through its support of the Fascists, the Vatican inherited untold wealth. From its foreign investments it gained even more. Its banks were already doing business with the most powerful oil companies and American and European corporations, and it had massive investment in armament factories and in the outcome of the wars perpetrated by its Fascist partners. Should these partners be defeated there was nothing to worry about, since the agents of the Vatican, due to their unrestricted passage in and out of countries, had transferred finances into American and Canadian banks. Whatever the outcome, the Vatican planned to survive.
After their campaign of infiltration ceased, the Vatican-Soviet conspiracy ended and the Vatican immediately began backing Italy's new president, the Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, forming a Fascist-Catholic agreement, ratified by the so-called "Lateran Treaty" of 1929. It was a most profitable deal since Mussolini restored to the Church its Papal States (Vatican City) that it had lost to Italian nationalists in September of 1870. In one stroke the dictator re-established the sovereign power of the Vatican. His action allowed the Vatican to grow more powerful than it had ever been, to regain lost wealth and status and to move toward corporate domination of the world that had the audacity to defy its authority, via revolution and war (American, French, and Spanish-American), by Romanticism and Naturalism, and by Communism and Atheism.
As Avro Manhattan reminds us, it is not by accident that the phenomenon of Fascism just happened to arise in the capital city of Italy, right next door to St. Peter's Square.
In more recent times the Roman Church has consolidated power and recovered lost assets by way of its advantageous, if scandalous, political pacts, its aggressive global investments and secret alliances with American and European corporations. From its birth during the reign of Constantine and Theodosius, it took centuries for the Vatican to amass its vast fortunes. Since the Second World War, however, that same wealth has been dwarfed into insignificance by those from global corporate investments and involvement in the economy of the United States of America.
The existence and proliferation of these apparently anti-Catholic orders, funded by the Vatican, actually reinforced the control and hegemony of the Roman Church. Moreover, the popes and bishops could cleverly condemn these orders, of their own making, as the spawn of Satan and could play upon that fear ad infinitum, thus galvanizing their own waning authority throughout the world. Arguably, the presence of ostensibly rational and progressive secret societies has done more to ensure the survival of the Church than anything else, particularly during the ages when its existence was most threatened.
This endeavor to spawn apparently anti-Catholic secret societies was probably spurred on when Rome's agents noticed, and began to be concerned about, bone fide sects and societies that sought to undermine the awesome and ever-encroaching dominance of the popes. The most important and successful of these apparently anti-Catholic societies was known as the "Order of the Illuminati." Far from being anti-Catholic, as most of its members believed, it was founded by Catholic Jesuit Adam Weishaupt and its members and branches operated throughout the world to serve Rome's long term agenda. Its existence prevented real rebellion against the Church and guaranteed its longevity. Like other similar organizations (Jacobins, Alumbrados of Spain,Theosophists, Cistercians, Freemasons, etc) it attracted many disgruntled princes and dukes and prospered from their donations and patronage. The founders and leaders of these orders did a lot of homework and they learned a great deal about anti-Catholic sentiments. They succeeded infilling their lodges with those very souls who desired to end the power threatening their families, lands, beliefs, and freedom. It was easy for the masters of the lodges to lead neophytes through initiations and rites that ostensibly rebuked royalty, imperialism, and dogmatic religion. The masters knew what the neophytes did not. They knew that these institutions were not half as important as the will of Aton which permitted their existence. Kings and priests could be rebuked and humbled, Aton could not.
Masonry was taken into France during the 18th century by the English elite. The first French lodge was launched at Dunkirk by Lord Derwentwater.
Papal Rome's dominance extended to kingdoms and countries such as Burgundy, Champagne, Lombardy, Italy, Germany, etc, but it caused many princes to openly rebel. Fredrick Barbarossa of Germany was one of the first to challenge the rights of the Church to his country. This resistance worried the popes who already had their entire wealth threatened and confiscated during the invasions of Arabs and early Italians. Since then they learned to devise ways to protect their vast assets and to deal with dissent from wealthy and powerful nobles. Their main strategy involved the creation of secret organizations that on the surface appeared, to their many members, to be anti-Catholic, or more correctly, Anti-Vatican. The strategy was so successful that several Catholic dignitaries and governments (particularly in France), oblivious to their true purpose, went ahead to decree prohibitions against the spread of Masonic lodges.
Around the year 1075, Pope Gregory VII began instigating what came to be called the "Gregorian Reforms." By way of his reforms Gregory sought to permanently secure the sovereign power of the Church. He strictly enforced celibacy among bishops and priests, prohibited marriage for all ordained churchmen, and saw to it that the pope would hitherto be completely above the law, as was the church itself. Gregory wished to create his own new world order in that the pope was supreme ruler over all men, and over all kings. Like other popes of his kind, Gregory ensured control over the human mind by insinuating that the sexual instincts of men were not of god but the devil. The bishops knew the inwardly divided man is submissive and controllable. At the beginning of Christianity there was no such taboo against sexuality but by the time of Augustine of Hippo the body was seen as an encumbrance keeping man from pure meditations and direct contact with god. The body and its needs dragged man to worldly life and sin.
During this period [Dark Ages] the Roman Church siphoned off the wealth of Europe. Books were prohibited and learning was forbidden to everyone except the clergy. Bibles were chained to altars so that the priests alone could refer to them. Even church men found themselves persecuted for challenging the status quo. The third century church father, philosopher, and prolific author, Origen, was excommunicated for merely theorizing that a man, as well as the Church, had a role in his own salvation. The Church knew that its own dominance was threatened by thinking men. Therefore, it not only incinerated the works of earlier nations such as the Irish but made sure that the world would be deliberately kept in ignorance. The Church of Rome would decide who was privileged enough to gain an education. Anyone found flaunting their edicts and prohibitions, anyone owning or reading the bible without permission, was a heretic to be made an example of.
The conspiracy that compelled men to eschew reason and loathe existence was conspicuously evident during the so-called "Dark Ages" that lasted for approximately five hundred years (between 470 and 1000 AD). The abysmal conditions that human beings endured during this period were artificially created. They were the result of experiments in social engineering and the brainchild of the sorcerers of Rome.
Peter, the patron saint of the city is a fictive character based on the Egyptian Ptah, chief god of the ancient city of Memphis. The name Peter comes from petra meaning "stone" or "rock." Saint Peter was allegedly given the keys of salvation by Jesus.
Kings bowed to the power of Rome not merely from awe but fear. They knew what their fate would eventually be should they have decided to contradict or obstruct the way of the Church. They knew they were open to excommunication for not persecuting the "heretics" (Pelagians, Donatists, Cathars, Manicheans, Fraticelli, etc) reported to them. That man's fear of the pope and of Rome's might was synonymous with fear of god was just one more cunning and brilliant stroke in the artifice of this house of lies and corruption whose power extends to the minds of men as well as to their laws.
The utter ignorance and credulity of the people during these ages was the key factor in the rise of the monster of corruption that still preys over the world to this day. This monstrosity used the Donation [of Constantine] and other forgeries to cement its vast holdings and power, to reward favorites and benefactors, and to crush rivals. We may sorely lament when we read about the dark ages of war, death, decay, and superstition. We may also acknowledge that such times did not come into existence of their own accord. They were not natural phenomena. They were bought, paid for, and delivered upon humanity. Witches did not immolate themselves and great oracles did not demolish themselves. Civilizations and nations did not terminate of their own accord, and men of wisdom did not incarcerate themselves in dungeons or hang, draw, and quarter themselves in city squares. No! These heinous atrocities, perpetrated by sadists such as Bernard of Clairvaux and Friar Tomas de Torquemada, assisted the Church of Rome to remove those men and women who dared to stand up against their oppressive dominance throughout their land. The campaign to ruthlessly condemn so-called "heretics" (especially wealthy ones) and the establishment of the famous "Inquisition" occurred for this exact purpose.
In the year 319 AD, Constantine decided that the clergy was to be free from all taxes and soon after, in 355 AD, they were also placed above the law and could not be brought to a state court to face any kind of trial.
The "Donation of Constantine" emphatically insisted that the Church of Rome had global reign and complete control in both secular and ecclesiastical life. There was to be no distinction between the two areas. Within the nine proclamations of political and sacerdotal authority there were two that gave to the Church legal sovereignty. From the document's acceptance, the clergy, bishops, cardinals, and popes were to be regarded legally as above state law. Their judge was god not man.
Significantly, it was not Jews who were flocking into Rome to gawk. They were not the ones sustaining this insidious exploitation. It was Anglo-Saxons from Western Europe, recently converted from paganism, who were primarily involved. Some Anglo-Saxon kings abdicated their thrones in order to live the remainder of their lives at the tomb of St. Peter, their supposed ticket to salvation.
The pope, like the priests of the antique solar colleges is, like Akhenaton, a mediator for the sun god. One of the main titles of a pope is, suggestively, Servus Servorum Dei - “Servant of the Servants of God.”
Emperor Valentinian III was just one of the many dignitaries who ensured the success of Rome through his generous contributions of land and money. And when such men as he were offered remission for their earthly sins for a price (known as the “Sale of Indulgences”) the contributions came in thick and fast from all over the world. This kind of circus side-show brought in untold prosperity from the guilt-ridden of every corner of the globe. It was soon supplemented by an even more shameless trade in “holy” relics.
Upon a few archaeologically suspect bones found beneath the Basilica the mighty Church of Rome was established.
Early Christian pilgrims would go to Rome and gather at the place where Saint Peter was said to have been martyred and interred. Of course, there is not a shred of proof to support the proposition that a man called Peter either visited Rome to spread Christ's message or that he was subsequently crucified there by his enemies. That story was pure concoction and it remains unsubstantiated to this day. It was, however, the barrage of visitors to St. Peter's alleged final resting place that profited the churches and Christian colleges that soon became established in the area.
The god venerated by the world's many Catholics is not the volcano god Jehovah but Aton, or Adon, the sun god of the broken kings of old cast out of the country they brought to the brink of ruin. The Vatican and the Church it has established are founded upon the same solar theocracy as was common on the banks of the Nile and as that conveyed in secret by the priesthoods of the sun at Heliopolis, Giza, Amarna, Avaris, Tanis, and Alexandria.
The piazza is shaped like the thistle, a sacred Druidic symbol, still used by the Scots today. The word Vatican has interesting meanings. The syllable can connotes the serpent in many languages, and therefore Vatican can mean "place of the serpents" or "place of serpent worship." The word can, or cain, also means "regent" or "noble." The word vat comes from the Irish vate, ovate, meaning "prophet" or "judge." In this instance, the word Vatican would mean "place of the head men," "prophets," or "nobles." Since the Ovates were renowned as powerful magicians, Vatican can mean "place of the magi." Rome was aligned with Newgrange and Tara in Ireland and erected upon 7 hills. The site of Tara was protected by 7 circular barriers. Vatican City is the prototype for "Capitol Hill" in America. The word capitol is made from capit meaning "head" and taegl meaning "tail." It refers to the head and tail of the dragon or serpent. The symbols of the hill and the encircling serpent is a distinctly Druidic motif. The Irish Ovates were found as far off as India where they were known as the Adhvaryu. The word vates is also the root of the modernword faith. Historians referred to the Ovates as those who rejoiced in the freewill of all humans.
The Roman Catholic Church is the main offshoot and continuation of the ancient Egyptian Solar Cult of Aton. Its popes are not styled upon Jesus (which is patently obvious) but on Akhenaton -Egypt's great potentate and grand minister for the god of light.
To discover the present whereabouts of the Cult of Aton we need look no further than the Vatican in Rome. It is from popes ("white" and "black") and from their hired lieutenants that the insidious lies of history come, the most ludicrous of which insisted creation's history to be a mere 5,000 years old. If we find concocted history, faked biography, spurious gospel accounts, rivaling factions (all professing uniqueness), massacred civilizations, looted lands, immolated martyrs, condemned free-thinkers, tortured rebels, and indoctrinated masses unaware of the sick theological lies they and their forefathers have been ingesting, we should know from what vile source it all emanates. We must endeavor to expose this corruption while inquiring into its strange origins. We must also waste no time arming ourselves with knowledge to fend off the insidious effects of this inhuman leviathan that grows ever more powerful from our ignorance and compliance.
But, as we have already pointed out, he [Ralph Ellis] stresses that the Israelites who fled an upset and weakened Egypt were not the ragged enslaved bunch mentioned in the Old Testament. On the contrary, they were a powerful and wealthy coterie who looted and pillaged Egypt, destroying temples and shrines and burning down pyramids as they departed.
His discoveries [Professor Thomas L. Thompson], and those of his fellow archaeologists, resurrect the theories of Comyns Beaumont who, among others, was condemned outright for his claims that the events in the bible's Old Testament did not occur at the locations specified.
The "Israel" and "Judah" spoken of in the bible's Old Testament are fictions pure and simple. They did not exist in the way we have been conditioned to believe. This fact is known to most of the historians, biblical scholars, archaeologists, linguists, geographers, and other experts in related fields. This fact is not, however, known to the general rank and file, and many of the latest whistle-blowing experts, such as Thomas L. Thompson, have suffered suppression and academic exile.
It does not take much to see that Egypt existed. Its monuments, temples, tombs, mastabas, and vast pyramids irrefutably testify to this fact. The Pantheon, Coliseum, and Capitoline Hill, testify to the existence of Rome. The ancient ring forts, cairns, raths, tumuli, and stone circles, stand as proof for Irish civilizations. In India, Mohanjo Daro, Harappa, Jantar, and Benares clearly reveal the existence of various advanced civilizations. All over Scandinavia one can see restored Viking ships and amazing astronomically aligned structures constructed by Nordic races. In Germany intricate burial mounds and barrows clearly indicate the presence of the Teutons. Where then, we ask, are the monuments, temples, state buildings, dams, farms, wells, and houses indicating the existence of biblical Israel and Judah? They are nowhere to be found. Yes, strange as it may seem, and difficult as it is to mentally take on board, it remains an incontestable fact that no evidence whatsoever exists to support the legitimacy of a topographically placed Israelite nation during the ages conjectured by "experts." From the disciplines of archaeology, ethnology, history,and geography, there comes precious little evidence supporting the existence of an Israel or a Judah. There is no hard evidence for a United Israelite Monarchy; no evidence for a physical location in ancient times called Jerusalem, nor for a Temple of Jerusalem. There is no evidence of wars for Palestinian conquest and little hard evidence for kings Saul, David, and Solomon, as the bible describes them. Yes, we have the bible's vexatious and spurious stories of their existence, but tragically difficult as it is for most people to comprehend, stories are not proof.
Furthermore, in fourteenth century Spain, were not Jews forced to convert to Christianity? The converted were referred to as "Marrano." This word meant "accursed" or "damned." How would such a edict exist if it were known that being a Jew is a racial or ethnic distinction? It was enforced by Christian tyrants to re-covert converts who had preferred Judaism as a religion over Christianity, a choice that was unacceptable to the monarchs of medieval Spain. Our point is that it was a choice to be either Jewish or Christian. Judaism is in the brain not the blood. The modern Jew simply adopts his religion as a man of any race might do, and as many men do. An English Protestant who converts to Shintoism after a trip to the Far East need not be Japanese to begin with. Furthermore, he remains an Englishman even if he convinces himself he is Japanese.
In short, the bizarre fact is that in almost every case no "Jew" living today can trace their family's ancestry back to the time of the Israelites or Judites, let alone back to ancient Egypt. It is from the stupor of grievous self-delusion that any Jewish person (or Gentile) proposes otherwise. There are no direct blood-ties to these ancient peoples, and the world's Jews are Jews by simple religious conversion and not by race. We know this to be true since it was legally acknowledged shortly after the foundation of the State of Israel, the "homeland" for all Jews of every persuasion.
There is hardly a Jewish person who can trace his heritage further back than the 16th and 17th centuries and even that is some doing. Over eighty percent of Jews are known as "Ashkenaz" Jews. These Jews were resident primarily in Poland and Russia and are racially descended from the inhabitants of the Black and Caspian Sea regions. They were originally the Khazarian people who converted en masse to Judaism in the 7th century. These Turko-Mongolic people have no racial or ethnic connection to the ancient lands of Egypt of Palestine.
Modern Jews are, like modern Christians, converted to their religions. Individuals who have converted may be able to trace their personal lineage quite far back in time (perhaps to the 17th or 13th centuries), but this kind of biological and racial descent has little bearing on the claims made by Jews and Christians concerning their relationship with the spurious characters of the Old Testament. Jews and Christians have no racial or biological connection to ancient tribes of the so-called "holy land."
The nonsense of the bible only seems complicated because modern Christians attempt to distinguish themselves from Jews by saying that they are descended from all twelve tribes whereas the Jews are only descended from one tribe, that of Judah (the fourth son of Jacob). Once we realize that neither Christians nor Jews can prove any such descent, the puzzles are solved.
The words Jew, Judean, and Judite are etymologically related to words and names such as Judge, Jude, Tudor, Tutor, and George. One of the greatest Sumerian kings was Lord Gudea. He was known as the judge or wise man of his people. Originally, a Jew or Judite was an initiate or adept, an astrologer and master of esoteric science. If we change the letter "J" to "D," instead of Jew we get Dew or, more correctly Deus, meaning "god" or "of god."
The word [Judah] originally meant the same thing as the word Judge does today. It did not refer to a particular race but to an elect of educators or adepts initiated into the mysteries and dignifiedin science and magic. The words Jew, Judite, and Judge are to be rightly regarded as the titles of those proficient in astronomy, astrology, and esoteric science. Change the "J" to the phonetically similar "D" and we get Dews, or Deus, meaning "god," or "of god."
The term Juda means the "shining" or "illustrious ones." It refers to the members of the Gaonim, or the Cult of Aton, and not to some black-robe-wearing priestarchy. It refers to the eighteenth dynasty Sun Cult pharaohs of Egypt whose descendants hide under the names "Israelite" and"Judite." So when we hear that “David” and “Solomon” (whom we now know as Tuthmosis III and Amenhotep III) were of the "House of Judah" we understand that it was a reference not to the Semites, or the Levites and their ethnicity and theology, but to Egypt's Solar Cult and their theology.
The following appellations are Druidic in origin, but have long been appropriated and falsely assigned:
Jew (Judah, Judite, Yahud)
Adonai (Yahweh, Jehovah)
When and if we read these terms, and others of their kind, or hear them mentioned, we must think Egypt, Hyksos, and Cult of Aton.
The so-called Jewish "Tribe of Manasseh" is, as a perusal of the symbolism reveals, yet another cover term and idea for the Atonists. Suggestively, the word Manasseh contains the syllable and phoneme assa (or essa), betraying its Irish origins. There is precious little to support the existence of this or any other "Israelite" tribe. The fiction of the ten tribes is a convenient dramatic device behind which the devilish Solar Cult remains hidden.
It is from these temples [sun colleges and temples of the lower Nile] that the term and title "Israelite" (as it has come to be used) derives. Since the earliest and greatest solar deity was the Irish Iesa, and since his worship had been brought to Egypt from the West by the Shemsu Hor (the Disciples of Horus), his adepts simply adopted titles based on his holy name. The names of many later solar personalities, such as Dionysus (Dion-esus), and Orpheus (Orph-esus) and Bacchus (Bacch-esus), Zeus, and Jesus (J-esus), etc, were just such renditions based on the prototype. When the testaments were conceived it was decided that both the word and concept of Israel should be personified. For reasons not explained Jacob -the son of Isaac (Isa, Esa) and grandson of Abraham was renamed Israel by god. This act of "renaming" (Genesis 35:9) was one of several clever ploys by the bible's mythographers to distort history and obscure the identity and existence of the Cult of Aton.
Let us ever bear in mind from now on that the generic terms "Israelite" and "Hebrew" denote those people who had spent time in Egypt and who were most probably of Hyksos origin.
This egomaniacal cult of spiritual darkness could not tolerate posterity thinking of them as just another clan of primitives, not after living it up as lords in the greatest country on Earth, under the shadow of pyramids and beneath the starry empyrean of Nuith. They were legends in their own minds and wanted to be acknowledged as spiritual progenitors and as a specially endowed priestarchy directly marked and chosen by god himself. And so the cult of Judaism as we now know it was born. This is why we have to be uncommonly skeptical about every account and passage of Judaic and Christian history that comes to us from the time of the exodus, from the time of the founding of the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities, and from the Grecian and Roman periods. We can take it as a given that these accounts are infested with lies and that the testaments have been composed at the behest of the descendants of this perfidious Solar Cult of Akhenaton.
The Jews were not eager to emphasize their blood-ties to the royal dynasties of Egypt for two main reasons. Firstly, if they admitted to it openly they would have only a short time to glow since it would then come out how they were, in fact, illegitimate invaders, marauders, pillagers, and imposters who entered at a time when Egypt was drowning in social chaos. If they admitted to being Hyksos kings they would admit being the infamous "Leper Kings" so despised by the native Egyptians. They would have to admit to their looting and pillaging and to the fact that they had inhabited the fertile Nile Delta for over 300 years and accomplished next to nothing of significance, architecturally or artistically. They would have had to admit that they were renegades and that they were forcibly expelled by consensus and public uprising against them. And they would have to admit, should the facts ever come out, that their "Moses" - the real life Akhenaton - had an incestuous relationship with his megalomaniacal, foreign-blooded mother Queen Tiye. Additionally, they would have to admit to the world that their great savior or Messiah, Joshua (Tutankhamun), was the son, not of god, but of an incestuous relationship between his own father and his grandmother. None of this, as we can see, is in the least bit aggrandizing. Secondly, they would have to explain why they have been seeking the limelight of history as god's "chosen" ones. They would need to explain how they could have been condemning every other culture and nation and every other theology as if they were uniquely spiritually endowed when, in fact, they were originally a bunch of treacherous, bloodthirsty, pantheists benefiting from their sojourn in a land of enlightened adepts. Yes, such admissions would certainly tarnish their image. So, it was decided that the truth concerning their origins and history would be obscured and that great efforts would be made to degrade and berate Egypt and its people.
Another, most important example of this plagiarization of Egyptian gnosis is the case of the biblical Decalogue, the so-called "Ten Commandments." It has been admitted for some time that the Commandments of Moses are excerpts from the Egyptian Book of the Dead's 42 "negative confessions."
Firstly, we have doubts about the two captivity stories, and doubts about the formation of any colony at the place known as Israel. Our main reason for this doubt concerns the destiny of the earlier exiles, those Hyksos who were expelled en masse by Ahmose I. Where did these people go? Surely, these fabulously wealthy and powerful ex-pharaohs of Egypt were not doomed to be wanderers in the wilderness for forty years. After their departure would not these Hyksos have swiftly and intelligently ingratiated themselves with their allies in Nubia, Minoan Crete, Sardinia (Shardana), Greece, Italy, Persia, Babylon, and possibly even among the Phoenicians? We think it most likely that the Hyksos of old, of the first Egyptian exodus, did find new homes in the lands around Egypt and possibly within its borders, in cities of the Eastern Delta such as Tanis. Therefore, would they not have welcomed and protected the Judites, their blood-kin, who had been themselves ousted from hated Egypt? We think this was definitely the case. We do not think the Judites experienced a single day of hardship after their unceremonious departure. If the Atonists were in these places it was as favored guests. It was their own mythographers who altered the accounts to make them read the way they do. We also believe there were strong ties between the Atonists of Egypt and the Scythians, and that together these contingents decided to make a move back to the West in order to secure new seats of power in Greece, Italy, Spain, France, and Britain. We understand, however, that they did not wish to have their royal Egyptian connections emphasized. We understand that their choice of names was based on this need for concealment. For them Egypt was taboo and references to their role in its history would be drastically distorted and underplayed. The terms adopted as monikers, such as "Levite," "Israelite," "Hebrew," and "Judite," etc, were terms that primarily connoted their theological status and duties. These were common terms for priests, particularly of the Stellar, Saturnian, and Solar Cults. They did not signify ethnicity. In fact, as we strongly advocate, these terms originally derived from Ireland and from the Druids. The fact that Egyptian and Druidic iconography permeated Judeo-Christianity was just an anomaly that would have to be covered up and downplayed through time. This was agreed by all. This ploy has been deliberate and has, for the most part, succeeded. The iconography exists and has always puzzled scholars and researchers who cannot account for it unless they accept the official story of the captivity of the Jews in Egypt, a fiction from start to finish. For instance, the term "King" (as in"King Solomon," etc) could not have come to be used by the "Israelites" unless there was a strong Egyptian influence. A king could not declare himself a representative of god unless he was familiar with the sacred "Land of Khem" and with the theology of the Amenite priesthood that had declared their kings to be living agents of god. It was not the Jews who originated such concepts. And these are only two of many hundreds of examples.
It might be asked why the Levites and the Cult of Aton, after their exile and ruthless occupation of Judea, chose to downplay all connection to Egypt and alter their titles and personal names. Why did they refer to themselves as "Levites," "Israelites," and "Judites," etc, when they were as we have shown, eighteenth dynasty pharaohs recently departed from Egypt? And we might ask why they would not wish to emphasize that their patriarchs (Abraham, Jacob, and others) were linked to the Hyksos kings who dominated Lower Egypt for over 300 years. One would think that they could not resist this flaunting of their reputation and status.
As we have emphasized elsewhere, one of the Atonist's most cunning strategies involves the concealment of their existence. They have literally created fictive peoples and races to pose in their place with no provable historical connection to Egypt. When limelight falls across those with no legitimate connection to the ancient thrones of the world it is not upon those frequenters of the shadows who do have that connection. The Jews who exist today, and who are Jewish by simple religious conversion, have no authentic racial or ethnic ties to the so-called "holy land" at all. Nevertheless, they remain obsessed with the idea, implanted by duplicitous rabbis under allegiance to the Vatican and the Atonists, that their ancestors are the ones who walked with Noah, Enoch, Abraham, Lot, and Solomon, and who witnessed the building of the great "Temple"in the good old days of the kings. The world teems with duplicitous scholars, "historians," and Zionist (Atonist) spin doctors secretly commissioned to perpetuate this fabulous disinformation.
The so-called Israelites were not monotheistic but henotheistic. They had merely selected one god from many to worship.
One blatant example of the plagiarization of pagan culture concerns the monogram that is attributed by Christians to Jesus - the figure IHS. These are the first letters of the Latin term Jesu Hominum Salvator ("Jesus the Savior of Men"). But it has also been used as the cryptogram for In Hoc Signo (in this sign), and for other such mottos. Its original usage concerned Bacchus(Dionysus), who was often depicted as a radiant and handsome effeminate male with a crown of sun rays (thorns).
Our point should be clear. The bible's passages are certainly not to be taken as accurate historical accounts. Additionally, the authors of the passages cannot be considered learned men.Their agenda was not to inform or enlighten, but to befuddle, confuse, and control. When we read their accounts concerning the origin of the Israelites and Judites, the slavery in Egypt, the exodus, the roving in the wilderness for forty years, the settlement of Jerusalem, the alleged captivities in Assyria and Babylon, and of any other event, we would do well to be skeptical in the extreme and aware that we are not being informed of things that actually happened. What we read, although fascinating, is a travesty of history composed by consummate liars and mythmongers whose status was, and still is, utterly compromised by facts and by the truth.
The Jews who exist today, who are Jewish by simple religious conversion, have no racial or national connection to the so-called "holy land," regardless of what they have been expertly programmed to believe and profess, and regardless of the pseudo-scientific evidence offered forth from time to time.
[...] Pauline Christianity was fashioned as a replacement for extremist Judaism, which would continue to operate in secrecy, behind the walls of Freemasonic lodges and so-called "Invisible Colleges." The trailed of the past (of the descent through time of Akhenaton and his Cult), had to be concealed and Mosaic Judaism offered imperfect cover. Moreover, the Judaic Messiahs were merely human beings. Their main field of operation was politics. Mosaic Judaism was a liability, because a close reading of the Judaic religion eventually would expose its Egyptian roots. Christ would be from a heavenly realm far above the confines of the world. He would reject the Pharisees and they would reject and condemn him. Christ would be accepted by the Gentile nations of the west and all would be well. A new church for a new age, a new doctrine to be forced on the western world by holy emperors. No more Torah or Talmud, and barely a mention of Egypt. When the Pauline "Christ" apparently rejected Old Testament laws, the way was opened for a breakaway religion with new converts and adherents. As time passed, and as men got on with their new religion, the cunning Levitical masters of the Cult of Aton breathed easy. Their trail had become all the more difficult to discern and track.
The Bible - Book of the Pharaohs. Jews believe and state openly that Moses was the author of the Hebrew Torah (the first five books of the Old Testament). He is also known to be the disseminator of the hidden Oral Tradition, that eventually inspired the Babylonian Talmud. But, as the great Sigmund Freud pointed out, and as we re-assert - MOSES WAS AKHENATON - the Bible is not a Jewish tome, but an Egyptian one. This is the great secret that has been kept from humankind for so long. The generations of alteration and re-editing by Josephus and Bacon and others has merely assisted in this truth being kept hidden. But when we understand the true identity of this Moses, we understand also the true authors of the Bible. This is the real reason why Bibles can be found on Masonic altars. It is not because Masons are Christians, but because they are Atonists, as are all Christians and Jews, regardless of what false notions the Vatican spin-doctors have connived and enforced. As Albert Pike wrote in his Morals and Dogma: "The Hebrew books were written only to recall to memory the traditions; and they were written in Symbols unintelligible to the Profane."
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are not a Jewish Manifesto, but an Atonist one. Although many Jews work for and serve the Atonist Establishment, and though many work and serve the Vatican and the Black Venetians, the "conspiracy" against freedom and race and truth is not of Jewish origins. The "Jews" are used as pawns for the Cult of Aton who engineer and have engineered the dialectic so that Jews in their pay appear to be at the helm. They are the proverbial "red herring." However, the fact is that the sadists employed by the Establishment come in all sorts - Gentiles, Jews, African, and all the rest. A Jew is often confused for a Zionist,and the Zionist knows the difference. The majority of Jews are converts to the religion of Judaism that is Egyptian in origin. Most Jews do not know this. Most Jews are not Semitic, so the stigma of Anti-Semitism is most often misapplied.
The United States of America are not controlled from the White House, as most people believe, but from the Jesuit Georgetown University that overlooks Washington DC. It is the "Black" popes (Cardinal Francis Spellman and Hans Kolvenbach) who give the president his orders. The Jesuits were expunged from many countries of the world at different times. Their secrecy is for a reason. The college's motto is "Both and One" (meaning Three). A pyramid with an eye and emitting solar rays can be seen above the door of the oldest and most prestigious Jesuit college - the Pontifical Gregorian University, in Rome. Jesuit symbols contain stars and other sabean symbols from the pre-Christian world.
The pope has, from the inception of the Roman Church, been referred to as Servus Servorurm Dei - "Servant of the Servants of God" On the pope's miter is the Latin motto: Vicarius Filii Dei, that means "Vicar for the Son of God." Numerologically, this phrase totals 666. Vicarius equals 112; Filii equals 53; and Dei equals 501.
Boston College houses the largest Jesuit community.
The Bohemian Club - Elite members of this secret order (that includes most US presidents) meet at a time when the sun (Aton) is at its highest point during the year - at the summer solstice - June 21st. The summer solstice was adopted by Hitler and his Nazis as their most important day of ritual and celebration. It was the most sacred day in the Nazi calendar.
Masonic Degrees - bear "Hebrew" titles. Higher degrees bear tags such as "Sublime Prince of the Royal Secret," "Knight of the Sun," "Grand Pontiff," "Prince of the Tabernacle," "Knight Commander of the Temple," Knight of St. Andrew (Indra), etc. As we show, these terms are Egyptian in origin. (Our work is the first to reveal the true origins and purpose of Freemasonry). The "G" stands for Gaonim - the elites of the Atonists. The lower case "g" is a sigil for the serpent and the knowledge preserved by members of the ancient Dragon Bloodline
A good student is given a "degree" today, when he is ready to serve the Masonic god - Aton/Jehovah/Lucifer.
Zionist Madeline Albright - With her Atonist Eagle. The Albright family were, and are, lieutenants of the Masonic Atonists situated in London and New York. With their "insider smiles," leading Zionists and Neocons know full well that their agenda has little to do with Israel, oil, or issues that constantly preoccupy the mainstrem press and laymen.
The Double-Headed Eagle with a red background was the insignia of the Byzantine Empire founded by Constantine the Great. He was a member of the Atonist Sol Invicti cult. His armed guards were called the "Golden Militia," and they wore the symbol of the Double-Headed Eagle.
Charles de Lorraine: Patron of the Illuminati. Researchers who imagine that the Illuminati were anti-royalist are grievously misinformed. Although this is the impression the secret society's elite members attempted to generate, it is anything but the truth. European royals were, and still are, the power behind the world's prominent secret societies. Their interests have never been the overthrow of orthodox religion or monarchy, or the liberation of humanity. This idea existed only in the mind's of gullible, misinformed lower rank members.
Like George Washington and others, Benjamin Franklin was an Illuminati infiltrator who took his orders from the same British royal figures he was inspiring Americans to rebel against. A member of the Nine Sisters Lodge of France and of the Hell Fire Club in England, he was, suggestively, known in occult circles as "Moses." Like Francis Bacon and other occultists, he was an Atonist agent, securing America for his cabal. He was recruited and sent to London by Scottish Templar and Governor of Pennsylvania Sir William Keith. He was officially known to have become a Mason in 1731, in Philadelphia
By way of their control over the major pharmaceutical leviathans, this poison-peddling order can have the masses of the world made sicker and more infirm, on all levels. And the evidence of this enterprise of human destruction can be seen all around us. The symbolism employed by most of these corrupt edifices is enough to alert us to their perfidious agendas. Through their agents in the media (Henry Luce, Sumner Redstone, Ted Turner, Rupert Murdock, Conrad Black, Katherine Graham, etc,) they make sure that the world's uninformed masses remain that way. By disseminating a daily diet of pornographic images and perverse subliminal messages, deeply disturbing to man's libido and psyche, they contaminate the world with their noetic "infections." It is partly due to this psychic dictatorship that the average man lacks the passion and inclination for anything other than the pursuit of sensual gratification and personal narcissistic titillation.
The location is the College of Arms in London. Every country and nation in the world, and every state must apply to this college to be awarded the right to bear a flag or heraldic device. All flags bear similar solar, stellar, and Masonic motifs - and are all bestowed from London.
Renegade Pharaoh Akhenaton - the "Son of the Sun" (Aton). The real "King of the Jews." He was the master of the Levites and of the "12 Tribes" under his dominion. His "biography" is the Bible, his instrument of torture - Judeo-Christianity! His Cult of Aton was, and is, identical to the pre-diluvian "Brotherhood of the Snake." His minions are the Vatican, the Illuminati, Templars, Royals and British-Israelites - enemies of freedom and truth, each and all The Atonists have expertly employed their age old symbols to indicate their presence to the symbolically literate. From their bases of operation (Tanis, Alexandria, Rome, London, New York,and Washington DC) and through their lieutenants they control the world, their new Egypt.
The misunderstood motto above the Egyptian pyramid at which the Judaic/Atonist eagle stares - "Annuit Coeptis" - means "He Favors Our Undertaking." The "He" is not god but Akhenaton and/or his god Aton. The New World Order of the Atonists is to replace the old order over which they once reigned in the Egypt of old.
According to the cryptic metaphorical "histories" of the British-Israelites, Joseph's two sons -Manasseh and Ephraim - are the ancestors of the races guided by "god" to found Britain and America. The sons are, however, merely fictive devices. They are just two of many non-historical biblical characters scripted to impersonate the chiefs of the Cult of Aton, who speak only in symbols to the world they stage-manage from behind the scenes.
The Eagle is the symbol of the so-called "Tribe of Manasseh," named after a son of Joseph, the pharaoh's dream-analyst, and man with the "coat of many colors" (zodiac). In reality Joseph was Yuya, the wealthiest man in the world during the time of the Pharaoh Tuthmosis IV. Yuya held the highest office, and was probably connected to the Hyksos Kings of Egypt. He was one of 12 "Brothers," that is a cryptic reference to his priestly (masonic) rank. He was second in command after the pharaoh of his time. In Egyptian and Hindi the word Akha (Akhe-naton) means "Eye." The hierogram for the word Akhem or Akha was an eagle. The eye and the eagle are therefore closely related and have long been symbols for royalty, especially Egyptian royalty. The name Akhenaton means the Eye of Aton. Manasseh is, therefore, a cover term and idea for the Atonists, and their conquest of America.
At the Hague - in Holland, the seat of EU government - a huge black widow-like spider. Spider webs are seen on the US dollar bill, on Mormon architecture, at the so-called Nazca Lines in Peru and on obelisks and civic buildings. It represents the forces of darkness that spin the webs of deceit to entrap minds and souls. In the web of the spider the trapped victim strangles itself through it very attempts to be free.
The US Statue of Liberty is an Egyptian symbol that also connotes the Cult of Aton, the true owners and rulers in America. The star that the statue is erected upon symbolizes Sirius.
The White House - now shares the same name as the new government center in Moscow. The name originally comes from Egypt. The White and Red Houses of the late first dynasty were departments that officiated for the will of pharaoh. The second most important state building in Egypt was the treasury. It was known as Per Hetch, meaning "White House."
Zoroaster, and Zoroastrianism. A solar-cult mystery religion that developed in Persia around 1200 BC, shortly after the time of the removal of Akhenaton from Egypt. This solar based religion is uncannily similar to Atonism. It preceded Christianity. Zoroaster may have been a prototype for Paul's Jesus. Zoroastrianism was prominent under the Sassanid Empire of Persia (modern Iran). It is not known whether Zoroaster was a historical figure. Dates for his existence vary widely, anything from 2000 BC to 458 BC. The term zoro, means "golden" and is close to sura or surya, meaning "sun." Zoroaster, is taken to mean "golden star." He is considered the creator of the Magi who really go back much further, and who had western origins. Zoroastrianism plays a role in the Masonic tradition. The god of Zoroaster was known as Hormuzd, Ormuzd or Ahura Mazda, god of light. Apparently, he was a version of Horus, Amun Ra, and Aton. In Mozart's Masonic opera The Magic Flute, the character sarstro is portrayed the fount of all wisdom
Christian anti-masons cannot understand why masons employ what appears to be Christian symbolism. They have to discover that the "Christ" referenced in masonic works is not their Jesus, but the previous "monotheist" - namely, Akhenaton of Egypt. This is the reason why the cross is used alongside the rose and/or crown, etc.
[...] the eagle (and also hawk or falcon) became the prime insignia of the gods.
The Levites were originally Irish Druids, not Jews as we know them.
The word Caesar (Ce Sar, or Kesar) gives Caesarean meaning to be severed and removed from the womb or mother. The word originally meant "the sun" and has the same meaning as other elite titles: Sah (for Orion or Osiris), Sera (title the Egyptians used for Pharaoh) Shah (Arabic for King), Sarah ("Princess"), Sahib, Czar or Tzar (Russian Emperors), Shaman, Surya, Sire, Seer, and Sir, etc.
The Romans dominated Egypt for four hundred years, from the time of Augustus (30 BC to 395 AD).
The Stuarts. The monument to the Catholic Stuart Dynasty of Scotland and England, in Rome. The Stuarts were one of many "Dragon" dynasties ruling the world. The word stuart means "steward,"signifying those who rule in place of another, or who officiate for another higher more elusive authority. Interestingly, the Stuarts were known as the "Jacobite" Kings, referring to the father of the Israelites (Atonists). The British flag is today referred to as the "Union Jack" for the same reason. Another Stuart symbol was the white rose. The Stuarts were powerful Freemasons,negating the idea that Catholicism is "against" such secret societies. The Stuart treasure was lodged in the same Belgium bank that kept the accounts of their "on paper" Protestant enemy, Hanoverian King William of Orange. William had more Stuart blood in him than James Stuart. His own wife Mary was sister of James Stuart. The Stuarts only appeared to be deposed. It was James I who commissioned the "King James Bible." James I was suggestively referred to as "Jacob" or "Jacobus" hence the "Jacobin Period" of English history. The Stuarts, like their close relatives the Tudors (Tutors), had close connections to French Templars. Indeed the French Fleur-de-Lys appears on most English heraldry. These royal dynasties had been exposed to Druidism via Culdean monks from Ireland. The name James (from the Gaelic Seamus), meant "Gate-Keeper," or "Guardian," in the Egyptian language. In Egyptian it is Shamar or Shemes. It may also relate to Shemsu, meaning "Disciple" or "Follower," in this case, "Disciple of Aton."
Adolph Hilter was a British (or Atonist) agent. He shakes hands with King Edward VII of the Windsor Family who are of German and Venetian ancestry. Sir Oswald Mosley, the leader of Britain's Fascist Party, during the second World War years, was related to the Windsor royals. Gregg Hallet, the author of Hitler was a British Agent, has exposed the connections between the Nazis and the British Crown. In his Mein Kamf, Hitler hypocritically professed hatred for the world's aristocracy. In truth, like the Rothschilds of Frankfurt-on-Main, he was in their employ.
The Nazis and their Masonic-Atonist solar eagle. Hitler, Himmler, and other Nazi agents of the British Crown, never ceased to refer to themselves as "New Templars." Appropriating and misusing the sacred title "Aryan," they distorted and obscured the true meaning of this term that signified the Druids or Elders (the wise and perfected men) of any race.
Albert Pike was Grand Master of American Freemasonry and head of the Illuminati.
[...] and gives his Masonic pose of the "Lion's Paw," which refers to his secret society status and subliminally shows to the world that he is an agent of the Cult of Aton, not of Christianity.
The Standard of the Belgian Kings. At the Bank of Belgium, the so-called rivals - the Stuarts and the House of Orange - keep their accounts. The Windsor family has dynastic ties to this important Masonic-Atonist country.
The word Wales means "Place of the Strangers" or "Foreigners," signifying those who invaded and settled from abroad, probably from France. The indigenous peoples of Wales refer to themselves as the Cymri, or Kimri.
Between Masonry, Judaism, and Atonism, as the symbolism reveals, there is not much difference.
The Lion of the Tribe of Judah, the lieutenants of the Cult of Aton.
In general terms, whenever the code term "red" is used in the Old Testament, it denotes the Hyksos dynasty.
Expert on Egypt, Ralph Ellis has discovered that there may be good reason why the Craft Lodge of Freemasonry is known as the "Blue Lodge" and why Freemasonry have "Blue Degrees," and why it is that blue is used by the super elite order known as the Knights of the Garter, founded by king Edward III in 1348, and presently headed by the queen of England. Ellis has shown that there is a connection between the legendary St. George the dragon slayer and the god Set who also entered into combat with the serpent Apophis, using a spear to overcome his serpentine adversary. One of the meanings of the Egyptian word Set is "garter." The name also means "secret." Like the ancient worshippers of Set, and like the Egyptian nobility, the Knights of the Garter wear a blue-colored band upon their person. It is usually hidden from view, or kept "secret."
The Red Cross - seen on the flag of St. George, the Ulster flag, and Union Jack of England, has a very old history going back to Egypt and the worship of the god Set who was connected with the colors red and blue. An ancient name for Egypt was Mori, and the hieroglyphic for this word featured a circle and cross identical to those seen on many flags and emblems of the world, particularly those of Britain. The word Mor or Mer, also referred directly to the Giza Pyramid and to the keepers of the knowledge of the pyramid. Therefore, it is a word that connects to secret societies and their knowledge (for example Merovingian).
The symbol here of the cross has little to do with Christianity as we know it. If it were an Ankh, all would have been revealed long ago.
666 - ("The Holy Crown") It is the sum of the Hebrew term nezer ha-kodesch - that means “The Holy Crown.” This term can be found throughout Masonic Temples and inscriptions. The "Holy Crown" is of Akhenaton and his descendants in the Cult of Aton.
The Crest of the Knights Templar - featuring the same lion and unicorn motif that appears on so many royal coats of arms. These are Atonist symbols. The crown above the cross is pharaonic.The red cross can be found on prehistoric Phoenician and British megaliths. The cross and crown are also employed by American Scottish-Rite Freemasons, who work in secret to undermine the sovereignty of America, on behalf of their Atonist chiefs in London and Rome. The kings of the Merovingian dynasty were believed to have been born with birthmarks in the form of a red cross.
During his investiture, Prince Charles sat upon a throne bearing a red dragon emblem. His mother spoke these words over him: "This dragon gives you power, your throne and your authority."
The Pharaonic Lion and Unicorn primarily symbolizes the Cult of Aton and Tribe of Judah, both renegade exiles from Egypt. We see these emblems on the world's heraldry, and on corporations, and institutions, yet rarely ask where they originated or what they truly symbolize.
Scotland is a major homeland of Templar families. Their houses, churches, and businesses are astrologically and geomantically aligned, and have been from as far back as the tenth century. Most of the Scottish kings are descended from the family of Danish King Christian I, whose daughter married James III, King of the Scots, in 1469. Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh is of this family line which is why he has the title in the country of Scotland.
Our Zarah is the son of Judah, the son of Jacob, the brother of Joseph (recorded as being the "dream analyst" of Pharaoh Tuthmosis IV) but who was more likely Yuya of the Hyksos line of pharaohs.
Moreover, the symbol for the Tribe of Judah is the lion. This symbol is used by the royal families of Britain and is found on British heraldry, incorporated into the architecture of state buildings, and emblazoned on so many corporate logos. The Lion is the symbol for the sign of Leo that, as any competent astrology buff knows, has long been connected to royalty, especially that of Egypt. The pharaoh's costume included a ritually worn lion's tail and the throne of pharaoh, like those of the kings and queens of England, was styled with lion motifs. Many images show the pharaoh's hunting lions from their royal chariots. The cheetah and the panther were associated with the priests, but the lion was always reserved for the pharaoh. The lion of Africa is used as a seminal symbol by the royal houses because of their descent from the House of David, or more correctly,from the House of Aton.
The lineage of Judah-Zarah is referred to as "The Scarlet Thread."
Church Steeples and Domes. Based on Irish Round Towers - They point upward to the cross in the sky - to the Cross of the Zodiac. The word Cathedral, meant "Temple of Brightness." Bells are rung from towers to summon the god Bel. The Irish Trinity was Bel, Taranis and Esus. The name Bel has also been rendered "Baal," and has predictably been demonized. The name of the Hebrew/Jewish god "EL" is also a clever obscuration of the Irish Bel. The sacred trinities of the Hindus, Egyptians, Jews, and Christians derive from this original. Rome, London, and the major cities, are littered with Egyptian obelisks and towers of the astrological sort.
The Hyksos kings and their people honored the astrological precession and began reverencing the traits and proclivities associated with the sign of Aries, whereas the priests of Thebes in Southern (or Upper Egypt) decided that the time was not right for new gods to be venerated.They wished to theologically remain loyal to the Taurean principles.This intriguing scenario allows us to hazard more than a guess as to why there was a schism between the tribes of "Israel." The ten tribes decided that the old paradigm was still in, whereas the two tribes of Judah decided to honor their king Akhenaton and venerate the new Astro-Theological order. Although we may not appreciate the contrariness of the Israelites, we can liken it to the more recent historical conflicts between denominations of the Christian church. Ellis gives the example of Northern Ireland where two contingents, of the same background and blood, violently differ on theological grounds.
Another interpretation concerning this revelry states that the Children of Israel were rebelling against Moses and his Atonist Cult. They were venerating the golden calf in order to honor Pharaoh Heremheb whose name means "Powerful Bull." By paying respect to this Heremheb and the Egyptian Amunists, the Children of Israel were hoping to gain favor and perhaps be allowed to make a return to Egypt. Both the Aramaic and Hebrew bibles do make mention of the conflict at Sinai between Moses and the exiled people.
For instance, when we read of "lamb's blood" being daubed on the portals of doorways, we are being told of this constellational change. When we hear of the Jewish priests blowing the "ram's horn" at the Eastern gate of the temple, we are being told of it, and when we hear of the sacrifice of the "Paschal Lamb," the story is the same. The very term "Passover," originally referred to this action of the sun literally passing over the hypothetical boundaries of the signs of the zodiac. The most important biblical rendition of the astrological story and dilemma concerns the time of the exiled Children of Israel at Mount Sinai. It was here that the people returned to the worship of the "golden calf," that is of Taurus. As the Book of Exodus relates, Moses was furious with his people's recalcitrance and smashed the tablets with his Yahwistic (Atonist) commandments on them.
According to Ralph Ellis the division probably occurred due to the Cult of Aton's priestarchy who knew that a significant astrological change was taking place. This change or phase-shift concerned the sun's rise on the vernal equinox and the constellations that were seen just before sunrise on the first sign of the zodiac. For over 2,000 years, until the point of Joseph's arrival into Egypt, the sun had occupied the sign of Taurus - The Bull.
The Masonic apron, compass, and letter "G" for the Gaonim. The symbolism of Masonry, which scholars believe to be Judaic, is primarily Atonist. We believe that the high level Atonists withing Judaism, were the Gaonim. They were descended from those Levitical elders who recieved the so-called "Oral Tradition" at Mount Sinai. Later Talmudists and Zionists are frontmen for the Gaonim. The lower case "G" is serpentine, symbolizing the Dragon Court that stretches back to the pre-diluvian epoch. The priests of the sun at Heliopolis, as well as at other places, employed the symbol of the serpent, as did the pharaohs. In Gaelic, the name of the sun is Grian, and the Masonic G is frequently depicted with rays of light emanating from it.
The masonic "G" is, in our belief, an insignia of this Babylonian Gaonim. It is usually surrounded by the masonic "compass and rule" that are themselves fashioned to represent the capital letter "A" for Akhenaton and his god Aton. Later they changed their title to “Freemason” as a ruse to hide their true identity. The Freemasonic Lodges (particularly the Grand Orient Lodges, but also the Scottish Rite branches) originate from Atonist Gaonate colleges. The term "mason" simply refers to the pyramids, the Temple of Solomon, the solar churches of Egypt, and their builders. The word Freemason comes from the French Phre (sun) Mas (child) connoting the "Children of the Sun," or the "Brothers of the Sun."
From Pumbedita and Sura (meaning "sun") they [Levitical-Pharisees] established their priestly order known as the Gaonim.
Pharisaism arises from the Mosaic-Levitical tradition. The very word pharisee means "those set apart." The Pharisees were, like their elite rivals the Sadducees, descended from the Levite priests in Jerusalem holding up the Mosaic Law. Interestingly, it was from the Pharisaic tradition that the idea of a living Messiah came. This figure would lead the Jews to their victory over all adversaries, to redemption and liberation, and would acquire for them the thrones of all nations.
[...] it has recently come to light that the Babylonians, Persians, and Syrians were of Indo-European racialstock themselves.
During the alleged Babylonian arrest under Nebuchadnezzar the Levites compiled and added four more books to Deuteronomy. These four books became known as the Torah (from the Gaelic Tara - meaning "Law"). It is suggestive, and of great historical significance, that the Aton cult (and the majority of their Levite followers) decided, after their "release" from Babylon by Cyrus the Great (in 537 BC), to not return after all to their beloved Jerusalem. Having wined and dined in Babylon, and having been exposed to yet another exotic and cosmopolitan civilization (the Paris of its times), the "chosen people" were reluctant to make a return to the dust bowl in Canaan.
The Levites began the compilation of their suggestively named "Law of Moses" in the period following the alleged Assyrian captivity, but before the Babylonian arrest, during the 7th century BC. Moses, of course, had long since passed from the scene and knew nothing of this Levitical Law composed in his name. From this point onward, what lord god Jehovah said was whatever the Levites said he said. No one could argue the point since, before the "Law" and the Levites Book of Deuteronomy existed, nothing was written down. Nevertheless, the Levites declared themselves to be exceptional because Moses had handed down to them an oral tradition that remained undisclosed to the uninitiated. This fact alerts us since it is the perfect ruse by which the Atonists could disguise their identity from both Jews and Christians. The oral law was a secret law and so no outsider could have a clue what it said. This oral law dates from the time of Moses' ascent of Mount Sinai. The Book of Deuteronomy ("Second Law") concerns the oral tradition's precepts, and clearly shows an objective reader that the Levites were interested in only one thing, that is condemning and murdering everyone who stood against them. Religious intolerance could not have a better manifesto. And the weapon suggested to be used against the world by this Machiavellian dossier - was fear:
The rivalry of the tribes alerts us to the fraudulence behind the naming of the modern "State of Israel." Israel as an entity has, according to every authentic and legitimate authority, long assimilated into the world's nations and has, as a result, long ceased to exist (if it ever did to begin with). The usage of such a term today especially to name a homeland for "Jews" is the height of historical nonsense. The vast majority of Jews living in this "Israel," like the majority of Jews anywhere in the world, are Jewish by simple religious conversion and not by ethnic or racial descent.
According to the Old Testament, one of the reasons why the House of Israel chose to spurn the House of Judah was due to the latter's vile obsession not only with war but with human and animal sacrifice. One can split the Old Testament prophets into camps based upon whether they speak for the Judites or whether they remonstrate against them and their heinous practices. The Israelite prophets Amos, Hosea, and Jeremiah, were the staunchest opponents of the House of Judah (David) and throughout their narratives they cajole the Judites, imploring them to abandon their godless practices, particularly the sacrifice of their firstborn sons.
We believe the "captivity" stories to have been manufactured at a later date by those Atonists wishing to prevent the truth about their true destinations from being discovered. There is little doubt in our mind that the accounts of the settlement in Israel, the building of the temple at Jerusalem, the development of the united monarchy, and the attack of hostile forces from Assyria and Babylon are largely concoctions. They were necessary fictions giving the impression that the books of the bible were composed and compiled in Babylon instead of Rome. Moreover, it is difficult for us to believe that the "chosen people" were as homeless and comfortless as the bible reports. On the contrary, once we connect the dots we find that both the Yahuds/Judites/Levites and the Israelites from Egypt would have swiftly found new homes with their Hyksos kin who had been expelled a few centuries previously and who would have, by that time, found themselves new homes in the many lands around Egypt. We do not believe the Judites and Israelites to have been wanderers through any "wildernesses" for forty years. We do not believe they suffered a day of such hardship. We do believe that there was a schism between the factions after the expulsion. The Judites or Levites (Yahuds) were closely allied with Akhenaton's Cult of Aton and have been a front for them down through the ages until the present day. When this fanatical sect of Atonists realized the rest of their nation (the Israelites) did not care to continue with the plan and were disgruntled and vengeful they simply rejected and cursed them, and were cursed in return.
Naturally, the sane among the Atonists wanted nothing to do with such monstrous scheming. They soon decided to go their own way. Biblical tradition tells us that the "chosen people" lived together in Israel for about 500 years. After 250 years they chose to divide themselves into two "Houses." Eventually, we are told that Israel was attacked and large portions of both Houses were taken into captivity by the Assyrians. The House of Judah (Aton) was particularly vulnerable since they were, unlike the Israelites, few in number. Allegedly, after their release by the Assyrians, the Judites and Israelites again suffered invasion and captivity at the hands of the Babylonians. After this period of bondage, the ten tribes of "Israel" decided not to return to their homes and Temple in Palestine but to emigrate Westward across the Caucasus Mountains and into the lands beyond. Only two tribes were still fanatical enough to allegedly make a return to Jerusalem, the "Tribe of Benjamin" and "Tribe of Levi." It is from these tribes that Levitical Judaism arose. From this tradition came the Gaonim, the Sadducees, Zadokites, Khazars, and Kabalistic colleges that were instrumental in creating the smokescreens behind which the Cult of Aton would operate.
Akhenaton had probably perished at Tanis or at Sinai soon after the final expulsion from Egypt by Seti I. His descendants - the "Davids" who ruled in his name - wanted nothing less than to build another power state to rival all others. They conceived of a grand plan to establish a New World Order that would, if need be, be erected upon the ruins and wreckage of the world's infidel nations.
From this point onward the two houses - of Jews (Judah) and Israelites (Israel) - parted company. We can surmise that it was at this point that the main body of the Israelites (so called) did not agree with the Atonist plan for world domination [New World Order].
Today, this cult does not care how their devices and designs might negatively affect "Jews" since they know that most Jews are not the same people as the bible makes mention of and because they, being of Egyptian origin, have no reason to spare "Jews" from tragedy or loss. Those who think of themselves as religious Jews are, like the Gentiles, treated by the executive of Levitical Atonists with the same haughty and even murderous contempt. They may worship Jehovah but do so without being privy to his true identity. They raise their arms in church and synagogue in the same manner as the ancients did when venerating the sun and they utter "Amen" at the end of prayers with no thought as to the Irish or Egyptian origins of what they do. To the Atonists ordinary Jews are a class below, and not worthy of distinction. Their existence merely serves as useful camouflage and as a way to lead attention away from the ruling quorum.
It is this Tribe of Judah that was, in our estimation, Atonist.
The original "Luciferian" philosophy behind orthodox Vatican Christianity is the brainchild of the degenerate "Broken King" Akhenaton.
The Flavian and Piso families of Italy (among others) were descendants (biologically or ideologically) of the original "holy" sun clan of Aton. It was they who commissioned the writing of the bible in Rome.
The hordes who tended Akhenaton and his court, and who accompanied him after his exile, were Levites from the city of Avaris (Zoan or Zion) and Amarna. They were descendants of the Hyksos Kings who had invaded Upper (Southern) Egypt over 300 years before (at the opening of the 13th dynasty). No, the "Israelites" were not the people who accompanied the pharaoh; they were the pharaoh and his immediate Egyptian coterie.
So, in light of this, we have no difficulty placing the Hebrews or, more correctly, the Ibaru. They were the "Initiators," the "keepers of knowledge," the "wise-ones," the Druidic Elders of Ireland and Britain whose colleges once existed even in the far-flung corners of the globe. The ancient name for the land of Ireland was Hibernia and the Irish were known as Hibernians. This is a Gaelic word and it also denoted those tribes that inhabited Spain. (Spain's olden name was Iberia.) In short, the original "Hebrews" - were Irish. The word Hebrew most likely comes from Ibiru, Ibaru, or Iburu meaning "Yew Tree." The word Yahweh (meaning Jehovah) comes from Yehew or Yew. The reference in the Old Testament to Moses meeting god at a "burning bush" is yet one more biblical corruption of Druidic tree lore and stellar mythology. The term Hebrew was not, therefore, brought to the West by travelers from the East. If anything, it is more likely that Eastern migrants merely used these place-names because they understood that the countries to which they went were ancient homelands of the Ibaru. To obscure the anomaly concerning the name of Ireland, the historians disseminated the story that it was traveling Israelites or Hebrews from the East who, upon their arrival in Ireland, named it Hibernia. Such migrations did take place but were of later times. They occurred during the centuries AD. Many groups settled in Ireland for one reason or another and many came from the Levant. However, there was little that these people could teach the Irish. Such a notion is not only preposterous but it demonstrates the level of perfidy of the historians who have suggested such nonsense.The ancients knew that the terms Israelite and Ibaru referred to high-ranking, spiritually endowed Egyptians and their ancestors. And they knew that Egypt had been visited numerous times by vagabonds and ne'er-do-wells out for what they could get. The outlying provinces of Egypt were often plagued by such miserables who stole food, polluted wells, and generally caused a disturbance. More than once did the Egyptian governors take to banishing and exiling foreigners who were preying upon their people.
A "Hebrew" (Ibaru) was a stellar priest. The term did not refer to a race or nation, as we have been told by duplicitous "historians." It actually referred to the caste of Druidic Elders and to their gnosis. It also referred to their sacred language and alphabet. A "Hebrew," therefore, was one conversant with sacred knowledge - to be precise, knowledge of the stars.
Those who became known as "Jews" were, however, originally neither Israelites nor Hebrews, and were not racially Semitic. The term Hebrew (and possibly also Jew) comes from the Old Irish Iur, and the Irish Gaelic Ibur or Iburu meaning "Yew Tree," or "Men of the Yew." The yew tree was considered very sacred to the Druids and Egyptian Magi. The Ibaru (or Ibri, Abri, or Abari) turn up in Egypt as the "Wise Ones" or "Elders." The letter "H," added as a prefix, simply meant "the," and so the word Hebrew meant "the Ebru" or "the Ibaru." This is the origin of the word Iberia which signified Spain and Hibernia which signified Ireland. The word rabbi is a rendition or variant of this ancient name Abari or Ibaru. The Ibaru were Druidic Elders who had traveled to Egypt in remote periods and who had brought solar worship there. They were probably akin to the predynastic Shemsu Hor or "Disciples of Horus," the tall, fair-complexioned, technically proficient race whose remains were found in tombs in Nubia by the eminent archaeologist Professor Walter B. Emery. This word Ibaru had a similarity to Apiru (Egyptian Apir) which meant "wanderer," "undesirable," "shepherd," or "foreigner." This unfortunate similarity of etymology has caused great confusion but has favored the machinations of those elites who crave to obscure the truth of their Western ancestry.
Aye - Israelite pharaoh after Tutankhamen. The power behind the throne of Akhenaton. His name meant the "Eye." The Jewish Targum, or Aramaic Bible, confirms his Atonist leanings and reveals him to have been the leader that the Jews entitled "Jehovah," or "Adonai," meaning "Lord Aye." Does the eye at the top of the Pyramid represent the Eye of Aye, the Atonist?
There is not a single shred of evidence for any of the implausible biblical characters as they have been presented (Abraham, Isaac, Joseph, Saul, Solomon, David, Aaron, and Jesus, etc). This is because they are later interpolations. They were designed to resemble earlier figures who wished to be remembered and lauded even though concealment was their over-arching priority. The bible is their story, their history, its many imperfections a clever mask of mystique designed to evoke reactions of awe, frustration, intrigue, and suspicion. Like tigers, the real figures have hidden behind the "tall grass" of history, so to speak. It is only recently that a few investigators have dared to burn down the camouflage and to reveal the shy creatures stalking there. The authors who have busied themselves with their investigations generally desire to discover the true identities of the biblical dramatis personae. This understandable quest is to be found animating most historians, and it is motive enough.
The name Moses came from Mose or Mosis that simply meant "son of," or "heir of." It is a suffix found at the end of many Egyptian names such as Tuthmosis, Amenmosis, and Ramesis, etc. Therefore, if we suggest that the biblical Moses ("son of" someone) was Akhenaton, the heir of Amenhoptep III and inheritor of the throne of Egypt, we may be on the right track. Given the proofs for this contention that have emerged in the last decade or so, we know that we are.
If anyone was "fathering" nations it appears to have been the pharaohs.
The covenants between god and Moses were in fact covenants between Aton and Akhenaton. This revelation gives incredible relevance to the passages from the early books of the bible. To understand the world of the past and the world of today it is essential that the passages are, for the most part, seen to be references to Earthly and political intrigues and not spiritual ones.
Author Ralph Ellis (following on from the great Comyns Beaumont) has a slightly different opinion regarding Akhenaton and Smenkhare. He suggests that Akhenaton was Aaron and that Tuthmosis (a mysterious first brother to Akhenaton that official historians have been curiously vague and dismissive about) was Moses.
Christianity is based not only on Akhenaton's particular skewed version of solar theology, but on Egyptian sun worship of every sort.
The consensus is that he [Tutankhamun] was the son of Akhenaton and his second but favorite wife Kiya. Naturally, this theory is disputed by a few historians. Moreover, on an inscription at a Sudanese temple, Tutankhamun himself speaks of being the son of Pharaoh Amenhotep III. In that case Tutankhamun would, like this father, have been foreign-blooded. Being the son of Amenhotep III would have made Tutankhamun the younger brother of Akhenaton and not his son. DNA evidence apparently confirmed that Tutankhamun was the brother of Smenkhare and most Egyptologists do now believe Smenkhare to have been the son of Amenhotep III. This indicates that he too may have been raised and tutored by the Israelites Yuya and Tuya at Goshen (Avaris). For Tutankhamun to be the son of Amenhotep III means that the latter must have lived longer than most Egyptologists speculated, and that he may even have been a major influence during the reign of his son Akhenaton. He may even have been co-regent with him. Archaeologists Flinders Petrie, John Pendlebury, and Herbert Fairman, found some evidence to suggest that this was the case. Also known as Tutankhamun and Tutankhaten, his title was "The Living Image of the Aten." He was married to one of Akhenaton's surviving daughters, Ankhesenpaaten, and through her he had a legitimate right to the throne of Egypt. Ralph Ellis suggests that he may really have been the son of Aye and not Akhenaton, while author Charles Pope (following on from Immanuel Velikovsky) believes that both Tutankhamun and Smenkhare were born from the incestuous relationship between Akhenaton and his foreign-blooded mother queen Tiye. He ruled for approximately 9 years, coming to the throne when he was 8 years old and dying at age 17. Irish style torcs and beads were found amongst his tomb treasures. During his regency, that was probably shared with his grandfather (or uncle) Aye, he appears to have completely renounced the worship of Aton. By the time he commissioned his own stele at Karnak, he had changed his name from Tutankhaten to Tutankhamun. Additionally, his tomb contained the images of many Egyptian gods, not something seen with the rest of the Atonist clan. Evidence suggests that he was murdered, but on the whole there is not a lot of clear information about who Tutankhamun was, or where he came from. This dearth of information may be due, not to the ancient Egyptians and their indifference to his person and reign, but to the strange and reprehensible activities of those Victorian "archaeologists" who discovered his tomb. The famous tomb was officially opened to the world on February 13, 1905. His fabulous golden funerary mask and nested coffins appear to have been made for someone else. The tomb was discovered by the unscrupulous Howard Carter and eminent financial backer Lord George Herbert, the fifth Earl of Carnarvon. The devious, power-hungry Earl was married to a daughter of Baron Rothschild and it was Rothschild money that he used to finance the excavation of the tomb of Tutankhamun.The Carter team had actually discovered the tomb eight years before their fraudulent public announcement of it. The tomb was much larger and richer than the world ever knew. The Rothschild agents illegally looted it of over 80 percent of its treasure and, with the assistance of the Times newspaper of London, methodically concocted and manipulated the global media frenzy that followed their would-be discovery of the tomb meticulously doctored to appear authentic. The mummy of the young pharaoh was mutilated beyond recognition by Carter and his team who tore it to pieces to get at the golden mask and over 145 embedded gems, jewels, and priceless ornaments it bore. Authors Gerald O'Farrell and Ahmed Osman believe there is no doubt that Tutankhamen was the same person as the biblical Joshua whom Moses (Akhenaton) predicted would succeed him. Since the Mosaic Joshua was a model for the Gospel Jesus Tutankhamun was, therefore, the prototype of the Jesus Christ of Christianity. Secret papyri found within the tomb of Tutankhamun, and kept back from the public by Howard Carter and Lord Carnarvon, prove this to be much more than theory. The stolen and secreted papyri revealed that Tutankhamun had ordered the murder of a priest of Aton for some misdemeanor and had him hanged on a tree to die. In retaliation another high priest of Aton arranged to have Tutankhamun intercepted and murdered while on his way to visit his exiled father, Akhenaton, at Sinai. His corpse was, for a time, also hung on a tree. Moreover, in Egyptian the term "Carpenter"(Setepenre) was used as a title for pharaoh. The many strange deaths of men involved with the excavation of the tomb of Tutankhamun, including Baron Richard Bethel, Lord Westbury, Arthur Weigall, George Jay Gould, Arthur Mace, and Lord Carnarvon himself - those put down to the "curse of the pharaohs" - were deliberate assassinations by an unknown hand committed to ensure that the truth of Tutankhamun's identity remained a secret. After Lord Carnarvon's mysterious death his body was mummified and his stomach removed. His Rothschild wife, Almina Victoria Maris Wombell, inherited his immense collection of Egyptian artifacts including those stolen with Carter from the tomb of Tutankhamun. Ralph Ellis speculates that Tutankhamun was not the son of Akhenaton or of Amenhotep III but of Aye, the uncle of Akhenaton. This is because Smenkhare came to the throne directly after Akhenaton's removal. If Tutankhamun had been the true legal descendant of Akhenaton, it is likely that he and not Smenkhare would have succeeded him. But it is not easy to be sure when it comes to this particular era of Egyptian history. Many of the beautiful artifacts found in the tomb of Tutankhamun, including the famous golden mask (from the second interior coffin), were made for Smenkhare and were originally in his tomb before being appropriated by the priests and moved to the lavish tomb of Tutankhamun. The face seen on the famous golden mask is that of Smenkhare and not Tutankhamun. Some Egyptologists believe that Tutankhamun may have despised Smenkhare and ordered his tomb to be looted. This is unlikely, since the latter's mummy was left unharmed.
Other names for Meritaten were Mayati and, after her departure from Egypt, Scota. As we show in Volume One, she survived the great plague that swept Egypt and, after her father died, she and her entourage traveled from Egypt to Scythia, Spain, and then (either she or a namesake daughter) crossed over to Ireland. Ireland took the name Scota from her and, after Irish tribes colonized Scotland, that country also bore her name.
A problematic personage. She [Nefertiti] was the daughter of Sitamun and wife of the most powerful man in the world, Akhenaton. Her name meant "Beautiful One Who Has Come." She was the mother of Meritaten ("Beloved of Aton") who made her way, under the name Scota, to Ireland. Nefertiti disappears from the scene during the fifteenth year of Akhenaton's reign when a deadly plague began sweeping the land. Archaeologist Dr. Joann Fletcher may have discovered her body within the tomb of pharaoh Amenhotep II. Nefertiti's sister Mutnodjmet was married to Pharaoh Heremheb who overcame the Atonists and attempted to rectify the havoc that Akhenaton had caused throughout the land. Expert on the Hyksos period, author Ralph Ellis, believes Nefertiti and Mutnodjmet to have been daughters of Aye, the priest of the sun and uncle of Akhenaton. Nefertiti has been taken as a prototype for the biblical Mary the mother of Jesus, as Eve, and also as the Old Testament Sarah. If her disappearance was in fact a banishment, then Nefertiti maybe a liable prototype for the biblical Lilith who was banished to the wilderness because of her rivalry with Adam and Eve.
Sometimes rendered Ikhnaton, his original name was Amenhotep IV. His name is thought to mean "Aton is Satisfied." He came to the throne in 1353 as a married man aged fourteen. He, or his brother Tuthmosis, was the prototype for the biblical Moses. His wives were Nefertiti and Kiya. With Nefertiti he had six daughters. Suggestively, according to the bible, the wife of the biblical Moses was known as Adonith, which means “of Aten.” This would refer to Nefertiti. His son Tutankhamen was probably born to his second wife Kiya. This theory is disputed by Ralph Ellis who believes Aye to have been Tutankhamen's true father, and by a few other Egyptologists who believe he was the son of Tiye and her husband Amenhotep III, making him the brother of Akhenaton. Akhenaton reigned for approximately 17 years. He built his first Atonist temple practically in the shadow of the temple of Amun (Amen Ra) as a mark of disrespect to the Amenist priesthood who had once saved Egypt by expelling the Hyksos usurpers. His body has not been found although for a while a mummy discovered in the tomb of queen Tiye was believed to have been his mortal remains. Recent, but rather shaky, evidence suggests that he had been briefly interred at Amarna, his own great city, but that his tomb was eventually ransacked and desecrated by rivals of Atonism. Akhenaton was probably the prototype for the biblical Adam. Wall reliefs and other images show his god Aton "breathing" into his nostrils by way of the Ankh,or symbol of breath and life. Akhenaton is also often depicted androgynously, that is in the form of both sexes. Akhenaton, Nefertiti, and their children, are depicted running about naked in their private garden and apartments at Amarna. Akhenaton also bore the title "first prophet of Aton" and, since Aton was none other than the Judaic-Christian Jehovah, this would make Akhenaton a great candidate for the biblical Adam. This "Adam theory" is accurate given that we remember the idea of Adam to be primordial, reaching back before the time of the Amarna period to the worship of the god Atum Ra of Heliopolis. It is possible that beloved elements of this ancient "Adamic" myth were merely being re-enacted by the dramatically inclined Akhenaton and his relatives. In any case, the story of the banishing of Adam and Eve from the idyllic "garden" has been likened to the expulsion of Akhenaton and his Nefertiti (or Kiya) from power in Egypt. Egyptologists have noticed the singular fact that Queen Kiya's name (from Khavah, meaning "Life") is suggestively close to "Eve."
The consensus is that she [Sitamun] was the mother of Nefertiti. Unlike Tiye she was of royal blood and bore the official title "Great Royal Wife." Her children were true claimants to the throne of Egypt. She was probably the daughter of the pharaoh Amenhotep III as well as his wife. Sitamun's sister was called Isis.
Although he [Yuya] never reigned as a pharaoh he was the unseen authority behind the thrones of Amenhotep III and Akhenaton. Lately identified as the prototype for the biblical Joseph, he was the richest man in the world after the pharaoh who promoted him. He possessed many illustrious titles. Pharaoh Amenhotep III awarded him the title "Father of a God," a title later passed to his son Aye. Since his daughter Tiye was the mother of Akhenaton, Yuya was the grandfather of the man who would become the most notorious pharaoh in Egypt's long history. His son Aye, the uncle of Akhenaton, would also go on to be a major player in the story of the Atonists. Yuya and his wife Tuya were among the major educators and caretakers of the young Akhenaton. They were Israelites descended from the Hyksos people and were probably of elite rank within that allegedly foreign race. This is probably the reason why Yuya bore the illustrious title "Father to a Pharaoh." It is believed that one of his wives, Asenath, was the daughter of the chief priest of the sun at Heliopolis. Yuya cleverly arranged matters so that his daughter Tiye married Pharaoh Amenhotep III, the son of Tuthmosis IV, who had first honored him. Yuya (Joseph) was descended from Yakobaam/Jacoba/Jacob, an earlier Hyksos pharaoh. In the bible we are toldthat Jacob’s name was changed to Israel, hence the Hyksos people can be known as “Israelites.”If Yuya was indeed the same man as the biblical Joseph it is interesting to note that he served as the chief "tax collector" in charge of the seizure and acquisition of many private estates. The seven years of famine also helped Joseph prosper since, as the bible states, the rich of many lands came to Egypt to purchase grain. More importantly, for our investigations, the bible reveals that Joseph's initial benefactor, Potiphar, was a sun priest of the city of On, or Heliopolis. In Hebrew the name Potiphar means "powerful pharaoh" and in Coptic it means "belonging to the sun." In his fine books author, Ahmed Osman, writes about the effect Yuya's mummified visage had upon him. He relates how his discovery of the connection between Yuya and the biblical Joseph led him to his masterly revisionist readings of the bible and Egyptian history.
He [Amenhotep III] was the prototype for King Solomon
Prototype of the biblical patriarch Abraham he [Tuthmosis III] was the actual father of the so-called Twelve Tribes of Israel. Author Ahmed Osman regards Tuthmosis III as the prototype for the biblical king David.
So feared and respected was he [Tuthmosis III] that he was given the title "Pharaoh." This was a term used by foreign nations. The Egyptians used the term "Zera" or "Sera".
Indeed, Yah was originally a name for Thoth the Egyptian moon god. His name and worship appear to have been adopted and altered to suit the ways of the solar cult.
Clearly, Yahweh was based on Aton and not so much upon older gods. The edicts which the Atonists brought out of Egypt, those scripted and levied by Akhenaton and his direct descendants, were simply camouflaged as the "oral tradition” of the Levitical elite. The ordinary "Jew" would not be privy to this tradition. To this very day the majority of biblical researchers and practitioners of the Judeo-Christian religion are unaware that the oral tradition (that eventually became the basis of Talmudic Judaism) was Egyptian and Atonist in origin. The Levites cunningly rescripted their history and liberally plagiarized the cultural archives of many other Occidental and Oriental religions and ethnic groups, including the Irish, the Goths, and the Phoenicians. As we demonstrate on these following pages there is not a shred of factual evidence for their "history." The authors of the Abraham story afforded no dates for this legendary migration, and that omission alone speaks volumes. It is from their time with Akhenaton and his cult of the sun that the Levites began to believe they had a special spiritual destiny. Doubtless, this absurd racist notion was due to their indoctrination by, and identification with, a crazed, perverse, and egomaniacal renegade pharaoh who believed himself to be divinely inspired and glorious; we might say - a legend in his own mind.
The evidence of two gods being fused into one can be found concealed within the early passages of the Old Testament. The Book of Exodus, that tells of the first meeting of Moses and Yahweh, makes it clear that Yahweh was a new god to the Israelites. This problematic dichotomy was solved by the bible's composers and editors who attempted to fuse the old pagan god with the newer god of Moses. The passage, that reveals the lack of antiquity of Yahweh, can be found at Exodus chapter six.
God spoke to Moses and said to him: "I am Yahweh. To Abraham and Isaac and Jacob I appeared as El Shaddai; I did not make myself known to them by my name Yahweh...Say this, then, to the sons of Israel, 'I am Yahweh. I will free you of the burdens which the Egyptians lay on you...I will adopt you as my own people, and I will be your God. Then you shall know that it is I, Yahweh, your God, who have freed you from the Egyptians' burdens...'
This sales pitch of god, directed via his minister to a people who did not know him, was clearly a clever insertion made to link a new and exclusive god with one recognized, accepted, and worshipped by all. If the people of Israel knew of this god, and if they had already been worshipping him since time immemorial, such a passage would never have been found in the bible or anywhere else. But if Yahweh is Aton, a unique solar deity worshipped by a select few, the passage would make perfect sense. We discover from this passage that Yahweh was not the god to whom the poor "enslaved" Israelites were praying. He was simply not their god. He was a god who entered in of his own volition to adopt and rescue them, demanding to be followed and obeyed. And he threw down curses on those who refused to do so.
The consensus of most official historians and Egyptologists is that Aton was Adonai or Jehovah, and that Akhenaton was the world's first monotheist.
A "Jew" might be a worshipper of Yahweh. This much is known. However, what if the word Adonai was the important word and not Yahweh? What if the ruse was to have the former as a sobriquet for the latter in order to draw attention away from the significance of the word Adon? If we think it merely a relatively meaningless sobriquet then our attention falls not on it as much as upon the referent Yahweh. Perhaps, the ruse was to ensure that we did not examine the word Adon and find its Egyptian and Irish roots. That the Jewish god Jehovah (Yahweh) is an Egyptian sun god and not in the least bit unique was not to become common knowledge, if it could be helped. The Egyptian connections to the Israelites had to be obscured and the name of god was a major stumbling block. So the preposterous story of Moses and the "Burning Bush" was concocted and the Jews themselves were fooled into the belief that it would be scandalous irreverence to pronounce the ever so sacred name of Yahweh (Jehovah). The implication was that Adonai, being common, simply meant "our sun god" and was purely connotative. It could be uttered, whereas the name Jehovah could remain unspoken. In our reading of the issue, however, the situation is just the reverse. Adonai was the sacred name of god cunningly hidden in plain sight. It was not connotative but denotative. It denoted Akhenaton, his sun god Aton, and the Egyptian priesthood that worshipped the sun. It denoted the Israelites and Levites who were members of that same cult and devotees of that same god. We are less likely to focus on the term Adon once it is put before us as a mere convenience, a rhetorical device. We are more likely to focus on that which it is said to refer to, that is, to this mystical and mystique-drenched Yahweh. Let us state now, for the record, that it is not the name Jehovah that is important but that of Adonai, that is, of Aton. Once this is understood, we can declare the identity of Yahweh problem to be solved, once and for all.
Suggestively, the lunar god Thoth was known as Yahu (or as Yahew). Ralph Ellis believes this indicates that the Israelites were originally moon worshippers. They simply accepted the moon as the twin, or nighttime emissary, of their beloved sun god Aton, and saw it as a "little sun," or "Silver Aton," shining at night for their benefit. The word Yahweh can also be found in the Persian Yawnah (or Jawnah) meaning "sun." The Phoenicians knew this god as Yahwe. In Welsh he was Jahna from which we get the modern Jon or John. The name John, like Iona, meant "sun" as well as "son." This is why so many male children were named after this sun god. The son is the sun of the father's life, quite literally his youngster or "young star" - his golden boy. Was not John of the Gospels known as the "beloved" one? In Syria it was Yaw which, with Yehew (Yahweh or Jahweh), obviously derives from the Yew tree, sacred to the Druids of old.
The name Jehovah (or Jaheva) simply refers to a god who is both "male" and "female."
The suffix ai, found in Adonai, simply means "one of." Adonai, therefore, means "One of Adon," or "One of Aton." In Hebrew, Adonai is spelled Adni which alerts us since it is near to the Sanskrit Agni, the Hindu (and Aryan) fire or sun god. The word Adonai is also near to the Irish Don and this is probably the origin of the word.
The Pharaoh Akhenaton, like his father before him, referred to god by the name Aton, a word curiously similar to the Hebrew term for god Adon (or Adonai). We believe that it is this similarity that proves, beyond all other clues, the connection between the Israelites and Atonist pharaohs of the New Kingdom. It is just one piece of evidence to show that monotheism was nothing new. It was not unique to the biblical Jews by any means.
Scholars accept that there is no essential difference between the Egyptian Aton and the Israelite Adon (or Adonai). These names are the same and so are the deities and worship they denote. The transposition of a single consonant (or vowel) does not change this fact.
So it appears that the "Jews" of later ages would have their work cut out for them. They had to go to great lengths to downplay their connection to the Hyksos pharaohs and to obscure the nature of their heinous deeds in the land of the pyramids. This is why they chose to re-script history to make their alleged ancestors appear ragged homeless "slaves." It was a comedown, to be sure. But it was better that history recorded them as oppressed outsiders rather than as tyrannical conquerors who raped Egypt of its many treasures. But the secret could not be kept forever. Clever scholars began to uncover the truth. Sigmund Freud, for instance, noticed that Jews and Egyptians shared the rite of circumcision that was not employed by neighboring peoples. He noticed that the name "Moses" was of Egyptian origins and that it was most unusual for a highborn son of pharaohs to go round killing guards and taking the cause of "oppressed" slaves.
Egyptologists have been conspicuously reticent to say what god or gods the Hyksos really worshipped. As we have already mentioned, we are told they were predominantly venerators of the god Set.
Heliopolis is a Greek rendering of the city's name. The Egyptian name for the great city was On.
Like this writer, the researcher Ralph Ellis does not buy into the migration of Abraham and Sarah story. He believes that Abraham and Sarah did not come from Sumeria into Egypt in the manner commonly described. Ellis, like the great revisionist Comyns Beaumont before him, believes that Abraham (from Ab'ram meaning "of Ra the Father") was the first pharaoh of the Hyksos dynasty. Abraham may have gone with his sister and wife Sarah towards Thebes (in southern Egypt) after a famine broke out in his own Northern kingdom. According to Ellis it was during this journey that the Theban king fell in love with Sarai and took her for his wife. The Southern pharaoh in question was none other than Tuthmosis III. And so, it was he, and not Abraham, who was the true father of the so-called Twelve Tribes of Israel. They were in fact the Twelve Tribes of Aton. Since the Hyksos were rulers in the North (Lower Egypt, Delta region), they would have had dominion over the pyramids and over Heliopolis, the capital of solar worship. Hence, Akhenaton's zeal for just that kind of worship and iconography. Ellis suggests that prior to the reign of Akhenaton, the Levite Yuya (the biblical Joseph) acted as an agent for the expelled Hyksos and returned to ingratiate himself with the pharaoh Amenhotep I. Ellis believes that he was successful and became a powerful presence behind the thrones of Tuthmosis III, Tuthmosis IV, Amenhotep III,and Akhenaton. Yuya and his family were the richest personalities in the entire world at that time, after the pharaoh himself.
Regarding the Hyksos connection, the author Ralph Ellis has established that the syllable Hyk had two meanings that might easily have been confused. The term can mean either "captive," or "king," depending upon whether the "y" is pronounced like an "I" (as in "Nick"), or as "Y" (as in"Mike") Ergo, historians can easily misidentify the Hyksos people. If modern Jews and Christians can fool the world by saying that their ancestors date back to "slaves" and "captives" rather than to "kings," then the prospects for true understanding of religion and scripture, as well as for the overall state of the world, are few indeed.
As we show in Volume One, Iesa was the third aspect of the ancient Druidic trinity. This makes him equivalent to the Christian Holy Spirit as well as to Christ. Originally, an "Israelite" was probably an Iesaite, Iesite, or Iesalite. Moreover, once the god name Iesa or Isa is combined with the Egyptian god name Ra, we get Isra. The final suffix "el" simply meant "messenger." So the name "Israelite" may simply have denoted a "messenger of Iesa and Ra," the sun gods of the ancient Arya. Iesa was the sun god of the Celts, Gaels, Scythians and Druids; and Ra (or Amen Ra) was the sun god of the Egyptians. Those who adopted the name "Israelite" have not legitimate right to the term. Originally it simply denoted an initiate or priest of the Solar Cult.
One of the chief gods of the Megalithic Irish was known as Iesa. This name has been been rendered in many ways, such as:
The first thing to clarify when it comes to the "Israelites" concerns the origin of the name "Israel." This name was not original to the people mentioned in the bible whose center was Jerusalem. None of the cities of the Hyksos pharaohs and their people bear the title "Israel." The term originated with the Irish and with the Phoenicians who had erected prominent and sophisticated cities all over Eastern Europe, Asia Minor, and the Levant. The Phoenicians were originally of Irish extraction and they had some of their most important bases in Ireland and Scotland. Not only were the Phoenicians expert sailors but they made good use of the land bridges that once existed between Scandinavia and England, and between England and Ireland.
There are many spurious inserts in the Old Testament, but despite the cover-ups we sense that there were close bonds between the early Israelites and Egyptians. In short, the deliberate stratagem of avoiding naming important personages, of omitting and altering times, dates, and sequences of events, of distorting chronologies, and of inserting complete fabrications, worked wonders to enable the biblical editors to devise their testaments as they saw fit, shuffling historical data as a conjurer does a deck of cards.
The biblical editors (believed to have been working and compiling in Babylon between the sixth and third centuries BC) decided to include this fabulous tale of Abraham and his devious and inexcusable intrigue against the pharaoh, to subtly cast doubt upon the parentage of a most important person in Jewish history, namely their son Isaac. If Sarai lay with pharaoh on the first night of their wedding ceremony (as was the custom), then could not Isaac of the Jews, of the seed of Abraham, not be of the house of pharaoh instead? It is our belief that this tie probably did exist and that it was covered up by the biblical editors who were under orders from the Cult of Aton as to what to write. It would have seriously weakened the allegiances and ties between the Jews and the Cult of Aton if it was to be realized that there were close bonds to earlier pharaohs. As a result, the connection was downplayed so that the Atonists (those with an intense hated toward Egypt) could maintain the respect and allegiance of their Jewish servants. They wanted the Jews who followed and served them to develop the same antipathy that they possessed towards their original homeland and the pharaohs of previous dynasties. The Egyptian iconography and cosmology would remain in order to embellish the books, writings, and religion, but the blood ties would be obscured and only obliquely referenced. We also suppose that it was due to this intimate blood tie that the migration of Abraham from outside Egypt was concocted. If it could be shown that the first generation patriarch was not himself of Egypt but from some other place, and if he was sent from the outside into Egypt, the story would be more palatable to the Atonist editors of the bible, those "paying the bills," so to speak. The role of Sarai had to be played down as much as possible. The readers of later generations were not to know that she was an honored woman and wife to a pharaoh. So, the story of the Lord appearing to Abraham and giving him the covenant (Genesis 15:18) was concocted to make him the more appealing and striking character. Now all eyes would be focused upon Abraham and his Lord and on some vague inexplicable "covenant." Attention would not be on Sarai or Isaac's true father, the suggestively unnamed and mightily deceived pharaoh, who was the true father of the so-called "Twelve Tribes of Israel." In the Book of Genesis we are told that Sarai was unable to bear children, which is why she offered up her maid-servant, Hagar, to her husband Abraham. Clearly, this was another fabricated addition to steer readers away from the truth. (See Genesis 16:11.)
If we disregard [Ralph] Ellis' theories and choose instead to accept as fact the highly improbable story of Abraham, and his migration into Egypt, we are compelled to acknowledge something of singular importance concerning the virtue of this "holiest" of patriarchs and concerning the claims to virtue of the so-called "chosen" people supposed to have descended from his line. We discover, from the rendition of his life in the Book of Genesis, that this Abraham, upon his arrival at the House of the Pharaoh, lied to all saying that his wife Sarai was in fact his sister. This lie was told by the schemers when they discovered that the pharaoh had taken a personal liking to Sarai. When the pharaoh finds out that Sarai is Abraham's good-looking sister he takes her in marriage and rewards Abraham with considerable wealth. So, for simple material gain this great and holy patriarch palmed off his wife as his sister to the pharaoh of Egypt. And the supposed descendants of this Faginesque swindler dare tell us that the Egyptians were morally suspect. However, the Book of Genesis goes on to relate how terrible god-sent plagues descended upon pharaoh's people and that he finally finds out that he was sorely duped by Abraham, his duplicitous guest. The troubled pharaoh (considered a very evil person by the Jews of later ages) does not jail or kill Abraham but simply banishes him from his sight. (See Genesis 12:18.)
Ralph Ellis believes that Moses was really Tuthmosis, the brother of Akhenaton, known as Aaron in the Old Testament stories. However, we must remember that each pharaoh, each Egyptian king, and probably most high level court dignitaries, had several personal names. Pharaohs had five names with two known publicly and three kept secret. Pharaohs had "throne names" and doubtlessly had names which they preferred to be called by their closest family members. It is unlikely that these secret names would ever have been written down or known to the world at large. Therefore, "Moses" could still have been a name for Akhenaton. It merely means - "the son of..." and may have referred to Akhenaton being the "Son of Aton," exactly what he considered himself to be.
We are told that during his time at Sinai, Moses (Akhenaton) was unable to speak directly to his "Israelite" cronies. This was due to his alleged inability to speak their language that we are told was “Hebrew.” He engaged his Israelite (Levite) brother Aaron to intercede for him. Researchers have identified this Aaron as the Pharaoh Smenkhare, the son of Akhenaton, although Ralph Ellis believes him to have been Tuthmosis, the brother of Akhenaton, believed to have died young. Akhenaton's need for an interpreter leaves us thinking that there were some major differences between his people and these Levites even though they were close political affiliates before, during, and after their expulsion.
Scholar Albert T. Clay believes that the Amorites were the true founders of the Babylonian civilization. He claims that it was during the Amorite Hammurabi Dynasty (25th century BC) that the names of famous "Babylonian" gods and heroes appear, such as El, Anu, Ea, Ishtar and Tammuz, Adapa, Anat, Dagan, Molech, Lugal, and Gilgamesh, etc.
Interestingly, their [the Amorites] god was one of mountains, volcanoes, and thunder. If the official history on the Amorites is to be trusted this suggests the Amorites were a very ancient people even if they were not as civilized or fixed as the Sumerians, Babylonians, and Egyptians. Allegedly, their language was a form of Akkadian and near to what is now referred to as Hebrew. Some historians believe the Amorites to be the ancestors of the Israelites although the connection cannot be assured due to the dearth of information on the race. The bible refers to the Amorites as mountain or hill dwellers. The mountains of Judea, like Mount Moriah (or perhaps Amoriah), for instance, were known as the"mountains of the Amorites" (see Deut. 1:7, 19, 20). The bible does state that the Amorites were of giant stature. Their king was known as Og, and this is close to the Gaelic Ogma the giant god of strength and wisdom. The bible, however, does not presume kinship between Amorite and Israelite but deems the Amorites to be ancestors of the Canaanites. Nevertheless, there may have been a connection between the biblical Israelites and Amorites since the languages are so similar and since their gods (of volcanoes, mountains, thunder, and storms) are so reminiscent of one another. The myths of the Israelites, after all, do seem preoccupied with mountains, deserts, wildernesses, fulminating gods, whirlwinds, and short-term kingdoms. Most importantly, the connection of the Amorites to the Hyksos is strengthened when we discover that the Amorite goddess, the consort of Amurru, was known as the "goddess of deserts." Assyriologists have discovered accounts that show that the Amorites despaired over their nomadic life of wandering and farming:
The term "Shepherds" was quite commonly used as a description of the Arabian people known to history as the Amorites. Philologist and historian, L. A. Waddell, maintained the Amorites to have been of Nordic stock. This means that they were white Indo-Europeans related to the Syrians, Assyrians, Sumerians, Babylonians, and Persians.
Ralph Ellis speculates that the Hyksos were close relatives of both the Minoans of Crete and the Philistines of Canaan. This theory is endorsed by the authors Alan Butler and Stephen Dafoe who have made extensive researches into the Knights Templar and Minoan civilization. There is also evidence that the Hyksos had settlements in Greece and Italy.
Scholars believe the Hyksos set up a new capital at Jerusalem, while author Ralph Ellis believes they were able, during the period of the 22nd dynasty, to maintain a base at Tanis in the North-Eastern Delta region. Evidence suggests that the reconquest of Egypt was never far from their minds.
This need for camouflage compelled the exiled "prophets" to select one god to worship from the rest and to concoct their sagas of Abraham, Joseph, and Moses, etc. Downplaying their elite status, they craftily set about rescripting their god of light and of the sun, not as Aton but as Jehovah.
The Babylonian Talmud is said to have been the result of an oral tradition transmitted from Jehovah via Moses at Sinai. In truth it is the doctrine of Aton, conveyed to his servants and commanders.
Jehovah is known to this day as Adonai, a word that derives directly from Aton, the god of the sun.
Regardless of where they originated, it is likely that the Hyksos people had close ties with tribes in Canaan.
It could hardly be made since the pyramids, it is thought, were erected in the predynastic age under the regency of Pharaoh Cheops. This pharaoh, who was also known as Khufu, lived between 2589 and 2566 BC, or one thousand years before the Hyksos (Levites) were ever heard of.
Academic scholars have encountered problems dating the exodus since the Old Testament's composers strangely failed to mention the name of the most important pharaoh Moses had all the problems with. We can now see why this omission occurred. It was an inevitable omission given the fact that Moses was himself a pharaoh. It was imperative that the pharaoh's name be omitted and the date of Moses' exodus with the chosen people be left a mystery. It was imperative that the world did not find out about the earlier exodus under Ahmose I. It was never to be known that the Levites (Atonists) had powerful allies awaiting them in lands outside Egypt, and perhaps at Tanis in the Eastern Delta region. They were to appear poor wanderers hard pressed by the evil pharaoh.
The recent historical discoveries make sense, because the figure given for the number of "slaves" who followed Moses, could not possibly be accurate. The multitude mentioned were after all meant to have descended from Abraham and his one wife after a mere three hundred years sojourn in Egypt. No, the massive exodus mentioned in the old Testament was not of oppressed slaves, but of oppressive Hyksos. The second later exodus (of Moses/Akhenaton and his followers) was not as large. It has, however, been deliberately confused with the earlier expulsion event.
Pharaoh Ahmose I and his queen Ah hotep were members of the Lunar Cult which predated the Solar Theocracy by millennia. This cult had a center at Thebes and it was the Thebans who were most oppressed by the regime of the Hyksos. The phoneme Ah (in Ahmose and Ah hotep) was the name of the moon god. The members of the Lunar Cult of Thebes were rivals of the priests of Heliopolis whom they considered little better than the Hyksos. The conflicts in Egypt of which we speak were not merely political strife. They were primarily theological in nature.
The Tempest Stele confirms that the Hyksos pillaged the land they had once ruled and left with coffers full of treasure. These facts further render laughable the image of god's impoverished, oppressed, desert-wandering "chosen people" presented in the early books of the bible.
According to the Jewish lore, Moses was married to a Nubian princess and was therefore the commander of the Nubians.
Recent Investigations have revealed the biblical exodus story to be a veiled and doctored reference to two events that occurred centuries apart. It refers to the mass expulsion of the Hyksos people under the reign of Ahmose I (1575-1550 BC) and also to the removal of the renegade Pharaoh Akhenaton at the end of the 18th dynasty. This first exodus of the Hyksos was an immense affair and took a long time to complete. The Hyksos cities such as Memphis and Avaris were evacuated and the quarter of a million inhabitants from this Avaris plus those from other towns and cities left a trail of ruin in their wake. Although the process of removal was slow, and even though Ahmose was compelled to pay an enormous amount of money to hasten the departure of his powerful enemies, Egypt was liberated during his regency.
At the beginning of the eighteenth dynasty, during the reign of Pharaoh Ahmose I (Aahmes, Amasis, or Amos), the majority of the Hyksos people were finally routed and expelled from Egypt. By way of emphatic negotiation and financial incentive, the Theban pharaoh succeeded in bringing their cruel and destructive 300-year rule to an end. Pharaoh Ahmose was directed by the El Kab family descended from early Egyptian feudal lords. The ancient texts describe his great victories and his own stature:
Many scholars have agreed that the story of the combat between Horus and Set encapsulates the historical antipathy and tribulations between the native Egyptians and Hyksos invaders. In this case it is not that Set was evil but that he was the god adopted by the evil ones who chose to worship him. This is why Set would have been deemed a god of darkness in the age after the Hyksos were defeated and removed from power. Since Set opposed Osiris and Horus, the gods of light, scholars question why the Hyksos and Levites of the Solar Cult worshipped him. The answer has to do with the metaphysical properties of light. Set represented the dark side of the sun and of light. But he was a solar god nevertheless. Egyptian pantheons were dualistic and balanced. There were gods of light and gods of darkness. There were gods of the overworld and the underworld, of this world and of the next. In Egyptian, Set's name is believed to mean "great in strength." The Egyptian word setam meant "hate" and "opposition," while the word shetam meant "fight." In any case, he is one of Egypt’s oldest deities, worshipped centuries before the Hyksos arrived. Indeed, it is possibly due to Set's eventual connection with the hated Hyksos that he was not completely assimilated into the pantheon of Egyptian gods but always regarded as a god apart from the main pantheon. Finally, after the Hyksos Kings had been expelled, Set was considered the god of evil or, more specifically, of the evil ones. In fact, the true god of evil in Egypt was not Set but Apep or, more correctly, Apophis. This serpentine god ruled the underworld and hindered the god Ra when he attempted to traverse the forbidding regions of the nekyia. The protector of the sun god was none other than Set who attacked and overcame the demonic Apophis. So it is clear to students of Egyptian occultism that Set was not an easily defined one-dimensional god.To some minds he is evil and to others a god possessed of abilities that keep true evil at bay. Set was often depicted kneeling and we get the English words set and seat from this name. Something about Set reminds us of the Hindu god Shiva.
Set has been considered the Egyptian equivalent of the Christian Satan, though we stress that Set was a much more complex archetype than the Christian version.
Dionysus - his original name was Zagreus, meaning "horned one." He appears to be a anthropomorphic rendering of Cernunnos, Herme, or Set, the gods of earth, nature, animals and forests. He was clearly a chthonic god, connected to underworld rituals. The Christians took Dionysus and made him their St. Denis. Dionysus' birthday was December 25th. Michelangelo's statue of Moses in Rome also bears horns. (Note the similarity between the words "horned" and "honored.")
Lord Set - An ancient god of the earth, akin to the Irish stag god Herne, and Hindu Shiva. His color was red and men will still say they "saw red" after becoming enraged. The red cross of England comes from his worship as do the many other "red" insignias to be found employed by governments and religious bodies. The red squares on the chess board represent the red desert lands of Egypt burned by the sun. These were the lands ruled over by Set
In any case, Set was considered a scheming deity who sought to overthrow the reign and sovereignty of his brother Osiris. After Set murdered Osiris he was sought out by Horus (the son of Osiris and Isis) who wounded him in the groin with a spear. Set managed to spear out one of Horus’ eyes but was ultimately overthrown by the god of light.
Some scholars imagine the Hyksos to have been horseback riding Hittites while others deem them Greeks, Syrians, Amorites, Minoans, Scythians, Hurrians, or even Trojans. One fact that suggests that the Hyksos were long term inhabitants of Egypt, rather than invaders, is their veneration of the ancient god Set (Seth, Sutekh, Seteh, or Seb) who had dominion over Lower (Northern) Egypt. During the time of the Hyksos, Set became part of the Heliopolitan Ennead. Set was god of the dark places, wild weather, and of the inhospitable red desert burned by the sun called Tesherit. This word means "red lands." Red was the color of Set, so it is interesting that this color should be frequently and conspicuously employed by corporations and governments (red squares, St. George's Red Cross, Red Coats, red tape, red carpets, red ribbons, red military stripes and lapels, red roses, etc). Some researchers point to this as evidence that the Hyksos were fair-complexioned westerners known as "Edomites."
The Lamb Skin is employed by Christians, Jews, and Masons. It was, and is, a symbol denoting the Hyksos dynasty of Egypt, known as the "Shepherd Kings."
Allegedly, another Egyptian term for the Hyksos was Shasu. This term meant "Shepherds," and we might note how frequently this term is employed in the bible.
So, we now discover that the famous Israelites were powerful kings in one of the greatest civilizations on Earth. We find that they were not oppressed captives or slaves, and that they were one and the same people as the so-called "Hyksos" people. Within the last ten years or so, authors such as Ralph Ellis, Moustafa Gadalla, and Ahmed Osman (following on from masters such as Comyns Beaumont, Immanuel Velikovsky, Sigmund Freud, and others), have uncovered the close ties between the Hyksos and the so-called "Israelites" of the Old Testament. We believe that the Israelites, or Hyksos, were Scythians displaced from Ireland during the great Age of Catastrophe. We believe they were the "Shepherd Kings of foreign lands," that historians have been so hard pressed to identify. We believe they had several communities in Egypt, and that they were originally, before their physical displacement, of Irish ancestry. If the Scythian-Hykson used the title "Israelite," it was probably because this was the name of the ancient Irish Iesa or Isa, the god of light. If the name Isa is combined with Ra, one derives Isara or Isra, which can soon be rendered Israel. The final phoneme el means "minister" or "messenger." Iesa and Ra were lords of light, so the combination of names by members of the Solar Cult is perfectly understandable.
Eventually, the Hyksos moved northwards and overran Memphis. They established their first main capital there. They later moved to Avaris that, according to biblical tradition, was the same city occupied by the Levite followers of Moses. Avaris was basically a garrison town held by over a quarter of a million men in arms. Avaris was also known as Zoan. This latter term is close to Zion. If it is the same word then the constant references by Jews to the time of "Zion" refer to the dynasty of the despotic Hyksos people to whom they were related. According to Ralph Ellis the patriarch known as Abraham (from Ab'ram - meaning "of Ra the Father") was the first pharaoh of these despised Hyksos people. His sister and wife Sarah eventually married the pharaoh of Southern Egypt forming a union with that rival and more native house. This alliance would have resulted in future mixed marriages (like Amenhotep III's with Tiye and Yuya with Asenath, etc), and to claims to the throne from foreign-blooded heirs. The majority of the pharaohs of the eighteenth dynasty fit this type.
According to the history books, the Hyksos arrived during a time of unrest and anarchy in Egypt when the pharaoh was Neshi. Neshi was a negro from Nubia who managed to seize the throne for himself after a violent struggle with two weak successors of the 12th dynasty pharaoh Neferkhara (of the Sebekhotep kings) whose vast empire extended from Nubia to the Mediterranean. Under the corrupt and inept rule of Neshi, Egypt was vulnerable before its enemies. According to most experts, it was at this time the Hyksos attacked and established their own despotic empire. Some Hyksos historians believe that the fearsome invaders were aided by the inept imposter dynasty of Nubians that rose after the fall of the Sebekhoteps, and by the many refugees and immigrants who, though granted shelter in Egypt during times of want, cared little for the welfare of the land of their hosts. The Hyksos strengthened their numbers with these self-seeking envious foreigners and found Egypt for the taking. After their successful takeover they kept open the country's borders and all foreigners were bid welcome into Egypt. The reign of their Pharaoh Salatis opened Egypt's fifteenth dynasty. The native Egyptians prayed to their old gods for release from those they referred to as the "leper kings," the "impure ones," and the "polluted."
The dragon was the emblem of the Dragon Court of Egypt, the Brotherhood of the Snake, headed by the Hyksos pharaohs and later by the renegade Akhenaton (Moses). This so-called "Dragon Bloodline" still exists. It was preserved in the Merovingian, Carolingian, Plantagenet, Tudor, Stuart, Hapsburg, Hanoverian, Savoy, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Battenberg, Bowes Lyon, Guelph, and Windsor dynasties (and others).
The Old Testament tells us that Moses and his brother Aaron were sent by Jehovah to the unnamed pharaoh to plead for the release of the "chosen people." While they are debating with pharaoh and his priests, Moses and Aaron perform a strange magical trick. Suggestively, they do this regardless of the prohibition against performing magic. [...]
This frightful nonsense is a cover story for a game of politics being played out by Akhenaton and his Atonists. It is a cryptic reference to the antagonism and struggle for power between the scheming exiles and the Egyptian pharaoh who was restoring peace and stability to his stricken land. This pharaoh was not intent on holding the Israelites (Atonists). On the contrary, he was expelling them and eager to do anything to make sure they trouble Egypt no more. What we find in biblical accounts is nothing more than a deliberate and cunning reversal of what took place in Egypt's history. It is just one more travesty of truth. In any case, the mention of the "Brazen Serpent" serves to alert us to the true identity of the "Israelites." The Egyptian pharaohs (like the Chinese emperors) used the symbol of royalty to denote themselves. There is no way that a follower of Jehovah (as put before us) would be making use of such a "pagan" device.
As we assert, the biblical Israelites were followers of renegade Akhenaton, the biblical Moses, and their powerful descendants have sought to keep this fact from the world.
[...] the Phoenicians were indeed extraordinarily gifted men. They were one of the first races to devise and employ a sophisticated alphabet, construct great cities and temples, make paper for writing, and sail the seas of the world. The fact is that they were Arya, or adepts of the highest order. They were master architects, astrologers, shipwrights, mariners, healers, and scientists. We believe the Phoenicians were, like the Scythians, originally from the West. They preserved of the secrets of Megalithic construction and many other ancient arts. They may have been the original builders of many temples along the Nile. This is what the Old Testament hints, and what a great deal of miscellaneous Masonic literature suggests.
Akhenaton was the figurative "missing cornerstone" (or capstone) that the builders (Egyptians) rejected. (See Psalms 118, and Matthew 21:42). It is Akhenaton and his Heliopolitan Solar Church that were cast out from the land of Egypt and banished to the wilderness (the rest of the world). Since that time Egypt has been despised by the descendants of the Atonists who have perpetually worked to obscure its history and significance. The pharaohs of later periods were despised and when the chance came to retaliate, the Atonists ("Christians") gleefully burned the Library of Alexandria to the ground and murdered Hypatia, the prophetess of that great city who was exposing them.
Pharaoh Heremheb ("Golden Horus, the Powerfull Bull") who finally seized the throne for himself in order to demolish Akhenaton's perverse, egoistic and oppressive reign.
Seti I was the great pharaoh of the nineteenth dynasty (and of the Biblical Exodus) who, like the great Pharaohs Ahmose I and Heremheb before him, vanquished the Monstrous Cult of Aton.
The chiefs of the so-called "Israelites" had been pharaohs themselves and were related to, and descended from, the Hyksos pharaohs of the 13th dynasty. Their great capitals were Memphis and Avaris. Avaris was later renamed Pi-Rameses but had been known as Zaru and Zion. It was situated in the "Goshen" of the bible, in the Eastern zone of the Nile Delta. Suggestively, it was the city where Akhenaton had grown up and been educated. The Atonist coterie, who were expelled along with Akhenaton were, like the pharaoh himself, members of this Hyksos dynasty of wealthy and powerful kings and priests. The Hyksos, we believe, were connected to, and possibly identical with, the Scythians of Northern Europe. These Scythians were Celts (or more correctly Gaels) displaced to Europe after the Age of Catastrophe. They were, we believe, originally from the British Isles. If, therefore, it is true that the Hyksos and the Israelites were one and the same people, as serveral investigators now allege, it means that the Israelites were in fact, in their earliest incarnation, Gaels from the North-West. We believe the legends and the etymology prove this to be very likely.
Although the story of Akhenaton's exodus (c. 1300 BC) is cryptically referenced in the bible's early books and chapters, it is only now that the full light of truth has begun to shine upon the happenings and personalities of this book. In the past, the historians Manetho, Josephus, and Strabo, proclaimed the wandering Israelite tribes to be intimately connected with the pharaonic dynasties of Egypt. Nowadays, a few researchers carrying on the revisionist work of Karl Abrahams, Sigmund Freud, Immanuel Velikovsky, and Comyns Beaumont, help us to understand where the mysterious people of the bible came from. What stands out from their discoveries is the level of mythmongering and deception involved in the bible's compilation. Most importantly, we discover that the Israelites were certainly not impoverished oppressed slaves as most of the world has been expertly conditioned to believe.
Heremheb (1323-1295 BC) was the last king of the troubled 18th dynasty. He appointed his military general Rameses I (1295-94 BC) to the throne to take his place. Rameses I was followed by his son Seti I (1294-1279 BC) who gave the throne to his own son Ramses II (the "Great") the pharaoh who finally set about hunting down and killing Akhenaton after his arrogant return to claim the Egyptian throne for a second time. The complete list of the nineteenth dynasty pharaohs is as follows:
Rameses I (1292 - 1290)
Seti I (1290 - 1279)
Ramses II (1279 - 1213)
Merenptah, Mineptah, or Mernptah (1213 - 1203)
Amenmese (1203 - 1200)
Seti II (1200 - 1194)
Siptah (1194 - 1188)
It is not by chance that Pharaohs Heremheb, Rameses II, and Seti I are frequently depicted as evil tyrants in the various Hollywood movie accounts of the biblical exodus. In a classic example of reverse projection and transference complex they are without fail portrayed as despotic, idol-worshipping maniacs obsessed with punishing the good and holy Akhenaton (Moses) and his followers. Given the identity of those who fund and control the movie business, we tend to find this kind of portrayal unsurprising, Under the hands of the Atonist mythmongers, Heremheb became the model for the biblical Pontius Pilate who would, as the Gospel of John reports, crucify "the king" (see John 19:15).
Around the year 1361 BC, and after almost two decades of intolerance, bigotry, and suppression, the priests of Amen Ra at Thebes, with the majority of the Egyptian people, finally rose up against this decadent and spiritually degenerate dynasty and ousted them from power. After the reign of Akhenaton collapsed, the throne was passed to Smenkhare and then Tutankhamun who, renouncing the worship of Aton, returned the reigns of power back to the Amenist priesthood. After the untimely death of Tutankhamun his uncle Aye (who had also apparently renounced Aton) became pharaoh. He reigned for approximately four years before being removed by Heremheb. When it looked as if things were going too slowly, or that the Atonists would try to re-establish their despotism, Pharaoh Heremheb was compelled to seize the throne of Egypt with the assistance of the military. He (and later Ramses I, Seti I, and Ramses II) oversaw the Atonists' gradual removal from positions of power, at least in the major cities and provinces.
Although a few ancient historians had alluded to the connection between the bible's "chosen people" and the ruling nobility of Egypt, it was not something the compilers of the bible wanted publicly known. This information has not been forthcoming from all the world's great seminaries or synagogues. On the contrary, what we have received from such institutions, for generations, is at issue of historical fabrication and deception. This alteration of history was deliberate and ingenious. Several devices of deception have been employed and we list a few of them here so that an understanding of the scriptures can be made easier for the reader. The devices of deception include:
Geography - The deliberate positioning of events in areas of Asia Minor and Egypt that never took place there.
Caricature - The flagrant embellishment of certain personalities to disguise their true identity.The bible contains many spurious characters and descriptions of outlandish habits and fantastic activities that are patently improbable.
Etymological - Words, terms, phrases, and place-names, etc, underwent either subtle or drastic editing and transposition.
Renaming - The deliberate alteration of personal names. This device was used widely. Names of characters were simply changed so that their existence and activities would be impossible to confirm. Titles were reported to be personal names, such as David, Solomon, Joshua, Jesus, Aaron, etc.
Omission - Key events that did occur historically are drastically downplayed or omitted altogether by the biblicists.
Invention - This involves the introduction of people or tribes, or events, that never existed or happened
Chronology - Timelines are muddled on purpose. King lists are rearranged, and the lifespans of individuals modified. Dates for key operations, such as building projects, battles, traversals, famines, coronations, marriages, births, and so on are tampered with.
Interpretation - Wild, unrealistic interpretations are given to events and ideologies to flagrantly confound understanding.
Crypticism - The introduction of a welter of code words, terms, and phrases that signify little to the layperson, but that communicate secret meanings and intentions to the initiated reader. Examples include: harlot, prostitute, virgin, drunkard, leper, cave-dweller, carpenter, shepherd, fishermen, merchant, judge, serpent, blood, seed, vine, covenant, watcher, mountain, desert, heavens.
If Akhenaton (and his family before him) was of the Hyksos bloodline, then his bizarre and sacrilegious actions would make a great deal of sense. But it should be realized, in any case, that Akhenaton was not the legitimate heir to the throne of Egypt. His mother Tiye was not of Egyptian blood and was not acknowledged as being a spiritual "daughter" of the god Amen-Ra, that a female had to be in order to have legal rights to the throne. Since Tiye did not possess this right,her son Akhenaton did not either. It can be argued that almost every pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty (as well as those infidel "Hyksos" kings from the 13th dynasty to the 18th) were not, in the true spiritual sense, legitimate pharaohs. Nevertheless, Akhenaton certainly was not. Ergo, when he and his cult of Levite followers were deposed they naturally found it expedient to obscure their identity ("Israelites," "Judites," "Levites") and not openly proclaim or emphasize their relationship to Egypt. Historians have followed suit so it is only now, in relatively recent times, that the truth about the origins of the Judites and Levites has surfaced.
The Hyksos were none other than the biblical Levites.
This connection to Heliopolis can be explained once we consider the theory of revisionist author Ralph Ellis who (following on from the nineteenth century scholar Donald MacKenzie) believes Heliopolis to have been dominated by the Hyksos kings. Authors William Bramley and Laurence Gardner define these kings as part of the ancient "Dragon Bloodline."
Akhenaton (renamed "Moses" by later propagandists) was a priest of the Cult of the Sun and the controller of the "Brotherhood of the Snake." The god he worshipped was Aton (also Aten, Adon, or Adonai). Being a deranged and obsessed megalomaniac, Akhenaten decided to do what no previous pharaoh had thought of let alone dared. He forcibly abolished the worship of all other gods in Egypt and curtailed financial support of the temples and priests. Apparently, it was his intention to forbid pantheism in favor of monotheism. But his concern was not, as has been insinuated by academic sycophants, to spiritualize the country. In effect, it was to de-spiritualize it. His demented concern was to have the god of his Levitical family be everyone's god. Few in Egypt shared his sentiments or thought this was a good idea. He had support only from other members of his family, from henchmen and court guards from foreign parts hired to protect him, and from certain Hyksos sun priests at Heliopolis, Avaris, and Memphis. These priests of the Delta's Solar Cult appear to have had a hand in electing the pompous king to his elevated but much misused office. Certainly, as the old historians have written, it was at the city of Heliopolis that "Moses" received his education, or shall we say his indoctrination.
We believe that the prominent Egyptologists have gone to great lengths to obscure Nefertiti's true ancestry just as they have gone to greater lengths to paint the self-obsessed Akhenaton as a semi-enlightened pacifist and minister of truth. Many sources admit that Nefertiti eventually faded from the scene but suggest that was merely due to an identity change. Some scholars claim to have discovered evidence suggesting that she was the ruler who came to the throne after Akhenaton was removed and that she went by the throne name Semekhara (or Smenkhare). A few scholars insist that the Pharaoh Smenkhare was Nefertiti and not the younger brother of Akhenaton. Although this may indeed be the case we need to remain cautious since this rather bizarre conjecture may merely be a designed to obscure the fact that Nefertiti was cast aside by the hardcore Atonist priestarchy due to her eventual rejection of both Aton and her husband's ideology that had brought ruin to the land. One of the strongest exponents of this theory is the archaeologist, Dr. Joann Fletcher, who believes that Nefertiti's body has been discovered in the famous Valley of the Kings. Her investigations led her to believe the queen's corpse was one of three discovered in 1898. Three mummified bodies were discovered by the team of French Egyptologist, Victor Clement Georges Philippe Loret, within a side chamber of the tomb of Pharaoh Amenhotep II. The pharaoh was discovered in this tomb that had been robbed in times past. It was discovered the same year as the tomb of Tuthmosis III and close to the time of the discovery of the tombs of Hatshepsut and Yuya. The body of the young woman thought to be Nefertiti was severely mutilated. She had clearly suffered a malicious murderous attack and may have perished from her wounds. Although these finds are intriguing, it appears to us that the mummy said to be Nefertiti was of a woman too old to be the great queen of Egypt.
Meritaten (Meri Aton) was the eldest daughter of Nefertiti and Akhenaton. Also known as Mayati, her nickname was Scota. With her husband Mile, she allegedly traveled to Ireland. She, or a namesake female descendant, is reputedly buried in Country Kerry. The word Scota was the original name of the Scythians. Irish annals state that Scota's husband Mile was a Scythian king. We believe that Scota and her mother were also Scythians or Gaels.
Ralph Ellis believes that Akhenaton's wives, Kiya and Nefertiti, were prototypes for the Virgin Mary.
Nefertiti's characteristically pale complexion and aquiline features alert us to her Western origins. Moreover, author and historian Lorraine Evans has, in her fine book Kingdom of the Ark, recently confirmed the old Irish legend that spoke of Scota, a pharaoh's daughter, arriving (after the death of Akhenaton) to live, die, and be interred, in Ireland. This queen of Egypt gave her name to Scotland. Evans has shown that Scota was none other than Meritaten (Meri Aton "beloved of Aton"), the eldest daughter of Akhenaton and Nefertiti. It is reasonable to ask why this daughter of a pharaoh would decide to vacate her homeland and travel with her entourage to Ireland.
It was Nefertiti and not Akhenaton who should have been pharaoh after the demise of the deranged and decadent Amenhotep III. She certainly had more right to rule being the legitimate daughter of the "Great Royal Wife" Sitamun, the first queen of Amenhotep III. It was due to the clever intrigues of Tiye that Akhenaton became king of Egypt. Tiye arranged his marriage to Nefertiti whose name meant "the beautiful one is come." It was through this famed marriage that Akhenaton gained the right to rule over Egypt. It is our opinion - even after noting the dearth of information about her - that Nefertiti was of Irish ancestry.
Given that his [Akhenaten's] mother Tiye was an Israelite, and that his father's step-parents were also [...]
Despite Amenhotep III's gender peculiarities, he and his wife Tiye had six children in all and it was their first son Tuthmosis (Akhenaton's elder brother) who was favored as next pharaoh by Amenhotep III. The young boy died mysteriously and so it was Akhenaton (also known as Amenhotep IV or, in Greek, as Amenophis IV) who became pharaoh. Strangely, Akhenaton does not appear in the various portraits of his father and the rest of his brothers and sisters. This fact tends to confirm that Akhenaton was not the favorite of his father. He may even have been shunned by his family in the early years. He not only appears to be the proverbial "ugly duckling" but also something of an unwanted black-sheep shunted from place to place.
Tiye was not overly concerned whether Egypt would balk at accepting her foreign-blooded son as king. As long as he married legally he would have to be accepted as the legitimate pharaoh. It also appears that her husband Amenhotep III (King Solomon) had a very romantic and amorous nature. He constantly sought the company of women. The satisfaction of his physical needs appears to have been his primary passion in life, and his Israelite queen appears to not have interfered with his peccadilloes. Indeed, she exploited them. As a result Amenhotep III enjoyed intimate liaisons with innumerable native and foreign princesses. These liaisons ensured favorable relationships with foreign governments. Consequently, the reign of Amenhotep III and Tiye was known to have been a pleasant and nonviolent one. However, given Amenhotep III's success in sexual conquest we must ask questions concerning his overall competence as a ruler. It may be realistic, if rather alarming, to surmise that the official duties were taken over by his cunning wife and her retinue of Israelites. In other words, if we are seeking for any point during the eighteenth dynasty (other than the period of Akhenaton's personal reign) for gross breaches of normal procedure and conduct and for suspicious insider-intrigue that may have destabilized the country, it is this period that warrants attention. Although the official history declares Amenhotep III's reign to be one of great stability and excellent foreign connections, we sense that the horrors of later times were rooted in the not so obvious political intrigues of his time.
Ralph Ellis has gone so far as to say that Aye (also known as Aya) was none other than the person symbolically rendered in the bible as the god Yahweh.
Tiye's lack of legal right did not prevent her from exercising a great deal of control over her easily swayed husband and from effectively ruling from "behind the throne." She was adamantly resolved to have her son and not Sitamun's become pharaoh. To do this legally she had her strange mixed-blooded son Akhenaton (Amenhotep IV) marry with Sitamun's daughter, Akhenaton's half-sister, the famous Nefertiti. This marriage was merely a convenience to secure him the throne. Subsequently, during the twelfth year of Akhenaton's reign Nefertiti vanishes into the nether and her name is violently removed from many monuments. It is not clear whether she was a true believer in Aton or not. Certainly, the evidence hints that she was expendable. Akhenaton saw to it, for instance, that his brother Smenkhare would rule after him and not his wife Nefertiti who had more legal right. This act betrays just how anti-Egyptian and pro-Israelite he was under the influence of his mother, the daughter of Joseph - the biblical patriarch.
Israelite and commoner, the super rich queen Tiye - mother of Akhenaton and prototype for the biblical Bathsheba. Her ambition brought chaos and ruin to Egypt. The Cult of Aton rose to great prominence during her personal reign prior to Akhenaton's. The second temple raised to Aton was in her name.
By marrying with Tiye and favoring her above the royal wife, Amenhotep III broke the great convention of Egypt. Until this apostate's seditious act the succession of Egyptian kings had always been through the royal blooded female line. This break with convention had the most serious consequences for the great land of Egypt.
Yuya's (Joseph's) power was enhanced and solidified after his daughter Tiye was betrothed and wedded to the young Pharaoh Amenhotep III (1382-1344 BC). This fortuitous marriage sealed the Israelite/Levite (Hyksos) line with the native Egyptian one. There is little doubt in our mind that if Amenhotep was not himself of Hyksos descent, his second wife Tiye most certainly was.
There are hints in the Book of Genesis that Cain was not the son of Adam but of the Annunaki, or heavenly "fallen angels." The tyrant kings of the world are thought to descend from Cain who was slanderously labeled a murderer. The error is thought to have occurred due to the mistranslation of the word yaqam that did not mean "slew" but "elevated." In other words, according to the occult interpretation, Abel was a lowly human while Cain was the son of the gods. Accordingly, the "Mark of Cain" was merely his symbol for royalty -the RX - that is still to be seen used by the medical conglomerates and that reads REX - for king.
The "Dragon Court" can also be named the "Brotherhood of the Snake." This term denoted the bloodline that had existed from the time of the pre-diluvian civilizations of Atlantis and Lemuria. At that time, human DNA was crossed genetically with that of alien visitors from other worlds, those referred to in the scriptures and myths as the Annunaki, the Nephilim, the Sons of God, or the Fallen Angels. The hybrid created from these transgenic experiments may be referred to as "Homo Atlantis" and also as the "Son of the Serpent." From this first race of "Adams" all the races of the world have been "begotten." Some humans cleave to the alien strain and some to the original human strain. From the Atlantean strain the kings of the world have been chosen and carefully recorded genealogies ensure that only the appropriately endowed individuals rule from the thrones of the world. The "Dragon Bloodline" has conflicts within their own ranks as well as adversaries from without. Nevertheless, they have maintained their hegemony and privilege through the centuries. Some investigators track the Bloodline back to Cain the elder brother of Abel and son of Adam and Eve.
Although the majority of the Hyksos people were frowned upon and even despised by native Egyptians their upper class and priestly class were accepted and honored in pharaonic circles. Indeed, most of the pharaohs of the eighteenth dynasty may have possessed Hyksos blood. This is most important because recently discovered evidence reveals that the Hyksos settlers of Egypt were none other than the Israelites and Levites of Judeo-Christian history.
Before we explore what the term "Israelite" truly referred to let us just emphasize the great power that Yuya and his family enjoyed. Being made viceroy and vizier by the pharaoh gave him complete power over the entire country. It is likely that he and his wife were descendants of the Hyksos kings of previous dynasties, and of the Levites resident in Avaris at the time.
The so-called "coat of many colors," that the prophet Joseph is said to have been given by his father, is reminiscent of the garb worn by the high priests of Ireland. The Druid Magi wore elaborately decorated coats to distinguish their prestige within the solar cults. We can see this tradition carried on today with the robes and regalia employed by barristers, judges, magistrates,and mayors, etc.
Tuthmosis IV died relatively young (before 30) and left a very young Amenhotep III (also of mixed blood) in the hands of the priests. Amenhotep III (the prototype for the biblical king Solomon) could only have been between 2 and 12 years of age when he was made pharaoh of Egypt. Because of his young age others stepped in to take control of Egypt from behind the throne. The two most likely candidates were his step-parents - the Israelites - Yuya and Tuya. Scholars recognize their Israelite origins and investigators such as Moustafa Gadalla, Ahmed Osman, and Ralph Ellis, are convinced (as we are) that Yuya was the biblical patriarch Joseph, the previous pharaoh's (Tuthmosis IV) "dream-analyst" and man with the "coat of many colors." Ellis states that this Joseph (Yuya) had been elevated to high command and was not only the second most powerful Egyptian after pharaoh, he was the world's wealthiest human being.
Tuthmosis IV was, like his father Amenhotep II, a belligerent pharaoh and one of the first to wage war without provocation beyond Egypt's boundaries. As a result of his aggressive attacks slaves and foreign elements were common in Egypt. Consequently, there was more intermarriage during his reign than at other times. Egypt was visited by merchants and traders and was extremely prosperous and cosmopolitan during this period.
This punitive, intolerant, self-important, and renegade dynasty, lionized by modern historians were, as investigator William Bramley rightly advocates, senior priests of the pre-diluvian Dragon Court, or "Brotherhood of the Snake." These lords, and their senior ministers and priests, symbolized their long genealogies by a tree and a serpent. We still use the image of a tree today when charting family histories. The serpent was appropriate because it represented not only the movement of time but the secret tradition preserved by these families through the ages. This sacred tradition came down from the pre-diluvian epochs and those who were initiated into it employed the symbol of the serpent. The image of the serpent or dragon signified kingship, civic authority, and spiritual mastery. During the corrupt rule of the Broken Kings the people of Egypt were expressly forbidden from venerating any other deity except the sun god Aton (or Aten). The Atonists forcibly closed the great temples, instigated their monotheistic cult, and allowed foreign elements in to the country.They had centers at Gizeh, Amarna, Avaris, and Tanis, and specifically at Heliopolis, where the powerful Solar Cult had been established for millennia. The priesthood of Heliopolis had been powerful even during the theocratic dominion of the god Amen Ra (Amun) who was primarily worshipped at Thebes, the center of the Egyptian universe. They rose to greater power under the Pharaoh Tuthmosis IV (1419 and 1386 BC). He was not of royal blood and it is suggestive that he was apparently not favored by his own energetic chariot-riding father Pharaoh Amenhotep II. The consensus of modern scholars is that Tuthmosis IV was selected for the throne by the priests of the sun cult at Heliopolis. He was but one of his father's many sons and very little is known of his life or rule.
Vatican City was perfectly aligned with the Druidic sites of Newgrange and Knowth, in Ireland. From the air, St. Peter's square looks like a keyhole, and also suggestively like a Scottish thistle. Does this indicate ties between the popes and Scottish Templars?
As the Dead Sea Scrolls have revealed, the Old Testament and the Gospels are travesties that have served to obscure the truth about the true origins of religion.
By the time of the wealthy Christian extremist Bishop Marcion (an ardent second century supporter of Paul's message) Christianity was lauded and the new Christ accepted as the king sent from heaven to save souls. Marcion, who was possibly an Atonist, virulently condemned the Jews and their Torah, accusing them of being devilish "Anti-Christs." He asserted that only Paul's message should be trusted. Any other church or interpretation was to be considered false and heretical. He worked to have the Old Testament removed from the bible and to re-collate and re-interpret the Gospels. The Marcionite sect remained prominent in Europe for over three hundred years.
We would do well to meditate on the meaning of well used terms such as "the sacking of Jerusalem" and "destruction of the temple." They mean that "Judaism" was over and done with as far as the world was concerned. It was officially a dead religion. If anything of it remained it was literally owned by the masters of Rome. Judaism was, in effect, their property
The Dead Sea Scrolls may not have been written by the Essenes at all. That was merely the first conjecture made by experts shortly after their discovery. The Scrolls do not mention any such group as the Essenes. It is not even agreed that the Essenes were Jewish.
Due to their antipathy toward the complicit Jerusalem Church, many Jews decided to join breakaway sects and remove themselves to remote regions in order to preserve the ways of the Torah and to facilitate an unadulterated lifestyle. Among the most important of these sects were the Essenes, presumably the composers of the Dead Sea Scrolls. When these texts were re-discovered in the twentieth century the Vatican's hierarchy were deeply threatened. The Vatican officialdom knew that these documents would contain information on Paul and on the false brand of Christianity concocted for Western audiences. The campaign to suppress the texts and to prevent their worldwide publication is rooted in this fear.
All the while Paul knew exactly who the real "Christs" were - his own Roman backers - the Flavians, Pisos, and other Atonist families of Rome and the Orient. It was for them that a new religion had to be fashioned and imposed upon the world. It was from their capital city that it would eventually be established and to a Western audience that it would matter most in the end. If it pacified Jewish revolt that was good. But this is not the reason for which Christianity was created, as so many authors and historians conjecture.
Paul's Christ recommended giving unto Caesar his due and not fighting against him. Christ's message compelled one to turn the other cheek and to forgive enemies. Paul's "Christ" did not advocate, as did the Torah, the living of a spotless moral life. It stressed being forgiven for all sins and moral infractions by Christ. It stressed belief and acceptance by faith. It let one off the hook and this doctrine was most attractive to the kings, emperors, and nobles of the West. The Christian doctrine was infinitely more acceptable than the hardcore Jewish brand. Paul drew heavily on paganism in order to make his Christ figure familiar to a pagan audience. For this offense he was naturally spurned by the orthodox Jews who were still committed to the old calcified and convoluted paradigm.
The Exilarchs of the Gaonim compiled the Talmud and Torah knowing full well what ordinary Jews and Christians were never meant to know, namely, that the roots of Judaism and Christianity had been inherited from the great solar colleges and temples of the Nile, from the three-hundred year reign of the Hyksos kings, and from the Atonist Pharaoh Akhenaton and his skewed version of sun worship. Once the Gaonim set to work expunging obviously pagan elements they could lay claim to that which was not theirs to begin with. They could maintain that Yahweh had communicated the Law to their ancestors at Mount Sinai. They could downplay Egypt and form themselves into what appeared to be a distinctly unique religious sect. Paul and his Christians could do likewise and all would be well. And so we have it - Judaism and Christianity - two hands serving the same brain. The Gaonim (or at least their occult ways) would later be an active part of the Freemasonic Order. The cryptic masonic insignia "G" refers to and belongs to them.
The average Jew has yet to realize that although they have been expertly taught to regard themselves to be "People of the Book" the book in question is not the Torah but the Talmud (and also Mishnah). The descendants of the ancient Talmudists from Sinai, the followers of "Moses" who have expertly duped the world, are alive and well. They operate from behind the veils of Judaism and Christianity, the religions of their own making. It is the ancient oral tradition that is of value and importance to them and it was a tradition not meant for the laity. It was reserved for the elite, the Naassians, Kohanim, Levites, Gaonim, and Pharisees. This tradition was finally codified as the Palestinian Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud.
The pope who ostensibly heads Catholicism from the Vatican ("Place of Sorcery") wears the Judaic regalia for a reason. The Lutheran priests and court magistrates and school teachers who adorn themselves in the long black robe of the rabbis also do so for a reason. Whether it is the tassel on the square "mortar board" headgear of graduates, or the many Christian festival holidays, or the symbols employed by Western royal families and their governments, the "Judaic" (Atonist) elements are evident.
What we see with Paul's work is an ingenious revamping of the old Egyptian solar religion that had been grinding to a halt with rabbinical Pharisaism.
In time, after a few decades had elapsed, and after its establishment, Christianity's Judaic origins could be acknowledged. But in its inception the emphasis was to be placed on its novelty. Conversely, the rank and file of Jewry would be coerced by their Pharisaic rabbis and teachers to ostensibly reject this Christ and his conformist teachings. And this rejection of the new religion by old world, old school Jews further served to convey the impression that there were few points of similarity between the two religions.
The Sadducees of the Temple of Jerusalem knew how detrimental belief in a raging Messiah would be to their interests. They knew only too well that there was no way for a Pharisaic Messiah to be accepted or welcomed in Rome by Gentiles. They also knew that the Jewish people were not going to jubilantly accept Rome as the capital city of the new church. So, we insist that it was a coterie of Sadducees who, during the Roman occupation, commissioned "historians" in Egypt, Judea, and Rome, to concoct the Messiah story. We do not accept the theories of those scholars (Joseph Atwill and others) who strive to prove that the situation was the reverse, i.e., that Romans, for their own purposes, invented the Christ story. We do not feel that the Jesus story was created merely to dampen or offset the revolutionary spirit among lower class Jews in Judea. We do not believe that those who had smashed the Temple and removed the Jewish Torah to Rome, were particularly worried about Jewish uprising. The Roman Empire was large. If they were inclined to concoct new religions and new divine heroes to dupe the people of the lands they occupied they would have done so for every one of the places they overran and conquered. And this is not the case. Massacre, persecution, and oppressive legal prohibition, were the manner in which Rome dealt with open hostility and rivalry. Taking out the head men and dispensing fear were the methods used to maintain order in foreign parts. Making friends of the intellectual classes and employing "Quislings" from the conquered peoples also paid dividends. Demonstrating a relatively tolerant attitude toward the religious beliefs of compliant nations was also a clever ploy to win acceptance. It appears that the Romans permitted their conquered peoples to continue worshiping as they saw fit, as long as they also accepted the divinity of Caesar.
The elites within Judaism (in particular the Sadducees), who had their minds set on assimilation into Western elite circles, were not eager for it to be known abroad that their Moses was none other than Akhenaton and that their own origins were to be found in the despised land of Egypt.
"Solomon" who established the "Zadokite" order was none other than the eighteenth dynasty Pharaoh Amenhotep III, the father of Akhenaton. Amenhotep III was a descendant of the Hyksos pharaohs of Upper Egypt and was a worshipper of the sun god Aton. The name Solomon was merely his solar title - sol meaning sun. The Zadokites, originally sun priests of Egypt, were serpent worshippers.
The Sadducees were also known as Zadokites (from tsedduqim) after the high priest Zadok who had anointed King Solomon (Sol, Sun).
The Sadducees were aristocrats. They were a conservative upper class while the Pharisees were distinguished by their intellectual expertise and great learning. The word Pharisee meant "those set apart" or "those standing alone."
The Sadducees were the elite, wealthy Jews who worked closely with certain Roman nobels. Hated even by their own kind, whom did they really serve?
Official Jewish history indicates that the Sadducees and Pharisees were rivals but the division between these kindred sects occurred relatively late in their history. It occurred during a Jewish civil war that broke out during the so-called "Hasmonean Period" under the rule of Maccabean King John Hyrcanus II. The conflict finally abated and history books tell us that the Sadducees finally ceased to exist after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. We are not, however, convinced that the Sadducees just vanished into thin air at this time. They were on excellent terms with the Roman nobility and would have been protected and forewarned of Rome's retaliation against Jerusalem.
For these reasons we do not agree with the writers and investigators who believe the Gospels to have been written at the behest of Rome for political reasons. The intellectual elite within the Sadducees and Romans were not in the least bit perturbed by the zealots of Judea. They considered the Messianic idea of ordinary Jews totally redundant. If pacifying Jews was their desire they could have groomed a real, living savant and let him loose, professing himself to be the Messiah. They could have promoted a man to impersonate the Messiah and no one would have been the wiser. This would have made better sense than to simply create the history of one in writing and hope that people would read it and react. No! The idea was to create a new religion based on the old Atonist model to appeal to a Western audience. Whether this religion and its Christ was accepted by the Jews or not was barely a concern. They could accept Christ or they could deny him. What did it matter to Rome and the Caesars? This is why Josephus barely mentions the Messiah in his vast works and why Christianity was established in Rome and not Judea. Christianity was the brain-child of one small elite group of Atonists resident in Rome, and of their intellectual colleagues, the Sadducees. Its central hero was a hybrid of several pagan deities and heroes, and partly based on the old Jewish Messiah. But the creators of the new religion, and of Christ, knew that the real Messiah was an Egyptian concept and not a Jewish one. The real Messiah was a descendant of the House of David, and that meant them. The claims made by the Jews meant nothing and would never come to pass - as they have not.
The strange predictions of a coming savior that misinformed Christians believe exist in the books of Daniel and Isaiah do not refer to Jesus. They refer to the one for whom the Gospel Jesus spoke, for whom the inventors of Jesus spoke. Whether these inventors were Roman emperors or Egyptian sun priests, their agenda was the re-creation and re-establishment of a solar religion that had failed to galvanize the world at the first attempt. The second attempt was to succeed. All human beings would leave aside their petty allegiances and would remove their blindfolds. They would bow before the new lords of light and their bright stainless king.
The Atonists had left Egypt in the company of their Israelite brethren. After their exile, and after falling out amongst themselves, the Atonists found themselves vulnerable and few in number. These Atonist-Levites carried with them the gnosis imparted to them by Akhenaton and his descendants. They were a privileged priesthood and had little time for the mass of Israelites that had accompanied them and eventually fallen back to old pagan beliefs. A close reading of the factional conflict at Mount Sinai reveals as much. We read that Moses (Akhenaton) became furious after discovering his disgruntled followers were backsliding into the worship of the golden calf (symbol for the god Amen-Ra and the previous Age of Taurus). As the centuries passed the elite Atonist Levites had less and less to do with their erstwhile lower class brethren, the Israelites. Ten tribes had assimilated into the Western lands and only the so-called Tribes of Benjamin and Levi (The Levites) had stayed true to the oral tradition handed down to them at Sinai. These hardliners knew themselves to be heirs of the pharaohs and they did not relish their fate, nor plan to continue scrounging around the wastelands in exile. They had their minds set on ingratiation with their many allies in Assyria, Babylonia, Crete, Greece, and Italy. It is our belief that they were more than successful in their intent and that they did indeed enjoy the confidence of foreign powers. When the Grecian Empire gave way to that of the Roman, the Atonist families continued to prosper and liaise. They concerned themselves solely with making inroads into civilized nations and winning power-allies and not with the goings on in Judea of people they considered arch-betrayers. If their old pals were being conquered and harassed, that was just hard luck on them. They were merely receiving their just desserts for past iniquity. They did not want Aton so they could have the Roman Jupiter instead. They could wait for their promised Messiah for as long as they wished. He was not coming, because he was already there.The Atonists who insinuated themselves into the upper class of Roman society considered themselves direct descendants of Akhenaton. They were the "Messiah" that Jews were foolishly expecting. Paul and his Christ character of the New Testament were merely loudspeakers, messengers, proclaimers crying in the wilderness "make straight the way of the Lord Aton."
The priests and governors of Judea were personally appointed to their stations by the Flavian Caesars of Rome. It is coming to light that the Flavians were, through their agent Paul, one of the main conceivers of the Jesus story as it appears in the New Testament.
Before they arrived in Rome, the Herodian dynasty were allegedly known as Edomites, and we strongly suspect they were connected to the descendants of the Atonists and to the Hyksos "Shepherd Kings," of Egypt. The word Edom is believed to have meant "red men," or "men from the red land," and the color red is associated with the Hyksos bloodline. The Herod family was both Jewish and Roman, and we believe them to have been puppets of the Atonists ensconced in France and Britain.
The Herodians, known as "Kings of the Jews" were a Jewish-Roman elite of great power and prestige. They were Edomites (Idumeans) or Hyksos, that is - Atonists. A few experts believe that the letter "I," at the beginning of Idumean, should be a "J." They believe the word is a rough and deliberate corruption of Judean. This makes sense. This is merely one example of how words and terms have been tampered with so that the truth about mankind's past remains distorted.
The relationship between the Sadducee Party and Roman authorities requires further exploration and is, in our opinion, a key factor behind the re-casting of the Jewish Messianic figure into the Jesus Christ figure so beloved of the Christians and so soft on the Romans. It is our personal belief that a relationship existed between Roman and Sadducee elites and that these two forces conspired together, for reasons of financial gain and territorial power, to invent the Christ myth.
Before his remarkable and suitably dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus, Paul was suggestively named Saul (Sol). Before he worked for "the Lord" saving souls he worked for the High Priest of the Temple of Jerusalem. He was a police agent hunting and persecuting Christians. The High Priest was a member of the powerful Sadducee Party.
After the death of the physical Jesus Christ the Church Fathers decided to combine the Old and New Testaments. The reasons for this have been downplayed and are very important. The joining of the two treatises was a signal that there was, after all, little difference between Mosaic (Atonist) Judaism and Pauline Christianity. And we agree that there is little essential difference. In the end, despite implied superficial differences, Judaism and Christianity are merely two words for Egyptian Atonism.
To hardcore Jews these Romans and their Sadducee (and Herodian) lieutenants were emissaries of Satan.
The two crossed keys and golden eagle of Vatican City. Like the double-headed eagle of Freemasonry, or the royal lion and unicorn insignia, these emblems symbolize the dialectic of Judaism and Christianity - two arms serving the same brain.
Like the pyramid, the beehive suggests the organized, hierarchical society so desired by the Atonist world controllers. This symbolism makes us aware of the intimate connections between the Church of Rome and the secret cabals they pretend to oppose.
The [two crossed] keys also represent the enigma of zodiacal precession. The words pontifex (a title of the pope), and cardinal connote doorways, and the reference is to the various zodiacal doorways which are opened and closed as the sun passes from one age, or sign, to another.
In the Dead Sea Scrolls, although the connection is never lucidly made, Paul is certainly the one being described as the "Wicked Priest" who threatens the life of John the Baptist, the "Teacher of Righteousness."
But he [Paul] knew that the Christians who felt repulsed by hardline Pharisaic Judaism were unconsciously identifying with Levitical Atonist Judaism. The fact that most Christians were unaware of how their allegiances were being manipulated, and of the deep connections between their religion and the secret Judaic tradition, has little bearing on the facts. This is the very reason why so many American evangelist pastors appear to be so pro-Israel, and why they continue spouting Zionist rhetoric about the holiness of Israel and the fact that America is the "New Israel." They do not care about ordinary Jews and their beliefs. Their Zionism is not Jewish but Egyptian. It is Atonism plain and simple.
The Levites and Gaonim were of the House of Judah (Yahud) and not Israel. As we will see, the majority of those "Israelite" tribes that had left Egypt had chosen not to follow Akhenaton and his extremist Atonist priests. They went their own way after rejecting the agendas of the megalomaniacal Levites and their obsessed leader. As a result of their blasphemy they and their descendants were considered degenerate outcasts by the elite Atonists. In their minds, the Levites were true "Jews" and not the renegades who chose to disperse and assimilate into the West. The two tribes of Levites, under Akhenaton, would see to it that the "Children of Israel" would be banished in the sight of their Lord, condemned and considered "lost tribes."
The story of the Baptist and his Gnostic Church was modified and skewed into the shape found in the New Testament that presents John as a rather eccentric skin-wearing old world prophet content to baptize and laud Jesus and tell his own disciples and the rest of the world to follow him alone. In truth, the successor of John the Baptist, the Mandean "King of Light," was the Gentile prophet Simon Magus who cryptically turns up in the Christian New Testament as Simon the Zealot, Simon Cananaios, and Lazarus of Bethany. The cults of John and Simon are believed to have carried on in secret through many Gnostic sects and orders, particularly the Knights Templar, Knights of St. John, and powerful Order of Sion (whose chiefs are entitled "John" or "Jean"). The Church of Rome considers the John cults heretical and even satanic since they condemn the Pauline Jesus as an imposter and opportunist.
According to Judaic and Christian sources, the original followers of Jesus were not called "Christians." They were referred to as "Nasoreans," or "Nazarenes" (from Notzrim). This is confirmed by Clement, Origen, St. Jerome, and other historians. If Roman or other historians had then been writing true and accurate accounts of Jesus they would have been chronicling and recording this term and not that of "Christian," that is used but four times in the New Testament. The reason why this proper name was not used probably has to do with the fact that the Nazarenes were known to have existed over 150 years prior to the birth of the New Testament Jesus. This predicament was not a problem to the Essences and Gnostics who accepted that Jesus, the "Nasorean," had lived years before the bible's nativity. For Christians, however, the predicament was seriously threatening since it hearkened back to a time when their Jesus was considered a heretical self-serving corruptor of truth rather than a champion of it. For this reason the term "Nazarene" was misapplied to mean the place of Jesus' birth and the term "Christian" was adopted to distinguish his followers. Factually, the term Nasorean, that means "to be separate," was used to describe the priests and members of the Gnostic Mandeans who repudiated the teachings of Jesus in favor of those of John the Baptist. Jesus had, they believed, been a disciple of John but had corrupted his teachings. The term Nasorean had to be mistranslated since the Church knew that it originally referred to cults with connections to Egypt whose teachings contradicted the Christian Gospels and whose leaders came from a spiritual lineage going back to distant ages. Most importantly, the Mandean church and its teachings clearly evidenced the direct connections between proto-Christianity and Egyptian stellar and solar theology. And it was this relationship that threatened Paul and his masters.
It was by the ingenuity of Paul that this improbable Judaic "Messiah" was re-scripted and upgraded into an attractive and dynamic figure with a unique spiritual message openly contradicting the rabbinical tradition and offering a revolutionary path to salvation. A weak renegade who was an anathema to Jewish hardliners could quite easily be transmogrified into something suitable for a different audience. He could have traits of every god-man, sun king, and solar hero that had ever edified the human imagination. And he could be a representative of someone very special, someone who was not meant to be openly known, whose bloodline had continued to influence the world from the Mosaic age and who had ingratiated the highest echelons of imperial Rome, whose empire stretched across the known world. As an agent of this secret dynastic power, Paul was to artificially create a rift between the old tradition and his new one so that one could be played against the other for as long as need be. Through his artifice the divide would be drastic and long lasting. It was important, therefore, that his Messiah's message was seen to be rejected by recalcitrant and quarrelsome Jews. It was important that his savior of all mankind be put to death by the Jewish Sanhedrin of Pharisees and Sadducees and not by Rome. His tradition would acknowledge no direct connection to the Rabbinical tradition of ancient times. Ultimately, Paul's treatment would denigrate the Jews and cause men to accuse them of deicide. Moreover, such egregious tactics would compel the vast majority of Jews to reject the "Rome-friendly" solar hero of the New Testament. This rejection of the Pauline Christ was the perfect smokescreen obscuring the dark and remote origins of both religions.
Yes, this [Messiah] is clearly an entity in line with the Mosaic (Atonist) Jehovah. He's a far cry from the gentle forgiving Jesus presented by Paul. Paul was basing his Christ only slightly on such a rapacious character and much more on pagan deities familiar to Western Gentiles. His Christ was compassionate, tolerant, and loving of all men, someone who gave up his own life for the good of all. The Messiah of the hardliners was the "Lion King" of Judah returned to cast off oppression and bring retribution. It is our belief that this Jewish personage - part king, part adjudicator, part destroyer - is a composite figure based on the Akhenaton, his god Aton, and the volcano god Yahweh. He is a concoction of the Levites and Gaonim, a being who would have faded into oblivion if the Jews of later ages had not suffered invasion and oppression, and if their political aspirations had not been thwarted. Those who have happy homes in this world do not devote themselves to the veneration of aggressive Messianic kings. A part of Paul's job was to take this time hardened tradition and soften it up. It was vital the Messianic figure was seen to have spiritual powers only, and not be considered a political threat.
Behind the official form of Judaism lay the secret Mosaic (Atonist) doctrine transmitted to an elect group of mysterious Levites who had followed Moses out of Egypt across the desert to Mount Sinai.
For all his conniving and ingenuity, Paul's attempt to divide Christianity from its Judaic roots failed. The Church employed too much old world symbolism for the ploy to be one hundred percent successful.
The Israelites were a powerful nobility of Egypt and not vagabonds wandering around seeking for a home. Their religion was not fringe or obscure. It was conceived in the sun temples of the Nile. It was fine that the world remained ignorant of this. The elites with intelligence knew it, and that was enough. Judaism had arisen from Atonism and another branch would develop from the same trunk. That branch was Christianity.
The British and Roman quorums for the rise of "Judaism" are also responsible for the rise of Christianity. The supposed differences between the two religions, and the schisms between them (like those between Catholicism and Protestantism), have been craftily concocted to conceal this fact. Their differences and supposed enmity are, for the most part, merely camouflage concealing their closeness and true histories. When "Judaism" ceased to fully serve the secret purposes of its creators, living it up in affluent Rome, a new religion was commissioned to better serve their temperaments and private agendas. Judaism was not to fade. It was to be renovated and transformed. As Ralph Ellis puts it in King Jesus, Pauline Christianity was in reality Judaism made simple. The Pharisaic interpretation was to be scaled back and Paul, friend of the Sadducees and Romans, would rescript the archaic traditions into something modern that served to mollify their pagan hosts while empowering the Levitical elites seeking new empires in the Western lands. Paul would be the man to tear the tapestry of Judaism into two parts. The separation of the tapestry, so to speak, allowed Paul to stich into his Christian half the Atonist threads that had faded and broken in the Judaic half. Atonism was to be the world's new religion. It had been the father of all religions and it was to rule again albeit under a cloak.
The bizarrity is increased when we discover how many "career" clerics, bishops, and priests have dismissed the historicity of Jesus, the man they are meant to be administering for.
The expelled Atonists of Egypt had quickly managed to find new homes in Greece, Syria, Crete, and other countries, so it is not unlikely that they also had many friends in Italy, especially among the patrician families who admired Egypt and who would one day conquer it for themselves. Yes, the Atonists would have coveted the hospitality of the Roman elite. In Rome they would have had access to the men whose empires controlled the world. From there they could commission agents to concoct historical and religious motifs to suit their vision of themselves. We believe Rome was chosen as a new headquarters by Akhenaton's Atonists.
Bushby rightly draws our attention to the significance of the term Panthera. It specifically refers to the panther, and to the garb worn by priests of the sun temple of Egypt. The panther was, like the lion, a symbol of initiation into the Hermetic mysteries. And most significantly, the term appears to derive directly from the Egyptian Pan Neter Ra, a title meaning “Son of Ra” (Son of the Sun). So,if we are to believe the latest evidence, the physical Jesus was not the son of god, as Christians and Jews may or may not accept, but the descendant of Roman emperors and heir to their throne.
Interestingly, for our thesis, the ancestors of Mary were Benjaminite priest kings of the House of Judah (Aton).
Author Tony Bushby, primarily working from rather spurious and convoluted Jewish sources such as the Talmud and Toldoth Jeshu or "Life of Jesus," is convinced that Paul’s hero is based on a legitimate historical rebel leader known as Judas Khrestus and on his twin Yeshua Ben Panthera.
Author Tony Bushby discovered that many of the stories pertaining to Jesus were rescripted excerpts from the biography of Apollonius. Apparently, it was Church Father John Chrysostom who set about plagiarizing the story of the life and times of Apollonius, presenting them anew as the story of Jesus. Bushby believes that the name "Paul" was the nome de plume of Chrysostom or some other ghost writer. In his mind there was no Paul of Tarsus. He explains that the name Paul, or Paulus, is merely the Latinized version of the Greek name Apollonius.
Through the exemplary revelations of many researchers we now know Paul modeled his "Christ" on several mythical and historical personages who had already risen to prominence and notoriety in the world. A partial list of potential candidates for Paul's elusive Jesus includes:
King Hezekiah of Judah
John the Baptist
Apollonius of Tyana
Joshua the Son of Nun
Menahem the Essene
Joshua ben Panthera
Caesar Augustus (Octavian)
Esus, or Iesa
Dionysus (Zagreus, Bacchus)
Siddhartha Gautama Buddha
Basing his Jesus on well known mythical icons and spiritual adepts was a clever device to ensure that his creation would be accepted throughout the world by men of culture and learning.
Apollonius of Tyana (97 AD) was known as the "Nazarene." The neo-Pythagorean sage lived and taught in Tarsus, the city where Paul was born. Supposedly a contemporary of Jesus, he was known to have traveled to the East to meet the Brahmins of India.
There was only one major difference between Paul's Christianity and the pagan corpus, and that it involved the sanctity of the self. Apparently, the cabals in Britain, Rome, and Jerusalem, that commissioned Paul were determined to decimate the pagan philosophy that considered man as his own savior.
Paul of Tarsus (10BC-67AD) - Agent of the Atonists. Author Ralph Ellis believes Paul and the historian Josephus Piso to have been one and the same person. Ellis maintains that Saul-Paul-Josephus wielded enormous power in Judea. He was probably not only the creator of Christianity, as we know it today, but, according to Ellis, he was also the compiler of the Talmud. He was, therefore, responsible for the type of Judaism known today. Paul also had the power to sequester or destroy any historical works and accounts that contradicted his own literary concoctions. He had the power and ability to invent historians and historical accounts out of thin air. Author Tony Bushby believes Paul was the pen-name of an unknown author. Bushby emphasizes that the name Paul, or Paulus, is the Latinized version of Apollonius, and that the biography of Apollonius of Tyana was plagiarized by the scribe known as Paul.
We are now sixty-seven years on from the death of Sigmund Freud and we feel that the time has finally come when scholars and researchers can declare, with confidence and authority, that the Jesus depicted in the New Testament did not exist as a physical presence in the world. Search as they might the biblicists have not found the appropriate evidence to support a real man, a carpenter's son, who was also savior of the world. Every major find further decimates the theory of a Jesus of Nazareth put before us in the New Testament.
A controversial postscript to the case of Sigmund Freud concerns his murder. Author and investigator into the so-called "curse" of the tomb of Tutankhamun, Gerald O'Farrell, believes Freud was poisoned to death in retaliation for his audacious revelations. The heinous act served to keep him from revealing more to the world. O'Farrell has discovered that Freud's writings and notes on the connections between Moses and Akhenaton are being deliberately sequestered by the keepers of his archives in New York. Freud's assassination was, according to O'Farrell, one of many killings surrounding the excavation of the tombs of Tutankhamun and Queen Tiye (Akhenaton's mother).
The origins of Judeo-Christianity are to be found in Egypt.
Despite deliberate doctoring, passages such as the following from Exodus, Isaiah, Hosea,Joshua, and Micah (typical of many in the texts) are not to be erroneously regarded as recordings of the words of an affronted or disgruntled Yahweh, a disembodied supernatural god. On the contrary they are those of a physical being. The "I" speaking is not god but Moses or - more correctly - Akhenaton.
There are many passages in the Old Testament that speak of semi-enlightened god-men, or god-kings, the leaders of the Israelites. Many of these passages, particularly those in Daniel and Isaiah, have been cunningly misinterpreted as predictions concerning Jesus who was to appear seven centuries later in history. This nonsense has been widely accepted on faith by the majority of churchmen and evangelists. However, these mysterious passages relate not to future prophets and leaders but to contemporary ones who descended from royal Atonist houses. The character known as Moses was one such super-human entity. Even though it is now known that this Moses did not write the books attributed to him he is still considered a legitimate historical character. We submit, however, that he was none other than Akhenaton himself or, at least, one of his royal pharaonic Atonist successors.
Once we realize that Aton and Adon are the same deity and that they are Egyptian and not Arabian or Syrian, and that their priest was none other than Akhenaton, the expelled eighteenth dynasty renegade pharaoh, the clouds of mystery evaporate and the truth stands illuminated. The realization assists us to understand the secret meaning of many biblical passages that have not been successfully explained even by the greatest scholars.
In any case, Freud's words lead us to the heart of the Moses-Akhenaton problem. We know that the god of the latter figure was Aton, god of light. This is the same god worshipped by the Israelites under the name Adon. But Adon was a name used in place of the word Jehovah. So Aton and Adon (or Aton and Jehovah) are one and the same being. Since this fact had to be concealed, the story of the volcano-god was concocted. Jehovah was to be met in lands distant from Egypt. He was to be encountered after the exodus and not before. Prior to the exodus only Moses himself would have been granted an audience and that, again, would have been during the time when he was an outcast in remote lands.
Freud expressed amazement that so much detail on the reprehensible nature of this god [Yahweh] should have been preserved. Perhaps he would have agreed with us that it was included and preserved, even after centuries of editing, because it served to obscure the god being worshipped by the Egyptian-born exiles, the entourage of Akhenaton - the real "Moses."
[Sigmund] Freud rightly sensed this and knew full well that Jehovah was but a minor god of mountains and volcanoes, worshipped by small numbers far outside the land of pyramids, sun temples, and complex pantheons.
The Ankh is a symbol of the Nephilim, or Annunaki, and their primordial knowledge and royal status. It served the same symbolic purpose as the modern crown, scepter, and mace. Indeed, the very word ankh is a loose rendering of the word Anakim (meaning “great kings” or “giants”) and perhaps of Annunaki, meaning "heavenly serpents" or "those who came down from heaven to earth.” That Judeo-Christianity was not originally monotheistic is demonstrated by the fact that the Elohim are commonly considered identical to Jehovah.
Freud did not realize, as most still do not, that the term Elohim (from Eloah, and Aleim), that implies a plurality of "gods," simply referred to the Egyptian (and Phoenician-Sumerian) kings and pharaohs who were considered nothing less than living gods. These kings of the Euphrates and the Nile not only styled themselves on the gods of ancient pantheons, but were regarded as actual embodiments of and channels for the will of those gods and goddesses. They were the"Keepers," the "Watchers," the "Elders," the "Kadosh." Secondary permutations of the words,Elohim, Nephilim, and Annunaki, refer to these living incarnate gods, the pharaohs of Egypt, and the various stellar, solar, and lunar priestarchies they headed.
That there are two gods and two schools of thought, in the first books of the bible, is of major importance. It shows us that "history" was being deliberately, if not methodically, concocted.
In Moses and Monotheism, Freud discloses a theory for the belief in a Messiah, and in the second coming of such a being. He emphasized that it was a consequence of the violent demise of the Jewish Moses after the time of the exile. Most biblical researchers and commentators agree that Moses died soon after reaching Sinai and that the leadership of the exiled peoples fell to his brother Aaron.
On the surface this Atonist denial of the underworld, of shadow, death, and mortality, can seem admirable and commendable. But total denial can lead to its own kind of pathology. And we assert that it has indeed done so. Apollonian religions, such as Judeo-Christianity, have forced the consciousness of human beings into a polarized and unhealthy state. The Atonists believed shadows disperse once bright light is thrown at them. They were wrong. The shadows merely darken. Dare we speculate then on the peculiar psychological profile of priests and worshippers of the sun who avoid noticing the existence and significance of shadows cast by the light they revere?
We insist that this Atonist doctrine was a key pylon in the foundation of both Judaism and Christianity. Although the earliest "Christian" sects sought to live humble spirit-focused lives as taught by their savior, and although they honored the apostolic tradition of poverty, the leviathan of the later Roman Church took a suggestively different course. The shameless decadence and arch-materialism of the Vatican stands out as further proof for their Atonist origins. The abandonment of all gods but one, the adoption of a theology of light, the denial of Underworld rituals and tradition, the lionization of an exceptional but short-lived leader, the heinous cruelty against adversaries, and chronic unbounded materialism, are the commonalities between Judaism, Catholicism, and Atonism. They are the hallmarks of all three.
Freud also speculated about the psychic disposition of Moses (Akhenaton) and wondered not only why he was so ardently fixated on the sun and its properties, but why he feared and loathed darkness. He noted how Akhenaton had forbidden the people of Egypt to venerate Osiris or to participate in the rites of the Underworld that had been customarily undertaken for thousands of years. The Atonist pharaoh might perhaps have begrudgingly tolerated mention and veneration of Atum Ra (an important sun god of Heliopolis in Lower Egypt) or of Shu and Isis perhaps, but never of Amun Ra (Amen or Amon) of Thebes, or of the primordial Osiris. These gods played no part in the Cult of Atonism. There was no Underworld for Akhenaton. There was no traversal of the twelve stages of the shadow realm, no guides of the dead, and no need to think of anything beyond this life. These theological and cultural changes came as a shock to the understanding of most Egyptians who believed that Osiris was the god who would lead the soul safely through the tests that awaited after death. The man who did not reverence Osiris could not possibly enter the afterlife safely and could not hope for salvation. To not believe in Osiris was tantamount to not believing in the soul.
We emphasize at this point that spurious and preposterous stories, such as this one mentioned by Freud, are just part of the great tapestry of deception covering up the connections between Moses and Akhenaton. It was essential to the authors of the "holy books" that Moses, their concocted character, appear to have a separate life of his own. In light of this, any kind of embellishment was satisfactory as long as it served to make Moses appear to be a different character from Pharaoh Akhenaton. And so we have the outlandish stories of his birth, abandonment, adoption, and criminal history, etc. Most of these stories were simple plagiarization of earlier world myths. The tale of the abandonment on the river was adopted from the life of King Sargon. The scene upon the mountain was gleaned from tales of the lives of King Menes and King Nebo. His "biographers" who detailed his time as an exile, shepherd, and adopted son of a strange priest Jethro, knew that there was nothing original about their stories. Every culture and nation had similar if not identical heroes and myths. Their concoction would be skillful enough to subtly paraphrase the life of Akhenaton without giving the game away. It was designed to magnify areas of insignificance and minimize anecdotes of greater significance.
One of the problems that intrigued Freud was why Moses, an Egyptian prince raised in the houses of the pharaoh, would go on to reinvent himself as the autocratic leader of a ragbag bunch of slaves and foreigners. Why would he wish to know, convert, and lead such a motley bunch? Why would he be in a position to not only tell them what to do but to bestow upon them an apparently brand new religion? Why would he be in a position to introduce them to Jehovah, their new god? Did they not have a god of their own before Jehovah? And if they did have a previous religion why do we hear so little about it in the bible? Additionally, why would the Israelites be motivated to change their beliefs in such a radical way to please a single man? Naturally, our answer to questions of this kind builds upon the Freudian foundation and continues to undermine the traditional historical version of the life of Moses as well as the identity of his followers. Our theory is that the chosen people themselves were not lower class foreign contingents living miserable lives within the country. They were not slaves or underlings but powerful and wealthy conquerors of Egypt. The people that "Moses" led out of Egypt were, as Freud and others have speculated, nothing less than a powerful pharaonic dynasty. And more controversially, their leader Moses was none other than Akhenaton, pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty and true originator of their brand of monotheism.
He [Sigmund Freud] understood that, mythologically speaking, a man becomes a hero after he combats and defeats his first major rival, his own father. After his fell deed, the victorious son gains the supremacy and ends his secondary status tribally. He also gains spiritual status. He is no longer the prince but the king, and he acquires the privileges of his rank. He gains respect and has the pick of the women of the tribe. Despite his physical acquisitions, however, the son must live with the guilt of patricide. He has a guilty conscience for his murderous act and for giving vent to his aggressive and acquisitive instincts.
The eclectic and brilliant man [Sigmund Freud] fully understood that the Jewish people would be extremely loath to accept his controversial theories concerning their origins.
Sigmund Freud was the Viennese founder of the School of Psychoanalysis. He was cold-bloodily murdered for what he knew and wrote about Judaism, Egypt, and the secrets of the Bible.
Tutankhamen's title was "The Living Face of the Sun." He was an Atonist pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty. Lord Carnarvon, in charge of his tomb's excavation, was funded by the Rothschild dynasty to which he was personally related.
And so, if it be true that Jesus lived at the time of Moses and if, in post-exilic times, he ruled as a king over the Levites and Houses of Israel and Judah, then perhaps we should spend some time examining this era. After all, the "Messiah" of the Jews was considered to be of the Davidic line, a descendant of the House of Judah (Yahud). He was supposed to be the "Lion King," the savior to free his people from oppression.
The Jews have allowed their denial of the Christ to stand but have concealed their reasoning from Christians. They also know that Jesus was not a name per se but a title, one used by many leaders of the Egyptian solar church. Allowing readers to believe that it was a personal name compounded the obscuration of the truth. It is even likely that Paul, the employee of the elusive descendants of the Egyptian Levites operating out of Rome, also knew about the story of Joshua. He may have based his Jesus upon Joshua, Moses, Aaron, and other earlier leaders of the Levites. To the hardliner Essene, Joshua was the solar Messiah about to make a physical return. He was to save his devotees not only from the Romans but also from the colluding elitist Sadducees of the evil “Jerusalem Church.” The fact that these Essenes would have had no time for the New Testament Jesus did not prevent Paul from adapting Essenic lore.
Clearly, this earlier existence of a Jesus character was known to the Palestinian Jews since there was not a writer amongst them, nor amongst the Roman historians for that matter, who mentioned a single word about the Jesus who was eventually accepted by Christians. This can explain why Jews problematically deny that the Christian Jesus was the Christ, and why they do not accept him as being of the House of David. The reason for their denial is because they know what Christians are not supposed to ever know. The Jewish elite know that Jesus lived one hundred centuries earlier.
With a similar mindset as Dr. Karl Abraham and Dr. Sigmund Freud, the authors Ahmed Osman and Moustafa Gadalla both insist that the biblical Moses was the Pharaoh Akhenaton and that the expulsion of Moses from Egypt during the later eighteenth dynasty was, in fact, the expulsion of the "broken king" Akhenaton. The scene at Sinai, the subsequent move to Jerusalem, and the eventual splitting of the twelve tribes, were events that occurred not to humble oppressed captives but to an arrogant and wealthy royal clan, followers of a pharaoh considered the father of monotheism. Soon after arrival at Sinai legend has it that Moses died. His place as leader of the Levites (Atonists) was taken by a mysterious man called Joshua. Osman believes this character to have been the true Jesus. If Osman is correct it means that Jesus lived over 1000 years before the official dates given by Paul and by the four spurious gospels. It also means that Jesus was an Egyptian.
Official history tells us that the oppressive Hyksos were eventually expelled from the country by the Pharaoh Ahmose I (1575-1550 BC) who led the Egyptian people in rebellion against the tyrannical invader dynasty. However, we believe the upper classes of the Hyksos invaders were not expelled. We believe they maintained senior positions at the pharaoh's court and great temples of the sun at Gizeh, Tanis, Heliopolis, Amarna, Avaris, and Alexandria. The upper strata of the Hyksos people had clearly married in with the native Egyptian line, since even Tuthmosis IV and his son Amenhotep III were of mixed blood. Some Egyptologists believe that Amenhotep III was the father of both Smenkhare and Tutankhamun, and given that this is true, it would mean that these two Atonist pharaohs were also of mixed blood.
All is made clear,regarding Abraham and Sarah's traversal into Egypt, when we realize what biblicists meant by the term "Egypt." As Ralph Ellis so brilliantly points out, the name Egypt was employed by the composers of the Old Testament to denote Thebes in Lower Egypt. This was the city and region controlled by the adversaries of the Hyksos. It was considered a separate region, with different rulers, gods, customs, and politics. So, it was not the country of Egypt that Abraham visited, but Thebes within Egypt.
They [Moustafa Gadalla and Ahmed Osman] contend that Abraham, Jacob, Isaac, and Joseph were themselves members of a powerful dynasty of Egyptian pharaohs known as the Hyksos. Osman declares these Hyksos to be the same people as the Israelites. He argues that the Hyksos Kings of the Egyptian 13th dynasty, who ruled for approximately 300 years, are the ancestors of those referred to as Israelites and Levites. During the eighteenth dynasty, their leader was Pharaoh Akhenaton, who was himself either a physical or ideological descendant of the Hyksos. Author Ralph Ellis insists that Abraham did not come into Egypt from elsewhere. He claims that Abraham was always resident in Egypt and that he was a powerful Hyksos king and rival to the pharaoh of Upper Egypt resident at Thebes. The city of Ur was not in Mesopotamia at all. It was not near the Euphrates and Tigris, as most believe, but on the Nile.
What most Christians and Jews may not be aware of is that there are many candidates for the real Jesus and some lived centuries before the time asserted in the Gospels. Naturally, there is little consensus among modern investigators as to the identity of Jesus. Each declare that he was this or that person, from this or that period in history, either from the accepted periods or from times more remote. It depends upon the individual scholar. Given that such a man existed (and that is neither impossible nor improbable) we find that one of the most logical candidates for the man Jesus is none other than the famed boy-king, Tutankhamen, of the eighteenth dynasty of Egypt. Regardless of the controversiality of this declaration, it stands to reason once the evidence is reviewed.
As we have outlined in Volume One, Christianity was created in Britain and eventually transplanted to the Middle East. The story of Jesus did not originate in Galilee or Judea as the Gospels state. The men who invented the story of Jesus had their origins in Egypt of the eighteenth dynasty. They were the Atonists.
As for the symbol of the cross, it too was known the world over. Although Christians consider it one of their cardinal symbols, it is hardly unique to their religion.
The Chaldean-Babylonian god Tammuz was referred to as "the only son" or "only begotten one."
If writers such as Doherty are that eager to find evidence for a physical personality, perhaps they should examine the character of the Irish sun-king Esus. If not, they may find time profitably spent tracking their "Jewish" sagas back to the life and times of the Buddha. Failing that, they may wish to look to the lives of Lugh, Orpheus, Dionysus, Prometheus, Attis, Mithras, Serapis, Osiris, Horus, Balder, Odin, Rama, Krishna, Quetzalcoatl, or any one of the sixteen or more crucified saviors of old:
Adad (of Assyria)
Zeus (of Greece)
Alcides (of Thebes)
Attis of (Phrygia)
Baal of (Phoenicia)
Bali of (Afghanistan)
Beddru (of Japan)
Buddha (of India)
Crite of (Chaldea)
Deva Tat (of Siam)
Hesus (of the Druids)
Indra of (Tibet/India)
Jao of (Nepal)
Krishna (of India)
Mikado (of the Sintoos)
Mithra (of Persia)
Odin (of the Scandinavians)
Prometheus (of Greece)
Quetzalcoatl (of Mexico)
Salivahana (of Bermuda)
Tammuz (of Babylon and Chaldea)
Thor (of the Gauls)
Universal Monarch of the Sibyls
Wittoba (of the Bilingonese)
Xamolxis (of Thrace)
Zarathustra/Zoroaster (of Persia)
Zoar (of the Bonzes)
The Jesus story is, like most of the bible, an Astro-Theological story first composed by astrologers who noticed the passage of the sun through the heavens. This knowledge is what led the scribe John to alter the dates of Jesus' crucifixion. He contradicts Mark, Luke, and Matthew, and places the crucifixion of Jesus on the eve of the Passover and not one day after it. This mythmaker at least knew the sun's astrological birthday and wanted his character's death and resurrection to correspond to the sun's transition and renewal. Astrology is where we are to look for origins concerning the life and death and rebirth of this character Jesus and not the history of men.
Jesus, the sun king, was a concept known long before the rise of orthodox Christianity. The early religious groups that were aware fo this were eventually annihilated by emissaries of the Vatican.
Josephus' writings, in this regard, cannot be considered a true and accurate account of Christianity's history. Moreover, this Josephus was in the employ of the Flavian Caesars and was devoted to maintaining their power in Judea. The Flavians, and other Roman patricians (such as the Pisos, Aemili, Claudia, Julia, Manlia, Cornelii, Fabii, Scipiones, Gracchi, etc), despised the religion of the Jews but were clever enough to indulge it for the sake of order. They installed a non-Jewish dynasty to rule the region - the Herodian - and cultivated profitable political affiliations with the powerful and wealthy Sadducees. Their main opposition came from lower class Jews and from the families considered those from whom the famous "Messiah" would arise. The most illustrious of these rebel families was the Maccabees. They were annihilated and basically disappeared from the world stage after the time of Emperor Vespasian.
To the horror and consternation of Christians all over the world, this passage [Book Eighteen, Chapter Four, of Josephus] was, during the sixteenth century, proven to be a blatant forgery. It was worthy of doubt since no contemporary historian, or any coming after who knew Josephus' works, mentioned this passage. This omission was especially startling in the case of the Church Father Origen who wrote many hundred books and covered every aspect of Christian history. In Origen's voluminous work there is no mention of Jesus as a man and no quote from, or reference to, Book Eighteen, Chapter Four, of Josephus.The spurious passage (like another in Book Twenty) was an interpolation and had been inserted into the works of Josephus by a later unnamed "editor" or compiler, no doubt some monk who decided to edit history in order to give Christians "proof" for their Jesus. The passage also mentions that Jesus was accepted as the so-called "Christ." This is also patently spurious since most Jews did not accept Paul's version of Jesus as the "Christ." This concept meant something only to pagans. Additionally, the Romans (like the Egyptians) were already familiar with the term "Chrestus" (meaning "anointed") used for their own gods and emperors. Thus the term "Christ" would not have denoted anything particularly unusual and would actually have offended both the orthodox Jews of Jerusalem and the Nazarene Church (those said to have known the physical rabbi Jesus).
Flavius Josephus Piso (whom author Ralph Ellis believes to have been St. Paul of Tarsus).
Outside of the bible, the name of Jesus appears in brief, fragmentary comments and passages from the works of several Roman authors, historians, and chroniclers. The list is as follows:
Suetonius - Lives of the Caesars (120 AD)
Suetonius - Life of Nero (120 AD)
Tacitus - Annals (112 AD)
Pliny the Younger (93 AD)
Lucian of Samosata (165 AD)
Flavius Josephus - Antiquities of the Jews (Bk XX. 94 AD)
Justin Martyr - Dialogue with the Jew Trypho (cf. Eusebius, Church History IV, 187)
Rabbi Abbahu of Caesarea - (270 CE)
A historical event takes place once at a particular time and at a particular place. A mythological event is not so constrained. It can take place in the same manner anywhere at any time. A myth is beyond time and space.
Abraham about to sacrifice his son Isaac. The mountain is a symbol for the sign of Aries, as is the sword and ram seen in this artist's rendition of the Old Testament account. New found evidence suggests that, like several other Biblical characters, this patriarch was himself a noble of Egypt, or even a pharaoh. He has been tentatively identified with Sensuret I of the 12th dynasty and with Amenemhet I.
Amenemhet III. Could he have been the Biblical Joesph, the so-called dream interpreter of the unnamed pharaoh, and the man with the coat of many colors?
Amenemhet I (1991-1962 BC) was titled "Amen is the Head." He was the first king of the twelfth dynasty, and his ancestry is unknown. Some scholars suspect he was the prototype for the Biblical patriarch known as Abraham. However, this would place Abraham in Egypt before the official dates for the invasion of the Hyksos. The problem is less complicated once we understand that the Hyksos were not invaders from outside Egypt. They were foreign to Upper Egypt but not to Egypt itself. The groups that invaded during the thirteenth dynasty may have been related to the noble families of Lower Egypt, that is, of the Hyksos Kings. They may have entered the land by invitation. Later, as the dynasties changed, these visitors appear to have been considered unwelcome guests or invaders.
We are to understand that there is not a lot of authenticity to the characters who appear in the bible. Although newly discovered evidence shows that a few were based upon actual historical personages, many more were pure concoctions. Some were analogues of powerful men who desired to keep their identities hidden from mankind, and some were flagrantly outlandish fictions. Scholars tend to classify them under the term "biblical embroidery". Some were based upon historical savants, while others were the brainchildren of clever duplicitous propagandists. Some were composites of several figures, and some are representatives of psychological "types." More contentiously, others were personifications and analogues of zodiacal phenomena; in other words they were created as fictive renditions of Astrological Archetypes first studied and codified by Druids of ancient Ireland. It is certainly this last thesis that most concerns this writer. However, the other concepts are of great interest and cannot be underestimated. All in all, the way is open for a total overhaul of what we know about the Christian religion and the characters we have accepted as historically legitimate. We can only benefit from such exploration.
Nevertheless, when researcher Ahmed Osman declares he has proven the Old Testament character known as "King David" to be none other than the eighteenth dynasty Pharaoh Tuthmosis III; and a succeeding pharaoh, Amenhotep III, to be the “Jewish” King Solomon, one would think the revelations should not only raise the proverbial eye-brow but should cause worldwide discussion. When author Laurence Gardner states that the prophet Enoch was a character based on the Sumerian Enki; and when Tony Bushby declares Roman Emperor Tiberius to be the true father of Jesus, we should take notice. And when revisionist author Moustafa Gadalla labors to prove that Jesus Christ was a character based on Pharaoh Tutankhamen, the world should surely grind to a halt to listen.
Hypatia of Alexandria (370 AD - 415 AD) was a teacher, philosopher and polymath. A Christian mob attacked her as she drove through the streets of the city. They dragged her from her chariot and proceeded to beat her to death. After she was dead the mob took sharp shells and used them to tear every piece of flesh from her bones. Her remains were then cast into a bonfire and burned so that not a trace of the seer remained.
He [Jesus] was the character scripted by adroit myth makers who knew that the world would accept their literary hero. Man's imagination would be their ally and the promises spoken of by their savior would be perfect incentives. If the world was made a hellish place, and if ordinary men and women were stripped of dignity and rights, the promise of eternal life by way of a glorious, forgiving, miracle-working savior would surely prove attractive. Entire civilizations bowed before Earthly kings and pharaohs and they would likewise bow to a god made flesh who held keys to the kingdom of heaven. Once the idea of such a being and his life were installed in the human mind the fertile imagination would take over and do its work. As time passed, people would not bother to question whether their ideas were based upon facts. And this is what the priests have counted on. A civilization that has not learned to distinguish between an idea of reality and reality itself can be slowly manipulated into believing anything.
So, again, why was there not an Egyptian revival? Why was Jesus accepted and not Horus, or Osiris, or Serapis? One answer could be that the vast majority of intelligent converts already knew that Christianity was close to Egyptian religion. Unlike people today they would have understood Christianity's doctrine to be nothing more than a rescripting of solar theology from Egypt's many esoteric colleges. We do not see any other reason as to why such conversion would have taken place given that the world's wealthiest and most erudite scholars and dignitaries were reverers of Egyptian occult traditions.
Charlemagne (742-814 AD) was the Merovingian and Carolingina Emperor and close friend of popes. The "hammer" of the Saxons, he butchered those who would not convert to Christianity.
"Make them to astonish," demanded Constantine, speaking of the compilation that finally became the New Testament. His wish was amply fulfilled.
After Horus was born, he and his mother Isis had to hide from his evil uncle Set who had vowed to kill him. Set was afraid that Horus would grow up and avenge his father's murder. Isis and her son hid in the marshes and swamps of the Nile. Her symbol, the lily, which signified divine protection, was later adapted as a symbol for the Virgin Mary. One day, Horus was badly bitten by a scorpion. His body went limp and he fell into a comatose state. Isis grieved, thinking her son would not recover. This incident in the life of the Egyptian sun god was later adapted by Christian mythmongers.
If this Jesus was really the son of god - the Christ - how come he made such a insignificant impact on the prominent intellectuals and historians of his time? Why do the major historians and intellectuals of his time not mention Jesus or any of the events that occurred because of him, in their works? Why do recently discovered scriptures (the Gnostic Gospels and Dead Sea Scrolls, etc), as well as various Apocryphal works, not corroborate the bible's key accounts? Why were such texts considered uncanonical?
Our statement becomes even more pertinent when it is realized just how little attention was originally given to the existence of Jesus by historians and philosophers who lived during the period in which he is believed to have lived and preached.
Book after book is composed by perplexed scholars who are forced to accept, by the dearth of references on Jesus from early Christian sects and by the contradictions between the official accounts, that the story of Jesus just could not be based on actual events. It is anything but a biography, lacking the essential minutiae and nuance that are customary when descriptions are made of a living person's life. It is certainly not a valid recollection of his colleagues since their accounts are contradictory over essentials that should merit neither doubt nor discrepancy.
We can surmise,however, that those same forces insisting the Jesus story be accepted as it was written in the gospels would sooner admit to it being a concoction than they would admit it to be Egyptian or Irish in origin.
For centuries, prominent biblical scholars have demonstrated that the four gospel accounts do not reference events that occurred historically.
As we mentioned in Volume One, the Gnostics, like the Stoics, were most likely a pan-Druidic order. Gnostic groups were very likely making a return to the highest principles of the Egyptian Amenists and the Irish Druids. This is the reason why Gnostic groups were so ruthlessly persecuted. Given that this is the truth, we are not surprised that modern academics are, on the whole, loath to get to the bottom of what Gnosticism was about. They know, all too well, what it would mean for the orthodox hegemony, should the truth about the Gnostics and their inclination toward Druidry be brought to light.
Gnostics, whose only "crime" involved anon-literal interpretation of scripture, suffered unbearable tortures. They were barbarically massacred because they chose to interpret bible's passages allegorically, because they incorporated the feminine principle, and because they had a different take on the ancestry and identity of Jesus.
One of the most interesting and puzzling Gnostic sects with a deep connection to Egypt were the Mandeans. Their existence was brought to light when Jesuit missionaries discovered remnants of their cult still existing in modern day Iraq. The Mandeans said that they were descendants of the church of John the Baptist and that they did not accept the Jesus of the official Church. They considered Jesus a "lying Messiah." This attitude was also found among the Essenes of Qumran who referred, in their texts, to John as the "Teacher of Righteousness" and Jesus as the "Wicked Priest." The Mandeans referred to themselves as "St. John's Christians." Their chiefs or priests were known as "Nasoreans." The Moslems knew them as the "Sabeans," a word that means "of the stars" or "heavens." The Mandeans declared themselves descendants of the Egyptians and their master to have come from Alexandria in Egypt. Naturally, the existence and teachings of these Gnostic Mandeans has been obscured by the hegemonic forces from Rome and London.The Iraqi Mandeans are now practically extinct.
The Church did not want the teachings of the Gnostics to be studied. They knew only too well that Gnosticism was nothing more or less than Egyptian religion. It was the faint echo of the theologies of Egypt mixed with many other religious and spiritual traditions commonly found in Hellenistic Alexandria long after the great dynasties had passed into oblivion. They do not want it known that the Gnostics themselves were a later offshoot of the more ancient Solar and Lunar Cults that had their roots in the Stellar Cults of Egypt and Ireland. And they did not want it known how the Gnosticism of the Egyptians had influenced their religion and bible.
Gnostics did not attribute much meaning to a physical Jesus even though they did believe in one. For the majority of the Gnostics it was Jesus' divine presence that was important. And this is most significant since this was also the mindset of the Solar Cult members of ancient Egypt. The interest of the Gnostics was on the archetypal rather than stereotypical level. Jesus was a symbol of what all men can and must become. Their Jesus was a spiritual model and not a physical being whose earthly lifestyle mattered.
The mysterious Melchizedek and Pharaoh Akhenaton. Were they the same person? Or was Melchizedek a fictive stand-in for Akhenaton's god Aton? Is it Aton (code name "Melchizedek"), and not Jesus, who has been secretly venerated for centuries by the hierarchs of Vatican City?
The [Dead Sea] Scrolls reveal the dementia of men who believed in the coming of a blood-crazed Messiah. They also help us to understand the dementia of men who believe in the intervention of the divine savior. After all, what if the concept of divine salvation by proxy was spawned by men too spiritually malignant and toxic to make moral and spiritual changes of their own bat? The man who requires a divine mediator to "save" him from his own sins, is the man incapable of moral change for its own sake. Weak, demon-haunted, men of this kind are plentiful today and were plentiful in ages past. The first Christian emperors and bishops (such as Augustine of Hippo) were such men. St. Paul - the great Christologist himself - was definitely such a man. His own words show that he was troubled of heart and filled with animosity towards himself and his grievous sins. Masochism and extreme guilt are common dilemmas among "good" Christians.
Ultimately, the data in the Dead Sea Scrolls revealed that the irrational ideas of the fanatical Zadokites had been plagiarized by Paul and Christian churchmen. They supplied evidence to show that Paul was certainly an agent of the Romans and probably of the elite Sadducees.
The suppression of Dead Sea Scrolls is entirely understandable. Their publication was resisted by the Vatican's appointed overseers for the reasons stated above, and also because the secret cadre operating behind Judaism and Catholicism would have been compromised once the world came to know facts about Palestine. It would not have served the interests of the Vatican hierarchy if the world came to know how tolerant early Jews from Judea and Galilee had been toward local pagan ideas and gods. And, furthermore, it would not have been good for business if the world discovered that the Jewish god had morphed out of pagan deities well known in the region. It would be difficult if bible readers were to find out that the Jews of the Near East had the Messianic doctrine forced down their throats, or that those possessed by Messianic zeal were merely one small extremist cell with political rather than spiritual objectives. Early Jews were supposed to look like the perfect followers of Moses and Jehovah, while early Christians were meant to look as if they were obedient and devout followers of a merciful and forgiving Jesus Christ. And evidence that might inspire deviance from these made to order images was marked for seizure and destruction. Stories of the secret oral tradition handed down at Sinai to the Levites were downplayed; data on the identity of the mysterious Melchizedek was obscured; the tolerance of the vast majority of Jews toward pagan traditions was both ignored and under-emphasized; and information about extremist cults whose ideas, in skewed form, became the basis for Christian doctrines, was prevented from reaching the world.
Melchizedek's lineage is obscure in the Bible because he is merely a fictive device, a stand-in for someone else whose name was not to be mentioned.
In the same book [Hebrews 5] Melchizedek is described as being: "Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made life unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually." This reference emphasizes that Melchizedek can not be considered a normal human being. He is a king of special lineage. Suggestively, this was how pharaohs were regarded. Their mothers and fathers were gods.
The name Melchizedek apparently means "King of Zedek," "King of Salem (Peace)," or "King of righteousness." The term zedek means "justice."
This Sadducee-Roman connection has rarely been investigated by modern authors. In fact, it has been downplayed. Significantly, it was the Sadducees who taught that Moses had received two laws from Jehovah, one written and one oral, that is, one open and one secret. It is likely that the wealthy Sadducees encouraged their Roman allies to finally eradicate the extremist Zadokites who were making so much trouble for them. This assault did take place, and the Vatican was disturbed should modern-day readers find out about it. The facts concerning the ruthless purge of Zealots and Zadokites, by the Romans and Sadducees, was to be obscured at all costs.
A major area of controversy, when it comes to understanding the Dead Sea Scrolls, concerns the true identity of the group responsible for their composition. Some believe the Essenes were the authors of the Scrolls, while others believe the Zealots were responsible. The difference is important because the Zealots were part of the fanatical Zadokite Order that dated back to the time of King Solomon and to the even more ancient Melchizedek. The powerful religious sect, the Sadducees, were also thought to be descended from the Zadokites or "Sons of Zadok." In any case, the Zealots, or hardline Zadokites, had broken away from the Temple of Jerusalem and the elite Sadducees who supported the Roman presence in Palestine. The extremist Zealots awaited the coming of a Messiah-King who would free them from Roman domination and strike down the Jews who had been their confederates. Their radical stance put the Zadokites at odds with the Sadducees and with most Jews in Palestine.
The main controversy, regarding the [Dead Sea] Scrolls, centered on the fact that they did not present a loving and merciful Son of God consistent with the image found in the Gospels and presented by Paul. Furthermore, the "Teacher of Righteousness," mentioned in the Scrolls, and often taken for Jesus, might have lived centuries before the time stated in the officially compiled scriptures. And so, because the content of the Scrolls was largely inconsistent with Christian accounts, the Vatican elites prevented their publication for over forty years. Another reason for the reticence could have been due to the fact that the breakaway sect of Qumran had clearly desired the overthrow and destruction of Rome. They considered Roman rule to be evil and, although they did not speak for the majority of Jews, they condemned any Jew who supported or profited from Rome's presence in their land. Ultimately the Vatican could not benefit from the information contained in the Scrolls. There was too much dissimilarity between their Jesus Christ and Qumran's Teacher of Righteousness, and too much criticism of Rome.
The Jesus of the New Testament would not have been accepted by such a sect [sect that allegedly lived at Qumran, and was responsible for the Dead Sea Scrolls]. Paul, his inventor, would also not have been accepted. Paul, who, after his alleged conversion on the road to Damascus (and who was for a short time a member of their order), was regarded as a renegade, betrayer, and scurrilous counterfeiter worthy of death. He was regarded as a Roman agent who had infiltrated their order to find out coveted secrets that he afterwards broadcast to the world at large. His Christianity, and his Jesus, were not acceptable to the hardline Jewish militants. His murder was only prevented by the Romans whose agents closely watched over him.
Whatever the truth, and whatever the motives of the Church's executive, the physical Jesus can have existed but once and meeting him would have been a historical event, pure and simple. A spiritual Christ, on the other hand, as revered by St. Paul and the New Testament's authors can be encountered and experienced at any time by any person (believer and non-believer) at any location of the world. If we are led to confuse the two we are condemned to position our physical Jesus (or at least his attributes) wherever and whenever the spiritual Christ is said to have appeared. The truth falls by the wayside while the spiritual gets confused with the physical and the theological with the historical.
The search for proofs concerning the historical existence of an all too physical Jesus has been the monomania of several modern scholars, of both the orthodox and revisionist persuasion. British-Israelites, such as Fredrick Haberman and E. Raymond Capt, have assured the world that Jesus and his coterie arrived in England with the Roman trader Joseph of Arimathea in the years following the supposed crucifixion. Those who have deciphered Templar and Gnostic documents believe that Jesus survived his crucifixion and that he and his wife Mary Magdalene traveled to England by way of France. Author Tony Bushby trails his "Yeshua ben Panthera" to Wales by way of Rome, while author Ralph Ellis believes him to have been Jesus Gamala, a descendant of Cleopatra and Julius Caesar. We are quite bemused with the efforts of writers such as these to prove the existence of the world's most elusive man. Perhaps, such authors have an agenda that transcends mere maverick investigation or academic inquiry. After all, the Machiavellian intelligentsia behind Judeo-Christianity have always been most aggravated by the exposure of their fraudulence and connivance and by the dearth of biographical information confirming the existence of their iconic savior. Since the most erudite scholars in the world, down through the ages, have demolished all possible arguments for the physical existence of Jesus, as the bible has portrayed him, it would be most gratifying if apparently "independent" and "objective" researchers from the secular world were to come up trumps.
Moreover, a great deal of trouble has been caused within theological circles, as well as in the secular domain, simply due to confusion over the difference between the physical Jesus (a supposed historical personality) and the preternatural Christ figure. In most minds the two are fused as one and this presumptuous blending, together with the plethora of other factual inconsistencies between the two entities, has lead the Christian and non-Christian masses to see one where the other should be, and to think of one in terms of the other. The attributes of the spiritual Christ have been transferred and transposed to the physical personality while the attributes of the supposed physical Jesus have been carried over to the phantasmagoria of the Christ. We have been conditioned to treat these two very different entities as one and the same. Nevertheless, they are not the same. In short, the story of the man Jesus is quite a different story than that of the Christ. This fact cannot be overstressed.
The greatest of Jewish scholars, those who have thoroughly analyzed the ancient Jewish scriptures and who have expert knowledge concerning the origins of Christianity, understand Christianity to be akin to the mystery religions of the ancient pagan world and to the Gnostic traditions that orthodox Judaism ostensibly frowns upon. It was these pagan mystery traditions that advocated sun-gods, dying saviors, and divine salvation, and not Judaism. These facts have been guilefully obscured by latter-day elites within the Roman Catholic (and Protestant) churches who have a great deal to lose should the pagan roots of their "heavenly" Jesus be revealed.
The "Christ" is a rendition of the sun king, a sacred archetypal principle revered by the priests of the Solar Cult in Egypt. The stereotypical “Christ” was a figure who personified the physical sun, and his "biography" was simply a re-scripting in anthropomorphic terms of the annual behavior of the physical sun as it passes through the twelve signs of the zodiac. On its journey, the sun encounters other luminaries and stars and must pass through constellations and houses. This personification of heavenly bodies began in Ireland with the Druids. It was a subject taught throughout the world by masters in the many Druidic colleges that were destroyed by the Romans and founders of Christianity. To the Druids there was nothing secretive about the sun king and his message of light and love. The son of god - the metaphorical "Light of the World" - is the sun of god, the actual light of the world. This is not as heretical as it may first sound for when we do our homework and open our eyes we will discover that the elites within Judeo-Christianity know this fact all too well. Their predecessors are the ones who decided, as many other pagan peoples had already done, to personify the sun as a man born at the winter solstice.
In our estimation the term "Jesus" was, in fact, not a name but a title. It was a title given to the highest initiate of the Solar Cult in Egypt, although its actual origins lie in Ireland. A "Jesus Christ" was a high ranking priest of the temples of the sun. He was a priest of Aton, the sun god worshipped at cities of Heliopolis, Avaris, Tanis, Amarna, and Alexandria. The title was transferable and did not specify a single unique god-inspired savior. It was similar to the titles "pharaoh," "sera," "king" and "pope," adopted by any number of incarnate individuals.
The point that requires stressing concerns the connection between the Jewish "House of David" (or Judah, or Yahud) and the Egyptian House of the Pharaohs.
Jewish author and historian Hyam Maccoby states that the term Messiah referred to the seed and house of David.
The important matter, however, is not that she [Mary Magdalene] was a physical wife to the man Jesus but that she was a symbolic representation of the Christed man’s feminine aspect. The biblical Mary is an analog to Danu, Brigit, Isis, Nuith, and Ma'at, to Demeter, Hera, Persephone, and Eve. Like the moon in the heavens and the night sky around the Earth, the feminine Anima both mirrors and embraces the masculine Animus.
Sobek (or Sobek Ra), was a crocodile god worshipped at Thebes. Like Christ and the pharaoh, he represented the merging of the four elements.
The very word Messiah comes from the Hebrew Mashiach (Egyptians Messeh) which means "anointed." It specifically referred to the oil that was processed from the fat of the Nile crocodiles that were sacred to the Egyptian god Sobek.
In the Egyptian language the word “Christ” denoted one who was "anointed." In ancient times there was a process or ritual known as Horasis. During this rite the male's entire body was regarded as a phallus and anointed accordingly. This practice originated from the Druids who would anoint the trunk of a specially prepared oak tree with oil. We note a similar practice among the Egyptians, whose ithyphallic obelisk symbolized the ancient earth god Geb. And we find the practice among the Hindus, whose erect "lingam" stone symbolized the ancient god Shiva, or Pashupati.
Evidently, the star that was of concern to the Essenes and to the descendants of the Cult of Aton, was the sun itself and not just any old star in the over-crowded heavens. The Commander, the David, the Krist, the Lucifer, or Messiah, was not only the "Star," he was the Sun - the Prince of Light.
The title "Star" is significant given how many starry symbols we see today on state regalia. We see stars on flags, medals, and corporate logos. They are frequently used as symbols for political organizations and churches. We even find stars as emblems on hellish machines of war. They appear on the American one-dollar bill and above the head of the dollar's apparently “Judaic” eagle. Newspapers and businesses utilize the title, and media celebrities have even been given the term to emphasize their iconic status and claim to fame.
The term Krist (or Karast) was a title commonly bestowed by the Essenes to denote one of their excellent or special initiates who had passed through extraordinary trials and who held high status and rank. It was not a personal name. The Essenes are known to have referred to themselves as "the Elect" or as "Sons of Light." Masters of high caliber were known as the "Star." This is clearly an astrological title. Paintings have been discovered of priests with star-shaped diadems upon their foreheads. The very word minister contains the syllables for moon (min) and star (ster). We can perhaps understand now why the Vatican did not want the Dead Sea Scrolls, and other presumably Essenic scriptures, to be found, translated, published, and commonly read. The Vatican did not want any record or mention of lineages of "Christed" men. They wished the world to believe their Jesus to be unique in every way. The literature and traditions that contradicted this policy were to be sequestered or destroyed. Cults or sects that preached the contrary were to be condemned and persecuted as heretics. Interestingly, this word simply meant "those who choose."
The term "Christian" appears only three times in the New Testament's convoluted scriptures. It appears twice in Acts and once in I Peter, although the entries in Acts may not be original. They may have been added by editors at a later date. Worse than this, the word "Christian" can not be found in Christian literature composed in the first one hundred years after the supposed crucifixion of Jesus. The term is found only in literature of pagan authorship. On almost every occasion the term is used to describe degenerate sects who have disturbed society by violent and illegal acts. The first pagan author to mention the term was Suetonius. After him it appeared in a letter of an Adrian around the year 117 AD. Spelled "Chrestian" it again turned up in the work of Justin Martyr between 147 and 161 AD. As we can see these brief entries do not provide enough information to verify that the term signified the followers of the biblical Jesus.
The world's Luciferian enclaves, the meritocratic masonic secret societies, also make frequent use of the symbol of the sun and the metaphor of light as knowledge. They honor and observe the days of ritual importance on the solar calendar, hold secret meetings on specific dates, and pass on their arcane teachings in private convocations. Illustrious masonic initiates refer to themselves as "Princes of the Light." Both they and their lodges are, in our estimation, corrupt replications of the sun temples of the ancient world. Their choice of symbolism (both Druidic and Egyptian) leaves us with no doubt of this. As a result of their peculiar theological disposition masons generally allow all the world religions to play a part within their lodges. The three main religions are revered and regarded as equals. We say, naturally this is the case. It occurs because these masonic insiders know what laymen are not supposed to know, namely that religion is a solar theology and that the Sun Cult's chief hierophant and tutelary icon was not Moses, David, or Solomon, but Akhenaton - the Aton worshipping Pharaoh of Light (or "Lucifer").
After the eighteenth dynasty, princes and priests of Aton became the most powerful monarchs and theocrats in the world. The Atonists operated from behind serveral fronts. One of these was the Sol Invictus Cult to which Emperor Constantine belonged. He was an initiate of this order during the time he established Christianity. Therefore, as far as we are concerned, Constantine and his royal descendents were Atonists. They were guided and financed by the biological or ideological descendents of Akhenaton, who established the worship of Aton.
The chiefs of the world's most powerful Solar Cults use the title "Lucifer." This is because, esoterically speaking, they are sons of the morning or dawning. They are "Sons of the Sun" - the Princes of Light. (The very term Freemason means "Brother of the Sun.")
Throughout his life Constantine had been the chief of the Sol Invicta Cult. Like the Atonists of Egypt, the members of this order believed that the emperor was a living incarnation of the sun.
It was on June 21 - the day of the summer solstice - that a total of 2,048 presbyters, deacons, sub-deacons, acolytes, and exorcists gathered at Nicea to decide what Christianity really was, what it would be, and what writings were to be used and who was to be its god. The tyrant Constantine commissioned this council and he imperiously presided over it throughout its duration.
One of the most repetitive refrains concerns the building of a new world over the ashes of the old.
He [Constantine] made Christianity the official religion of Rome after allegedly receiving a mystical vision. He murdered his wife and eldest son the same year he convened the Council of Nicea. Throughout his life he was head of the Sol Invicta Cult that, like Atonism, held the Emperor to be an incarnation of the sun.
Many people have chosen to believe the incomprehensible gobbledygook of the bible simply indicates its scribes and editors were not, in fact, guilty of any conscious manipulation of history or theology. If they had wanted to create a religion to manipulate the entire world then surely they would have compiled a more consistent and realistic tome. In other words, they would have done a better job. We submit, however, that it is foolhardy to believe that the bible's utter incoherence and fantastic collection of scientific, philosophical, and theological errors, is proof of innocence on behalf of its composers and compilers. The various biblical councils could certainly have fashioned for themselves and their flock a book of sublime rationality such as would have impressed the Grecian philosophers. But this was not their aim and the inconsistencies and absurdities were purposely left in for a very important reason. A rational book, understood by all, would need no interpreters whereas a mythical compendium would require it. The clerics, bishops, cardinals, priests, and curates of the past, and the hysterical, verbose, and ludicrous evangelists and pastors who preach today, would hardly be required if the chapters, verses, and words of the bible made sense. They were not intended to make rational sense. They were chosen, entered, and espoused because they stimulate the mythic sensibility and ancestral consciousness. They stir the imagination and limbic centers of the brain, and mollify the needs and cravings of the many rather than sharpen the logic of the independent thinker. The world's masses require myths, and subconsciously rely upon them in order to feel secure. Believing these myths allows a man to feel part, rather than apart, of the collective. Men require things to believe in, and to have faith in. They are largely unaware of how these needs make them victims of manipulation. Where belief is operating, sanity and reason are often in abeyance, and the masters of the game, the "Scribes and Pharisees" so to speak, know this only too well. The early potentates never expected an independent and critical class to rise during their own time, or at any other time. They were concerned with duping the mass, the rank and file, and those illiterate hordes who could not work out the bible's meaning for themselves and who would not be permitted to do so. Humanity inherited the Cult of the Priest and has been under the power of these blackguards for thousands of years. For their special self-appointed duty of pontificating upon the "mysteries" of the bible they live in luxury and are awarded all sorts of titles and social privileges. Indeed, it is this special overclass that molds and controls the societies of the world. The god of these duplicitous and profoundly sadistic men did not write his own biography or record his own activities. He had secretaries, public relations officers, image consultants, and make-over artists to do it for him. He was made in the image of those with cruelty in their hearts and world dominion on their minds. The world's cultures were filled with gods and goddesses some of which were of a very pure and lofty nature. Some are immensely ancient and deeply revered. The god of Judeo-Christianity had to stand out. He had to be properly shaped to suit a practical and political end. If Jehovah could be made to thunder and flash, and if his countenance was stern, angry, and vengeful, as opposed to gentle, loving, and forgiving, then men would fear him. Even very rebellious and iconoclastic men would harbor fear in his presence. And if men could be trained to fear and obey their brooding heavenly "Lord" and "Master" they could soon be trained to fear and obey their earthly lords. It seemed a feasible and relatively simple ploy. It was an attractive notion to the emperors and princes who commanded their myth mongers to script "Lord God" as a most intolerant, hot-tempered sort ready to damn to perdition those who showed the least sign of contempt or self will. The scribes did their work well. Their travesty of theology sent men into a maze of conflicts and confusion. In their hellish vats fear was mixed with love and forgiveness with vengeance. On their canvases heaven was contrasted with hell, and beauty with corruption. The human reason was gradually but expertly subverted.
Many historians have been puzzled as to why Western "European" man has had such an obsessive fascination with the convoluted nonsense of the bible. Why was this tome taken to heart by Westerners who had their own rich ancestral traditions? Certainly, force was involved, but the main reason for its acceptance is a carefully guarded secret. The bible stories were accepted throughout the occident because they were born there. Travesties they may be, but the ancestral brain remembers and is subconsciously familiar with the underlying truths contained in the bible's lamentably fragmented and convoluted texts. Behind the apparent nonsense and contradictions, the protestations and dubious morality tales, lies the great tale - that of the stars, the heavens, and the wisdom therein.
It is not very difficult for a rational person to see that there is something distasteful and wholly suspect about the majority of the sordid stories in the bible. If it were not for the indoctrination which begins during our earliest years we would regard the bible as a book to be avoided rather than lauded. If it were not because of the existential ennui that leaves a man open to manipulation we would regard the god of the Testaments as a most deplorable creature. We would regard the bible in the same way we do the Maya Popul Vuh, the Norse Eddas, or the Aryan Shastras and Vedas, as a book with interesting aspects not to be wholly believed or used to condemn other human beings to eternal damnation. Without brainwashing the bible would be avoided by literate men and hardly considered a manual for right living. No, the bible would be seen for what it is - the bizarre creation of the deranged. It might even be given an "X" rating and kept well out of the way of youngsters who would find all they require for right living in Plato, Aristotle, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Rand, or in the myths and legends of their ancestors. In our opinion, this mythic archive contains all that a man or woman needs for moral rectitude and spiritual maturation. If there is value in the bible it exists only in the proof that its text offers us concerning the depth of human idiocy and depravity. As a catalog of man's inhumanity and perversity the bible serves the student well. As William Blake affirmed, its proverbs are not of heaven but of hell.
Additionally, most of the people of the world, being illiterate,could not care less whether the bible was based on fact or not, and the very few literate readers knew full well what the consequences were if they offered refutations or contradicted the almighty emperor and his appointed bishops. The memory of the fate of the great Giordano Bruno would be enough to quell most dissent. The situation was no different during the time of the despot King James Stuart. People accepted his "Authorized" version simply because he had authorized it.That version of the bible, and only that version, would be considered right. There was no debate about the matter.
Thankfully, there have been those down through time, as well as at the time, who knew that the bible was a concoction of ancient solar theocracy and that it did not depict actual events.
And more; it was the sacred principles of Druidry that were to be studied by the senior Templars, Masons, Cardinals, Priests, and Kabalists of old.
The most fantastic and yet psychically tranquilizing of these promises concerns a man's fate in the afterlife. If he performs his duties well in this life he may inherit good things after he dies. His sins will be forgiven and his soul will be at rest for eternity. If he rebels and does not perform his assigned tasks he will perish and be eternally damned. Promises were the business of the Church, and they still are. In this regard nothing has changed. They were in fashion then and they are in fashion now. It is by way of this reward contract that the church has slowly but effectively molded men into obedient slaves. This crafty tactic has even served to quell the Spirit of Rebellion in many men. Yes, one cannot think of a more successful stratagem than the promise.
The bible is a compilation of numerous occidental and oriental pagan doctrines. Its compilation was commissioned by the chiefs of the Solar Cult (Atonists) situated in Tanis, Alexandria, Jerusalem, and Rome, in order to galvanize their empire and maintain control over the minds of the mass of illiterate and superstition-ridden human beings under their dominion. Dominion over men and the world was what it was all about, and little has changed when it comes to this agenda.
At least, we may inquire why is it that this touted but misnamed "Judeo-Christian" religion, that all men are expected to respect and trust if not follow, does not speak in detail concerning the dynamics of man's psyche as do the writings of Plato, Aristotle, and Lucretius? And why do we find it full of animosity for what man is? Why is it so full of conflict, superstition, adversity, and rivalry? Why do we learn such terrible things about man and the world from its pages, while from a Homer, a Shakespeare, or a Lawrence, we learn so much that is great and sublime? Why is the gamut of human emotion so limited and paltry in this book meant to reflect man as he lives and is? And why do we not laugh when we read these scriptures of Christianity? Why does it state that one small "chosen" coterie will enjoy dominion over all other nations and peoples? Why does this book of Jews and Christians not contain treatises from masters of astronomy or geometry, or of husbandry, pyramid-building, and navigation? And why is it so difficult to place the authors who have contributed to it, those Solomons, Isaiahs, and Jeremiahs? Why, in this most patristic book of pages do we not encounter hymns to the earth and goddess as we do in Lao Tzu or Chuang Tzu? And why nothing concerning the spiritual significance of animals that we find in the lore of so many antique nations? Why is Earth deemed so lowly in this lauded book? We do not find it so in the works of Wordsworth, Bronte, or Hardy. And why the talk of bad angels and infernal pits of fire and brimstone? Why plagues and famines unleashed upon the unsuspecting? Why a god so wrathful and jealous and so bent on retribution and destruction? Were we psychologists we might be motivated to ask whether the bible's strange chapters and verses reflect man as he truly is, or whether they reflect how man and his world were perceived by its few psychically demented authors obsessed on emphasizing and broadcasting their own superiority and prowess. Might we not tend to agree with Nietzsche's contention that it is the desire of Christians to see the world as ugly and bad that has made it ugly and bad? In any case, a great deal may hang upon the answers to our disquieting questions.
Fortunately the bible, like any book, will reveal its secrets, but only to those skeptical and persistent enough to follow the twists and turns in its convoluted text in order to ascertain what is true and what is false. Academics concede that the bible's text is full of "pious fraud." They admit that there are two gods being spoken of in the opening books and that as time went by these two gods (Elohim and Jehovah) became fused into one, known henceforth as the "Lord God." They concede that there are errors, fictions, and skewed facts and that there are stories concerning people who never lived. They freely admit that there are plagiarisms and renditions of pagan myths and legends, and that the very gospels were not written by those four "saints" after whom they are named. Yes, a lot of things have been conceded since bible study began in earnest a mere 100 years ago. And a lot has had to be conceded given the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Gnostic Gospels, texts from within Christianity that contradict some of the most revered but falsely authenticated tropes of the official testaments.
The religions of Christianity and Judaism originate from the same source, and that source is Egypt. Egyptian culture and religion had its source also, and that source is Ireland. Ireland's Druidic and proto-Druidic traditions, likewise, had their source in the pre-diluvian civilizations of Atlantis and Lemuria. These facts will come as something of a shock to the majority of those readers who have received their education from conventional sources and who have tended to blithely accept on faith all that pours forth from the mouths and pens of the so-called "historians"and "experts" who believe themselves informed about the world of the past.
The Druids were the oldest priesthood from the oldest civilization on earth. Egyptian religion and Judeo-Christianity were plagiarizations and corruptions of Druidic teachings and traditions. The word Druid means "Doorway," and also "Servent of Truth."
When we contemplate the mysteries of time and history, we see how everything that exists came into being for a reason. It is only intellectual lethargy, and the passage of time, that allows fallacies to appear before us in the guise of facts. Indeed, all that is required for a historical lie to be accepted as historical truth is the passage of historical time. This particular phenomenon has been, and continues to be, on the minds of the world's most devious mythmongers who seek to further the deceptive industry of their predecessors. Those who have arranged the subject of history, so that men see what they are meant to see and so they know only that which they are meant to know, are profoundly aware of how the simple passage of time aids them in their heinous work.
Although the earliest of the world's Mesolithic and Megalithic sites have proven to be more sophisticated in design and construction than those of later date, most people continue to accept the unsustainable fiction concerning the world of the past. Ancient man was primitive and modern man is civilized. This is what most people accept and believe. It is, however, one of the most egregious fallacies conceivable.
As ex-rebels James Simon Kunen (Columbia University activist) and Jerry Kirk (Black Panthers) have already informed us, there are two main forms of rebellion - the soft and the hard. There is the “designer” or “chic” version that serves, in the long run, to reinforce the established status quo,and there is the authentic and radical form that attempts, and occasionally succeeds, in countering and demolishing the rotten status quo. The masses of discontented and inwardly discomfited who consider themselves as being “against the system” (and this includes the majority of pseudo-Communists, pseudo-Anarchists, and so on) are usually of the first variety and are, therefore, easily duped and led. More often than not these soft-rebels are also highly duplicitous, narcissistic and devious. They desire only to seize the reigns of power for themselves. After all, how many Stalins, Castros, Maos, and Mugabes of the world begin as zealous “opponents” of the status quo only to later become the most zealous of oppressors? As William Blake wrote:"...the fist that crushes the tyrants head becomes a tyrant in the tyrant's stead." So, although the masters of the game may occasionally permit this soft designer-rebelliousness, they are ever vigilant against the true hard form should it ever threaten to appear.
What many paranoiacs, fear-mongers, and doomsday merchants imagine to be the countdown to extinction is actually the countdown to freedom. What many falsely imagine to be the instigation of a tyrannical “New World Order” is, in fact, going to be the removal of all such draconian order from the world, forever.
In psychological terms, Pluto is the “Shadow.” Symbolically speaking, it is nature's psychic surgeon or hygienist that arrives to cleanse the soul of its toxicity and repressed debris so that it may be chastened and virginal enough to perhaps receive the clear elixir of truth. That Plutonic Shadow, the emissary of the Holy Spirit, has already been manifesting in the world and it will continue to do so for a decade or more. Its presence is the harbinger of truth and above all - freedom. Therefore, only those imprisoners of human minds and souls haves something to fear from the coming "Age of Revealing." As the Scorpionic thirteenth card of the Tarot shows (Rider-Waite Deck) it is only the popes and kings, and their lieutenants, who will be leveled before Pluto's great steed. It is only the emotionally, morally, and spiritually toxic amongst us who have something to fear from the approach of Pluto's silver scythe. The rest can benefit from, and even enjoy, the healing that comes after the pestilence, the plague, and the offending virus has been eradicated. All we have to remember is that everything in our world is cleaned - our bodies, our cars, and our carpets. Only our emotions and psyche remain perpetually neglected and unhygienic. This is what the energy represented by Pluto comes in to confront and clear.
Symbolically speaking, we find it more than suggestive that the dove was chosen to represent the third party of the Blessed Trinity since it is not a Christian emblem. It is a very ancient pagan symbol. The origin of the mystical symbolism of the dove comes from astrology and from the gnosis of the ancient stellar cults. The dove is, in fact, the symbol for the sign of Scorpio, which is one of the two signs of the zodiac connected to the Spirit of Rebellion. So, we find it more than significant that the symbol chosen to represent the higher self - the true Holy Spirit - should relate directly and undeniably to the spirit and act of Rebellion, and to the Spirit of Contradiction.
Perhaps, we can now understand why it is that a man cannot be forgiven for sins committed against the “Holy Spirit,” that is, against his own Higher Self.
The abnegation of selfhood is tantamount to self-murder. Thanks to orthodox religion and its anti-human dogmas this sadism to the self is rampant throughout the world. We can find it in the East and in the West. Religion,government, and corporations, exist to rape men of their inherent sovereignty and to crush the Spirit of Rebellion. These forces are obscene contradictions to the true Holy Spirit. The church, in particular, is not the agent of the Holy Spirit but its greatest enemy. A careful reading of the bible reveals how many passages are given over to the question of slavery and how endorsed it is by god and his terrestrial agents.
The dove is merely a metaphor for the deconstructive energy that is astrologically symbolized by the sign of Scorpio and its ruling planet Pluto.
The abnegation of selfhood is tantamount to self-murder. Thanks to orthodox religion and its anti-human dogmas this sadism to the self is rampant throughout the world. We can find it in the East and in the West. Religion,government, and corporations, exist to rape men of their inherent sovereignty and to crush the Spirit of Rebellion. These forces are obscene contradictions to the true Holy Spirit. The church, in particular, is not the agent of the Holy Spirit but its greatest enemy. A careful reading of the bible reveals how many passages are given over to the question of slavery and how endorsed it is by god and his terrestrial agents.
We understand that a rational man cannot say, like Christ is meant to have done, that: "I and my Father are One," unless we are each first one within ourselves to begin with. The "Father" is complete and if we are ourselves not complete then how can we possibly be one with him or with anyone? The Christian who imagines that being one with the Father implies the abnegation of selfhood is a sadist to his own being. He commits a cardinal sin with just this kind of illogical thinking. How can a mere nothing, a human zero, merge with god? After all, who is it that comprehends this state of oneness? Logically, it is only a self that can merge or bond with god's self.
The knowledge of god, or even of the son of god, is worthless to the one who does not deeply know him or herself. The chaos and debauch in our world is the result of this lack of self-knowledge. The casualties from drugs and from false spiritual paths and teachers also stand as testimony to our assertion and thesis.
In truth, there is no enlightenment to be found outside oneself. There is nothing worth having or attaining that does not originate within one's own being. If there is such a thing as enlightenment it cannot be found in the company of gurus, priests, or experts. Only its antithesis can be found in such company. As it was written at Delphi, it is only when a man has ended his own inner division and come to rational clarity over the mystery of himself that he can inherit true wisdom.
Although most Christians will be loath to accept what we say, it is in accordance with true Christian precepts to identify this so-called “Holy Spirit” (the third spiritual essence and principle within the Trinity) as our own selfhood. The Holy Spirit was referred to as "Wisdom" (Sophia), and was equated with transcendent knowledge. This knowledge may extend to the son of god, and then to god himself, but it must first begin with self-knowledge.This is literally what Sophia of the Trinity is - knowledge of the self. The conspiring forces that sought to make this self-knowledge taboo, and who distorted and complicated our understanding and veneration of the true Holy Spirit, were attempting to blot out the self from the Holy Trinity and from the spiritual canon. To imagine the Holy Spirit to be some vague presence, or some indefinable aspect of the Virgin Mary, a white ethereal dove, an abstract metaphysical principle, or an inexplicable mystery, suited the desires of the Christian priestarchy but denied their flock their most valuable key to the gates of salvation. What we were not told is that without the key of knowledge of the self, the other keys, should they even come into our possession, are worthless.
All of them, from Tonatiuh to Odin, from Apollonius and Socrates to Christ, were rebels, iconoclasts, and outcasts. And yet, each was sent to the world by the higher power to execute the will of the so-called “Holy Spirit.” Rebellion, the hallmark of all Servants of Truth is, therefore, a true service to the Holy Spirit. Rebellion against those authorities, systems, or ideas that attempt to molest, impede or confound our sacred individuality,sovereignty, and true voice, constitutes service to the Holy Spirit.Rebelliousness is the hallmark of the Holy Spirit.
For every Christ and Muhammad there are a thousand other god-men, born of virgins, imbued with the deepest wisdom,and enamored with a divine mission. India is filled with such men and women today. So let it be known that there is nothing truly unique about the life of Jesus Christ. The only thing unique about Christ is the lengths to which the Cult, that has adopted his name, has gone to suppress the truth and to foist their unsustainable sectarian beliefs upon the world.
No, few care or have ever cared about the factuality of the bible's convoluted stories. Inwardly, subconsciously, most people know the improbability of such tales. It is apathy and conformity that motivate men to accept such fictions.
Although we may resist accepting it, the youth could care less about Jesus and God. The young ones who appear to care are often forced to do so as a consequence of the inevitable indoctrination process of punitive parents and guardians.
No, the average believer wants Jesus to do something for him. He wants Jesus to act on his behalf and to provide various physical, emotional,and spiritual comforts and securities. Yes, what a great pleasure a mentally and emotionally destitute (“meek”) man finds knowing that for the nominal fee of blind obedience his jealous god will fulfill his needs and also dispense hell and damnation to his enemies. Who could pass up such a platinum deal? The day that Jesus and god fail to cut it, the guru gimmick-merchant on the block will do just as well.
We overcome the direst enemies with knowledge and not might. We seek revelation to prevent revolution, to overcome evil with the force of our example not by the example of our force, but by psychological weaponry, and by total conviction in our cause and sovereign power. As said above, we understand lucidly that freedom is never free, and that silence is most definitely consent. Regardless of whether we are joined by others, or not, we proceed on our quest with conviction. There is the fairest of damsels to be saved and a Serpent's blood to redden our shields - that is all!
What may come after our efforts is not a primary concern.We are not interested in building new world systems but confine our energies to the destruction of old ones that must be rivaled and logically toppled at this time.
The Servants of Truth know from experience how few friends are won, if and when they should endeavor to expose the dirty little secrets of religion's upper echelons.
Like children we have sought to prepare a dish and have exchanged sugar for salt because, in our innocence, we believed because they look alike they must taste alike. So it is with our error over the likeness of love and power. Therefore, it is hardly a surprise that we are not enjoying the dish we have prepared.
The Age of Revealing (or of Apocalypse) is a time when the masks of the false are removed, and when man gets his chance to see who and what he is without filter or censor. Works such as this one, which delve into hidden origins, are symptomatic of this phase-shift into the time when men get the rare chance to find out what has been kept from them, and to have the answers concerning their true origins and destiny. Primarily, the presence of Plutonic (and also Uranian) energy hearkens in a
Spirit of Rebellion. This spirit comes to assist in the process of revelation. It also compels us to resist conformity. As a result of its presence the autocratic forces in the world, that contrive to maintain group-think and who benefit from mankind's unquestioning obedience, become even more tyrannous and aggressive. They manufacture more ingenious devices to ensure that people do not go AWOL. Pluto signals major revisions in the social order, and large scale maneuvers from the power-brokers within governments.
Astrologically, this need to see beneath the surface of things is “ruled” by the planet-archetype Pluto. The energy represented by this planet-archetype (that of deconstruction, ending, and revelation) will be increasing in intensity during the early part of the new millennium. This increase will be experienced as very uncomfortable by people who have lived their entire lives under “consensus trance” and who have not developed the mental equipment to objectively critique their lifestyles or environment.
To offer critiques concerning the five-senses reality is to come up against every one of the innumerable defenses that define the anatomy of the human ego. As the Freudians know, the human ego is little more than a mass of defenses. The Ego-Ideal and Super-Ego (complexes within consciousness) defend against content threatening to ego autonomy. The ego's defense apparatus operates in this way even at the cost of higher forms of expression and awareness. The defenses operate to secure the image that one has of oneself, even if the image has been largely implanted by external authorities. Indeed, the Super-Ego has been regarded as the psychic representative of external authority. And interestingly, its nature is binary. There are permissive defenses and prohibitive ones and, like most biotic functions, they operate unconsciously. These various ego-settings came into existence due to the titanic forces that beset our ego-consciousness from within and without, from the unconscious and from the world. Sanity is a balancing act and, as we say,there is a thin line between genius and madness. This thin line exists also between independence and conformity and between freedom and enslavement. If the human ego senses that the inner and outer threats are intensifying, it tightens and, like a shellfish, retracts from reality. This process is known to psychologists as regression. The egos' behavior is then more conservative and irrational. The regressive tendencies, together with many others (denial, repression, identification, sublimation, sado-masochism, aggression, self-destruction, perversity, insanity, etc) are manipulated by autocrats who seek to control the mass of mankind in the same manner as Wild-Child is controlled by an individual master who, like any animal-tamer,expertly displays his two faces - his permissive and prohibitive tendencies.
Wild-Child is soon trapped in a web from which he can never free himself. He becomes enmeshed in a net tighter yet more tensile than those prepared and laid for his erstwhile forest cousins. Instead of the sun and moon to look down upon him he has the All-Seeing Eye of his imperious master watching his every flex and twitch and peering deeply into the miasma of his mind. The smile he sees greeting him every morning becomes infinitely more sinister and troubling to him than any painful prod or incomprehensible laboratory test. Wild-Child despises the punitive aspects of master but is gratified and appeased when his “correctness” impresses his austere father. Wild-Child develops a “love versus hate” relationship with the master. He is attracted and repulsed at the same time. He detests the power his master has over him but covets that kind of power himself. He is subconsciously attracted to it and bides his time, waiting until he can gratuitously exercise control over creatures meeker than himself. Eventually, Wild-Child learns how the power structure works hierarchically and how even his own master is himself a servant of some other agency. He learns that there is pain in store for his tendency to malinger and that there are punishments in store for even questioning his lot. In the end he accepts his servitude and grows accustomed to his own place in the great invisible hierarchy. The experiment to change his essential nature occurred early and, despite resistance and recalcitrant urges, Wild-Child eventually becomes Tame-Child. He learns to adjust and to even be rather shameful of his previous form of existence that was more natural and free. He learns to disapprove of those who exist as he once did. His identification with the object of his own hatred turns him into an oppressor and a dominator.
In his ambivalent and schizoid state Tame-Child brings havoc to the world but his ego-censors prevent him from apprehending himself as the cause. The world's problems are mysterious in origin and have nothing to do with him. He may sensually deplore what he sees and he may try to topically remedy some of the blatant injustices and affronts he encounters, but looking deeply into causes and motives is certainly not his forte. Endeavors of that kind leave him feeling ineffectual and frustrated and he prefers to leave that kind of thing to others. His hours and days of sensual experimentation with the phenomena of the world must not be halted by thoughts concerning meaning. Life is life. It does not have meaning. Such becomes the credo of the Tame-Child. If and when his personal ideas of reality come under attack from external adversity he can escape into drugs and sexual gratification. He can eat, drink, party, get smashed, and put his blues behind him. The world is just a place he is in. It is outside and is rather threatening. It is full of foreign things he often has to pretend he likes. It does not belong to him and he is not its caretaker. That too is someone else's job. Freedom makes him uneasy and bored. He does not know what to do with it and prefers not to have it. He invents cunning arguments to cover the fact that what he really desires is freedom from freedom. He feigns lamentation about the absence of freedom, valor, and independence, but secretly he despises these things and is envious of those who appear to possess them. Above all, Tame-Child does not wish to think too deeply or revitalize his own ideas of reality. He finds that he can exist without being so bothered, and this knowledge brings him great satisfaction. He discovers that society will reward him for his avoidance and lack of attention to the questions that matter. Tame-Child does not need to think because someone will always be there to tell him what to do and how to do it. The routines, uniforms, repetitiveness, and conformity are very comforting. Doing what everyone else does and thinking as everyone else thinks is psychically elating. It is Tame-Child's satori.
The ending of the Age can mean the end of the machinations of warlords and aristocratic tyrants. It can hearken in a time of enhanced freedom for those who sorely deserve it.
It is almost impossible for a hypnotized, mind-controlled, illogical, desensitized, or psychopathic person to be aware of their own error or dementia.
What is slightly less a matter for the conventional staff-room and laboratory is the question of how larger units of society might likewise suffer being controlled and manipulated by external interference.
Regardless, of the edification of scientists we can glean one simple point - a man, even a very primitive man, can have his behavior and personality shaped and changed.His essential character can be altered by the persistent and deliberate application of conditioning techniques. It matters little whether these impositions are natural or unnatural or whether they are moral or not. What matters is that a man is changed. Once-upon-a-time he was one thing and then, after interference, he becomes something else.
Man believed he could grow strong on a diet of pure materialism, and now wonders why he is vomiting forth his guts and dying of malnutrition.
The races of Egypt, Libya, and India, etc, knew these strange visitors as "Red Men," "Men of Gold," "Goat Men," and "Stag Men," etc. In the bible they are cryptically referred to as "Edomites." This name, attributed to the early Egyptians, simply meant "Red Men." This term has never been satisfactorily explained. However, the original Egyptians are described as having fair hair, and as being of red complexion. The redness mentioned is merely sunburn. Red is what a Caucasian man's skin turns in equatorial heat.
[...] evidence is now coming out showing that Egypt was colonized by Western people over 15,000 years ago.
According to Beaumont, Edinburgh (Din Eidyn), the capital city of Scotia, or Scotland, was the original Zion, or Jerusalem.
Ancient historians claimed that Noah had come from the "Land of Seth" before the deluge. Beaumont believed that this was a reference to the Shetlands.
Osiris, considered by Egyptologists to be a god of the Earth, actually represented the Earth itself. He was the Earth. This is why we read that his ordeal involved a conflict with Set, the god of wastelands, and why we read of his dismemberment. Why this particular kind of death? Beaumont saw it as a device commemorating the tearing to pieces of the Earth by forces unleashed by comet Phaeton. The story of the god or hero torn apart, with his body parts scattered over all parts of the land, served as a retelling of actual terrestrial events. The resurrection of the hero involved the methodical piecing together of the body parts. This trope represents the parts of the Earth emerging again from receding waters and retracting or melting ice sheets.
The groups that managed to survive would inevitably have settled in foreign parts and gradually lost their racial uniqueness. They would eventually have assimilated into those tribes and nations that outnumbered them. If any were to return home in future ages it would have been descendants with blood mixed through interbreeding. What returned was never a pure stock. Those resettling ancestral homelands might not even recognize as their own the scant and faded remnants of civilization found amid the hills and valleys that had once been the sacred home of their fathers.
The erecting of obelisks and towers represented restored order and new life for the Earth. The tower was the Earth's phallus. Its erection symbolized hope and life. The symbolism also extended to the phenomenon of Earth's Polar Shift. Objects are straightened or set in place again once they have fallen or been toppled.
The "Jews," "Judites," or "Yahuds," were not Semites, Asians, or Orientals, from the Eastern hemisphere. They were the Iuda or Juda, the Duwes, or Deus - the "Godly Men" - from Britain and Scandinavia.
[...] "historical" civilizations first arose as remnants of older ones obliterated by these terrible upheavals
Beaumont emphasized the swiftness of the catastrophic events, and it is this belief in the rapidity of the spectacle that separates Catastrophists from Uniformitarians
Allan and Delair, like the main Catastrophist Theorists before them, understand that the massive casualties among the world's fauna did not occur due to movements of glaciers and ice sheets over millions of years. In the tradition of Beaumont and Velikovsky they review the extinction events that appear to have occurred over twelve millennia BC and that are also recorded in the world's myths and legends.
The great flood (for there were many lesser ones) of ancient myth was but one symptom of the global cataclysm.
He [Comyns Beaumont] demonstrated in his books how most of the locations, events, heroes, kings, and miscellaneous characters mentioned in the bible existed in Britain and Ireland, or had connections to these places.
[Ignatius] Donnelly showed that it was on Atlantis, and/or on other similar prehistoric sites, that man first rose from barbarism to civilization. Contrary to what Donnelly supposed, we believe Atlantis to have been one specific locale or city-state upon a continental landmass (known as Appalachia) that was situated in the north Atlantic region, and known in antiquity as Hyperborea, or Ultima Thule. Donnelly was a friend of President Abraham Lincoln who, before he was assassinated, promised to order the US Naval vessel Dolphin to assist in the search for Atlantis. The project was cancelled following the president's murder by Jesuit-backed assassins.
Beaumont specifically pointed out that the cultural elements and idioms regarded as "Egyptian" could not have originated in the land of the Nile. This single fact is inviolate and cannot be denied. It is obvious to those who have taken the time to study the subject, that the Egyptian civilization was transplanted by Western adepts and elders.
The earliest Neolithic sites appear to be those at Mehgarh. They date back to approximately 7000 BC, to the period following the Age of Catastrophe.
As the myths of Eastern people relate, it was white "god-men" from the far West who had arrived bringing wisdom. These myths merely recorded the migrations of exceptionally gifted peoples from lands ruined in the West. Some descendants of these migrating tribes would, during later periods of history, and after some semblance of normalcy had returned to their ancestral habitats, make the trek back again, taking with them their husbands, wives, and offspring of foreign race and blood.
The Atlantean empires spoken of in the works of Athenian philosopher Plato, that reportedly lay beyond the so-called "Pillars of Hercules" originally existed, according to Beaumont, on ancient Albion or Logres, that is in the British Isles. These Isles were either remnants of Atlantis itself, or were fragmented landmasses once connected to a larger continental mass that may have included Scandinavia, Iceland, Greenland, and the Arctic. This "Atlantean" area was known to the ancients as Hyperborea (meaning "Beyond North") or as Ultima Tule, Tula, and Tollan, and also as Arktos or Atzlan.
Nothing was to block the idea that enlightenment was in a man's own keeping. It was not, and is not, something imposed or apprehended from outside. As the Egyptians so beautifully depicted in their papyri, enlightenment is a consequence of man's perpetual inner cleansing.
In some texts, the Essenes reveal that their philosophy is of Druidic origin. Three Elders were served by twelve attendants. And this is certainly a tradition based on astrology. Essene masters were known as "the Star" and referred to themselves as "Sons of Light" or as "the Elect."
Before their [Dead Sea Scrolls] discovery, the world had not heard of the Gnostics. We knew nothing of them or of their teachings. And this was by design.
Did the "great" Martin Luther, the rebel against Catholic oppression, stand with the Anabaptists? Did he support the Peasant's Rebellion that, inspired by him, rose up against royal and state tyranny? No! He did not. He condemned their actions and cursed them each and all. In doing so he showed his colors. He showed the world that he was a nothing more than a paid stooge of the Vatican, funded to fashion what appeared to be a more human religion in order to offset world wide revolution. The new religion of this Luther, and of his protégés Calvin, Knox, and Wesley, was a throw-back to the sadism and irrationality of the Old Testament. It posed no threat whatsoever to the executive of the Vatican. Had it done so, it would have been eradicated overnight. The Vatican had nothing to worry about, and neither did the monarchs and princes of the world. This "Protestantism" was a perfect police-state religion, instructing its followers to be servile and obedient to authority. The tyrants of religion were in perfect accord with the tyrants of politics.
No such nonsense [redemption by proxy] was taught by the Servants of Truth. [...] The adept under the guidance of the Druid or Shaman faced nature and knew full well that there was no entrance to the halls of his gods as long as he remained morally impure and sodden.
The emperors, bishops, cardinals, and ministers conspired, and continue to conspire, to have their followers believe that Jesus will do the work for them. The man who converts and swallows this insinuation is hardly likely to work upon himself spiritually and psychologically. [...] His ultimate psychic satisfaction comes from the belief in redemption by proxy. That he does not need to deeply work on himself is the most subconsciously desired perk behind his religious allegiance. Along with a mass of others, equally hesitant to take responsibility for their own lives, he is convinced that he is privileged and special because he has been chosen by a spiritually perfected superior being who will do all his spiritual work for him. Jesus will watch over him. Jesus will prevent him from coming to harm. Jesus will lead him from temptation and reward him for performing good deeds and acting charitably toward others; and Jesus will save him from the seething evil of a devil trying to damage him morally and drag him to perdition.
The greatest travesty perpetrated by the destroyers of the Irish Church was the obliteration of the central tenet of all Druidic teaching concerning the sanctity of the self. The doctrine of selfhood was the number one greatest threat to the Roman Church.
Anat or Anath was based on the Aryan mother goddess Ana, who was also known as Dana or Danu. She was considered the "virginal" mother of the sun gods. Isis, Hathor, Astarte, Nut, and Neith, were virginal goddesses based on the Western antetype. As E. A. Wallis Budge wrote: And the priests of the goddess Net (Neith) of Sais...held the view that she was self-begotten and self-produced, that she was the mother of the Sun-god, and at the same time a perpetual virgin-goddess. There can be no doubt that these goddesses were the basis of Christianity's Virgin Mary.
As we have shown, the deer and stag were insignias of the Arya, or Druid Elders.
Essentially, the Wicca were, like the Stoics and Cathars, one of the groups preserving, as best they could, the Druidic Way.
Under Pope John XXII, in the year 1320 AD, the interrogation and persecution of so-called "witches" was made law. A witch was, of course, an adept. He or she was part of the "Wicca" or "Wise Ones." They were keepers of the arcane archive of knowledge passed down from the earliest times.
When the Church finally decided, at the Council of Ephesus in 431 AD, to include Mary as a divine aspect, and after it permitted her worship, innumerable pagan sites to the goddesses of old were converted into places sacred to her. The executive within the Roman church finally accepted how problematic it was to completely suppress the feminine principle. So, they simply deified Mary, knowing full well that she would serve them by appeasing the pagan sentiment impossible to wholly eradicate from the world.
Interestingly, we find that certain Christian and Judaic enclaves (such as the Gnostics and Essenes) also revered the goddess and the feminine principle. She is, for instance, mentioned in the Dead Sea Scrolls. In gospels such as that of Thomas (first translated into English by Professor Helmut Koester), we read of Sophia, the goddess of wisdom, and we sense a great reverence for the feminine aspects of deity totally absent in the orthodox branch of Judeo-Christianity. Then, to establish and emphasize our point, we find that these Gnostic sects predate Christianity and Judaism by centuries.
Like the Greeks, the Egyptians and Druids personified wisdom as a goddess. To the Greeks she was Sophia (a word meaning "serpent"), and to the Egyptians she was Ma'at, Nuith, or Taurt.
One of the most important ancient symbols for the goddess was the serpent. The Egyptian hieroglyphic for woman was a serpent.
From birth to death the goddess played a part in the lives of the nobility of Ireland and Egypt. She played no active part in the lives of the Israelites of the bible.
The Irish kings received their power and authority from the goddess. The same custom existed in Egypt, for the pharaoh. Pharaohs and Irish Chieftains alike ruled as ambassadors for the goddess.
Nuada (Nada) was the prehistoric king of the ancient pre-Celtic Irish. Chieftain of the Tuatha de Danann ("People of Goddess Danu"). His name comes from Naddred, the title of the High Druids, meaning "Wise Serpent." His name is the origin of the Biblical Noah (Nuah).
In ancient times the term virgin was attributed to any female who had left their wordly life in order to give themselves to the worship of a god. Such women were considered "born again virgins."
This terrible travesty of gender dynamics and religious belief does not originate with the Jews or Christians. It originates with the Atonists of Lower Egypt - the first monotheists with a pathological fear and hatred toward nature, darkness, and the feminine principle.
More importantly, the Jehovah of the bible was a corrupt rescripting of the ancient god of the moon, worshipped in Egypt and Ireland from the earliest days. As we have shown, his name (Yehew or Yahweh) originally came from the word for the yew tree.
The consort of Danu was Bel. Bel or Baal was worshipped by the Hittites, Canaanites, and Phoenicians, centuries before the so-called Israelites were even heard of. Bel was the first deity of the Druidic trinity. The bells that ring out from Christian churches to this day get the name bell from the god's name (pr. bayal). The Muslims know him still as their Al, or Allah, while to the Canaanites and Levites he was EL. The proto-Greek Pelasgians probably derive their name from Bel. The Hebrew god EL is merely a clever rendering of the Irish Bel.
The travelers gave their name to places such as Donetz, Danzig, Dneiper, Dneister, and Denmark, etc. In Norway, they are said to be the Donsk People. Sadly for Petrie, none of this nonsense is true. These places were not based on the Israelites who were most irreverent toward the goddess. They were named from much earlier traversals of Irish Druids, those most reverent toward their goddess Danu.
Without hesitation, therefore, we conclude that the spurious connections between Danites and de Dannan are a perfidious but subtle fabrication. We believe the word Dan, as used in the biblical scriptures, to be a later interpolation made to aid duplicitous historians tampering with occidental history.
The Danites concern us because of the outrageous attempts by British-Israelites to identify them with the Tuatha de Danann. Although the four pre-diluvian homelands of the de Danann were nothing like Egypt or Palestine, and even though goddess worship distinguished the matriarchal Irish Elders, the British-Israelites insist that they and the Danites are one and the same people.
If Jesus and his closest family members made their way Westward it was, in our opinion, not merely to escape persecution. It was a return, like so many before, to the lands of the ancestors.
In Irish myth the young solar king Lugh rides out to defend his people against he giant Balor of the Evil Eye. He kills his enemy with a sling. The story predates the rise of Judaism.
Haste was made to position "Eden," the home of the biblical Adam, the first man of the first race. It was to be found in the East of course, in the Northern plains of India. It could be identified with the Pamir Plateau, while the river Pison of Genesis was linked with the great Indus River that began there. This zone was erroneously designated, by British-Israelites and others, as the cradle of the Aryans. The main reason why the Himalayan regions were selected for the original homeland of the Aryans was because the main creation myths refer to a great central "White Mountain" that existed in Eden. This central mountain was known as Meru. Indeed, the Pamir Mountains, and those nearby known as Amu Darya, are the highest ranges in the world. However, the word Meru actually connotes Egypt and the pyramids. The pyramid of Giza was the "white mountain" of the legends, and Egypt was the biblical Eden.
The first king of the Phoenicians was King Tur, from whom the Teutonic Thor was derived, and also the British Artur or Arthur.
When it could be shown that "Semites" did not exist as a definable race before 2000 BC, and when it could be proven that the Babylonians, Persians, Phoenicians, Syrians, and Etruscans, were not racially Semitic, the big heat began to fall upon the Judeo-Christian propagandists. With consummate skill they began to reveal a few smidgens of the truth they had kept hidden for centuries. They sought to maintain their academic credibility that had begun to crumble during the first few decades of the twentieth century. Their main ruse was to declare the Jews and the Israelites to be racially dissimilar. They declared that the people referred to as "Jews" were not Semitic after all, but that they were one and the same people as the "Aryans," who were being studied and known to be the fathers of civilization. Without overdoing it they tacitly began admitting that the biblical Levites had an intimate connection with the Hyksos people of Lower Egypt who had ruled there from the thirteenth dynasty. It was essential that the "Jews" be given a noble appearance. Nevertheless, with the admittance that the Jews were not Semitic, we get to see the truth coveted and secreted for so long. The propagandists were admitting what they knew to be the truth, namely that the "Jews" were related to the "Aryans" by way of the Egyptians and other Caucasian races such as the Phoenicians and Babylonians. They were not the children of Shem (Noah's son) at all, and were misnamed.
According to British-Israelites and Zionist scholars, the pure-blooded unadulterated "Aryan-Israelite" elites eventually made their way Westward into Europe to civilize and bring the word of Jehovah to all pagan nations living in spiritual darkness. According to the insinuation, we are to look to these folk, these "Aryan-Israelites" from the East, for the origins of the civilizing elements and not to bother with earlier tree-worshipping, goddess-revering Druids or Phoenicians. Indeed, as the British-Israelite ideology developed, these very Druids were proclaimed to be of Israelite origins. Yes, the English, Irish, Scots, Welsh, Germans, and Norwegians, were all said to have descended from the people of the bible. When this nonsense began being accepted and believed by Western Christians, the truth of the true ancestry slowly faded.
Archaeological and anthropological discoveries, made throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, continued to raise important questions about the movement of races and the origins of Western nations. They also demanded a closer scientific look at the accounts within the bible and other scriptures. And it was this scrutiny by erudite and objective scholars that deeply unnerved the Judeo-Christian hegemony behind the rise of British-Israelitism. As the Western origins of civilization began to be proven, the case for the Judaic origins looked bleak. With these threatening new findings their false claims and illustrious image of being the great "holy people" would go out the window. The privilege they enjoyed from their deceptions might quickly end. Therefore, something had to be done. So, it was thought best to concede a little and allow a few historical facts to be accepted. The Egyptian connections would still remain obscure, but it could certainly be admitted that the Israelites were not racially Semitic after all. According to the British-Israelites, the Semitic blood entered in during the captivity in Babylon when the "Aryan-Israelites" consorted sexually with "foreign" elements. We find this hard to accept since the Babylonians, Persians, Medes, and Syrians were, in those days, of Aryan (Indo-European) stock. Nevertheless, it is asserted that the "mixed-blooded" were the ones who, infirmly, made their way back to Palestine at the cessation of the "Captivity." This infirm bunch were the "Jews" and not the more illustrious "Israelites."
Moses, the "goat-horned" prophet. The word Moses means "son." It is found in Tuthmosis, Ahmose, and Ramesis. Ramesis means "Son of Ra."
The early Phoenicians were known to have referred to themselves and their kings by the term Got or Gott, signifying goats. This is where we derive the words god and good, and where place names such as Gotland and Goteborg, etc, come from. The Gotts were called the Goths by the Romans. These Caucasian Goths considered horned animals, such as stags and goats, to be sacred symbols of their people and gods.
The term Anglo-Saxon came into use after the Roman invasion of the British Isles. The land of Britain was called simply Angle-Land or England by the new conquerors, the Germanic Angles, who were first invited to Britain by Christian kings to assist with the eviction of Scottish Picts during the 5th and 6th centuries AD. After assisting the Britons to push back the Picts, the cunning Angles plotted to remain and take Britain for themselves. They succeeded in this enterprise and almost annihilated the Britons. The few survivors fled to Wales for safety.
The "Israelites" were indeed of Indo-European stock. This made them kindred to the Greeks, Romans, Germans, Armenians, Scythians, Persians, Saxons, and the peoples of Northern India. In any case, racial type was not as important to ancient peoples as we have been led to believe. What mattered more was theology. Civilizations and peoples were kindred due to the gods worshipped and religious precepts followed. The term Aryan connoted the "White" or "Pure Ones," and referred to moral purity and spiritual status. It did not signify a racial distinction until it was deliberately mistranslated during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Those who sought to instill a false idea concerning the term Aryan belong to the same order as those concealing the West to East movement of the elements of civilization. They belong to the same species as those proposing that Eastern Israelites brought culture into Europe and Britain, and who imply that the symbols of the Houses and Kingdoms of Europe (to be seen on heraldry, flags, medallions, coins, and regalia) are Jewish in origin. They came into the West around 1000 BC. Actually, they were brought back by those whose ancestry lay in the West. Through the deliberate and pernicious tampering with the meaning of terms, names, and titles, this simple truth has been expertly obscured by the British-Israelites who excel at obfuscation.
According to British-Israelites, it was the influx of Israelites that civilized Britain in the first place. In their minds Anglo-Saxons and Israelites were of the same blood, race, and ideology.
The British-Israelite propagandists sought to show that the Israelites of the bible were in fact "Aryans," that is, Caucasians or Indo-Europeans. The British-Israelites realized that if they conceded the Israelites to be of Aryan (or more correctly Indo-European) racial stock, they could conceal a much greater truth and make it seem that peoples and nations of the Western Hemisphere had received their cultural idioms from the East.
Basically, the rational for these preposterous fascist notions, is based upon the idea that the ten tribes of Israel succeeded moving East after their captivity at the hands of Assyrian King Tiglath Pilezer III. However, once we understand that the so-called ten tribes of Israel are not the same as the Atonist Judites, the British-Israelite agenda becomes transparent. The Atonists are the ones who work from behind the scenes. It is they who control the royalty of Britain. Their ancestry, as the symbolism indicates, is not purely Judaic, or even Roman, but Egyptian.
The central tenets of the British-Israelites are the following:
- The British throne is that of King David
- The English royal family descends from King David
- The British royals, and their various European relatives, are descended from the Tribe of Judah and the Levites, by way of Zarah, the brother of Perez, son of Judah
- The British Empire and Church of England are the modern-day manifestation of the true kingdom of god
- The British have been chosen by god to build a world empire in order to rule the Earth
The greatest slander toward the Druids is the assertion that they were compulsive sacrificers of animals and human beings. The image of blood-soaked altars and blazing wicker men sickens modern readers and helps to aggrandize the minions of Christianity, making them appear humane and elevated in spirit. But in truth, there exists not one factual account of any such practices among the Druids. The fiction of their mania for sacrifice was pure propaganda. And naturally this makes sense since the world's priests and literati, the Brahmins and Aryans, the Egyptians and Persians, would hardly have held the Druids in such high esteem if bloody sacrifices were their sport.
The Greeks were merely broadcasters and disseminators of letters and culture. They are now known not to be the originators. It was the Phoenicians, Etruscans, Mycenaeans, Thracians, and Cretans, and Armenians, who originated what the world would inherit by way of Greeks and Romans. And these groups and tribes were Indo-European or Caucasian.
The cunning linguists downplayed the terms "Caucasian," "Nordic," "Gothic," and inserted the obscure terms "Celtic" and "Semitic," to mislead the curious. Whether the attacks on Ireland's sovereignty came from the original Roman Invasions (AD 43), or from Saint Patrick and his purges and book-burnings (443 AD), or from the Normans and their oppressive "Statutes of Kilkenny" (AD 1367), or from the bloody interference of the English Royals, or from the massacres of Oliver Cromwell (AD 1649), or from the artificially created Great Famine (1845-6), or from the ghastly Penal Laws imposed by England, or from the endless later "Catholic versus Protestant" conflicts, the object has remained very much the same - that we should never discover the sacred legacy of the Druids.
As we have already mentioned, once the Druids and Bards were destroyed, the desecration and looting of their works began. The physical and ideological plunder lasted for generations. The perpetrators of this crime (the Atonists, Milesians, Culdean Monks, Templars, and Vatican) commissioned “historians” to scribble a new history of the British Isles, a fiction that Hans Christian Andersen would have been in awe of. In the place of the White Magi we have leprechauns. In place of the groves we have Jesuit colleges. And in place of the natural religion of the Druids, we have Judeo-Christianity with all its error, folly, and poison.
The Roman governors knew their rule would be undermined by the Druids who traveled all over the country stirring up anti-Roman sentiment and spurring the people to rebel against foreign control. This patriotic anti-colonial stance was one political reason that contributed to the annihilation of the British Druids.
It is almost impossible to point to something in Greek and Roman culture that is original.
The elements that we now associate with Judaism and Christianity were brought to the West (to Greece, Rome and Britain) by Atonists exiled from Egypt.
Later, in the eleventh century, Normans from France, under William the Conqueror, invaded Britain. William displaced the Saxon kings, slaughtering and humiliating them until his own people dominated the land. This bloodthirsty tyrant and his Templar generals were emissaries of Rome. Their castles, forts, and mansions, can still be seen across the British Isles today. Most of them were precisely geomantically positioned. The Templars had been taught well by their Atonist Culdean masters.
After the Roman Empire collapsed, due to the successful spread of "barbaric" tribes, Britain was conquered by Norwegian Vikings, Danish Jutes, and Germanic Saxons. It was during and after this wave of invasion and settlement that the British became known as the "Anglo-Saxons," or as the "English," from Angle-Land. The Anglo-Saxon settlement occurred in the fifth century AD, two hundred years after the arrival of Christianity.
The average Christian is never meant to find out that, before it was warped and distorted, everything he reads about between the pages of his Bible, as well as every element of his religion, originally came from Egyptian Amenism and Irish Druidism.
The average Christian is not supposed to know that Jesus' home town of Nazareth did not actually exist, or that the key places mentioned in the Bible did not physically exist in the so-called "Holy Land." He is not meant to know that scholars have had greater success matching Biblical events and places with events and places in Britain rather than in Palestine.
The average Christian, however, is not meant to know that the earliest word for a believer in Jesus was Galilean, a word that derives from Gael or Gaelic. He is not supposed to know that St. Paul, and maybe even the man Jesus himself (given that he existed), was an agent of the elite Culdeans, Sadducees, and Romans.
Before we choose to merely laugh off the nonsense of the Bible and flippantly or indignantly dismiss the outlandish forgeries and fictions, let us realize that, as preposterous and spurious as most of the content surely is, it was not composed by pathologically impressionable or illiterate men with chronically naive minds. No, in our opinion, the Testaments were commissioned and composed by men of high intelligence for a cozened audience of impressionable, illiterate, and naive men ready to credulously believe the myriad fabulous lies spun by their imperious overlords. Sadly, this penchant for gullibility was not only a problem of bygone days. Man is as irrational and gullible as ever. Sadly, his zeal for demonstrating the level of his ignorance and fanaticism has not abated. Not in the least.
Atonism was building its new world order. Its new god of light would arise from the Middle East and eventually have his headquarters in Rome. His name was not Essa, but Jesus. He could be Jew or Gentile, depending upon what apostle was read. He could be a man or a god. He could be for or against official religion. And he could be for or against monarchy. He could be martyred and return one day from the dead. He could be forgiving and also damning. Yes, he could be just about anything depending upon the whim and expertise of his creators. He was then, and he still remains, anything his creators want him to be. He was composed, "Frankenstein-like," from a hundred pagan heroes and deities, from a dozen Messianic figures, from a welter of Egyptian pharaohs, and from zodiacal archetypes absorbed from every enlightened culture in the known world. He would truly be a man for all seasons. His followers were forbidden to question his authenticity. To do so meant being labeled as a heretic. It meant torture and death. And so, the follower learned to accept and believe what his Bible told him about Jesus and his twelve helpers. It does not say he was based on earlier prototypes, or on the Irish archetype Iesa. It does not say the Druids of the West venerated their sun-king thousands of years before the Bible was written, or before its Atonist authors were born.
After its creation, the story of Jesus was transplanted from Britain, where it was invented, to Galilee and Judea. This was done so that Christianity would not appear to be conspicuously Druidic in nature. To conceive Christianity in Britain was one thing; to birth it there was another. The Atonists realized their warped religion was based on ancient Amenism and Druidism. They knew their Jesus (their Iesus or Yeshua) was based on the Druidic Iesa or Aesar, and that nearly every educated person in the world would know it also. Their difficulty concerned how to come up with a believable king of light sufficiently appealing to the world's many pagan nations. Their employees, such as St. Paul (Josephus Piso), were, therefore, allowed to plunder the archive of the pagans. They were instructed to draw from the canon of stellar gnosis and from the ancient solar theologies of Egypt, Chaldea, and Ireland. The archetypal elements would, like ingredients, simply be tossed about and rearranged and, most importantly, the territory of the new god-man would be re-situated to suit the plan.
Research into the Templars and their affiliated "Salt Line" dynasties, reveals that the seven great Crusades were not instigated and participated in for the reasons mentioned in most official history books. As we show here, the Templars were the military wing of the British and European Atonists. It was their job to conquer lands, decimate rivals, and rebuild the so-called "Temple of Solomon" or, more correctly, Akhenaton's New World Order.
To this very day, the nobility of Europe and the East are controlled from London and Rome.
The Atonist elite knew it was impossible to organize and control a worldwide empire from Britain. The British Isles were geographically too far West for such management. In order to be closer the the "markets," the Atonist corporate giants coveted the city of Rome.
And when we take on board the interesting theory of author Ralph Ellis, who believes that St. Paul was none other than Josephus Piso, the Jewish-Roman historian[...]
In short, it was not as much a case of Romans conquering and controlling Britain, as it was of Atonists controlling the world by way of their Rome based empire. In any case, the new rulers of Britain were on excellent terms with the government and religious leaders of pre- and post-Christian Rome The latter were in the employ of the former. This is the conclusion of our personal investigations into the occult roots of Christianity.
We need to remember that these British nobles were in cahoots with the imperialistic Roman forces that official history books refer to as the conquerors of Britain. Like the Sadducees of Judea, the nobility of Britain conspired alongside their Roman collaborators.
The lion was and is one of the two most important symbols for Atonists. It ranks second to the sun.
The truth concerning the birth of Christianity, which has been guarded by the Vatican and the various secret societies, is that it was a religion devised by British nobles, those descended from the Gaels and Scythians, who sought dominion over valuable mining territories in Britain, France, Europe, and the East. After its invention, Christianity was transplanted to the Middle East. The reason for this has partly to do with the similarity of Christianity's main protagonist, Jesus, and the ancient god Iesa. One of the most important families behind the creation of a new religion was the Scots-Irish Clan of Menzies. Along with the St. Clairs, Stuarts, and other oligarchs with long bloodlines, they coveted the mineral rich territories upon which their stately homes, estates, and parishes now stand.
The keepers of the secret tradition, the preservers of the occult history of Christianity, know full well that their religion did not originate among those the world knows as "Jews." They know who the real "Jews" were. They know that both Judaism and Christianity were the brainchildren of Egyptian Atonists ensconced in Britain.
The Atonists realized that their materialistic objectives could be achieved if they manufactured a religion that appeared to be a follow on from ancient Druidism. [...] In the early days, this religion was actually known as Culdeanism, or as Jessaeanism. Early Christians were known as Culdeans, Therapeuts, or suggestively as Galileans. Although they would be found spread throughout Europe and the Middle East, their origin was Britain.
The chieftains of this sun cult did not conceive of Christianity for its own sake or because they were intent on saving the world. They wanted to conquer the world, not save it.
Once we understand that Atonist Britain was the first and true incubator of Christianity, a lot of historical mysteries are solved. When we understand how the story of Jesus was transplanted to the East from the West, we will have total insight into all that has transpired throughout the ages since Christianity took birth.
The strange and controversial fact is that Judeo-Christianity began in Britain before the alleged date of the Crucifixion. It was the brainchild of the Atonists of Britain.
Christianity and Atonism are both rooted in Druidism or, more correctly, in a corruption of prehistoric Druidism.
The highest ranking members of Europe's nobility, as well as senior members of the Catholic and Protestant churches, know the truth of what we reveal here. Naturally, such men are sworn to keep these facts from the masses of the world and normally they do not admit the truth in words. However, the truth has been conveyed via the symbolism often employed by the hierarchs and their lieutenants down through the long ages to the present.
Anthropologists have always been perplexed as to how the "Celts" appeared short, round-headed, and swarthy, and also as tall, narrow-headed, and fair. These Celts were, obviously, two extremes of a wide spectrum of racial specimens from the Indo-European family. Unlike modern anthropologists and historians, these ancient peoples did not, in our opinion, care one jot about race. What was important to them was religion, and spiritual belief.
[...] the infamous mythmongers, known as the "British-Israelites" (the precursors of modern Zionists), strongly believe Britain is the seat of the Israelite kingdom and that all the tribes and strains finally congregated there after the Norman invasion in 1066 AD.
[...] we think that the Druidic Order within Ireland were Amenist sympathizers and therefore anti-Atonist and anti-Milesian.
The princess's nickname can also be rendered Scotia. Scota's real name was Meritaten ("Mary of Aton"), which means "Beloved of Aton." This means that the names of Ireland and Scotland were given by elite Atonists. Scota was the wife of King Mile, whose family were descended from Gaelic Scythians.
The land of Scotland is named after Akhenaton's daughter Scota. Her name signified the land of Ireland. When the Irish crossed over to Scotland, they took the name of their own land with them.
The identity of Scota is of central concern. A well known figure in Irish mythology, she has been revealed to have been princess Meritaten, the eldest daughter of Akhenaton and Nefertiti. She is known to have mysteriously disappeared after the fall of her father and the death of several of family members from a virulent plague that had swept the land. Since Scota was a direct descendant of the chief Atonists of Egypt, and one of their highest dignitaries, if follows that her husband, regardless of what country he actually came from, was a member of the Solar Cult. Yes, Mile, like his Scythian forefathers, Bratha, Breogan, and Niul, was clearly a powerful and privileged ally of the Atonist pharaohs of Lower Egypt. Nevertheless, foreign princes and kings did not just marry Egyptian princesses as a matter of course. Such events were very rare indeed. There were edicts against this occurrence from the earliest days of Egyptian history. It would have been a marked sign of rebellion had a princess of her own volition married a foreigner. She would have lost both her standing and wealth after such an act. It would have only been permissible if the Scythian princes and kings were none other than the Hyksos princes and kings of Lower Egypt.
More importantly, these legends [early myths] show us that it was indeed Akhenaton's Atonists who made the journey West after their expulsion. The story of Mile and Scota is the story of Akhenaton and his descendants. It is the story of the true Israelites. In short, the Milesian conquest of Ireland, was the Atonist conquest.
During their travels out of their homeland, the legends say that the expelled Scythians were directed by a prophet to proceed to Ireland.
The Irish records clearly state that Niul was a contemporary of the biblical Moses and that, when the Israelites were departing from Egypt, traveling toward the Red Sea, they just happened to pitch their tents near to Niul's encampment. At this time, Niul is said to have wandered over to meet with the Israelites. Allegedly, he was met by Aaron who told him of Moses and their sundry adventures in Egypt. Niul then formed a strong bond of alliance with Aaron and Moses. He gave them food and then departed into the West taking the Israelite message with him. Later, when the Israelite tribes entered into Britain, they were welcomed by the Milesian descendants of Niul who had prepared the way for the chosen people of god. We can conclude that this fantastic tale, that is but one of many ludicrous ones concerning the meeting of Niul and the outcasts, works as a clever fictive device concealing the fact that it was Niul and his people who were the true "Israelites," or "wise ones," being expelled from Egypt.
We believe the Milesians-Scythians were the belligerent Hyksos Kings of Upper Egypt.
The word Saca or Saka, meaning the Scythians, is the root of the word Saxon.
Indeed, they [Scythians] may even have been related to the infamous Hyksos people of Egypt that so many investigators have had difficulty identifying.
Legend has it that Fenius’ (whose name is connected to Phoenix and Phoenician) people, after losing their thrones in their own lands, eventually became rulers in Egypt. One of the remembered Scythian capitals was at Galilee ("place of the Gals"). It was known as Scythopolis, later as Beth Shean (clearly a Gaelic term), and finally as a Beisan. The biblical term for the Scythians was "Gog and Magog," meaning "giants," and "supernatural men." Early tribes, such as the Huns and Cimmerians, etc, referred to their own ancestors, the Irish, as Gug and Guas. The modern consensus is that Gog and Magog referred to Russia. This is partly true since Scythia encompassed part of modern Russia (the Ukrainian and Caucasus areas).
There is no doubt in our minds, given the accounts, that Ith, Ir, Mile, Donn, and Heber, namely the "Milesians," were blood-related to the Egyptian Cult of Aton. It is these demagogues who sought to raise their own thrones upon those of the Druids, in a mineral wealthy, strategically well-placed, climatically temperate island known to them from their own childhoods as the "Fortunate Lands" in the West, beyond the "Pillars of the Giants" (The Giant's Causeway, County Antrim, Northern Ireland).
[...] the land of Ireland fell out of the hands of the “gods” and into the hands of “mortals.” We understand that the country's priestesses were predicting the decline of the golden age and the rise of another age dominated by spiritless people committed to debauchery, treachery, and evil. This "evil" was the consequence of the intrigues of those Eastern invaders who belligerently conquered the land of Ireland, taking it as a replacement for their lost Egyptian thrones.
The Atonists had lost their thrones in Egypt, but the event did not signal the end of their history. In fact, it was just the beginning. They traveled West to Spain and Ireland not as wanderers without a hope or plan but because they knew of Ireland, and of its significance.
The Atonists believed they would be welcomed in the land of their ancestors. However, they were wrong. We suppose the Druids chose to remain loyal to the Amenist pharaohs of Egypt and that, after hearing of Akhenaton's heresy and belligerence against the old gods and Egyptian people, they warily denied the Atonists entry into their land. As a result of this rejection, the Atonists regarded the Druids in a similar light as the Amenists. They reacted with open war.
Let us always bear in mind, however, that this campaign of eradication [of the Druids] did not begin with Romans or Christians. It began with these displaced invading Atonists who sought to erect a new global empire upon which the sun would never set.
As we stated earlier, it was the Irish, and after them the Egyptians, who created and developed the occult doctrine known as the Kabala. And interestingly, the Kabalistic system has always been symbolized by a so-called "Tree of Life." The significance of this cannot be underestimated. It proves that Jews (as they have been habitually presented to us) were not the originators of Kabalism.
The Eagle signifies "A" - the first letter of the Egyptian, Celtic, Hebrew and Greek alphabets
At some point, the term Iesaite (or Esite) was transmogrified to Israelite. The term is a composite of the names of Isa and Ra. In other words, it is made from the names of two of the most important sun gods, Iesa of the Druids and Amen Ra of the Amenists. The syllable "el" at the end of Israel simply means "messenger." Therefore, an "Israelite" was a "messenger" or "agent" of the sun gods. He was a member of the Solar Cult. That is all there was to it. The word did not signify race.
Let us remember Genesis Chapter 11:
The whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
Yes, one speech indeed. Strange, however, that neither the bible nor the rabbis claimed this "one language" to be Hebrew. If it was the parent language we can be sure that the rabbis and clergymen would proclaim this fact loudly and clearly ad nauseam.
The closest approximations to this original language are Gaelic, Arabic, and Sanskrit, but others such as Aramaic and Hebrew are near relatives.
The vast majority of Jews in the world (approximately 80 percent) have no ethnic or racial ties to the holy land of old. The Ashkenaz Jews originated from a race in Southern Russia known as the Khazars. The Khazars lived near the Caspian Sea and were of Turko-Mongolic racial stock. They had close ties with the Hungarian Magyars and Bulgarian Bulgars. They were more akin to the Huns and Tartars than to the "Hebrews" of Judea. These ferocious pagan Khazars converted en masse to Judaism during the 7th century. We understand that any human being can convert to any religion that suits them. This was the case with the Khazarian king of the time. He became Jewish after religious conversion. As centuries pass, the descendants of the converts naturally believed themselves related to the old world "Israelites." They are quite willing to accept the official reports concerning the nature of these people they falsely consider ancestors. It does not occur to them to question it, or to discover that the Israelites were actually pharaohs. They conceive of themselves as "Jewish" with little idea what a Jew was. The predicament is no saner than that of a Hottentot converting to Mormonism and then believing himself a direct descendant of Joseph Smith.
The Ibaru (or Ibri, Abri, or Abari) turn up in Egypt as the "Wise Ones" or "Elders." The letter "H," added as a prefix, simply meant "the," and so the word Hebrew meant "the Ebru" or "the Ibaru." This is the origin of the word Iberia that signified Spain, and Hibernia that signified Ireland. The word rabbi is a rendition or variant of this ancient name Abari or Ibaru. The Ibaru were Druidic Elders who had traveled to Egypt in remote periods bringing solar worship there. They were probably akin to the Shemsu Hor, the Disciples or Companions of Horus, the fair-complexioned technically endowed race whose remains were found in Nubia by eminent archaeologist Professor Walter B. Emery.
The term Judah in the bible (the fourth son of Jacob whose name was adapted as Jew) was not a name at all, but a title. It has been the clever ploy of duplicitous historians to have us erroneously believe that titles (for an initiate, king, or vizier, etc,) were personal names. This is the case with "Moses," "Joshua," "Jesus," "Aaron," and "John." Judah was the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, son of Abraham. Abraham's original name was Abram until, as chapter 17 of the Book of Genesis tells us, he was given his new title by the Lord. Sarah's original name was Sarai, and Jacob was renamed (re-titled) Israel. He probably received this title because, like his Levite family, he was very closely allied with the Cult of Aton. Being an initiate of the solar colleges he was eventually given a Druidic title to distinguish him as a "shining one."
The word Jew is, likewise, a Gaelic term. It did not refer to a racial group per se. It referred to any man or woman who rose up to study the great mysteries in order to attain spiritual perfection. It referred to those who shone like the sun, morally and spiritually, and to those who lived in harmony with nature. Its origin is the Gaelic Ibur, meaning "Yew Tree," or Iuh or Iudach (later Yudah or Judah) meaning "the "bright," or "the shining," or "the daylight." It referred to those awakened ones, the devotees of the stars. This is where we get the word "Judge." Thus, the original "Judites" were nothing less than the awakened ones who revered the twelve signs of the zodiac. They were the astrologers of Ireland and Egypt.
Religious Jews have been misled to believe that Hebrew is their national language. This is not the case. Not by a long chalk. The informed researcher, who has looked into the truth of the matter, soon finds out that Hebrew was a variant of the esoteric language employed by the Druids and Amenists, and related groups such as the Scythians, Gaels, and Celts.
Students of etymology and philology know that although there are great similarities between Arabic, Hebrew, and Sanskrit, these languages do not come out of one another but originate from a mysterious lost parent language. Scholars such as Conor MacDari and Godfrey Higgins proved this so-called "lost" parent language to have been Gaelic, a language almost eradicated due to the prohibitions of the English and Roman overlords.
[...] one of the greatest deceptions emanating from the controllers and editors of the world's history concerns the terms "Hebrew," "Jew," and "Israelite." The word "Hebrew" did not originally refer to a race, per se. It referred to the keepers of the secrets and advisors of pharaoh. The word also connoted the sacred mystery language of the adepts - the true “Israelites,” “Judites,” and “Jews.” The language was called Hebrew because it was that used by the Ibaru from Hibernia, or Ireland.
The American aboriginals, of both the South and the North, were eager and thrilled at first to receive the visitors. They erroneously believed they were the friendly god-men returning to their shores once again.
The Roman Church was not at all happy when Columbus relentlessly began petitioning the royals of Spain and England for their favor, and when he was searching for funding for his Western expeditions. At first they tried to dissuade him but later, fearing he would find patronage and proceed with his venture, they conceded and financially backed his journey of discovery, making sure to put their henchmen all about him to watch his every move. They knew, all too well, that America had already been colonized by Irish mariners and that the far away country contained Irish stellar temples and megalithic sites filled with treasure. They had their minds set on pillaging this wealth, and making sure that the relics of Ireland's presence in the New World would be attributed to, and regarded as, yet another "unsolvable mystery."
The word Bard may derive from Boreads, that meant the extreme north (as in Hyperborea).
From Dis came Deus, the Latin word for god.
[...] it was they [Phoenicians], and not the Israelites, who were the creators of the alphabet, the great temple builders, and the world's finest seafarers, astronomers, and adepts. What they still hesitate to accept is the Irish origins of the Phoenicians. This fact has been obscured due to the geographical dispersion of the Phoenicians. As we have said, this dispersion was a necessity after the Age of Catastrophe.
When King Solomon desired to build the great Temple of Jerusalem he promptly called on Hiram Abiff, the Phoenician master architect to do the job for him. Since the Phoenicians had already given Egypt the skills to build the pyramids, a temple was no problem. Solomon knew who to call upon and it was not upon his “Jews.” The temple (that author Ralph Ellis believes was actually in the city of Tanis on the Western side of the Delta) was designed with sacred geometry and was a representation of man and not god. It was based on the proportions of the human temple.
Zeno Apathea (the father of Stoicism, one of the purest and most elevated philosophies) was born to Phoenicians.
The Irish had traveled to every known country in ancient times. They bore the name Fenian or Fenician (from Fenii or Phenii) that later became transposed to Phoenician. The term may be connected to the planet and stellar archetype Venus (found as a root in veneration and also in places such as Venice and Vienna). The ancient navigators used this star when traveling, and the prows of their ships bore the female goddess form.
There were two important reasons why the truth about the Phoenicians had to be suppressed and occluded. The first had to do with the fact that they were of Irish extraction, and the second was due to the fact that the Egyptians declared themselves to have inherited their civilization from the Phoenicians. Under no circumstances was this knowledge to become widely known. So the disinformation began to flow forth concerning this special and enlightened race. Almost everything we read about them is designed to deceive.
IO = Horus
Only alternative historians Ignatius Donnelly and Comyns Beaumont accepted the truth of the matter and accurately set the homeland of the Phoenician race in Ireland and Scotland.
It has been conceded by anthropologists and linguists that the alphabet came into the world from the mysteriously endowed race known as the Phoenicians.
One of the terms that the Phoenicians used to describe themselves was Bharat, Barata, or Parats. This was the name of one of their earliest kings, the Sumerian Brihat, or Bharat. We surmise that this king, like his seafaring people, were actually named after the land of their ancestors, namely Barata, Brita, or Britain. [...] One of the most important Phoenician goddesses was known as Brit Ana meaning "Lady of the Waters."
The British Isles are named after Baratana, or Britana, the goddess of the Barats or Bharats (Phoenicians). They were referred to as "Aryans."
The original Irish, who had survived immense cataclysms, knew they needed access to the rest of the world in order to survive. They knew this meant the development of a "navy." So, the navigators were created. They were the Phoenicians, the expert observers of the heavens and mappers of the world. Their sidereal knowledge was an extension of Druidic wisdom perfected over centuries in North-Western lands. This knowledge allowed the "Hyperborean" Phoenicians to expertly navigate the oceans of the world. Like later Vikings and Danes, the Phoenicians sailed to the East (and West) creating small settlements on the coasts of lands they visited, traded with, and mined. Because of their prolonged commercial interaction with Asians and Orientals, the Phoenicians' alphabet, as well as many other Phoenician customs and practices, were adopted. Eventually, at the time of the Roman expansion, and after their roving decreased, the Phoenicians co-meddled with races of foreign blood and slowly began to lose their own racial distinctiveness.
We concur with Professor Waddell's conjecture that the Phoenicians were not members of the Semitic racial family. The archaeological evidence clearly shows that they were, like the Irish, ethnically and racially Gothic, Nordic, Indo-European, and Caucasian or, as Professor Waddell preferred, "Aryan."
Author and researcher Andrew Power (Ireland: Land of the Pharaohs) has found evidence that pyramidical structures also existed at the Newgrange site before being deliberately removed.
We believe that the Cult of Amun Ra had its origins in Ireland.
In light of this, we do not accept as accurate the official dates given for the rise of the Phoenicians (a few hundred years BC). We agree with Comyns Beaumont and L. A. Waddell that their ancestry went much further back in time.
Although Mediterranean and Asian cultures went on to develop, refine, and also distort the cultural elements they inherited from the Western Elders, they were not the original manufacturers of them. The seeds of Eastern European and Asian civilization were transmitted not from Scythia, as most "Celtic" scholars concede, but from much farther West, from the greatly endowed "Atlantean" inhabitants of the "Furthest West Sunset Land," who fashioned by their art the colossal Western temples still to be seen at Stonehenge, Newgrange, Carrowkeel, Avebury, and Carnac.
Adonis was also known as Adon, a name that meant "Lord." He was the supreme god of the Phoenicians.
[...] there can be little doubt, given the philological evidence, that the Phoenicians and Sumerians were one and the same people. However, unlike Professor Waddell, we do not believe the original homeland of the Phoenicians and Sumerians to have been either Cappadocia in modern Turkey, or the Danube Valley. We believe it to have been Britain. It is, therefore, through the travels of the Phoenicians that the world's parent language dispersed. Additionally, from the Phoenicians came the first unadulterated stellar and solar religion and first organized pantheons, as well as other techniques of science, architecture, music, and art.
The new evidence slowly coming to light, regarding pre-diluvian civilizations in the West, and concerning lost land bridges, strengthens our strong belief in the Western origins of the Phoenician people.
An objective study of the evidence shows that Aramaic, Hebrew, Arabic, Syriac, and Armenian, as well as many other ancient languages, were enriched by the infusion of Phoenician religious and cultural elements.
The Phoenicians (or more correctly the Kab Ari) were one of the greatest maritime races in the history of the world. They were masters of the oceans and the world's most proficient architects, shipwrights, woodworkers, traders, and astronomers. There was not a civilization in ancient Europe and Asia that did not owe their existence to the influence of the Phoenicians. This was especially the case with the Egyptians. The civilizations of predynastic Egypt were founded by these mysterious people of unknown origin. The first dynasty of Egypt was made up of Phoenician kings, and the languages of the two countries are strikingly similar. The language of the Phoenicians was not, as most scholars are wont to believe and advocate, a dialect of Egyptian. On the contrary, the Egyptian language was derived from Phoenician.
An early Babylonian "Lord of all Gods," was known as Merodach, which sounds like the Scots-Gaelic Murdoch. Merodach (Marduk) was the same as the sun god Bel.
The word Sumer comes from a Scots-Gaelic word meaning "Serpent." The root Mer, of Sumer, means "ocean" and also "Wise Ones."
In any case, the wisdom of the Chaldeans and their kings was, we maintain, an inheritance from the West.
The bible, as expected, has nothing good to say about the Chaldeans. It refers to them as Kasdim or Chasadim. The outrageously fantastical Book of Daniel was, in our opinion, composed to ensure their skills as prophets and soothsayers were contrasted with the Judaic prophet and seen to be less dramatic and competent. The bible mythmongers took pains to compose wildly hyperbolic accounts in order to exalt their extraordinarily god-inspired, lion-taming prophet Daniel. Like Joseph, Daniel was beloved of god and not the devious and incompetent Chaldeans.
This story [Solomon's Temple] is not, however, about one physical construction. It is a cryptic masonic allegory concerning the worldwide temples and stellar colleges of the Druids, the sons of the sun and moon ("Solomon"). These great colleges were later destroyed, built over, and/or occupied by imposters who took centuries to rescript the ancient gnosis to serve their own vile purposes.
It was Phoenicians who were commissioned by King Solomon to construct his temple.
The Chaldeans were known for their prodigious talents and learning. They were the envy of the world, and for this reason their true identity and significance has been obscured. The Chaldeans were very probably closely related to the Phoenicians who were the great navigators and shipwrights, and whose own land was not far away.
The language of the Chaldeans predates Arabic that predates Sanskrit. Indeed, Sanskrit was not native to India but was brought Eastward by the Aryan invaders or Vedics (from Vates or Faidh, the poets of Irish renown).
Ishtar later became Aphrodite of the Greeks and Venus of the Romans. She was also a major deity for the Assyrians and Babylonians, and presumably for the Chaldeans. She was the Astarte of the Sumerians. The words Esther and Easter derive from her name and worship. The word star also derives from Ishtar. Similar to the Egyptian Isis and Nuith, Ishtar was a goddess of the heavens. She was a prototype for the Christian Mary.
The Akkadians were a matriarchal people whose supreme goddess was Ishtar. And this suffix tar, is reminiscent of Tara, Ara, Arya, or Eri, meaning Ireland.
Moreover, the Assyrian language was undoubtedly not Semitic.
The language of these Chaldeans, said to be practically the same as Akkadian, Assyrian and Babylonian, is known to have pre-dated Aramaic, the language of the bible.
Another group of adepts who can be termed "Aryans" were the Bronze Age people known as the Chaldeans. Unquestionably connected to the Irish, and perhaps even from Ireland, the "Babylonian" Chaldeans were expert at manufacturing iron. The bible refers to their land as "Ur of the Chaldees." Ur is a variant of Hur or H'ur, from Horus. [...] In Ireland the Chaldeans were the Kaltach meaning "Stargazers" or "Astrologers."
Stonehenge is perfectly aligned with the Great Pyramid in Egypt. The great Megalithic henges have often been described as doorways or portals. The word door comes from duar, which meant "Druid." Another meaning of the word Druid is to "encircle" or "enclose within a circle."
The dog was a seminal symbol in early Irish myth.
It is still an act of academic heresy to regard Egypt as the cradle of civilization and originator of Jewish and Christian religious traditions.
Osiris was associated, and even fused, with the Old Kingdom god Seker (or Sokar). Seker was depicted as a mummified deity, falcon or hawk-headed, and with green skin that represented rebirth. Of course, this green coloring parallels the Irish Herne or Cernunnos, god of nature. Seker was often shown hovering on wings above the body of the deceased. He was, therefore, the basis of the Christian Holy Spirit.
The "underworld" that Osiris and the gods frequented was not, as we have been told, merely a mythical realm, but a physical region. It was the ancestral lands of the North-West that had been ruined by a natural disaster. It was the land of the setting sun, of darkness and death, into which the sun (Osiris) retired or returned at day's end. The enemy of Osiris and Horus was the serpentine Typhon. (This is where we get the word Typhoon.) Typhon represented the destructive force of nature. Osiris traveled westward every night to sacrificially enter into combat with Typhon. His victory over the serpent of destruction ensured that another cataclysm would not reoccur to destroy the world. To symbolize the victory of Osiris, and the return of order, the Egyptians took a pillar or obelisk (known as the Tat or Djed) and ritually raised it from a horizontal to a vertical position.
Scholars accept without question that the Greeks and Romans fused several deities together to form individual members of their own pantheons. Serapis, Dionysus, Mithras, and even Zeus, were composites of archaic Egyptian and Sumerian gods. The Egyptians were not above the same plagiarization. Many of their gods and goddesses were fusions of more ancient figures. This is particularly true of Hathor, Ptah, Osiris, and Horus. Scholars readily accept that the Greeks and Romans borrowed their gods from Egypt. They are, however, not as receptive to the idea that the Egyptians had done something similar. The Western origins of Egyptian cultural elements is not to be broached or considered.
He [Osiris] symbolized the sun after setting. Horus represented the sun after its daily or annual rise in the east.
To this very day Christians end prayers with the word Amen. This word is Egyptian for sure, and it referred to the most ancient sun god Amen Ra, primarily worshipped at Thebes. Interestingly, however, the word Amen (from Amentet) meant "Western," or "Western side."
Her ancestry is considered a "mystery." She was Akhenaton's favorite wife, and most likely the mother of Tutankhamun. Her name Kiyah is close to the Hebrew Khiyah, meaning life. When spelt as Khavah the name gives the biblical "Eve."
[...] Khufu who is believed to have been the pharaoh who commissioned the building of the great pyramid at Giza.
[...] the Irish traveled to America long before other groups, and were plying their trade and building settlements there hundreds of years before the arrival of Columbus.
[...] Horus was often referred to as the "blue-eyed" god.
The first pharaoh of the first dynasty of Egypt, and founder of the great city of Memphis, King Menes is buried in Northern Ireland. [...] It is not surprising, therefore, that he should have wished to travel to Ireland, the original homeland of his ancestors.
The Caucasian features described by Sir Elliot Smith are to be seen on the face of Queen Nefertiti, her sister Mutnodjmet (wife of Pharaoh Heremheb), and her daughter Meritaten (Scota). Indeed, there is little doubt in our minds that Nefertiti and her family were of Western ancestry. This explains why Scota, her eldest daughter, traveled to Ireland by way of Spain after the fall of Akhenaton's corrupt dynasty and why her grave was found, not in Egypt, but in Ireland's County Kerry.
The word root Har signified the hawk, and the god Horus. The term is still employed today. A good example is the Air Force jet known as the "Harrier." The first version of the war plane was even known as the "Hawker."
[Ralph] Ellis maintains that this mysterious sect of specially appointed guards was despised by the Hyksos people who were none other than the Israelites of the bible
We believe the term Hor (for Horus the falcon or hawk-headed god of the sun) represented the Ari or Aryans. The letter "H" was often used in the same way as "The" or as "Le" in French. Therefore, Har or Harri was "The Ari." The eagle or hawk was the symbol of the sun and of the enlightened ones of old.
According to the ancient tablets, known as The History of Thoth: The Atlantean, the Shemsu Hor (or Disciples of Horus), were a race of enlighteners who dwelt on ten pre-diluvian islands. One of their magi was the god Thoth, known by the Greeks as Hermes, and by the Romans as Mercury
One of the most important finds within the land of Egypt occurred when the Egyptologist and archaeologist Professor Walter B. Emery (1903-1971) was excavating tombs at the necropolis of Saqqara, one of the oldest cities in the land. There Professor Emery discovered men with blond hair and fair complexions. These individuals were revered and honored by the Egyptians as specially endowed elite.
[...] the vast majority of words, place names, and personal names in the bible, are of Irish origin [...]
The idea of three wise men or kings is astrological and Druidic in origin. The four animals depicted around the Christ represent the four cardinal signs of the zodiac. The three wise men, shepherds, or kings, represent the constellation of Orion through which the soul of "great kings" was believed to incarnate and then depart. The figure of the Virgin Mary represents the night sky. This particular artist suggests the round of the zodiac by the circular hem of the Madonna's cloak. Christ is the sun born into the sign of Virgo, the Virgin. Joseph, the "Carpenter" looks up toward the heavens. He is contemplating the signs, and represents the ancient gnosis suppressed by the Church of Rome. In Egyptian the word for "carpenter" was Setepenre. This word was one of the titles for a pharaoh. Jesus was indeed of a pharaonic bloodline, as the painting figuratively connotes. The man standing at the back right carrying the lamb represents the Cult of Atonists who observed the sun's move from the sign of Taurus into Aries. The ass or donkey is still used as a symbol today in US politics. The ass represents the god Set and the Hyksos Kings of Lower Egypt. The bull represents the Amenists of Upper Egypt, as well as the Irish Druids. The Roman columns emphasize Jesus' Roman ancestry.
Druidic motifs, such as the vine, tree, cross, and stone, abound in the bible. The concept of sacrifice, death, and renewal, are Druidic in origin.
Officially, the Gnostics were Gentile Christians and Essenes were allegedly Jewish Christians. Both groups believed that Jesus had lived centuries before the orthodox enclaves were insisting in the bible. And both groups knew that the Christ archetype was not their own creation or concept. It was for these reasons that the hierarchs of the early Church in Rome decided to persecute and eradicate these sects and, in more recent times, tried to ban and sequester their various texts (the Dead Sea Scrolls and Gnostic Gospels, etc). Vatican-appointed priests and agents were on site to monitor every stage of the translation of the apocryphal Dead Sea Scrolls after their discovery in 1947.
The Essenes were clearly named after Essa. [...] there is considerable doubt as to whether the Essenes were really Jewish. We suspect they were a sect, like the Stoics, that preserved Druidic precepts.
Prior to Constantine's Council of Nicea, organized to unify the world's creeds and cement the power of the Roman Church, Iesa was acknowledged throughout Europe. His origins were understood to be in Ireland, and not Judea or Egypt. The ancients of India referred to the British Isles as Britashtan, a word that meant "Seat of Religion." Iesa's aspects were worshipped under various names depending upon the culture and the facet that was being venerated. He was Osiris, Mentu, Horus, Set, Aton, Amun-Ra, Ptah, Serapis, Mithras, Apollo, Dionysus, Orpheus, Zeus, Jupiter, and Sol. He was all of them and yet he was one.
The biblical name Isaac has its origin in Isa. Isaac was the son of Sarah and Pharaoh Tuthmosis III - the true father of the twelve tribes of Israel.
Dion-ESUS, Orph-ESUS, OR Bacc-ESUS - its Irish all the way. Zeus, the father of Dionysus, had turned himself into a serpent to give him birth, and Dionysus himself was often shown in the form of the goat that links him the Nordic Goths
The Druidic knowledge of astromancy was transcribed by the Bards (Poets), Ovates (Speakers), and Minstrels (Singers) into songs, tales, and legends of "historical" personalities with no physical existence. The idea was always that mortals should model themselves on these fictional but archetypal renditions.
In Egypt the staff was rendered as a shepherd's crook that was a symbol for the pharaohs, the Druids of Egypt. The pharaohs wore the serpent on their headgear and the serpent was the symbol of the Magi of Ireland, the Naddreds, or Druids.
The scandalous attempts of later Judeo-Christian mythmongers to transfer Iesa's qualities to a stereotype of their own limited manufacture does not detract from this fact. As we saw above, the root is the Irish duw that becomes the Latin deus and the Anglo-Saxon Jeus, or Jesus. It becomes the Grecian Zeus.
During their rites, the Druids would find a tree in the shape of a cross, or would lop off the branches of a specifically chosen oak to make a cruciform. Upon this tree the name Hesus was usually inscribed. The party of Druids present at the ceremony of Iesa would face Eastward toward the rising of the sun and sing hymns and chant to the new-born son of the sun. The very word east comes from his name. It was only after later mythmongers assimilated the custom and made a travesty of it that a physical man would appear hanging in pain from a tree, or was said to have been in the presence of god at a burning bush.
In the New Testament, the three "wise men" who allegedly visited the stable where Jesus was born, represent the three aligned stars of Orion. This is because the Jesus story, like many other myths, is astrological (or sidereal) in nature. It is not the biography of a man who physically lived, at least as the New Testament portrays him.
Even during the course of a single day the sun possessed three important aspects. It was young at the Eastern horizon, full grown at midday, and old and wise at sunset. These facets of a single entity were incorporated into the story of the Sun King who represented the powers of the sun upon the Earth. [...] The priests worshipped the solar facets and took to personifying them as separate gods or deities although they never forgot that it was one being, and one concept, that was ultimately being revered. [...] As modern Christians accept a tripartite division of godhead (God, the Son, and the Holy Spirit) so did the ancients understand that there were many facets to the king of light. As the sun has three aspects (rising, midday, and setting) so did the Sun King also have three faces. The Hindu Trinity (Trimurti), as well as the Christian one, are remnants of this Astro-Theological principle. The twelve aspects of the heavenly sun were rescripted into the twelve tribes of Israel, the twelve sons of Jacob, the twelve judges, and the twelve disciples or followers of Jesus, the physical son of god.
Once we understand the hermetic devises used by the biblical mythographers to encode zodiacal symbolism we will finally find sanity in the testaments. We will see the metaphors for what they are and acknowledge the Druidical and astrological origins of Christianity.
Christianity is patently a solar centric theology and whether its modern-day adherents know or accept this or not is unimportant.
In astrological terms, the sun was one element of the zodiac. The moon, planets, and stars were equally important. This is why the homogenized solar zodiac is a quite recent historical phenomenon. Most ancient cultures employed a stellar or sidereal zodiac in which the various animal totems represented aspects of consciousness.
In other words, the signs of the zodiac represent hidden aspects of consciousness that must eventually come to light. The movement of the sun into a house represents a man's discovery of a secret truth about his own being. This is because the zodiac and consciousness are intimately connected. This fact was understood by Elders of the Stellar Cult. They knew that a horoscope is merely a external projection of the anatomy of the psyche. It is a life-map delineating strengths and weaknesses, and the relationship between Dharma and Karma.
The Druids, like the Celts who came after them, were also very conscious of the dual nature of things. As night follows day, and death follows life, so did all things in life possess their "negative" side. The sun and solar-god were no different. The dark side of Apollo was Dionysus. The dark side of Ahura Mazda was Ahriman, the dark side of Horus was Set, and the dark side of God was Lucifer. It was only later that the pretender solar church of Rome decided to abolish the logic of the dualist metaphysic and divide the sides of one personality into two separate and distinct entities forever adverse to one another and never to be reconciled.
Like the later Freemasons, who appropriated their symbolic tropes, the ancient Druids venerated the number three and tripartite metaphysical principles. From the earliest days of the Irish the custom was for three kings to simultaneously govern. This is a phenomenon we find employed in Egypt where each of the fourteen or more nomes, or sacred cities, along the Nile were ruled over by a trinity of gods.
Long before the age of Galileo, the Renaissance, and the so-called "Age of Enlightenment," the Druids (like the Maya) possessed telescopes by which they observed the heavens. They were experts at building tall stone observatories and they knew the complex ordinances of their vast sky temple in which the sun and moon were god and goddess. The former was the representation of light and worldly wisdom, the latter of inwardness and self-knowledge.
Indeed, the prowess of Christian magic was always overstated. The miracle-working prophets and saviors of Christianity had, after all, a lot to compete with. In our estimation, there is little doubt that the astonishing accounts of Christian miracle healings and banishings - from the wizardry of Moses in the wilderness to the raising of the dead talent of Jesus to the feats of St. Patrick and St. Columba - were deliberately concocted and added to the Christian canon in order to outdo the legacy of the Druids. The alleged healing powers of the waters at Lourdes is, for instance, about as pagan a motif as anyone might conceive. In the end we must be aware that the Druidism of post-Christian times, as well as the Druidism presented to us in official accounts, is not the same thing as actual Druidism. It is mere propaganda and distortion.
In light of this, when we read in Irish legends of the arrival of Saint Patrick, and of his casting out "serpents" from the land, we understand that the reference was not to physical snakes but to the non-Christian Druidic "Serpent Priesthood" he was apparently sent to depose and eradicate.
One of the monograms for Christ is the Greek Chi Ro. The word "carpenter" comes from the Hebrew naggar that is thought to mean "learned man" but which is very close to the Hindi naga and the Gaelic Gnadir, that mean "serpent." However, this title is very near to the term cheiro, meaning "Serpent Holder."
One of the titles for the biblical John the Baptist was the "Great Nazar." Clearly, this initiator of Jesus was himself connected to the Nazarenes and Serpent Priests.
Jesus is said to have been from the town of Nazareth. It is known that no such place ever existed. It is also known that the word was blatantly mistranslated to signify a place instead of a sect or cult. In fact, it has been revealed to be more likely that the man given the name Jesus was a "Nazarene" from the sect of that name. This gives us greater insight, since this cult's name bears great similarity to the Naasarites or Naassians - the "Serpent Priests" who followed Moses out of Egypt. It was this Egyptian connection that had to be obscured. And so the editors of the bible's testaments cleverly rendered Nazareth as a place name.
The symbol of the serpent is found throughout Ireland where physical snakes never existed. This is because there is a world of difference between physical snakes and the symbols of dragons or serpents. "Wise Serpent" refers to those who were initiated into the highest mysteries. It signified those who possessed healing abilities and great knowledge of astronomy and astrology. The Magi of Ireland were expert architects and they had the most intimate connection to flora and fauna. Like the pharaohs of Egypt they were semi-enlightened beings who lived in harmony with each other and with nature. They obeyed nature's superordinate laws and knew well the penalties for breaching them.
The Druids held the symbols of the serpent and the dragon in the highest esteem and considered them insignias of royalty. They referred to themselves as Naddreds. This word means "Wise Serpent."
There have never been snakes in Ireland. So who or what were the "Serpents" that were cast out by Christianity?
The Romans ruled the British Isles for over 400 years, from 40 to 410 AD. They had more than enough time to obliterate records and crush traditions of great antiquity. The villainous historians under their employ wrote what they were instructed to write, and little of their nonsense does justice to the people they conquered and suppressed. The Romans rank among history's worst desecrators of ancient gnosis. Julius Caesar himself ordered the utter destruction of the great library of Alexandria, that was later burned twice by Christians and Moslems. The student unwittingly seduced into accepting the scurrilously prejudiced and generally unreliable Roman and Saxon compositions as authentic accounts is seriously disadvantaged in his study.
Doctor Geoffrey Keating (1569-1644), in his masterpiece on Ireland, lays out numerous instances of blatant and egregious literary fraudulence concerning the history of Ireland's customs, people, and past. He accuses the worst offenders and reminds us to doubt all accounts of early British historians ignorant as to the origin of their country's name.
Author Peter Berresford Ellis reminds us that the Druids were not only exemplary healers but the first to take interest in the welfare of their lower classes.
The word city comes from the Gaelic Cyfaith, meaning "Seat of the Druids."
The original Western Levites were astrologers, priests, and teachers. The Biblical "Levites" adopted the old Druidic title was their own, either because they had descended from Western Druids or because they were initiates and adepts from Druidic colleges.
So, were the "Jews" originally "men of the Yew" - that is initiates of Druidic colleges?
The original birthday of Jesus was positioned by the church's mythmongers in the month of July. This was to align the birth of Jesus (the sun) with the rising of the star Sirius. Eventually, however, the birthday was moved to December in order to occlude the connection between the Christian Jesus and the Egyptian gods.
An analysis of the poetry and iconography of English poet William Blake leads us to believe that the word Jerusalem may have originally been a reference to Britain, the land of the Druids. The correct rendering of the word may be Darusalem or Derusalem. The phonetically similar letters "J" and "D" were often interchanged.
The first letter of the name Jehovah is probably derived from the Irish letter Jodh that is the origin of the Hebrew Yod, the first letter of god's name. This letter Jodh or Yodh (the Greek Iota) gives our modern letters "I" and "J." The Irish Druids associated this letter with the tree we refer to as the Yew (from Yeu or Yodh). From this word we derive Jul, Jew, and also Yule meaning Christmas, or the time of the winter solstice.
These Servants of Truth held greater power than the kings who took advice from them
The word has several probable related origins. Most likely it derives from the Gaelic draeidh (pronounced dhree) meaning "kindred;" or from druvid that means "one who knows" or "one who has knowledge." The suffix vid (also wid) is the root of wizard and wise. We find this syllable in vedic and veda that connote the highest wisdom. It may also derive from druthin that means "servant of truth." In German it means "of god." An Irish priestess was also known as a druith. We derive the word truth from druthin. The hard "D" sound becomes Anglesized as "T." Another acceptable rendering is from Welsh Gaelic - der wydd, meaning "superior-priest" or "inspector," and from draoith meaning "magician." In Persian we have duree, meaning "noble and holy man," and duracht. In Arabic it is dere, a "wise man," and in Persian it is daru, meaning "Magus." In Punjabi the word dara means "to dare" or to be "fearful," (or "awesome") fearless," "brave," and "bold." We get the word dare from this root. The English dear ("beloved one") derives from the same root. And related also is the Sanskrit Deva (from Duw) meaning “one without darkness.” The word can also mean "to shine," and it clearly referred to the sun and to the gods of light such as Indra, Agni, Adonai, and Aton, etc. Undoubtedly, deva is the origin of the word dove and the title David, as used by the Levites to denote their military commanders and chieftains (for instance Tuthmosis III).
Biblical legend states that Harran was where Adam and Even went after their expulsion from Eden. Terah, the father of Abraham, is also connected with Harran. The moon god Sin was worshipped there.
Naturally, it is not commonly known that the various symbols and theological idioms of Judaism and Christianity (and even Brahmanism) are of Druidic origin.
In short, it was men without spiritual distinction who sought a racial one to take its place.
Importantly, recent discoveries made by Jewish and Gentile investigators alike conclusively prove that the so-called "Israelites" (those arch-enemies of would-be "Aryans") were not racially Semitic after all. Like the "Aryans," they too were racially Indo-European. Their language, Hebrew, was identical with Egyptian. Therefore, in our mind the term "Semite" can and must henceforth be dropped as a racial definition for the Bible's "chosen people." [...] the terms "Israelite" and "Judite" do not define races. The terms were religious and theological, and defined cult not race. The Israelites and Judites were conglomerated groups closely affiliated with and probably blood-related to the Hyksos pharaohs of old, a fact confirmed by top Jewish historians.
The Aryan who is spiritually and technically advanced automatically benefits and civilizes the world he inhabits. No amount of ordinary men can achieve what he achieves. Furthermore, an Aryan can be Jew or Gentile, Saxon or Hindu, Celt or Egyptian, Oriental or Nordic, Maya or Maori. Originally, the Aryans were the technically and spiritually endowed Seers, Sages, or Elders of Atlantis, Lemuria, and the other lost civilizations that flourished and then fell over ten thousand years ago. In this sense the word "Aryan" is interchangeable with "Druid."
We are only too well aware of the Freemason (Atonist) origins and tendencies of the German Order, List Society, Order of the New Templars, Thule Society, Armaneschaft, Edda Society, Schlaraffia Lodge, German Workers Party, Nazi Party, and other allegedly pro-Aryan (anti-Semitic) organizations that succeeded (through their elaborate machinations, dissemination of pseudo-historical theories, and campaigns of mass indoctrination) in bringing ruin to Germany, Austria, and their neighboring European countries.
Like Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, and the Nazi hierarchy, these men were, for the most part, British agents.
The original official consensus deemed the Aryans to have first come into being as a race over eighteen thousand years ago in Africa. They were believed to be an offshoot of the so-called "Hamitic" ethnic group that, according to theologians, originated with Ham the son of Noah. The Egyptians and Canaanites, among other Asian and Mediterranean groups, were considered racially Hamitic, that is, descended from Ham, the son of Noah, who was believed to have been the progenitor of all African peoples. This consensus was finally proven to be unsustainable academic nonsense and was rejected as a symptom of the colonialist mindset that notoriously and prejudiciously categorized certain races and tribes as "inferior" and "recalcitrant." The preposterous travesty is clarified once it is understood that the term Hamitic originally referred to Egypt and its non-Semitic inhabitants. One of the earliest names for Egypt was Ham, and also Kham. The Hamites were, therefore, Egyptians and not some indefinite Semitic group. One would have wished that the scholars who eventually refuted the Hamitic myth would also have rectified the Aryan myth and discarded the racial denotation of this sorely misused term.
In the Bible, the Aryans are referred to as the Persians, Hittites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Philistines, and perhaps even as the Amorites, the race that markedly influenced the Babylonian civilization. Most of these cultures employed the symbol of the hawk or eagle.
Ares was the son of Hera and Zeus. He was also known as Ari and was closely associated with Ptah the architect god of Egypt. He is probably a Grecian corruption of the Egyptian god. His name suggests the Arya who were also great builders. He was a personification of the men of the West. His consort was called Eri, a name borrowed from the Irish goddess of the same name.
As doctors and surgeons attend a casualty of an automobile wreck, so the men who came to be known as the "Druids" attempted to heal the Earth's grievous wounds. They did not regard catastrophes as we do today in our spiritless times. To them there was no such thing as a random act of fate or nature. Everything that occurred had meaning. All that happened in the natural world did so to instruct and guide. The lessons of nature, the ultimate teacher, were to be heeded and cherished. It was never a case of "bad" and "good", for these were not unsophisticated men drunk with superstition as we have been led to believe by those wretches whose minds are truly rank and foul. The Arya, the Elders, the Druids, were the purified ones who had made themselves eligible to work with the subtle energies of the Earth. Few were pure enough for such science. Only those hygienic in mind and heart dare attend to duties of this kind. The Druidic Order of Aryan Elders reverenced the Earth and commissioned the construction of the many Mesolithic and Megalithic sites that cover Britain, France, and Scandinavia. They were the Magi who instructed the world' hierophants how to undo what had been done, and how to again set upright the pillar.
The word Ireland comes from Ari- or Ariya-Land, meaning the "Land of the Arya" or "aryans." In Indo-European languages the term Aliyan meant "lord" or "god." The letter "A" was transposed to "E," and so we have Eri, Eire, Erainn, and Erin.
The Greek historians and writers were not authorities on the origins and nature of Western peoples and their reports on the Irish, so-called "Celts," and other world cultures, are not to be accepted as accurate. The same thing goes for the Romans. The Romans conquered the world, yes, but they were very reluctant to let the world they owned remember that there had once been an Irish empire in existence long before their own.
Our point is that the Greek civilization and the first Grecian journalism on foreign parts came centuries after the rise of the Irish and their worldwide civilizations.
The Romans who rose to fall into oblivion in a historical instant were not the fathers of civilization any more than the Greeks were.
The desire of the Vatican mythographers was to falsely situate the seat of culture in the Middle-East and as far away from the Atlantic zone as possible. These mythographers knew full well that Ireland (Eri or Eire) was a remnant of Atlantis and that its primordial "Megalithic" inhabitants had been evacuated to the Continent en masse.
Although the majority of the kings and chiefs of the Fomorians were hideous in physical aspect, their king Elathan was considered the most beautiful of beings. His son Breas was also known as "the Beautiful." Brea's mother was a De Danann and by way of her he had legitimate claim to the throne of the Children of Danu. After attaining the throne he sided with his father's race and hard pressed the De Danann by taxes and unfair judgments. His actions precipitated the final conflict between the sons of light and sons of darkness.
Apparently, the Formorians were a devilish hybrid race, similar to the Titans, who had harassed every tribe that had attempted to seek refuge on Ireland. [...] We conclude that the Fomorians were not from under the sea but from civilizations that had sunk beneath the sea.
The Fir Bolg get their name from fir (meaning "men"), and bel (meaning "fair" or "beautiful"), or belos (meaning "shining" or "bright"). They may even have been worshippers on the primordial Irish god Bel.
According to the legends, the De Danaan were obliged to fight wars against the resident Fomorians and Iberian Fir Bolg in order to gain control over the land. [...] The De Danann and Fir Bolg were of the same race and, after their combat, Ireland was divided between them.
The Tarot first appears in Irish mythology. The prototypes of the Tarot suits were brought to Ireland from four lost islands, one of which was called "Murias" (Lemuria). The Tarot links Ireland's Elders (the Druids) to Egypt.
According to their own lore (found in the Lebar Gabala, or "Book of Invasions") the De Danann were survivors from four paradisiacal Western (Atlantic) islands that either foundered or suffered enormous natural assault during a great natural catastrophe or flood. These original homelands were called Falias, Murias, Gorias, and Finias.
The term tuatha (from the Old Irish root tuath) does mean "tribe." However, the term comes from the same root as thuaidh, meaning "Northern" or "Northern Point." The De Danann were from the North-West, as their own legends stated. They were the Hyperboreans and were clearly the ancestors of the so-called Teutons (an early Germanic tribe). The word is also connotatively related to the Old Irish tuas or thuas meaning "up" or "above;" to tuaithe that signified "sorcerers" or "magicians;" and to tuathgeinte meaning "elven," or "faerie," or "blessed good folk." The term Danu relates to the Irish goddess of that name. She was a goddess of art, craft, and beauty. Some scholars prefer, therefore, to regard and describe the Tuatha de Danann as the "People of Art" or the "Artful Ones." And we think this is an accurate title given the exquisiteness of their craftsmanship in silver and stone.
Duplicitous historians, desperate to conceal the Western origins of the De Dannan, erroneously insist that they were related to the Danes, Trojans, or even to the biblical Tribe of Dan. They have also sought to arouse doubt as to whether the De Dannan magi of Ireland were of the Caucasian (Indo-European) Race. However, it is not that the De Dannan were descended from the tribe of Dan but that the bible's Danites were related, either racially or ideologically, to the Irish De Dannan. In any case, after their final defeat at the hands of the Milesians (the Gaels), the De Danann transmuted their physical form and thereby became the mysterious Sidhe (pronounced Shee), or dei terreni ("gods of the Earth"), that is the Faerie Race who reputedly inhabited the inner Earth.
Despite the best efforts of clerics and historians it is only the last group of invaders - the Milesians - who can positively be shown to have come to Ireland from the East for the first time. The story of the visitation of the Milesians is of central importance to our work. We will explore it in greater detail in another chapter. What interests us is that these Milesians, the descendants of Celts from Scythia, have been linked with the Israelites whose exodus from Egypt occurred after the fall of Akhenaton around 1300 BC. Historians date the Milesian invasion of Ireland to approximately 1000 BC, but we believe it to have occurred at a few hundred years earlier. This is because a daughter of Akhenaton, named Scota, is believed to have accompanied the Milesians on their journey to Ireland. Her real name was Meritaten and she (or a namesake daughter) is buried in Country Kerry. It is from the time of the Milesian invasion from the Eastern lands that Ireland's so-called "Historical Cycle" begins. According to records and accounts the Milesians regarded their predecessors, the Tuatha De Danann, as nothing less than gods.
In our reappraisal, we conclude that the Fomorians were Atlanteans. We conclude that the British Isles and Scandinavia were part of the Hyperborean or Atlantean civilization. The Fomorians were also known as the Men of Lochlann. This is a reference to Norway, the land of lakes. Clearly, the Fomorians had taken to the seas in order to survive the after-effects of the deluge but did not evacuate the North-Western climes as other tribes had. They made use of whatever landmasses remained above the water level. They attempted, as best they could, to police those lands that, though wrecked by disaster, would again be habitable. They attempted to aggressively repel any tribe or contingent trying to return and resettle on lands they claimed either by right or might. We conclude that the Megalithic people, the original inhabitants of Ireland, hurriedly evacuated the torn lands by fleeing across the land bridges into Europe. Later, after a semblance of normality returned to the North-West, the descendants of the indigenous but displaced inhabitants of Ireland and England made their way back across the same land bridges now lost beneath the waves of the Irish and North Sea. What we deny, and deny utterly, is that these indigenous people (of whatever race) were visiting the British Isles from the East for the first time. We adamantly maintain that the Partholans, Nemedians, and De Danann of the history books had occupied Ireland millennia before the "Age of Catastrophe" dispersed them to the corners of the world, and that they originated in Western climes. To the Eastern lands they went, taking with them their skills and expertise in so many areas. And there they may have remained for as long a period as 5,000 years. In that time they, as inveterate rovers and intrepid explorers, visited France, Spain, Babylon, Syria, Africa, Egypt, China, and places further afield. We believe they maintained settlements in the Indus Valley until the drying up of the great Saraswati River. Nowadays, not a month goes by without evidence coming forth confirming the presence of Western men in the far off reaches of the world.
The monkish chroniclers betray the fact that they did not know about the land bridges that once existed between Ireland and England, and England and Scandinavia. These land bridges existed up until 3000 BC when rising sea levels obliterated them. Satellite photography has recently confirmed the theories of the geologist, Professor Ulf Erlingsson, who set about proving the existence of these bridges. His findings have had a most important effect on the false ideas concerning the remoteness of the British Isles. His scientific discoveries verify that Britain was a part of Atlantis, and confirm our suspicions concerning the historical inversion perpetrated by the Christian monks who wished it to appear that Eastern migrants had first colonized an unoccupied Ireland. As said, these monks were not inclined to accept or admit that the Earth had been host to advanced pre-diluvian civilizations, or that the Earth itself was over 4,000 years old. Whatever existed was mentioned in the bible and there was little to add. What was written in the bible was all a monk had to know about his world. For the Christian there could be no Atlantis or Lemuria. There could be nothing that was not contained in the bible. The bible did speak of the giants and of titanic fallen angels, and so a scribe could permissibly claim the Formorians to be of such lineage. The bible did speak of technically endowed Adamites and Canaanites, and so a scribe could permissibly speak of the Iberians and Tuatha de Danann. If it corroborated the bible it was entered as history. If it did not corroborate the bible it would be skewed or suppressed and most likely never see the light of day. For these reasons, it is irrational to believe that the monkish scribes of Ireland have provided us with historically accurate accounts concerning the world of the past. We can merely endeavor to take on board the newly discovered scientific evidence about Ireland and its geographical tribulations and surmise what we have not been told about Britain. Once we have an idea of what was omitted from the annals and chronicles we can gradually reconstruct the facts about pre-diluvian Ireland.
Those monks who were busy editing Ireland's history were not interested in having their readers find out that advanced pre-diluvian civilizations existed long before the time posited for the biblical creation. And so they were compelled to write their histories as we find them today. They were bound to present Ireland as an unpopulated country frequented by demonic titans who preferred to live on remote islands and high seas. And most importantly, they were bound to have the world believe that Ireland was first inhabited by migrants from the East. This deception has worked its magic. This is exactly what the vast majority of historians and interested parties believe about Ireland. What needs to be understood, and what we are adamantly convinced must be now disclosed to the world, is that these migrations from the East did indeed occur. The tribes of the mythological cycle of Irish prehistory did indeed enter Ireland from the East. But they were not coming to Ireland from that direction for the first time. They were returning after a prolonged period of forced exodus. They were the indigenous people of Ireland returning to their wrecked homes in order to begin the resettlement of their ancestral habitat. Once back they would have found their aspirations compromised by the return of other migrants from the East, and the arrival of those coming in for the first time in order to invade and conquer. The maintenance of order and security would have been dependent upon constant vigilance and a concerted aggressive resistance against hostile newcomers. This is what we deduce from various legends. In this regard, at least, we can assume the records of battles between rival races, common to the mythological cycle, to be generally accurate.
So, when we read that Ireland was largely uninhabited after the time of the biblical flood, we understand that it was inhabited before that destructive event took place. It might also be logical to suspect those indigenous occupants to be the same people who were displaced by the upheavals and who returned to their homes after a semblance of normalcy returned to their ancestral homes. This is exactly what happens today during a natural disaster and during its aftermath. It happens today and it happened in the past. Once we accept this simple premise we can make sense of the convoluted stories composed by mythmongers regarding Ireland's prehistory. These deceptive writers sought to begin Ireland's history from the time of the returns. This falsity can no longer be accepted by anyone wishing to research the West to East movement of the elements of civilization.
From the writings of the historians we discover that there were seven major phases or waves of "invasion" and colonization to Ireland after the great deluge believed to have occurred shortly after the creation. Although there has been little consensus over the order of visitations during the Mythological Cycle, the order of arrival and occupation usually delineated is as follows:
- The Fomorian Race - (considered cyclopean titans and adversaries of all who came after)
- The People of Kesair - (granddaughter of Noah, daughter of Bith, she allegedly arrived 40 days before the great flood)
- The Children of Partholan - (Arrival dated 2550 BC, they came from the West, and were decimated by war and disease)
- The Children of Nemed - (Arrival dated 2859 BC. They are also said to have been wasted by war and disease)
- The Iberians - (Fir Bolg, Fir Gaileon, and Fir Domnann)
- The Tuatha De Danann - (Tribe of the Goddess Danu, from lost islands in the North-West. Their arrival date was presumed to be approximately 2000 BC)
- The Children of Mil, or Mile (Goidelic Celts presumed to have come from Scythia in the East around 1000 BC)
It is important for us to analyze this order and fathom what the monks who archived Ireland's myths were attempting to hide and distort. For let us not doubt that there has been considerable distortion from Christian sources when it comes to Ireland's prehistory, particularly in regards event dating. What has been written and codified is not as important as what was not written or admitted. And the omissions, once rediscovered and understood, change everything we know about the history of Ireland and the world.
The student who contemptuously or ignorantly dismisses the existence of Atlantis and other pre-diluvian civilizations will never come to understand the true history of Ireland. Recognition of the existence and importance of Atlantis in world affairs is an essential prerequisite to the study of the history of the world, and particularly of the British Isles and Scandinavia. To acknowledge the existence of pre-diluvian empires is to have the clouds of darkness over Ireland's prehistory disperse. The veils and webs of confusion are removed while scintillating beams of light illuminate the mysteries of that great country's ancient past.
Certain researchers and experts on British prehistory have voiced doubts as to whether any so-called "Celtic" tribes ever actually invaded Ireland. L. A. Waddell and Beaumont found the idea preposterous. And the new science of DNA substantially corroborates their doubts concerning the spuriousness of "Celtic" East to West migration theories. Geneticist and genealogist, Professor Brian Sykes confirms, in his book Saxons, Vikings and Celts: The Genetic Roots of Britain and Ireland, that the Celts did not contribute to the DNA of the original inhabitants of Ireland. He shows that migrations from the East had no substantial effect on the genetic makeup of the aboriginal Irish. Moreover, he confirms that 9,000 years ago the ancestors of the Irish, Welsh, Scots, and English, crossed land bridges connecting their lands to Europe. Moving Eastwards these tribes found Europe to be drastically underpopulated.
In 1929, the author Elena Maria Whitshaw, wrote in her book Atlantis in Spain that the Spanish mariners and explorers, particularly during the time of Columbus, frequently visited the shores of Southern Ireland searching for evidence concerning the lost continent they referred to as Antilia. Clearly, the Spanish were in no doubt where to look for knowledge concerning the world that existed before the flood.
The historian of merit asks if there existed a single society that did not record the fact that the world had arisen from a pyre or that the world's upturning had ended the epoch of ancestral god-kings.
Britain and Ireland were the remnants, wrote Beaumont, of the empires of Atlantis. And it is from these regions that the most civilized and sophisticated peoples originated.
Even though the devastating cataclysms that obliterated the antique civilizations left survivors in a desperate physical state, it did not leave them in as primitive a condition as we are compelled to believe from the writings of historians of later ages, erroneously convinced their Neolithic cave-dwellers were the first civilized specimens on Earth. A study of the myriad Mesolithic and Megalithic ruins of Britain and Europe (created as requiems in stone to vanished technology of lost ages), of the various cyclopean remains of sunken cities and Earth zodiacs, and of the worldwide petroglyphic record, convinces us that the official dates given for human technological development are inaccurate and unsustainable. In short, there is a big difference between the sorry prehistoric creatures conjured before us by myopic historians and those who, having been robbed of their advanced cultural trappings and displaced from ancestral habitats, were subsequently compelled to rebuild empires after the originals had been obliterated by ferocious forces believed to have been unleashed by angry and vengeful gods.
Despite the consensus of orthodox anthropologists, the fact is that neither the Irish nor their Druidic Elders descended from the Kurgans or early Ukrainian hunter-gatherers. They did not, as most stubborn historians and commentators believe, hail from the Steppes of Russia, Harz Mountains, Balkans, or Danube Valley. Their origins are to be found exactly where their own legends state, in the ancient civilizations that existed and thrived before recorded history.
Ireland, England and Scotland were connected by land bridges that have since disappeared beneath the waves. England was connected to Scandinavia by a large land bridge that is believed to have been still in existence approximately 2,500 to 3,000 years BC.
Yes, great structures such as the Giza Pyramid stand upon Egyptian soil, but the structure bears no hieroglyphs and has no dead Egyptian inside. Moreover, the vast majority of the "tombs" of Egypt were plundered not by poor scoundrels, as we are told, but by very rich and powerful ones from Rome hoping to occlude the facts concerning the origins of their architects.
Those who come to browse the subject may be fooled into thinking that Wales, and not Ireland, was the original seat of Druidry.
The Druidic Order was apparently tripartite in nature. There were the Druids, the Bards, and the Ovates. The Druids were the perfected ones, the elite who presided over all. The order was not to enforce hierarchy but to make sure that only the pure had access to sacred knowledge. The word Ovate or Vate comes from the Gaelic word Faidh. This word also gives us the modern words Vatican, Fate and Faith. The Druids were literally those who were "masters of fate" or the "men of faith."
The antique unadulterated form of "Christianity" (Druidism) that existed in Ireland from the earliest times was a remnant of pre-diluvian theology. It was based on the observance and veneration of the stars, of the sun, the moon, and the zodiac. It was, from its inception a stellar religion. The bible, therefore, is not only based on Druidic philosophy, it is a sidereal testament disguised as a biography and history of physical personages who, for the most part, had no historical existence. How this antique Druidic philosophy was flagrantly appropriated and abused is a fascinating story that must be told. We are personally interested in the reasons why it was thought best to denude the ancient theology of its connection to the stars and why it was then foisted upon the world in its present contorted and preposterous form. To this day, the ancient mystery school subjects of Astrology and Kabala, etc, are still taught to the elites within the Christian and Judaic colleges, to those of the highest caliber and lineage. This secret is not known by the lower rank and file and great steps have been taken to downplay the Astro-Theological aspect of the major religions. Although innumerable books are now in circulation, attempting to shine light into Christianity's darker corners, the sidereal and sabean connections have rarely been exposed. This kind of revelation is, perhaps, too controversial even to most revisionists, especially to those of the "soft" variety. Obviously, should this gnosis reach the ears of the masses not much will be left of the vile edifice of Vatican-style religion.
Our revisionist work is made somewhat more challenging because most Christians know very little about the true origins of their religion and do not realize that most of what they read and hear about from priests and potentates is pure fiction with little to no basis in fact. They are not aware of how the Roman Church has fostered and unleashed upon their unsuspecting minds a battery of lies and fables in order to disguise the actual origins of religion. Nevertheless, we seek to show in the course of this work that Christianity, and its so-called parent Judaism, have their roots in Egypt and Ireland. And this holds true for the language and cultural idioms. This fact was commonly known the world over before the rise of the present imposter Roman hegemony. It was known in ancient times that Christianity, in its purest and most antique form, was nothing more nor less than Druidism from Ireland.
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was the author of New Atlantis. He served as Lord Chancellor of England under James I, and during the reign of Elizabeth I he was the adviser to Lord Robert Devereux, the ill-fated Earl of Essex who, under orders from the despotic queen to suppress Irish rebels, led the largest expeditionary force ever sent to Ireland. Considered a paragon among enlightened men, this maniac wrote an essay entitled: An Advertisement Touching an Holy War, in which he set the English above every other nation, declaring it a right of every Englishman to cruelly eliminate anyone who was considered socially unworthy or undesirable. The "extirpation and debellating of giants, monsters, and foreign tyrants," he wrote, was not only good and lawful, but "meritorious" and divinely honourable.
Judeo-Christianity, as we know it, is a creation of the Solar Cults of the ancient world. As an institution it is a construct of the Atonists, the renegade outcasts of Egypt’s eighteenth dynasty. After the termination of their dominion, the commanders of this powerful cult, seeking new empires, guided their people back to the place of beginning and subsequently set about erasing the archaic and sophisticated culture they found there. They overlaid their own corrupted traditions upon the more antique one that was soon forgotten.
The vile Judeo-Christian institution and its inhuman ideology would not have been able to endure if the pristine marvel of Irish Druidism remained strong and bright in the world of men.
Regarding the origin of the Church, Christianity moved to Rome by way of Byzantium and Britain and its roots are to be found in ancient Ireland. It certainly did not originate in Rome.
The subject of history is less than 200 years old. In that time men have convinced themselves of the following suppositions, some of which have been regarded as irrefutable truths.
After all, what is the subject of history? It is the study of the past, certainly. But it is also the study of man. It is the attempt by men to find out who they are by analyzing and reviewing what they have been. Even though scientific methodologies have a role within the subject of history, history is not science. Most importantly, students of history can easily be misled.
Most historians accept that Egypt was a cradle of civilization, and that many cultural idioms and traditions come from there. What has yet to be understood, however, is the manner in which Egypt inherited its cultural elements from the lands of the North-West. This fact is not known today because of the threat it poses to Rome and London, the Vatican and Crown, and to all those who have profited from the suppression of knowledge.
Jacob is the sun which "rests" its light and "sleeps" upon this stone during the solstice. Jacob, or Jack, is the sun. The nursery rhyme that reads "Jack be nimble, Jack be quick, Jack jump over the candlestick" refers to the sun passing over the celestial pole. The rhyme of "Jack and Jill" going "up the hill" is likewise a Astro-Theological device cryptically referring to the passage of the sun (Jack) and moon (Jill) through the northern zodiacal arch and their subsequent "Fall" into autumn and winter. England's "Union Jack" is really of "Jacob," cryptically referring to a Solar (or Atonist) Union.
From these Elders [Druids] the arcane archive of knowledge was surreptitiously appropriated by their enemies, the servants of darkness, whose biological and ideological descendants now rule the world.
The first people in recorded history to study the operations of the heavens and zodiac, and to understand the strange but intimate connections between physical and psychic energy, were the Druids from the "Fortunate" or "Blessed Isles."
It [the zodiac] was referred to as the celestial mystery school for good reason since, strange as it may seem at first, the zodiac mirrors consciousness. The men who looked up into the night sky were really looking into themselves. The gnosis of the heavens is the gnosis of the soul.
Certainly, we are not in opposition to religion as it is practiced by the sincere independent devotee. We do not seek to intrude into that space reserved for private worship. But we do stand opposed to the institutions that have inserted themselves and their mythology between the individual and his creator.
The Gaels, or Goidels, were another branch of the Celtic groups from Europe who allegedly crossed to Ireland around the fourth, fifth, or sixth centuries BC (depending on which officially posited theory one believes). These Goidels were known by the Irish mythographers as the “Milesians” or “Children of Mil.” They were descendants of the Scythian “Celts” who had visited Egypt and returned to their Western homelands after the reign of Pharaoh Akhenaton. Among their number was Scota, the daughter of the Atonist pharaoh and his consort Nefertiti.
The Irish were not “Celtic.” They were Celticized by invading foreign powers; particularly those from Rome.
The term “Celt” did not exist in the ancient languages of the Irish, Scots, or Welsh. There is only the Pictish Khaltis, most likely signifying invaders from France, Belgium, Germany, Galatia, and the Ukraine. The term “Celt” (Keltoi) was first employed by the incompetent Greek historian Herodotus to describe Western Europeans such as the Irish, Scots, and Gauls, etc. After his time other historians, such as Caesar and Strabo, continued to use this vague term to broadly denote any foreign tribe that Rome considered barbaric and antagonistic.
Thirdly, we reject the term “Celtic,” and refuse to use it when describing the ancient inhabitants existing in Ireland before 600 BC. We tentatively accept that Britain was finally reached by people who have been called “Goidelic” and “Brythonic” Celts after 600 BC; groups that anthropologists and historians finally had to admit were merely fragments of the larger Indo-European race. Of these invasions have Tacitus, Caesar, and Pythias the Greek, written. Nevertheless, we prefer to deal with the pre-Celtic inhabitants and their antique civilization that had, in remote ages, spread Eastward into Europe and Asia. We leave the word “Celtic” intact when quoting, confident that the reader will understand that it is a blanket term often used indiscriminately by authors referring to Ireland’s exceptionally gifted inhabitants who are, more correctly, the “Mesolithic” or even “Megalithic” people; builders of the cyclopean temples of Ireland and the world that still stand as silent testaments to their august presence. The Celtic tribes of the Iron Age, believed to have entered Ireland after 600 BC, built their own civilizations upon the foundations of earlier ones they found there, which they reckoned had been erected by the “gods.”
Secondly, we contend that the term Aryan has been most egregiously misused. We believe it referred not to race but caste. It was a term that simply distinguished spiritual and moral status. In our work, therefore, we use the term to refer to men from any racial stock who had perfected themselves in schools of initiation and who were adepts of high order. We use the term to identify the Irish Druids and their Mesolithic ancestors, the European Sami, the Phoenician and Median Magi, the Egyptian Disciples of Horus, the Mer, the Ibaru, and any other group of bards, poets, seers, prophets, hierophants, archimandrites, and architects of distinction. The term Aryan was erroneously accepted as a racial distinction after its discovery by the eighteenth century scholar and Chief Justice Sir William Jones of Calcutta. Jones discovered that the Hindus referred to their ancestors who appeared in Northern India and Pakistan during the seventh century BC, as the “Arya.” He did not realize that the term signified spiritual qualities rather than racial, ethnic, or linguistic ones. As linguists adopt the term to signify a class of languages, so we adopt it in a purest context to represent those Elders of any racial background possessed of exalted minds and hearts. We are convinced that our rendition and interpretation will serve to clarify many historical anomalies and mysteries. When speaking of the racial origins or nature of the Mesolithic and Megalithic Irish, we prefer to use the more descriptive and accurate terms “Nordic,” “Gothic,” “Caucasian,” and “Indo-European.”
The first and most important argument concerns the West to East migration of the elements of civilization. This theory rests upon the understanding that there were, in prehistoric times, highly developed civilizations situated in the Western hemisphere. These civilizations were brought to an abrupt end approximately 13,000 years BC, by terrestrial upheavals of an unimaginable scale. The gnosis that had been accumulated by the advanced inhabitants of these hoary civilizations originated on the landmasses known today as Ireland, England, Scotland, and Wales. These countries were once part of Atlantis or, more specifically, of the great continent of Appalachia. From these locations the gnosis was eventually carried Eastward across lost land bridges into Europe and Asia.
A chess master will give his student audience four pieces of advice from which we can learn. He will say that the first thing that is needed is a sense of patience. He will say next that a sense of timing is essential. Then comes one’s knowledge of the opponent, and finally, the clincher, the willingness to make any and all sacrifices to win. Now, can we see why we have the problems we do? The good have no patience, no sense of timing, zero knowledge of the opponent, and because of their inherent morality, are not able to make the necessary sacrifices. Compare this to the enemy. They have endless patience, with strategies lasting millennia; they have an excellent sense of timing, moving in gradual stages while planning a long way ahead; they have intense knowledge of us; and most importantly, they are not the least bit hesitant to make any and all sacrifices that are needed. In fact, that is exactly what they have been doing.
When the Earth is utterly exhausted, as it is soon to be, the progeny of the Atlantean sorcerers will again seek transplantation elsewhere. Each world to which they attach is always in spiritual or intellectual infancy, a necessary condition to prevent discovery and facilitate concealment. If they can find a way of breaking through the Stargate, they will vacate Earth in their “arks” taking some of us with them for seeding their new home planets with more slaves.
Moreover, the Nephilim have not, as some scholars ludicrously assert, left this planet in the days of old. Therefore, they are not about to return to save us all from ourselves. They have never been away and they have brought the conditions that plague us. The Earth is considered nothing more than a prison to them, a place of internment which is almost unendurable.
It is the “Fallen Ones” who seek to encourage their human slaves to think that they too have descended from the depths of space. The fact is, as the Pagans have understood, that this Earth is our one and only Garden of Eden. How is it that from this paradise one can look out to the nether and fantasize that “home” is somewhere out there? Only Satan and his hordes and those they have deluded the world would do such a bizarre thing. These ancient stories are extremely pertinent to the condition of the present. Genesis means the “Genes of Isis.” Isis is the Queen of the Earth, and we of the Earth are Her offspring, suffering from amnesia about our Earth-connection, convinced that the black void above is the real home we have lost. So our perception is in total reverse. Nothing measures the loss of reason more than the pervasiveness of this outlandish, incongruent notion. It is consistent only with the duped and controlled masses who are now psychologically identifying with the desires of the alien oppressors, instead of affirming with pride and love that they are children of this perfumed garden Earth.
Now, it so happens that the pages of the ancient scriptures and myths also mention the same aspiration, only it is not that of the human race, of any patriarch, or prophet. In the Bible and the ancient myths, one hears of Lucifer, or the dark angels, despising their sojourn in Paradise or Eden and consumed with mania and false aspiration, eventually leaving or being cast out of their home into the abyss and banished as defilers and ingrates. Perhaps the reality is that today the ones who are spiritually despondent and filled with the sense of futility are actually the true children of the Earth, while those who appear content and adjusted are from “out there,” transplanted centuries ago to exploit the Earth and its indigenous inhabitants. These “adjusted” ones must be those who align with their alien DNA and who police those who have a problem with the present conditions of the planet.
The progeny of the Nephilim, like their alien fathers, have been making use of deep underground caverns, some of which are hundreds of miles wide. They do not find it suitable on the surface of the planet and prefer the underworld. This is one reason why their monopolies are so adroit at leveling the forests and polluting the atmosphere. It is the ordinary Adamic human that suffers, while they remain impervious in their underground cities.
The “greys” that are common in eyewitness reports are not the actual aliens, but are semiorganic automatons created by their masters who control them via advanced forms of remote control. This is betrayed by eyewitness reports of their strange movements and stoic attitudes.
The hole in the ozone layer was not only caused by CFCs, but by microwave technology from HAARP. Microwaves were beamed onto the Stargate to break it, but instead they superheated the atmosphere causing permanent damage to the ozone layer. HAARP and microwaves are also behind the “Greenhouse Effect.”
There is also good reason to believe that the phenomenon known as the “crop-circles” have been created via satellites by the microwave technology known as HAARP. These circles and formations are not caused by doodling extraterrestrials with nothing better to do. The technology to create even the most complex crop mandalas is certainly in existence, regardless of the denials of scientists and science buffs.
The Atlanteans’ bloodkin do not like the human traits within themselves, nor do they relish human beings. They have always preferred to be served by robots of a mechanical or cybernetic kind and would have done away with humans long ago had that been feasible. They keep us alive because the Macrobes need their sacrifices, and also because they think that they can have the “robots” they prefer by dumbing down humans to the level of the automaton. In this way, they have the best servants. And this is exactly what has been happening since the sixteenth century, or the time when the “Regents of Darkness” discovered that they may have to remain here on Earth permanently.
The aliens on this planet are also attempting to clone or replicate the human form artificially. Their original form, being humanoid, cannot pass the field that was established around the Earth. But if they can clone or cybernetically change their forms, it may help their designs. This is why virtual reality, cybernetics, cloning, and nanotechnology are in vogue today.
The Nephilim who fell to Earth from the netherworld are trying desperately to regain their freedom. They have been chained in the pit (Earth), but are convinced that there is a way out of their terrestrial prison. This is why the space program exists, and why there is exorbitant and frenzied expenditure in satellites and the exploration of outer space.
Beyond the Moon’s circlet of apotropaic power, the true governing angelic agencies reign. They are the ones that create the glitches in the modules, satellites, and space telescopes that our satanic demigods put into orbit. The Moon’s orbit was precisely synchronized to move with the Earth. Being exactly the same size as the Sun seen from Earth, and we always only perceive one side of the Moon. The Moon is much larger than the satellites of other planets and is conjectured to be a recent addition to our sky.
The space program and all its attendant fields exist because the secret Brotherhood cannot of their own volition leave the planet. The supra-celestial forces have incarcerated them here permanently. The means of their entrapment is the Moon’s orbit, which is a barrier of etheric energy, the nature of which remains largely unknown to them and us. This orbit encloses the Earth, and this is the reason why there have been no manned excursions beyond the Moon. They can go to the Moon but cannot venture beyond, although machines can. This has caused them enormous frustration, and they will not rest until they find the means to break through this energy field. The Moon’s orbit has long been associated with power, protection, and ethereal energies. The Chinese refer to its encirclement as the coils of the “Great Dragon,” and this is what their dragon dances are partly about. Even in modern astrology and astronomy, we have the Moon’s “nodes,” also known as the “circling dragon.”
The space program, the “Silicon Revolution,” all the genetic, pharmaceutical, and military budgets and researches are convened with this objective in mind. Today’s “Silicon Revolution” is the culmination of operations set into motion in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. It has been long awaited. Its frontmen are made fabulously wealthy (though they personally own little of their own companies), and all doors are open to them. No one questions why they use the logos that they do (Apple Macintosh, Sun, NEC, Gateway, etc,). Few question the connection of these frontmen to powerful European financiers or question why they receive prestigious honors from royals.
There is a premise or a clause in the lexicons of the black sorcerers that they do in fact obey. It is obligatory for them to tell us in one way or another what their machinations and designs are, and what is happening or ever going to happen to their prospective victims. And they are letting us know right now, often by way of the media, but the so-called “good” are persistently unable to read the signs, being symbolically illiterate and recalcitrant. Therefore, we collude in our own fleecing. Evil always exists by the indulgence of the good. In the game of chess, if one does not occupy a square, then by rights the opponent can.
They have polluted the oceans and the atmosphere, reduced the oxygen and the electron count, burned holes in the ozone, devastated the forests, relentlessly annihilated the flora and fauna, caused havoc within the food chain, demineralized human food, poisoned the lakes, slaughtered the best of the human gene pool in wars for profit, eradicated entire nations and indigenous peoples, enslaved the ancient races, divided the lands, incarcerated the innocent, martyred the meek and the sensitive, dug caverns deep into the tissues of the Earth, altered the electromagnetic frequency of the human body through the misuse of electricity, torn through the veil of the subatomic realms, massacred millions with their “nuclear” and “atomic” assaults, messed with mind control, perverted the subject of history, lead millions down the path of mania and self destruction through devastating psychedelic drugs, peddled all kinds of pharmaceutical poisons, incubated every vice and addiction that one can imagine, imposed debt slavery, and basically industrialized the entire world.
The youth are especially vulnerable. Drugs and perversions of every kind, are made attractive and chic. The hard drugs that are taken by teens are also made available by the elites and the modern Dionysian Cults they fund. Every decade they provide some other bromide or toy to distract and befuddle the masses.
One manner of keeping the masses in check, as well as helping them lose their senses and commit slow suicide, concerns the purveyance of alcoholic beverages called “spirits” in taverns and inns. This custom was started under the tax exempt Knights Templars who opened most of the inns in England. These dens all have patently occult names (like Green Dragon, or Black Horse, Raven's Head, Red Lion, Plough and Stars, Rose and Crown, etc.). They also commonly bore the name “Arms” to commemorate that they were established by the military orders. They were also known down through history as venues for all kinds of revolutionaries and malcontents (see Daphne Du Maurier’s Jamaica Inn). And the cult of hallucinogens has been growing stronger for generations. They still provide one of the best means of creating family dislocation and personal existential malaise.
In the past, when one of the “Serpent Masters” or one of the “Sons of the Serpents” ended their long life, their confederates would generally commemorate their lives in stone by building a monument which encapsulated through its design and geometry the existence of the deceased alien or semi-alien being. We know these monuments today, for they are the cyclopean ruins that exist in almost every country of the world. Others, like the complex at Giza in Egypt, were constructed afterward. Such edifices are not tombs but cenotaphs. These monuments of commemoration are not to be confused with the circles, calendars, and earthworks that were made for utilitarian purposes.
Ovason then goes on to give one reason why the city was constructed according to such specific designs and dates. He speaks of the presence or existence of angelic beings, or overlords, who are being invoked to literally take part in the terrestrial operations of mankind.
It has rarely been revealed that the Vatican (one of the most truly Satanic edifices in mankind’s history) has spent literally billions of dollars to give mankind a false notion of Magic and the Black Arts. Their efforts and expenditure go into the making and purveying of popular music and movies which are exploitative and gratuitous and which generate deviant messages about the nature of Satanism. The famous black and white classic horror movies (Dracula, The Mummy, The Werewolf, and Invisible Man, etc.), the “B” movies of the 50s and 60s, and the “slasher” or “occult” movies (The Exorcist, Friday 13th, Halloween, Evil Dead, Poltergeist, The Shining, etc.,) of more recent times, are perfect examples of their artifice. Along with certain popular genres of music which have occult themes and imagery (which may appear anti-Christian), these films and their creators are, in actual fact, surreptitiously funded by the Vatican (also by the Jesuits and the Illuminati) via the record companies, marketing agents, and publicity houses. There is a reason why the pop icon Madonna, for instance, has this moniker and why she constantly displays the cross or crucifix. It is why the imagery in her videos is of the type it is and why she is so personally wealthy. It has to do with whom she and her promoters serve. The same goes for the Rolling Stones (listen to Sympathy for the Devil, 200 Light Years from Home, Midnight Rambler, Paint It Black, Goat's Head Soup, Their Satanic Majesty's Request, etc.,) the Beatles, and the Grateful Dead. And these are but three examples of thousands. The public would be shocked to their core if they were to find out the facts about this particular study and about what has been infiltrated into their minds and the minds of their young.
As we mentioned before, all we know, or think we know about the theme of Satanism actually refers to the alien presence and influence on this planet, and to no other source.
Somehow, the planet Saturn and its symbolism became confused with that of Tiamat, which was thought to be the second sun that fell to Earth. Kings of the Earth were said to rule as Saturn, or for Saturn. The Hebrews identified Saturn with Lucifer or Satan, god of restriction, materialism, negativity, and chaos, who also fell from “heaven.”
The most common symbol used by the Merovingians was the serpent, or the dragon. Indeed, the most well known amphibian god was Dagon, whose name connotes Dragon. One of the Merovingian kings bore the name Dagobert.
Sir John Dee, one of the greatest satanic occultists that ever lived, was extremely well connected throughout the Europe. Along with Edward Kelley and others, he set about opening portals to other dimensions in order to speak with the “angels.” His fraternal counterparts in Europe, under his instruction, performed similar rites. Their obsession was to contact extra-terrestrial, or preferably, pan-dimensional beings, the “Archons.” To do this, he invented what was known as “Enochian Magic” which, due to their adroit camouflaging, has been misunderstood to this day.
Sir John Dee was court ambassador to the Tudors (sic, Tutors). He would dutifully visit foreign courts, meeting with money men and master occultists of Europe, and then when sending back intelligence in writing to the court, he would sign his letters with the sigil 007. John Dee was a spy by royal appointment, literally, “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.” The modern MI5 comes from his time, as do many other idioms and customs that are taken as English today.
Elizabeth (E-Liza-beth) was known, suggestively, as the “Virgin Queen” (said to do with her being a Virgo), but really because the term indicates bloodlink to the “Serpent Masters” and possibly to the Reptilians. The name Elizabeth means “beloved of the Gods.”
When the predicament of the Stargate was fully accepted, the scions of Atlantis knew something had to be done, lest all their aeons of effort and tribulation would be for nothing. They convinced themselves that what technology could erect, technology could eventually take down. It became their avowed and solemn intention to move humanity forward to the point where it became intellectually evolved and capable enough to develop the high technical sciences that could expedite their freedom. So, it was decided by the Royals of England, the Tudor Dynasty, that though their present researches and operations would not be halted, a new approach was needed. The man with the idea for this new approach and the one who would undertake its execution was Sir John Dee, the court astrologer and ambassador of Queen Elizabeth Tudor.
Before their discovery of the existence of the “Stargate,” the Nephilim intended to one day vacate this planet that has long been their terrible prison. They did not come here by choice and have not had a good time of it since their forced arrival. They have been as the Bible relates, “chained into the pit.” It is their intention to break their chains and change galactic address as soon as the technology exists to make this possible.
The masters of the Nephilim were relatively convinced that even if their enemies were on Earth they could not survive the paroxysms and furor that Tiamat’s obliteration would bring on. However, these unknown pursuers did not just leave our solar system without instigating precautionary measures. Before they made the journey back to their own planet, they established an etheric barrier around our planet that would be along the same orbit trajectory as the Moon’s around the Earth. This barrier still exists and is utterly impenetrable to the Atlantean progeny, because the technology by which it was erected was of an extremely advanced level.
The "Holy Spirit," of the Trinity, equals, the self... that is... YOU
History is distorted by diachronic and synchronic manipulation. And those revisionists who attempt to bring the truth to the attention of the masses are constantly being thwarted and undermined by the minions of those who stand to be exposed.
The Biblical references to the Arc of the Covenant and Moses’ warnings about its powers clearly denote some kind of unpredictable and deadly radioactivity. It is also rumored that the arc contained the remains of the leader of the “Fallen Angels” or others of his 200. The word arc comes from arche, meaning the first, the original, or even, the originator, and also from arca, which translates as “tomb.” And the Israelites declared the so-called arc to “contain” God himself. Words like arcadia, monarch, archon, and arktos contain this strange prefix.
1859 Darwin’s Origin of the Species is published.
Comment (Michael Tsarion)
The full name of this book was Origin of the Species and Preservation of the Favored Races.
The Eves who were receptive to the counsel of the “Sons of the Serpent” in the garden became the first that were “awakened” and exalted by their more advanced cousins. They were initiated into the secrets of technology.
The hybrid progeny of the original fully alien masters could also eventually reproduce both sexually and genetically. Many dynasties and their tyrannical “royal” lines and leaders owe their existence to this, as a close study of their symbolism, deeds, and history reveals. This is the origin of the royal or “holy bloodlines,” like the Merovingians, Hapsburgs, Hanoverians, and Guelphs (Windsors).
For instance, in the Book of Enoch, we read of the birth of Lamech’s strange son:
I have begotten a strange son. He is not like an ordinary human being, but looks like the
children of the angels of heaven to me. His form is different and he is not like us…it does not
seem to me that he is of me but of the angels…
Behold, I thought then within my heart that conception was due to the Watchers and the Holy Ones…and the Nephilim…and my heart was troubled within me because of this child.
Lamech's father, Mathusala, eventually consults the prophet Enoch about the strange grandchild. The latter says to the concerned grandfather:
This child which is born to you shall survive on the Earth, and his sons shall be saved with him. When all mankind who are on the earth die, he shall be safe. And this posterity shall beget on the earth giants, not spiritual, but carnal. Now therefore inform thy son Lamech that he who is born is his child in truth; and he shall call his name Noah, for he shall be to you a survivor.
The euphemism that has come down to describe a female reserved for crossing with part alien being was “virgin.” The offspring of these relations were referred to as being of “virgin birth.” Other terms which implied genetics are “Blood” (as in “Blood of the Lamb”), “Seed” (as in “Seed of David”), and “Immaculate” (as in the “Immaculate Conception.”) This latter term connotes progeny who were created genetically, rather than sexually.
When the moral “Sons of the Serpents” in their diasporas came upon a welcoming tribe or a suitable place to reside they set up their base. It is from these regions that we find traces of great advancement, amid later primitivism. At these new locations, the “Sons of the Serpent” would also continue their genetic studies and work. They had “fixed” the Adamic peoples so that they would be intelligent and creative. They also made it possible for the Eves to reproduce sexually. This was primarily to pacify the normal urges of the now freed male Adams. And it is known that members of the “Sons of the Serpent” would “mate” with the Eves, producing exceptional progeny.
The “Reptilians” did indeed serve their masters well. They were part alien, part reptile, with no human DNA at all. Some, like their creators, looked entirely humanoid. Others were distinctly reptoid. They operated from the limbic mode of consciousness and possessed the physical endurance and strength, not to mention the guile, of the humble Earth reptile. From these beings, we inherit the term “coldblooded evil.”
They [the Atlanteans] decided that their main error was the experimentation on Homo Sapiens (also Erectus, Cro-Magnon, etc.) for it was certainly that which brought them problems. But humans were not the only life forms on the Earth. So, it was decided that experiments would be made on animal DNA instead. They began looking to the fauna, making genetic tests on certain animals. It was found that the DNA of the reptiles was the most suitable for their purposes. The alien masters then crossed their own DNA with that of certain reptiles, and it is from this that the “Reptilian” (dragon) beings of the storybooks were born.
Ergo, it is not St. George who is the patron saint of England, but Set of the Hyksos. In general terms whenever the code term "red" is used in the Old Testament, it denotes the Hyksos dynasty. Connected to the Order of the Garter, is the Most Distinguished Order of St. Michael and St. George, formed in 1818. Aditionally, legend has it that the senior members of the Merovingian dynasty of France (founders of the Knights Templar) had birthmarks in the shape of a red cross.
The Vatican is a front for the all-powerful Cult of Aton, which also funds the Illuminati and the Masonic Orders. The chief Jesuit is referred to as "The General" a term Akhenaton used for himself. The skull cap, that is also worn by Jewish rabbis, was originally worn by the sun priests of Egypt.
The Druids did not permit themselves the luxury of cutting a single living thing with a sharpened edge.
Later, as the Atlantean sorcerers gained power again and were successful in infiltrating a culture established by their humane scions, they would instigate the atrocity of human sacrifice. Appearing and presenting themselves as the gods of the “fathers,” they would seduce and then ritually slaughter countless thousands.
The hybrid progeny of the original fully alien masters could also eventually reproduce both sexually and genetically. Many dynasties and their tyrannical “royal” lines and leaders owe their existence to this, as a close study of their symbolism, deeds, and history reveals. This is the origin of the royal or “holy bloodlines,” like the Merovingians, Hapsburgs, Hanoverians, and Guelphs (Windsors).
The euphemism that has come down to describe a female reserved for crossing with part alien being was “virgin.” The offspring of these relations were referred to as being of “virgin birth.” Other terms which implied genetics are “Blood” (as in “Blood of the Lamb”), “Seed” (as in “Seed of David”), and “Immaculate” (as in the “Immaculate Conception.”) This latter term connotes progeny who were created genetically, rather than sexually. Properly, it was to designate that they were special children, the offspring of the gods. Eventually, the “Sons of the Serpents” interacted with human women in the normal sexual manner.
When the moral “Sons of the Serpents” in their diasporas came upon a welcoming tribe or a suitable place to reside they set up their base. It is from these regions that we find traces of great advancement, amid later primitivism. At these new locations, the “Sons of the Serpent” would also continue their genetic studies and work. They had “fixed” the Adamic peoples so that they would be intelligent and creative. They also made it possible for the Eves to reproduce sexually. This was primarily to pacify the normal urges of the now freed male Adams. And it is known that members of the “Sons of the Serpent” would “mate” with the Eves, producing exceptional progeny.
The Reptilians preferred to live beneath the ground or in dark caverns, their needs being seen to by other genetic mutants or even by compliant Adams who still remained in the ignorant state. They periodically demanded live sacrifices to be made to them and would go in search of the enemies of their masters.
The “Reptilians” did indeed serve their masters well. They were part alien, part reptile, with no human DNA at all. Some, like their creators, looked entirely humanoid. Others were distinctly reptoid.
They decided that their main error was the experimentation on Homo Sapiens (also Erectus, Cro-Magnon, etc.) for it was certainly that which brought them problems. But humans were not the only life forms on the Earth. So, it was decided that experiments would be made on animal DNA instead. They began looking to the fauna, making genetic tests on certain animals. It was found that the DNA of the reptiles was the most suitable for their purposes. The alien masters then crossed their own DNA with that of certain reptiles, and it is from this that the “Reptilian” (dragon) beings of the storybooks were born.
The coming of the original “Serpent Race” was probably around 50,000 years ago (but could have been as recently as 30,000 years ago). Genetic experiments and hybridization took place some time after the building of Atlantis, for which the services of Neanderthal Man seems to have been required.
The wars of the “gods” probably began around 13,000 years ago, with the Pole Shift following soon after. The Earth attains a semblance of normalcy as the centuries pass.
The warlocks of Atlantis, who were never many to begin with, suffered heavy losses in the destruction of their continent, Atlantis. It can be conjectured that there were less than 100 of these totally alien beings left, though there is little to no certainty about this. They also lost most of their sophisticated alien technology. And the “Sons of the Serpents” together with their Adamic wards suffered enormous casualties also. It may be conjectured that there were only about 1,000 true “Sons of the Serpents” left in existence.
In the Old Testament, passages relating to the twins, Jacob and Esau, may well refer obliquely to the pre-diluvian bipartisanism and their ongoing antagonism.
In your limbs lie nations twain,
Rival races from their birth;
One the mastery shall gain,
The younger o’er the elder reign.
The meaning behind the euphemisms of the combating “Serpents” or “Dragons” has to do with the antagonism within the biology of the Homo Atlantis. The reference is to the coils of DNA, to the alien and human strands and their incompatibility. The folktales which have to do with the evil and good twin, the dark and fair sisters, the white and black witches, the twin towers, the true and false knights, the heroes descent and ascent, etc., also conceal the same meta-theme.
The very name Pendragon means “Head of the Dragons,” that is, the race of good “Serpents,” from which the Celts and Gaels descended.
The second revealing anecdote happens when Moses and Aaron are in the presence of the Pharaoh. The scriptures speak of them having to prove their credentials to Pharaoh by changing Aaron’s rod into a serpent. This is strange, since Israelites were forbidden by Jehovah to engage in “magical practices.” Anyway, the Egyptians produce their own rod, which likewise becomes a serpent, and so on. This tale of the conflict between the two serpents is a barely disguised reference to that between the races.
...we hear of the strange meeting Moses had at the “burning bush.” This has long been a point of conjecture, but can easily be explained when the imagery is replaced by fact. Jehovah announces to Moses’s question, “I am the god of thy Fathers.” Scholars have pointed out that Moses’s doubt as to the nature and pre-eminence of Jehovah is strange, to say the least, and that Jehovah should need no introduction to a devoted Israelite. Moreover, the introduction clearly implies that Moses is in fact one of the progeny of the “Sons of the Serpents” (his “fathers”), but has now had the misfortune to come into contact with one of their fathers, that is, one of the original “Serpent Masters,” maybe even the “main man.”
Elohim, comes from Ellu, meaning “the Shining Ones.” “Shining Ones” is an ambivalent term used for both the Nephilim and their first born. The “Shining Ones” are often depicted with horns on their heads. This was a symbol of wisdom, but also of rulership. This is why shamans, priests, and kings adopted the convention of wearing horns also, especially in the form of the crown. This was to primarily indicate that they were descendants of either the Atlanteans or the Lemurians and were endowed with power. Michelangelo sculpted Moses with horns on his head to indicate his blood-bond to the ante-diluvian kings.
Things become easier still when we identify the “Serpent Masters” with the “Race of Jehovah” and the “Sons” with the “Elohim.”
“First Born” relates to the original progeny of the “Serpent Masters,” that is, the members of the Lemurian Race.
There is good reason to believe that the terms “Sodom” and “Gomorrah” originally referred to Atlantis (Appalachia) and Lemuria.
In the account of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, the fleeing prophet, Lot, is told by the “angels of the Lord” not to turn back, because the “wrath of the Lord” was coming to that place. Lot’s wife does look back and is straightaway turned into what is described as a “pillar of salt.” But this is a mistranslation. The word is more like our English “vapor.”
In the 1950s the father of the Atomic Bomb, Robert Oppenheimer (who frequently quoted the Mahabharata), was asked by a student at Rochester University, whether his Atomic Bomb was the first in history to be exploded, he suggestively answered: “Well yes, in modern times, of course.”
The Celts had the strange prohibition that no king could rule who was “blemished.” This does not make sense until we realize what it relates to is genetic alteration.
Eventually, the exodus of the Adamic race became known to the “Serpent Masters,” who grew furious and vengeful. This was the third time that their plans and exploits had been thwarted. First, they were banished from their home planet. Then after coming to a new one, they created a race to serve them, but which did not; and when they finally created the perfect servant, they found them permanently seduced away from their duties. The ire of the Atlanteans at this snubbing was so intense that they unleashed an atomic war on the “Sons of the Serpent” and their Adamic wards, now resident on Lemuria (Oceania). These latter were not unprepared, however, and being technically advanced, set up to defend themselves and retaliate against their evil adversaries on Atlantis. So, there was on Earth a nuclear war. It was an event that changed the face of Earth history. The war between the gods (the “Serpent Masters” and the “Sons of the Serpents”)
These cults of power women existed down to Medieval times, when the Brotherhood of the Snake, under the guise of Catholicism, rose up to destroy them, en masse. The Eves have never been forgiven for their abandonment
of the alien hegemony. Their decision sealed their fate. That the compilers of the Old Testament and the creators of the Anthrocentric, monotheistic religions propound the subservience of woman should be enough proof of whom they serve.
However, something happened that thwarted their plans for a third time. The “Sons of the Serpents” on Lemuria found out what their fathers were doing and about the newly created race that had taken their place as unwitting servants to evil. It occurred to them that such experiments were wrong and that this latest servant race was, although ignorant, part human and, therefore, “cousins” to themselves. It was decided that emissaries of the “Sons of the Serpents” would make contact with the new race.
Members of the “Sons of the Serpents” entered the “Garden” to open dialogue with their cousins in bondage and spiritual ignorance. The male Adams were not that interested in the counsel of their visitors. But the females, the Eves, were. It is said that the Eves found the newcomers comely and attractive. The visitors told those Adams and Eves who would listen that they were being kept in a state of induced ignorance and servitude, but that it was within them to become “gods” themselves, and that if they left the garden and came to Lemuria (Oceania), they would be shown all that had been hidden from them and be awakened to their true natures. Finally, because of this intercession, a great multitude of the Adamic race did follow their wise visitors to their island paradise. They were taken to Lemuria by spacecraft.
The Serpent Masters deduced that the first time round they had made a fundamental mistake. They had given their progeny the same intellectual capacities that they themselves possessed, which meant their creations also understood all about genetic science. This time, it was decided that such invaluable knowledge would be completely withheld and that the biological and cerebral centers of higher intelligence would be blocked. This would entail genetic modification. And the euphemism that has come down to us connoting this state of ignorance concerning the high sciences is “naked.” The members of this new slave race who were termed “Adamic” (meaning “from the Earth”) would be kept “naked” in the garden.
Unluckily for the “Serpent Masters,” this first-born progeny eventually began to chafe against their imposed servitude. Their human qualities and sensibilities were such that they were not only lofty of intellect, but were possessed of a moral and spiritual dimension utterly lacking in their extraterrestrial masters. As a result of this, they openly began to resist their creators whom they disliked and came to physically outnumber. It is written that these “Sons of the Serpent” would not recognize the superiority of their masters, since they lacked the exalted qualities. Finally, after an unspecified period of time, the majority of the “Sons of the Serpents” leave the “Gardens of Edinu” (Atlantis) and vacate the continent of Appalachia, relocating to the island of Oceania, later known as Lemuria, where today’s Pacific Ocean is. Here they establish a thriving civilization where they also practiced the high sciences. The sublime cultural inventions and philosophies that enrich humankind then and now originate from them.
The original pre-visitation Earth inhabitants were probably the Cro-Magnon, Engis, Homo Erectus or Neanderthals. There could have been some other race altogether, but given the suppression of data in these subjects, it is doubtful if we will ever know the truth about our Earth ancestors. Recent findings seem to indicate that both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon races were genetically interfered with and were the victims of hybridization.
More importantly, the offspring of those who had been genetically altered also continued to exist and procreate. They had within them the instincts of aggression and power mania innate to their forefathers. It is these persons who moved from the limbic and later the left-brain modality who excelled in the technological sciences and were predisposed to feeling separate, distinct from, or superior to the planet’s natural inhabitants. They were the ones who found it easy to destroy nature and to manipulate and murder their fellow human beings. Throughout historical time, we find personages rising to the top of political and cultural life who labor so assiduously for technological advance and yet who demonstrably display little love or concern for humanity.
Many of the people who left Atlantis after the overthrow were themselves genetically altered and possessed what was called “magical powers,” which awed all that were witness to them. The extraterrestrial priests who sided with the Earth-people set themselves up as kings or more likely as the advisors of the indigenous but “magically endowed” kings. The Arthurian legends speak of such beings, for instance, Merlin. In other Celtic myths, we have Taliesin, Amergin, Tuan, Breas, Balor, Diancecht, Indech, Elathan, Lugh, Nuada, Culhulainn, Ossian, Finn Mac Cumhail, and a host of others. In these and other stories, the advisor, leader, or king has pronounced strength, wisdom, clairvoyance, beauty, and long life, which are all the possible results of genetic modification.
Those ever so “lucky” persons who were chosen for hybridization by the Nephilim inherited the alien DNA and became morally corrupt. Some of these persons were sent back into their tribes as kings possessed of powerful magic and wealth. Henceforth, bloodline would be extremely important to the monarchs of the Earth. Records were kept in Atlantis of all their engineered slaves, and from then onwards, the progeny of those persons would be favored and protected. Some writers contend that after hybridization the genetically manipulated individuals had very extended lifetimes and could maintain the same form for many hundreds of years.
It is known, however, that these Neanderthals suddenly vanished from the Earth for no known reason.
It may be noted that though it is now common, it is not normal for mankind to congregate and live in cities. This is entirely artificial.
An interesting anecdote which repeats throughout the ancient records and accounts is that the beings who visited the various countries were never numerically many. The records say that they appeared in groups of three or four members. The fact that the visitors were of such a small number is suggestive that they were actually contingents of a larger mass centered elsewhere, that they were on reconnaissance missions, and that were data gatherers and ambassadors sent out to the corners of the globe.
The Nephilim established their main headquarters, Atlantis, on the continent of Appalachia. From this center they would corral and experiment on the indigenous Earth inhabitants taken from cultures and tribes that were shaken asunder by the recent celestial catastrophe.
There is a great deal of information coming out of the ancient legends that convinces this writer that the visitors, for all their intellectual acumen and technological expertise, were morally corrupt, without spiritual sensibilities of any kind. These alien, criminal renegades took their cover on Earth, met with the indigenous tribes, were considered gods, and took full advantage of the relative credulity of their hosts. Having no love for the people of Earth, they almost immediately sought to enslave them. It is our opinion that they were successful and that no one can have a real grasp of the history and progress of humankind without taking into consideration the idea of alien colonization.
We read from various sources that approximately 50,000 years ago a certain planetary body in our own solar system was mysteriously destroyed. This body has been called Tiamat, Phaeton, Lucifer, Marduk, Maldek, Rahab, and even Luna (not connected to the name later given to the moon). It was believed to have existed between Mars and Jupiter and was referred to as the “second sun” and may have been mistaken as such, because its atmosphere was resplendent with reflections of the actual sun...
Around the time of this event, the solar system, and later the Earth, was colonized by extra-terrestrial beings who were either attracted to this solar system by that conflagration or upon coming here caused the calamity themselves. Whether the disaster was natural or not, the result was that mankind on Earth experienced total and long lasting chaos and confusion. The surface of the planet Tiamat consisted mostly of great oceans. Upon its destruction, these vast saline waters entered into the Earth’s atmosphere causing the first of two massive prehistoric deluges and tribulations that mankind would experience. It is thought that the alien invaders took full advantage of this predicament and moved in to bring about colonization. They met no resistance from the disoriented and weakened inhabitants of the Earth who believed their visitors were powerful gods.
Atlantis was not a center of advanced human civilization, but was, rather, the creation of and home to alien beings that colonized the Earth.